Next Article in Journal
HIV-1 Integrase-DNA Recognition Mechanisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Activation and Evasion of Innate Antiviral Immunity by Herpes Simplex Virus
Previous Article in Journal
WU Polyomavirus (WUPyV): A Recently Detected Virus Causing Respiratory Disease?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antagonism of Innate Immunity by Paramyxovirus Accessory Proteins
Viruses 2009, 1(3), 689-712; doi:10.3390/v1030689
Review

Murine Coronavirus Cell Type Dependent Interaction with the Type I Interferon Response

 and *
Received: 2 September 2009; in revised form: 30 October 2009 / Accepted: 4 November 2009 / Published: 4 November 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interferon Antiviral Response and Viral Evasion)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [352 KB, uploaded 4 November 2009]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Coronaviruses infect many species of animal including humans, causing acute and chronic diseases of many organ systems. Murine coronavirus, mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) infection of the mouse, provides animal models for the study of central nervous system disease, including encephalitis and demyelinating diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis and for hepatitis. While there are many studies of the adaptive immune response to MHV, there has until recently been scant information on the type I interferon (IFN) response to MHV. The relationship between MHV and the IFN-α/β response is paradoxical. While the type I IFN response is a crucial aspect of host defense against MHV in its natural host, there is little if any induction of IFN following infection of mouse fibroblast cell lines in vitro. Furthermore, MHV is relatively resistant to the antiviral effects of IFN-α/β in mouse fibroblast cell lines and in human 293T cells. MHV can, under some circumstances, compromise the antiviral effects of IFN signaling. The nucleocapsid protein as well as the nsp1 and nsp3 proteins of MHV has been reported to have IFN antagonist activity. However, in primary cell types such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) and macrophages, IFN is induced by MHV infection and an antiviral state is established. Other primary cell types such as neurons, astrocytes and hepatocytes fail to produce IFN following infection and, in vivo, likely depend on IFN produced by pDCs and macrophages for protection from MHV. Thus MHV induction of IFN-α/β and the ability to induce an antiviral state in response to interferon is extremely cell type dependent. IFN induced protection from MHV pathogenesis likely requires the orchestrated activities of several cell types, however, the cell types involved in limiting MHV replication may be different in the liver and in the immune privileged CNS.
Keywords: murine coronavirus; CNS infection; virus induced IFN induction; IFN signaling murine coronavirus; CNS infection; virus induced IFN induction; IFN signaling
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Rose, K.M.; Weiss, S.R. Murine Coronavirus Cell Type Dependent Interaction with the Type I Interferon Response. Viruses 2009, 1, 689-712.

AMA Style

Rose KM, Weiss SR. Murine Coronavirus Cell Type Dependent Interaction with the Type I Interferon Response. Viruses. 2009; 1(3):689-712.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rose, Kristine M.; Weiss, Susan R. 2009. "Murine Coronavirus Cell Type Dependent Interaction with the Type I Interferon Response." Viruses 1, no. 3: 689-712.


Viruses EISSN 1999-4915 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert