Next Article in Journal
Raising Risk Awareness on the Adoption of Web 2.0 Technologies in Decision Making Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowledge Representation for Prognosis of Health Status in Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Stuxnet: What Has Changed?
Previous Article in Special Issue
e-Health Cloud: Opportunities and Challenges
Future Internet 2012, 4(3), 688-699; doi:10.3390/fi4030688
Article

Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment

 and *
Received: 19 April 2012; in revised form: 23 July 2012 / Accepted: 25 July 2012 / Published: 6 August 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future e-Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [140 KB, uploaded 6 August 2012]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: In Norway, it is a national goal to provide more patients with thrombolytic treatment. A referring hospital and a specialist hospital have implemented videoconferencing (VC) equipment to share knowledge and discuss stroke patients, regarding thrombolytic treatment. VC has only been used four times within the 19 months that the service has been available. The objective in this article is to increase the understanding of the contradiction between the need for knowledge-sharing through VC technology, as well as the reasons for low frequency of use when discussing stroke patients. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 professionals. The results illustrate how the technology per se is not the reason for the low frequency use. Health care is shaped by behavior, traditional rules, standards and division of labor. By using cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) as a framework, we illustrate the importance of understanding the historic way of performing an activity to be able to expand the treatment activity in the future.
Keywords: collaboration; medical discussions; knowledge-sharing; videoconference; activity theory; stroke collaboration; medical discussions; knowledge-sharing; videoconference; activity theory; stroke
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Nilsen, L.L.; Solvoll, T. Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment. Future Internet 2012, 4, 688-699.

AMA Style

Nilsen LL, Solvoll T. Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment. Future Internet. 2012; 4(3):688-699.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nilsen, Line Lundvoll; Solvoll, Terje. 2012. "Traditional Practice vs. New Tools and Routines in Stroke Treatment." Future Internet 4, no. 3: 688-699.


Future Internet EISSN 1999-5903 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert