Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Among Boston Trainee Doctors in Winter
Previous Article in Journal
Binge Eating and Weight-Related Quality of Life in Obese Adolescents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evidence of Associations Between Feto-Maternal Vitamin D Status, Cord Parathyroid Hormone and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase, and Newborn Whole Body Bone Mineral Content
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/nu4030181
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System: A Model for Understanding Human Vitamin D Requirements

by
Corwin D. Nelson
1,
Timothy A. Reinhardt
2,
John D. Lippolis
2,
Randy E. Sacco
2 and
Brian J. Nonnecke
2,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2
Ruminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA 50010, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2012, 4(3), 181-196; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181
Submission received: 1 December 2011 / Revised: 29 February 2012 / Accepted: 5 March 2012 / Published: 15 March 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The endocrine physiology of vitamin D in cattle has been rigorously investigated and has yielded information on vitamin D requirements, endocrine function in health and disease, general metabolism, and maintenance of calcium homeostasis in cattle. These results are relevant to human vitamin D endocrinology. The current debate regarding vitamin D requirements is centered on the requirements for proper intracrine and paracrine vitamin D signaling. Studies in adult and young cattle can provide valuable insight for understanding vitamin D requirements as they relate to innate and adaptive immune responses during infectious disease. In cattle, toll-like receptor recognition activates intracrine and paracrine vitamin D signaling mechanism in the immune system that regulates innate and adaptive immune responses in the presence of adequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Furthermore, experiments with mastitis in dairy cattle have provided in vivo evidence for the intracrine vitamin D signaling mechanism in macrophages as well as vitamin D mediated suppression of infection. Epidemiological evidence indicates that circulating concentrations above 32 ng/mL of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are necessary for optimal vitamin D signaling in the immune system, but experimental evidence is lacking for that value. Experiments in cattle can provide that evidence as circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations can be experimentally manipulated within ranges that are normal for humans and cattle. Additionally, young and adult cattle can be experimentally infected with bacteria and viruses associated with significant diseases in both cattle and humans. Utilizing the bovine model to further delineate the immunomodulatory role of vitamin D will provide potentially valuable insights into the vitamin D requirements of both humans and cattle, especially as they relate to immune response capacity and infectious disease resistance.

1. Introduction

The functions of vitamin D in cattle (Bos taurus) have been studied intensely over the last half-century [1,2,3,4,5]. Most research has been geared towards understanding the classical endocrine functions of vitamin D in regulating calcium homeostasis associated with the intense calcium demands linked to the onset of lactation. As a result the endocrine physiology of vitamin D in cattle is well described [1,2,3,4,5]. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) is the biologically active form of the vitamin [4]. The well-known endocrine functions of 1,25(OH)2D3 are to stimulate calcium uptake from the intestines, bones, and kidneys [4]. Vitamin D provided in the diet or produced in the skin is rapidly transported to and sequestered by the liver where it is available for conversion to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D3). 25(OH)D3 moves to the blood and is carried by vitamin D binding protein and its blood concentration is the indicator of vitamin D status. Serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations >20 ng/mL are considered by the National Research Council (NRC) to be adequate for maintenance of calcium homeostasis [6]. Cattle naturally rely on endogenous synthesis of vitamin D3 in their skin for acquisition of vitamin D [7,8], however, cattle in regions such as North America or Europe often do not receive adequate sun exposure to maintain serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations >20 ng/mL [9]. To assure that serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations range from 20–50 ng/mL, the NRC recommends an intake of 20,000 international units (IUs) of vitamin D3 per day for lactating dairy cows [6]. Dairy producers often supplement dairy cattle with up to 40,000 IUs of vitamin D3 per day because of the potential benefits of additional supplementation [10]. As consequence, dairy cattle in the upper Midwest range typically have serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations that range from 50 to 80 ng/mL [11].
Results from studies investigating the role of vitamin D signaling in the bovine immune system indicate that vitamin D signaling has important implications regarding immune function and infectious disease resistance in cattle [12,13,14,15]. The immunomodulatory effects of the vitamin D pathway in cattle are relevant for human health. The Institutes of Medicine’s recommendations for vitamin D do not consider immunity-related health outcomes of vitamin D citing insufficient experimental evidence to include them in setting vitamin D requirements for people [16]. Cattle offer a unique model to increase our understanding of immunity-related health outcomes in people, and to determine the vitamin D requirements necessary for optimal immune function. Here we review the functions of the vitamin D pathway in the bovine immune system and the applicability of the bovine model for human infectious disease and vitamin D interactions.

2. Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System

1,25(OH)2D3 is a regulator of innate and adaptive immunity in cattle [13,15,17,18,19,20,21]. Targets of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the bovine innate immune system are somewhat different than in humans, but effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on adaptive immunity are quite similar between cattle, humans, and mice (Table 1). The vitamin D-dependent immune responses in cattle are controlled through intracrine and paracrine vitamin D signaling mechanisms [13,14,15], similar to those described for human and mouse immune systems [22,23,24]. Furthermore, experiments in cattle have provided the first in vivo evidence for activation of an intracrine vitamin D signaling pathway in the immune system during a bacterial infection [14]. As shown in a study by Lippolis et al. [12], this pathway can be exploited to enhance the cow’s defense against bacterial infection, demonstrating the physiological significance of the vitamin D pathway in the immune system.
Table
Table 1. Species comparison of the effects 1,25(OH)2D3 on immunity.
Table 1. Species comparison of the effects 1,25(OH)2D3 on immunity.
Immune responseHumanMouseCow
Innate Immunity
Cathelicidin a↑ [23,25,26]→ [25,27]→ [15]
CD14↑ [28,29]NA→ [30]
Defensins b↑ [23,26,31]NA↑ [30]
iNOS↑ [32,33]↓ [34]↑ [13,15]
NOD2↑ [35]NA→ [30]
RANTES/CCL5NANA↑ [13,15]
Adaptive Immunity
T cell proliferation↓ [36]↓ [37,38]↓ [20]
IFN-γ↓ [39,40]↓ [41,42]↓ [13,17,19,21]
IL-10↑ [40,43]↑ [44]NA
IL-17A↓ [39,40]↓ [41,42,45,46]↓ [13]
IL-17FNA↓ [42]↓ [13]
a Cattle have eleven cathelicidin genes compared to one cathelicidin gene in the human and mouse; b DEF4B in humans; RNA sequencing data indicates that 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulates two defensin genes in cattle. (→), Not affected by 1,25(OH)2D3; (NA), evidence for 1,25(OH)2D3 effect is not available.

2.1. Innate Immunity

In the innate immune system of cattle, 1,25(OH)2D3 enhances nitric oxide (NO) and RANTES/CCL5 responses of monocytes activated via toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [15]. Treatment of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated monocytes with 1 and 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 increases inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and RANTES/CCL5 gene expression relative to LPS-stimulation alone. Upregulation of iNOS gene expression by 1,25(OH)2D3 is associated with greater NO production. Because effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on iNOS and RANTES gene expression in resting monocytes is modest, as is LPS treatment alone, the expression of these genes seems dependent on activation of both TLR and vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling pathways, similar to what has been described for the human innate immune response gene expression (Table 1) [31].
The biological relevance of 1,25(OH)2D3 induced upregulation of iNOS and RANTES in bovine monocytes has not been determined. Traditionally, NO produced by bovine macrophages is thought to be a component of their antimicrobial defense [47,48]. However, NO-dependent antimicrobial activity has not been demonstrated in bovine macrophages. Because NO is also an important signaling molecule in the immune system [49,50], 1,25(OH)2D3 induced up-regulation of NO production in activated bovine monocytes may enhance NO downstream signaling mechanisms. Increased production of RANTES, a potent chemokine [51], would presumably enhance recruitment of immune cells to sites of infection.
Compared to the human and mouse, some effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on innate immunity are unique to cattle. iNOS is moderately upregulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and the promyelocytic HL-60 cell line [32,33]; however, anti-bacterial activity controlled by the vitamin D pathway in human macrophages is independent of NO production [23,48]. In mice, 1,25(OH)2D3 actually decreases iNOS gene expression [34]. Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on RANTES gene expression in mice or humans have not been reported. In humans, cathelicidin, defensin β4 (DEFB4), NOD2, and CD14 are upregulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 [25,26,35]. There are 11 cathelicidin genes and over 100 defensin genes in cattle [52]. Expression of three cathelicidin genes (CATH4, CATH5, and CATH6) with potential vitamin D-responsive elements (VDREs) are unresponsive to 1,25(OH)2D3 [15]. This is not surprising given that the functional VDRE in the cathelicidin promoter is unique to primates [27]. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D3 does not upregulate CD14 and NOD2 gene expression in bovine monocytes [30]. Therefore, effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on bovine innate immunity differ from those in humans with regard to the regulation of cathelicidin, CD14, and NOD2 genes. Responsiveness of >100 bovine defensin genes to 1,25(OH)2D3 is currently being investigated and it appears that two bovine defensins are induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 [30]. Induction of an antimicrobial mechanism via the vitamin D pathway occurs in cattle as in humans with the exception of upregulation of cathelicidin.

2.2. Adaptive Immunity

Results from recent studies evaluating the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on adaptive immune responses in cattle, indicate that 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibits the pro-inflammatory interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-17 responses of antigen-specific T cells in culture [13,21] (Table 1). Ex vivo treatment of antigen- or mitogen-stimulated PBMC from Mycobacterium bovis, strain bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG)-sensitized steers with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 decreases IFN-γ production approximately 3-fold [13,17,21]. Similarly, IL-17F gene expression in antigen-stimulated PBMC cultures is decreased by half when the PBMC are treated with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3 [13]. The IL-17A response is also inhibited, but to a lesser extent [13]. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D3 is a potent inhibitor of antigen-induced proliferation of CD4+ and γδTCR+ T cells in cattle [20]. CD4+ Th1 and Th17 cells secrete IFN-γ and the IL-17 cytokines, respectively [53]. γδTCR+ T cells, representing a significant proportion of the T cell population in cattle [54], also secrete IFN-γ and IL-17 [55,56,57]. Thus, the anti-proliferative effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on CD4+ and γδTCR+ T cells are likely responsible for the observed decrease in IFN-γ and IL-17 responses by antigen-stimulated PBMC.
Similar effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 have been observed with human and mouse T cells. Treatment of human and mouse CD4+ T cells with 1,25(OH)2D3 decreases the percentage of Th1 and Th17 cells, and consequently the production of IFN-γ and IL-17A in culture [39,40,42,45,46]. Several mouse models of Th1 and Th17-driven autoimmune disease are prevented with 1,25(OH)2D3 [41,58,59,60], and in the 1,25(OH)2D3-treated mice the Th1 and Th17 responses are diminished relative to the placebo treated mice [41,42,43,44,45,46]. The link between serum 25(OH)D3 and autoimmune disease risk in people is attributed to these anti-inflammatory actions of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the immune system [61,62]. How the inhibitory properties of the vitamin D pathway affect T cell-mediated immunity against pathogens in vivo; however, has not been determined. Because the magnitude of Th1 and Th17 responses correlates with protection against Mycobacteria bovis infections in cattle [63,64], attenuation of Th1 and Th17 responses by 1,25(OH)2D3 may not be beneficial in this context. However, recent work indicates that Th1-mediated immunity to M. tuberculosis depends on the vitamin D pathway in macrophages [65]. Further studies are needed to characterize further the effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on adaptive immunity in cattle.

2.3. 1,25(OH)2D3 Synthesis in the Immune System

Research indicates that the 1,25(OH)2D3 needed to regulate innate and adaptive immune responses mentioned above is synthesized by activated immune cells. The first evidence of extra-renal 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesis was shown over two decades ago when pulmonary macrophages from sarcoidosis patients were shown to synthesize 1,25(OH)2D3 [66]. CYP27B1 gene expression in human macrophages, dendritic cells, and keratinocytes is induced by TLR recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns [22,23,24,67]. The enzymatic activity of CYP27B1 catalyzes the conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3. 1,25(OH)2D3 produced in human macrophages acts in an intracrine manner to induce cathelicidin and DEFB4 transcription. Similarly, bovine monocytes express CYP27B1 mRNA in response to stimulation with LPS, synthetic tri-palmitoylated lipopetide Pam3CSK4, and peptidoglycan [15]. The response of CYP27B1 mRNA in bovine monocytes is strong, increasing >40-fold in response to 100 ng/mL LPS, promoting the conversion of 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3. As a result, concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesized by CYP27B1 are sufficient to activate monocyte VDR when 25(OH)D33 is available. This was demonstrated in LPS-stimulated monocytes treated with 0–100 ng/mL 25(OH)D3. iNOS and RANTES responses of activated monocytes were minimal without added 25(OH)D3, but increased linearly with the concentration of 25(OH)D3 [15]. The increase in NO is also increased similarly. The effect of 25(OH)D3 on the monocytes was shown subsequently to depend on CYP27B1 activity, as addition of ketoconazole, a CYP27B1 inhibitor [68], blocked the effects of 25(OH)D3 treatment.
Induction of CYP24A1 mRNA is inhibited in LPS stimulated bovine monocytes [15]. CYP24A1 catalyzes inactivation of 1,25(OH)2D3 and its induction by 1,25(OH)2D3 normally serves to limit the concentration of 1,25(OH)2D3 [1]. LPS mediated inhibition of CYP24A1 expression in activated monocytes presumably facilitates accumulation of 1,25(OH)2D3 in activated monocytes and thus is a key regulator of 1,25(OH)2D3 action in immune cells.
B cells are another source of 1,25(OH)2D3 in the bovine immune system. CYP27B1 gene expression is upregulated in IgM+ cells nearly 40-fold in antigen-stimulated PBMC cultures, relative to expression in resting (i.e., nonstimulated) PBMC cultures [13]. In comparison, CYP27B1 expression in monocytes is upregulated 125-fold relative to resting PBMCs [13]. Given the higher proportion of B cells relative to monocytes in PBMC cultures, these data suggest B cells are a significant source of 1,25(OH)2D3. B cell iNOS and RANTES gene expression also increases when 25(OH)D3 is added to the PBMC cultures [13]; suggesting an intracrine vitamin D signaling mechanism in B cells. CYP27B1 also is upregulated in human B cells in response to B cell receptor/CD40 and TLR9 stimulation [43,69], and 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulates IL-10 in activated human B cells [43]. In contrast to activated monocytes and B cells in cattle, activated T cells do not manifest increased CYP27B1 expression [13]. Although CYP27B1 expression is not upregulated in T cells, IFN-γ and IL-17 responses of T cells were inhibited when 25(OH)D3 was added to cultures [13]. These results suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesis in monocytes and B cells regulates T cell responses in a paracrine manner. A similar mechanism has been proposed for control of human and mouse T cells [22,70].
Local control of vitamin D signaling in response to bacterial infection in cattle is evident in vivo. CYP27B1 gene expression is highly upregulated in mammary tissue infected with Streptococcus uberis relative to healthy tissue [14]. CYP27B1 is upregulated in the CD14+ cells (monocytes/macrophages) in secretions from infected mammary glands when compared to CD14+ cells from healthy glands or peripheral blood [14]. CD14− cells from the infected gland; consisting mostly of neutrophils and a few lymphocytes [71], did not show upregulation of CYP27B1. Upregulation of CYP27B1 is associated with increased 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesis and activation of the VDR in infected mammary glands as was demonstrated by upregulation of CYP24A1 gene expression in infected mammary tissue. CYP24A1 is not upregulated in CD14+ cells in infected glands, supporting the observation that 1,25(OH)2D3 induced upregulation of CYP24A1 is inhibited in activated monocytes [15]. CYP24A1 is upregulated in CD14− cells, even though CYP27B1 is not; suggesting that 1,25(OH)2D3 from CD14+ cells promotes VDR expression in CD14− cells. Although much of the tissue CYP24A1 is likely in mammary epithelial cells, the contribution of these cells to CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 expression in tissue was not evaluated. Mammary epithelial cells may be another source of CYP27B1 in the mammary gland given they express CYP27B1 and synthesize 1,25(OH)2D3 [72,73]. Both iNOS and RANTES are up-regulated in tissue and CD14+ cells from infected glands [14], but whether their expression is dependent solely on 1,25(OH)2D3 synthesis in infected glands is uncertain. Regardless, increased expression of CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 in infected mammary glands provides strong in vivo evidence for local control of vitamin D signaling during the innate response to bacterial infection.
The physiological significance of vitamin D signaling in host defense has been demonstrated recently in cattle [12]. It was hypothesized that intra-mammary infusion of 25(OH)D3 would be an effective treatment for mastitis in dairy cattle because the vitamin D signaling pathway is present in mammary glands during mastitis [14] and 25(OH)D3 concentrations in mammary secretions are low (<1 ng/mL) relative to serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations (>50 ng/mL) [74,75]. To test this hypothesis, dairy cattle with experimentally-induced, bacterial mastitis were infused intra-mammary with 25(OH)D3 (100 μg in fetal bovine serum) or a placebo (fetal bovine serum) daily [12]. Cows receiving 25(OH)D3 had significantly lower bacterial counts, reduced numbers of leukocytes in mammary secretions from infected glands, and lower body temperatures than control cows demonstrating that 25(OH)D3 can limit the severity of bacterial-induced mastitis. No changes were observed in serum 25(OH)D or 1,25(OH)2D, suggesting that endocrine system did not have a role in the effects of 25(OH)D3 on the infection. 25(OH)D3 may have acted directly through the VDR in the infected mammary gland; however, the observed induction of CYP27B1 gene expression in the infected mammary gland suggests that 25(OH)D3 was likely converted to 1,25(OH)2D3 to elicit the observed effects. Although treatment with 25(OH)D3 did not eliminate the infection, a significant beneficial effect of the vitamin D signaling pathway on the innate immune system was demonstrated.

