Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8(5), 1271-1286; doi:10.3390/ijerph8051271
Article

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of India’s 2008 Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places in Gujarat

1 Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 627 N. Washington Street, 2nd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA 2 Rand Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Room 4369, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA 3 Public Health Foundation of India, Second Floor, 4/2, Sirifort Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi, 110016, India 4 State Tobacco Control Cell, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, 3rd Floor, Block No. 5/2, Dr. Jivraj Mehta Bhavan, Sector No. 10, Gandhinagar-Gujarat 382010, India
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 March 2011; in revised form: 4 April 2011 / Accepted: 20 April 2011 / Published: 26 April 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tobacco Smoking: Public Health, Science and Policy)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [387 KB, uploaded 26 April 2011 15:24 CEST]
Abstract: Tobacco smoking and exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke are associated with disability and premature mortality in low and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing India’s Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places Rules in the state of Gujarat, compared to implementation of a complete smoking ban. Using standard cost-effectiveness analysis methods, the cost of implementing the alternatives was evaluated against the years of life saved and cases of acute myocardial infarction averted by reductions in smoking prevalence and secondhand smoke exposure. After one year, it is estimated that a complete smoking ban in Gujarat would avert 17,000 additional heart attacks and gain 438,000 life years (LY). A complete ban is highly cost-effective when key variables including legislation effectiveness were varied in the sensitivity analyses. Without including medical treatment costs averted, the cost-effectiveness ratio ranges from $2 to $112 per LY gained and $37 to $386 per acute myocardial infarction averted. Implementing a complete smoking ban would be a cost saving alternative to the current partial legislation in terms of reducing tobacco-attributable disease in Gujarat.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; public smoking bans; smoke free public places; secondhand smoke; tobacco smoking

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Donaldson, E.A.; Waters, H.R.; Arora, M.; Varghese, B.; Dave, P.; Modi, B. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of India’s 2008 Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places in Gujarat. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 1271-1286.

AMA Style

Donaldson EA, Waters HR, Arora M, Varghese B, Dave P, Modi B. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of India’s 2008 Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places in Gujarat. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2011; 8(5):1271-1286.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Donaldson, Elisabeth A.; Waters, Hugh R.; Arora, Monika; Varghese, Beena; Dave, Paresh; Modi, Bhavesh. 2011. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of India’s 2008 Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places in Gujarat." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 8, no. 5: 1271-1286.

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert