Next Article in Journal
Nutrients in Infancy: Progress and Prospects
Previous Article in Journal
Stability of Commercially Available Macular Carotenoid Supplements in Oil and Powder Formulations
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2017, 9(10), 1128; doi:10.3390/nu9101128

Effects of an Advocacy Trial on Food Industry Salt Reduction Efforts—An Interim Process Evaluation

1
Food Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 20, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
2
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
3
Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
4
The School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London W2 1PG, UK
5
Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
6
The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 July 2017 / Revised: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 10 October 2017 / Published: 17 October 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [419 KB, uploaded 17 October 2017]   |  

Abstract

The decisions made by food companies are a potent factor shaping the nutritional quality of the food supply. A number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocate for corporate action to reduce salt levels in foods, but few data define the effectiveness of advocacy. This present report describes the process evaluation of an advocacy intervention delivered by one Australian NGO directly to food companies to reduce the salt content of processed foods. Food companies were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 22) or control (n = 23) groups. Intervention group companies were exposed to pre-planned and opportunistic communications, and control companies to background activities. Seven pre-defined interim outcome measures provided an indication of the effect of the intervention and were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. These were supplemented by qualitative data from nine semi-structured interviews. The mean number of public communications supporting healthy food made by intervention companies was 1.5 versus 1.8 for control companies (p = 0.63). Other outcomes, including the mean number of news articles, comments and reports (1.2 vs. 1.4; p = 0.72), a published nutrition policy (23% vs. 44%; p = 0.21), public commitment to the Australian government’s Food and Health Dialogue (FHD) (41% vs. 61%; p = 0.24), evidence of a salt reduction plan (23% vs. 30%; p = 0.56), and mean number of communications with the NGO (15 vs. 11; p = 0.28) were also not significantly different. Qualitative data indicated the advocacy trial had little effect. The absence of detectable effects of the advocacy intervention on the interim markers indicates there may be no impact of the NGO advocacy trial on the primary outcome of salt reduction in processed foods. View Full-Text
Keywords: advocacy; food companies; salt reduction; randomized trial advocacy; food companies; salt reduction; randomized trial
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary materials

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Trevena, H.; Petersen, K.; Thow, A.M.; Dunford, E.K.; Wu, J.H.Y.; Neal, B. Effects of an Advocacy Trial on Food Industry Salt Reduction Efforts—An Interim Process Evaluation. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1128.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top