2.4.Vitamin D Requirements of the Immune System

The vitamin D signaling pathway is clearly present in the immune system in humans and cattle alike [13,14,15,22,23], and as shown in cattle, that pathway has clear physiological implications in host defense [12]. So what serum 25(OH)D3 concentration range promotes optimal immune function, or for that matter, overall health in general? Is immune function suppressed by unnaturally high serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations? As discussed later in this review, data suggests that sustained high serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations (>100 ng/mL) during the neonatal period may alter gene and protein expression associated with development of adaptive immune responses in calves vaccinated at an early age [76] and their subsequent response to experimental challenge with bovine respiratory syncytial virus [77].
Questions regarding the range in 25(OH)D3 concentrations that represents optimal vitamin D status persist with considerable debate regarding vitamin D requirements for both humans [78] as well as young and adult cattle. The best indication of what serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations promote optimal health are likely represented by levels achieved in a natural setting that provides abundant exposure of the skin to sunlight. For cattle and humans, these concentrations likely lie somewhere between 30 and 100 ng/mL [79,80]. Epidemiological evidence from the human population suggests this may be the case as the prevalence of upper respiratory tract infection, influenza A, tuberculosis and several autoimmune diseases are inversely correlated with vitamin D status [81,82,83,84,85,86]. These findings support the contention that serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations >30 ng/mL are needed to support optimal immune function in humans [62,78,87,88]. Given the similarities between humans and cattle regarding vitamin D physiology, the same is likely true for cattle.
In the endocrine system, the rate that 1,25(OH)2D3 appears in the circulation is dependent on CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 expression in the kidneys, and 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations in the circulation [1]. CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 are tightly regulated in the kidneys by endocrine factors (e.g., PTH, 1,25(OH)2D3) to assure 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations necessary for Ca and P homeostasis are maintained [89]. In the intracrine vitamin D signaling mechanism of the macrophage, the rate of appearance of 1,25(OH)2D3 appears to be associated with the expression of CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 and 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations in the macrophage. Furthermore, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 are regulated by immune stimuli (e.g., TLR ligands, IFN-γ) [15,23,65,67] and unlike the endocrine system, their expression is not adjusted further to achieve 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations necessary for optimal macrophage function. Therefore, diffusion of 1,25(OH)2D3 from the cell over time becomes critical and necessary for an optimal response. For this reason, serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations of 20–30 ng/mL that support the classic endocrine function of vitamin D may be too low to support optimal immune function yet sufficient for bone and calcium homeostasis. Consequently, when recommending vitamin D requirements for optimal health in humans and cattle it is essential that the intracrine vitamin D signaling mechanisms be considered as well as the endocrine effects.
Because approaches promoting optimal immune function in cattle reduce reliance on antimicrobials, improve the health and productivity of cattle, and as a consequence food safety, the potentially beneficial immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D in bovine warrant continued investigation. Furthermore, cattle provide a valuable model for estimating the vitamin D requirements of the human immune system. A concern of the mouse model is that the vitamin D requirements of the mouse differ from those of humans and cattle. This difference is likely because mice are nocturnal and do not rely on endogenous synthesis of vitamin D3 in the skin to assure vitamin D adequacy. In contrast, vitamin D physiology and the functions of the vitamin D pathway in modulating the immune response capacity of humans and cattle are quite similar, with the exception of some genes regulated by the vitamin D pathway in macrophages. Recognizing these differences, cattle still offer an advantage in that they can be experimentally infected with viral and bacterial pathogens and their serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations (i.e., vitamin D status) can be experimentally manipulated to correspond to ranges considered relevant to human health. As demonstrated recently, the ability to experimentally infect cattle has proven to be a valuable approach for increasing our understanding of the physiological significance of the vitamin D pathway in host defense [54]. Also, serum 25(OH)D3 concentration, reflective of vitamin D status, can be experimentally controlled to mimic vitamin status ranging from deficiency to the point of toxicity [74,90,91,92]. For obvious ethical reasons, manipulation of vitamin D status to represent deficiency or toxicity is not possible in humans. The ability to investigate the entire range in the bovine model provides an opportunity to determine the range of serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations promoting optimal immune function.

2.5. Preruminant Calf as a Model for Investigating the Effects of Vitamin D in the Neonate

When considering the applicability of the bovine model for the study of the effects of vitamin D, the preruminant calf offers a particularly valuable approach for examining the effects of extremes in vitamin D status on the growth, immune function, and health of the neonate, including the human infant. Unlike studies in human infant, those in the neonatal calf offer several benefits including the establishment of extremes in vitamin D status, the opportunity to examine for an extended period the effects of vitamin D status on, not only mineral metabolism and growth performance, but also immune responses elicited early vaccination and disease severity and duration associated with experimentally-induced viral and/or bacterial infections.
Serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations in the newborn calf can be manipulated in a predictable fashion by subcutaneous administration of 25(OH)D3 [92] or by altering the amount of vitamin D in the diet. Using the former approach, it was possible to maintain for several weeks calves with low vitamin D status (mean serum 25(OH)D3 <30 ng/mL) or high-normal status (mean serum 25(OH)D3 >60 ng/mL). These results were the first to demonstrate that it is possible to control predictably vitamin D status during the neonatal period and to suggest that the young calf may be a useful model for studying effects of vitamin D on growth, development, and immune function in the neonate. Results from a more recent study [76] suggest that vitamin D status of preruminant calves can also be manipulated by feeding custom-formulated milk replacers supplemented with varying amounts of vitamin D3. Because calves in these studies received colostrum at birth and were subsequently fed milk replacers with defined composition, it was possible to establish groups of calves representing deficiency (25(OH)D3 <25 ng /mL of serum), normal status (25–100 ng/mL of serum) and high vitamin D status (>100 ng/mL) status. All calves were vaccinated with BCG at approximately 7 day of age when differences in vitamin D status were established. Examination of ex vivo antigen-induced recall responses of PBMC collected at 56 day of age indicated that vitamin D status influences antigen (i.e., M. bovis derived purified protein derivative) induced IL-4, RANTES, IL-17A, and IL-17F gene expression as well as the number of IFN-γ secreting cells. Interestingly, these responses by low and high status calves were comparable and differed from responses of calves with serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations within the normal range. Although preliminary, results suggest that the vitamin D status during the neonatal period influences aspects of the adaptive immune response associated with the development of protective immunity induced by early vaccination. New studies are necessary to determine if these vitamin D status-dependent effects are unique to the BCG sensitization/PPDb recall system. Additionally, the calf model provides the opportunity to evaluate the effects of vitamin D status on disease development elicited by experimental challenge with virulent strains of M. bovis. In young calves, lung pathology elicited by experimental infection with M. bovis resembles that of the human more so than that of the mouse [93,94].
As noted above, the calf model has considerable potential for studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D status on disease development in the neonate. Experimental RSV infection in calves resembles RSV infection in infants, having similar microscopic lung lesion, including a prominent neutrophils infiltrate, and comparable immune pathology [95,96]. Recent research [77] evaluated the effects of vitamin D status on the response of preruminant calf to experimental infection with RSV. During the first 10 wk postpartum, calves were fed milk replacers with differing amounts of vitamin D3 resulting in two treatment groups representing low (25(OH)D3 <25 ng/mL) and high vitamin D status (25(OH)D3 >100 ng/mL). At 70 day of age, calves in both groups were aerosol-challenged with RSV and necropsied 7 days later. Disease development, based on gross and microscopic lesions in the lung, was similar in both groups; however, it was observed that cytokines often found to be suppressed by the vitamin D pathway in vitro are either increased significantly (IL-12p40) or unaffected (IFN-γ) in the lungs of RSV infected, high vitamin D status calves. Furthermore, expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-8 (CXCL8) was enhanced (P = 0.10) in calves with high plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations. These results suggest that vitamin D status modulates inflammatory cytokine gene expression in the virus-infected lung of the calf. Failure to observe effects of vitamin D status on lung pathology may be because the study was terminated at the peak of disease response. Future studies will address the effects of vitamin D status on duration and recovery following experimental infection of the lung.
Infection models in newborn calves offer an opportunity to study the effects of vitamin D status on host responses to bacterial and viral pathogens that are relevant to human health. New studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D status on immune function and disease severity/duration in the pre-ruminant calf will provide important information necessary for establishing the vitamin D requirements of the immune system of the newborn.

3. Conclusion

Cattle offer a valuable model for understanding vitamin D requirements for optimal health in humans. Cattle, like humans, rely on endogenous synthesis of vitamin D3 in their skin for acquisition of vitamin D, and the endocrine physiology of vitamin D is quite similar between cattle and humans. In addition, many naturally occurring pathogens in cattle are similar to those affecting humans (e.g., TB, RSV, mycoplasma) and thus, the bovine model is useful for investigating the effects vitamin D on the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. Recent observations indicate that the vitamin D pathway influences innate and adaptive immune responses in cattle as it does in humans. Research examining the effects of vitamin D on the severity of experimentally induced mastitis in dairy cattle has provided in vivo evidence for an intracrine mechanism of vitamin D signaling pathway in macrophages, and has demonstrated the potential for vitamin D to reduce the severity of bacterial infection of the bovine mammary gland. Research also suggests that experimentally induced alterations in the vitamin D status of the preruminant calf influence cytokine gene and protein expression associated with the adaptive (i.e., antigen-specific) immune response as well as its response to an aerosol challenge with BRSV.
Given the fundamental differences between intracrine vitamin D signaling within the immune system and the classical endocrine role of vitamin D, it is clear that the vitamin D requirements of the bovine and human immune systems warrant further investigation. The bovine model offers an experimental approach for investigating the influence of vitamin D on immune system and infectious disease response, thus providing insight into the role of vitamin D in promoting health in humans as well as cattle.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product to the exclusion of the other that may also be suitable.

References

  1. Horst, R.L.; Goff, J.P.; Reinhardt, T.A. Calcium and vitamin D metabolism in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 1936–1951. [Google Scholar]
  2. Horst, R.L.; Goff, J.P.; Reinhardt, T.A. Calcium and vitamin D metabolism during lactation. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 1997, 2, 253–263. [Google Scholar]
  3. Horst, R.L.; Goff, J.P.; Reinhardt, T.A. Role of vitamin D in calcium homeostasis and its use in prevention of bovine periparturient paresis. Acta Vet. Scand. Suppl. 2003, 97, 35–50. [Google Scholar]
  4. Horst, R.L.; Goff, J.P.; Reinhardt, T.A. Adapting to the transition between gestation and lactation: Differences between rat, human and dairy cow. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2005, 10, 141–156. [Google Scholar]
  5. Horst, R.L.; Reinhardt, T.A. Vitamin D metabolism in ruminants and its relevance to the periparturient cow. J. Dairy Sci. 1983, 66, 661–678. [Google Scholar]
  6. NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition; National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  7. Hidiroglou, M.; Williams, C.J.; Proulx, J.G. Plasma vitamin D3 response in cattle and sheep exposed to ultraviolet radiation. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1985, 55, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hymoller, L.; Jensen, S.K. Vitamin D3 synthesis in the entire skin surface of dairy cows despite hair coverage. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 2025–2029. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hymoller, L.; Jensen, S.K.; Lindqvist, H.; Johansson, B.; Nielsen, M.O.; Nadeau, E. Supplementing dairy steers and organically managed dairy cows with synthetic vitamin D3 is unnecessary at pasture during exposure to summer sunlight. J. Dairy Res. 2009, 76, 372–378. [Google Scholar]
  10. Weiss, W.P. Requirements of fat-soluble vitamins for dairy cows: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 2493–2501. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lippolis, J.D.; Reinhardt, T.A. 2012; Ruminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, USA. Unpublished work.
  12. Lippolis, J.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Sacco, R.A.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Nelson, C.D. Treatment of an intramammary bacterial infection with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. PLoS One 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nelson, C.D.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Waters, W.R.; Beitz, D.C.; Lippolis, J.D. Regulation of Mycobacterium-specific mononuclear cell responses by 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. PLoS One 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nelson, C.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Beitz, D.C.; Lippolis, J.D. In vivo activation of the intracrine vitamin D pathway in innate immune cells and mammary tissue during a bacterial infection. PLoS One 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nelson, C.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Thacker, T.C.; Beitz, D.C.; Lippolis, J.D. Modulation of the bovine innate immune response by production of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in bovine monocytes. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D; Ross, A.C.; Taylor, C.L.; Yaktine, A.L.; del Valle, H.B. (Eds.) The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  17. Ametaj, B.N.; Beitz, D.C.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Nonnecke, B.J. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits secretion of interferon-gamma by mitogen- and antigen-stimulated bovine mononuclear leukocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 52, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nonnecke, B.J.; Franklin, S.T.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Horst, R.L. In vitro modulation of proliferation and phenotype of resting and mitogen-stimulated bovine mononuclear leukocytes by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1993, 38, 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nonnecke, B.J.; Waters, W.R.; Foote, M.R.; Horst, R.L.; Fowler, M.A.; Miller, B.L. In vitro effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion by blood leukocytes from young and adult cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2003, 73, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  20. Waters, W.R.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Foote, M.R.; Maue, A.C.; Rahner, T.E.; Palmer, M.V.; Whipple, D.L.; Horst, R.L.; Estes, D.M. Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccination of cattle: Activation of bovine CD4+ and gamma delta TCR+ cells and modulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 2003, 83, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Waters, W.R.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Rahner, T.E.; Palmer, M.V.; Whipple, D.L.; Horst, R.L. Modulation of Mycobacterium bovis-specific responses of bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2001, 8, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hewison, M. Vitamin D and the intracrinology of innate immunity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 321, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, P.T.; Stenger, S.; Li, H.; Wenzel, L.; Tan, B.H.; Krutzik, S.R.; Ochoa, M.T.; Schauber, J.; Wu, K.; Meinken, C.; et al. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 2006, 311, 1770–1773. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stoffels, K.; Overbergh, L.; Bouillon, R.; Mathieu, C. Immune regulation of 1alpha-hydroxylase in murine peritoneal macrophages: Unravelling the IFNgamma pathway. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 103, 567–571. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gombart, A.F.; Borregaard, N.; Koeffler, H.P. Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, T.T.; Nestel, F.P.; Bourdeau, V.; Naga, i.Y.; Wang, Q.; Liao, J.; Tavera-Mendoza, L.; Lin, R.; Hanrahan, J.W.; Mader, S.; et al. Cutting edge: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is a direct inducer of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 2909–2912. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gombart, A.F.; Saito, T.; Koeffler, H.P. Exapation of an ancient Alu short interspersed element provides a highly conserved vitamin D-mediated innate immune response in humans and primates. BMC Genomics 2009, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schauber, J.; Dorschner, R.A.; Coda, A.B.; Buchau, A.S.; Liu, P.T.; Kiken, D.; Helfrich, Y.R.; Kang, S.; Elalieh, H.Z.; Steinmeyer, A.; et al. Injury enhances TLR2 function and antimicrobial peptide expression through a vitamin D-dependent mechanism. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 803–811. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, T.T.; Tavera-Mendoza, L.E.; Laperriere, D.; Libby, E.; MacLeod, N.B.; Nagai, Y.; Bourdeau, V.; Konstorum, A.; Lallemant, B.; Zhang, R.; et al. Large-scale in silico and microarray-based identification of direct 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target genes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005, 19, 2685–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nelson, C.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Lippolis, J.D. 2012; Ruminant Diseases of Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, USA. Unpublished work.
  31. Liu, P.T.; Schenk, M.; Walker, V.P.; Dempsey, P.W.; Kanchanapoomi, M.; Wheelwright, M.; Vazirnia, A.; Zhang, X.; Steinmeyer, A.; Zugel, U.; et al. Convergence of IL-1beta and VDR activation pathways in human TLR2/1-induced antimicrobial responses. PLoS One 2009, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martineau, A.R.; Wilkinson, K.A.; Newton, S.M.; Floto, R.A.; Norman, A.W.; Skolimowska, K.; Davidson, R.N.; Sorensen, O.E.; Kampmann, B.; Griffiths, C.J.; et al. IFN-gamma- and TNF-independent vitamin D-inducible human suppression of mycobacteria: The role of cathelicidin LL-37. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 7190–7198. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rockett, K.A.; Brookes, R.; Udalova, I.; Vidal, V.; Hill, A.V.; Kwiatkowski, D. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces nitric oxide synthase and suppresses growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a human macrophage-like cell line. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5314–5321. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang, J.M.; Kuo, M.C.; Kuo, H.T.; Hwang, S.J.; Tsai, J.C.; Chen, H.C.; Lai, Y.H. 1-alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulates inducible nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA expression and nitric oxide release in macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2004, 143, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang, T.T.; Dabbas, B.; Laperriere, D.; Bitton, A.J.; Soualhine, H.; Tavera-Mendoza, L.E.; Dionne, S.; Servant, M.J.; Bitton, A.; Seidman, E.G.; et al. Direct and indirect induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of the NOD2/CARD15-defensin beta2 innate immune pathway defective in Crohn disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 2227–2231. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lemire, J.M.; Adams, J.S.; Sakai, R.; Jordan, S.C. 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 suppresses proliferation and immunoglobulin production by normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1984, 74, 657–661. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bhalla, A.K.; Amento, E.P.; Serog, B.; Glimcher, L.H. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits antigen-induced T cell activation. J. Immunol. 1984, 133, 1748–1754. [Google Scholar]
  38. Koizumi, T.; Nakao, Y.; Matsui, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Katakami, Y.; Fujita, T. Effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on cytokine-induced thymocyte proliferation. Cell. Immunol. 1985, 96, 455–461. [Google Scholar]
  39. Baeke, F.; Korf, H.; Overbergh, L.; van Etten, E.; Verstuyf, A.; Gysemans, C.; Mathieu, C. Human T lymphocytes are direct targets of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the immune system. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 121, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jeffery, L.E.; Burke, F.; Mura, M.; Zheng, Y.; Qureshi, O.S.; Hewison, M.; Walker, L.S.; Lammas, D.A.; Raza, K.; Sansom, D.M. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and IL-2 combine to inhibit T cell production of inflammatory cytokines and promote development of regulatory T cells expressing CTLA-4 and FoxP3. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 5458–5467. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tang, J.; Zhou, R.; Luger, D.; Zhu, W.; Silver, P.B.; Grajewski, R.S.; Su, S.B.; Chan, C.C.; Adorini, L.; Caspi, R.R. Calcitriol suppresses antiretinal autoimmunity through inhibitory effects on the Th17 effector response. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4624–4632. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chang, S.H.; Chung, Y.; Dong, C. Vitamin D suppresses Th17 cytokine production by inducing C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 38751–38755. [Google Scholar]
  43. Heine, G.; Niesner, U.; Chang, H.D.; Steinmeyer, A.; Zugel, U.; Zuberbier, T.; Radbruch, A.; Worm, M. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 promotes IL-10 production in human B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 2210–2218. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gambhir, V.; Kim, J.; Siddiqui, S.; Taylor, M.; Byford, V.; Petrof, E.O.; Jones, G.; Basta, S. Influence of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 on TLR4-induced activation of antigen presenting cells is dependent on the order of receptor engagement. Immunobiology 2011, 216, 988–996. [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer, M.T.; Lee, Y.K.; Maynard, C.L.; Oliver, J.R.; Bikle, D.D.; Jetten, A.M.; Weaver, C.T. Lineage-specific effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the development of effector CD4 T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 997–1004. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chang, J.H.; Cha, H.R.; Lee, D.S.; Seo, K.Y.; Kweon, M.N. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits the differentiation and migration of T(H)17 cells to protect against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PLoS One 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Waters, W.R.; Palmer, M.V.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Whipple, D.L.; Horst, R.L. Mycobacterium bovis infection of vitamin D-deficient NOS2−/− mice. Microb. Pathog. 2004, 36, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thoma-Uszynski, S.; Stenger, S.; Takeuchi, O.; Ochoa, M.T.; Engele, M.; Sieling, P.A.; Barnes, P.F.; Rollinghoff, M.; Bolcskei, P.L.; Wagner, M.; et al. Induction of direct antimicrobial activity through mammalian toll-like receptors. Science 2001, 291, 1544–1547. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bogdan, C. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 907–916. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lacasse, P.; Farr, V.C.; Davis, S.R.; Prosser, C.G. Local secretion of nitric oxide and the control of mammary blood flow. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 1369–1374. [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy, J.A. The unexpected pleiotropic activities of RANTES. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 3945–3946. [Google Scholar]
  52. Elsik, C.G.; Tellam, R.L.; Worley, K.C.; Gibbs, R.A.; Muzny, D.M.; Weinstock, G.M.; Adelson, D.L.; Eichler, E.E.; Elnitski, L.; Guigo, R.; et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: A window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 2009, 324, 522–528. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bettelli, E.; Korn, T.; Kuchroo, V.K. Th17: The third member of the effector T cell trilogy. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 652–657. [Google Scholar]
  54. Plattner, B.L.; Hostetter, J.M. Comparative gamma delta T cell immunology: A focus on mycobacterial disease in cattle. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, 2011, 214384. [Google Scholar]
  55. Baldwin, C.L.; Sathiyaseelan, T.; Naiman, B.; White, A.M.; Brown, R.; Blumerman, S.; Rogers, A.; Black, S.J. Activation of bovine peripheral blood gammadelta T cells for cell division and IFN-gamma production. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002, 87, 251–259. [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin, B.; Hirota, K.; Cua, D.J.; Stockinger, B.; Veldhoen, M. Interleukin-17-producing gammadelta T cells selectively expand in response to pathogen products and environmental signals. Immunity 2009, 31, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  57. O’Brien, R.L.; Roark, C.L.; Born, W.K. IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 662–666. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cantorna, M.T.; Hayes, C.E.; DeLuca, H.F. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 reversibly blocks the progression of relapsing encephalomyelitis, a model of multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7861–7864. [Google Scholar]
  59. Cantorna, M.T.; Hayes, C.E.; DeLuca, H.F. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol inhibits the progression of arthritis in murine models of human arthritis. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cantorna, M.T.; Munsick, C.; Bemiss, C.; Mahon, B.D. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol prevents and ameliorates symptoms of experimental murine inflammatory bowel disease. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2648–2652. [Google Scholar]
  61. Cantorna, M.T. Mechanisms underlying the effect of vitamin D on the immune system. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 286–289. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hayes, C.E.; Nashold, F.E.; Mayne, C.G.; Spanier, J.A.; Nelson, C.D. Vitamin D and Multiple Sclerosis. In Vitamin D, 3rd; Feldman, D., Pike, J.W., Adams, J.S., Eds.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  63. Vordermeier, H.M.; Chambers, M.A.; Cockle, P.J.; Whelan, A.O.; Simmons, J.; Hewinson, R.G. Correlation of ESAT-6-specific gamma interferon production with pathology in cattle following Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination against experimental bovine tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 3026–3032. [Google Scholar]
  64. Vordermeier, H.M.; Villarreal-Ramos, B.; Cockle, P.J.; McAulay, M.; Rhodes, S.G.; Thacker, T.; Gilbert, S.C.; McShane, H.; Hill, A.V.; Xing, Z.; et al. Viral booster vaccines improve Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced protection against bovine tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 3364–3373. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fabri, M.; Stenger, S.; Shin, D.M.; Yuk, J.M.; Liu, P.T.; Realegeno, S.; Lee, H.M.; Krutzik, S.R.; Schenk, M.; Sieling, P.A.; et al. Vitamin D is required for IFN-γ-mediated antimicrobial activity of human macrophages. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Adams, J.S.; Sharma, O.P.; Gacad, M.A.; Singer, F.R. Metabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by cultured pulmonary alveolar macrophages in sarcoidosis. J. Clin. Invest. 1983, 72, 1856–1860. [Google Scholar]
  67. Stoffels, K.; Overbergh, L.; Giulietti, A.; Verlinden, L.; Bouillon, R.; Mathieu, C. Immune regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3-1α-hydroxylase in human monocytes. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  68. Schuster, I.; Egger, H.; Bikle, D.; Herzig, G.; Reddy, G.S.; Stuetz, A.; Stuetz, P.; Vorisek, G. Selective inhibition of vitamin D hydroxylases in human keratinocytes. Steroids 2001, 66, 409–422. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen, S.; Sims, G.P.; Chen, X.X.; Gu, Y.Y.; Lipsky, P.E. Modulatory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human B cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 1634–1647. [Google Scholar]
  70. Enioutina, E.Y.; Bareyan, D.; Daynes, R.A. TLR-induced local metabolism of vitamin D3 plays an important role in the diversification of adaptive immune responses. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4296–4305. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rainard, P.; Riollet, C. Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Vet. Res. 2006, 37, 369–400. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kemmis, C.M.; Salvador, S.M.; Smith, K.M.; Welsh, J. Human mammary epithelial cells express CYP27B1 and are growth inhibited by 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-3, the major circulating form of vitamin D-3. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 887–892. [Google Scholar]
  73. Rowling, M.J.; Kemmis, C.M.; Taffany, D.A.; Welsh, J. Megalin-mediated endocytosis of vitamin D binding protein correlates with 25-hydroxycholecalciferol actions in human mammary cells. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 2754–2759. [Google Scholar]
  74. McDermott, C.M.; Beitz, D.C.; Littledike, E.T.; Horst, R.L. Effects of dietary vitamin D3 on concentrations of vitamin D and its metabolites in blood plasma and milk of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1985, 68, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hollis, B.W.; Roos, B.A.; Draper, H.H.; Lambert, P.W. Vitamin D and its metabolites in human and bovine milk. J. Nutr. 1981, 111, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar]
  76. Nonnecke, B.J.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Sacco, R.E.; Waters, W.R. 2012; Ruminant Diseases of Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, USA. Unpublished work.
  77. Sacco, R.E.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Palmer, M.V.; Waters, W.R.; Lippolis, J.D.; Reinhardt, T.A. Differential expression of cytokines in response to respiratory syncytial virus infection of calves with high or low circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. PLoS One 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vieth, R. Why the minimum desirable serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level should be 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL). Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 25, 681–691. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hollis, B.W. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: Implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wagner, C.L.; Taylor, S.N.; Hollis, B.W. Does vitamin D make the world go “round”? Breastfeed. Med. 2008, 3, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Burton, J.M.; Kimball, S.; Vieth, R.; Bar-Or, A.; Dosch, H.M.; Cheung, R.; Gagne, D.; D’Souza, C.; Ursell, M.; O’Connor, P. A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010, 74, 1852–1859. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ginde, A.A.; Mansbach, J.M.; Camargo, C.A., Jr. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 384–390. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ginde, A.A.; Mansbach, J.M.; Camargo, C.A., Jr. Vitamin D, respiratory infections, and asth. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009, 9, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  84. Smolders, J.; Menheere, P.; Kessels, A.; Damoiseaux, J.; Hupperts, R. Association of vitamin D metabolite levels with relapse rate and disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2008, 14, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar]
  85. Urashima, M.; Segawa, T.; Okazaki, M.; Kurihara, M.; Wada, Y.; Ida, H. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martineau, A.R.; Nhamoyebonde, S.; Oni, T.; Rangaka, M.X.; Marais, S.; Bangani, N.; Tsekela, R.; Bashe, L.; de Azevedo, V.; Caldwell, J.; et al. Reciprocal seasonal variation in vitamin D status and tuberculosis notifications in Cape Town, South Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Adams, J.S.; Hewison, M. Update in vitamin D. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 471–478. [Google Scholar]
  88. Heaney, R.P.; Holick, M.F. Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2011, 26, 455–457. [Google Scholar]
  89. Engstrom, G.W.; Goff, J.P.; Horst, R.L.; Reinhardt, T.A. Regulation of calf renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D-hydroxylase activities by calcium-regulating hormones. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70, 2266–2271. [Google Scholar]
  90. Littledike, E.T.; Horst, R.L. Vitamin D3 toxicity in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 749–759. [Google Scholar]
  91. Nonnecke, B.J.; Foote, M.R.; Miller, B.L.; Beitz, D.C.; Horst, R.L. Short communication: Fat-soluble vitamin and mineral status of milk replacer-fed dairy calves: Effect of growth rate during the preruminant period. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 2684–2690. [Google Scholar]
  92. Nonnecke, B.J.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Waters, W.R. Short communication: The preruminant calf as a model for characterizing the effects of vitamin D status in the neonate. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 5692–5696. [Google Scholar]
  93. Endsley, J.J.; Waters, W.R.; Palmer, M.V.; Nonnecke, B.J.; Thacker, T.C.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Larsen, M.H.; Hogg, A.; Shell, E.; McAlauy, M.; et al. The calf model of immunity for development of a vaccine against tuberculosis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2009, 128, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  94. Van Rhijn, I.; Godfroid, J.; Michel, A.; Rutten, V. Bovine tuberculosis as a model for human tuberculosis: Advantages over small animal models. Microb. Infect. 2008, 10, 711–715. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bem, R.A.; Domachowske, J.B.; Rosenberg, H.F. Animal models of human respiratory syncytial virus disease. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2011, 301, L148–L156. [Google Scholar]
  96. Meyer, G.; Deplanche, M.; Schelcher, F. Human and bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine research and development. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008, 31, 191–225. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nelson, C.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Lippolis, J.D.; Sacco, R.E.; Nonnecke, B.J. Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System: A Model for Understanding Human Vitamin D Requirements. Nutrients 2012, 4, 181-196. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181

AMA Style

Nelson CD, Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD, Sacco RE, Nonnecke BJ. Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System: A Model for Understanding Human Vitamin D Requirements. Nutrients. 2012; 4(3):181-196. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nelson, Corwin D., Timothy A. Reinhardt, John D. Lippolis, Randy E. Sacco, and Brian J. Nonnecke. 2012. "Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System: A Model for Understanding Human Vitamin D Requirements" Nutrients 4, no. 3: 181-196. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181

APA Style

Nelson, C. D., Reinhardt, T. A., Lippolis, J. D., Sacco, R. E., & Nonnecke, B. J. (2012). Vitamin D Signaling in the Bovine Immune System: A Model for Understanding Human Vitamin D Requirements. Nutrients, 4(3), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop