Next Article in Journal
Mapping Asbestos-Cement Roofing with Hyperspectral Remote Sensing over a Large Mountain Region of the Italian Western Alps
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Prompted Annotation of Activity Data Recorded from a Smart Phone
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Integrated Low-Power Lock-In Amplifier and Its Application to Gas Detection

by
Paulina M. Maya-Hernández
1,
Luis C. Álvarez-Simón
1,
María Teresa Sanz-Pascual
1,* and
Belén Calvo-López
2
1
Electronics Department, Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE), Luis Enrique Erro #1, Tonantzintla 72840, Puebla, Mexico
2
Group of Electronic Design, Aragon Institute for Engineering Research, I3A, Facultad de Ciencias, Pedro Cerbuna 12, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2014, 14(9), 15880-15899; https://doi.org/10.3390/s140915880
Submission received: 10 June 2014 / Revised: 21 July 2014 / Accepted: 22 July 2014 / Published: 27 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

: This paper presents a new micropower analog lock-in amplifier (LIA) suitable for battery-operated applications thanks to its reduced size and power consumption as well as its operation with single-supply voltage. The proposed LIA was designed in a 0.18 μm CMOS process with a single supply voltage of 1.8 V. Experimental results show a variable DC gain ranging from 24.7 to 42 dB, power consumption of 417 μW and integration area of 0.013 mm2. The LIA performance was demonstrated by measuring carbon monoxide concentrations as low as 1 ppm in dry N2. The experimental results show that the response to CO of the sensing system can be considerably improved by means of the proposed LIA.

1. Introduction

The sensor market is undergoing continuous development to satisfy the increasing demand for portable sensing applications, mainly for healthcare, environmental and industrial monitoring [14]. In fact, portability significantly widens the spectrum and scenarios of sensing applications, but requires optimization of the sensor system at all levels, from transducer developments to the design of power-efficient electronic interfaces. Only in this way is it possible to attain a system showing the required low-voltage single-supply operation for compatibility with low-form batteries, low power consumption to extend the life of the battery and small size to ensure portability. In the case of remote sensing systems, such as wireless sensor networks (WSNs), the deployment impact must also be minimized.

Unfortunately, the small signal provided by low voltage low power sensors may be obscured by noise and interference signals, thus requiring special amplification techniques to increase the signal-to-noise ratio [5]. In particular, lock-in amplifiers (LIAs), based on a technique known as phase sensitive detection, are the most common choice to recover weak signals from noise by singling out the component of the signal at a specific reference frequency and phase [6]. Although widely used in instrumentation, the limitations of commercial LIAs in terms of size, cost and power consumption prevent their use within portable measurement systems. Moreover, LIAs are not currently marketed in an integrated manner most likely because, if integrated with the sensor, the product would turn into a specific System-On-Chip instead of a general purpose sensor, increasing the cost and reducing profit margins. However, preliminary results towards the design of an integrated LIA both found in literature and presented in this paper are quite promising and open up a really interesting research field. In the literature, only a few integrated versions can be encountered [714]: some of them operate in dual supply mode [7,8], whereas those with single supply exhibit power consumption in the mW range [914], jeopardizing its use in battery operated systems. It is noteworthy that all of these implementations are based on a voltage mode approach using rather complex building blocks and do not specifically focus on low-voltage low-power operation to meet the requirements of portable systems. Besides, they are designed to match specific applications, which limits their use to a given operation frequency and prevents them from being used in general purpose conditioning circuits.

Taking all this into consideration, the goal of the paper is the design of a versatile analog current-mode LIA fulfilling the requirements of portable systems, namely low voltage single supply and reduced area and power consumption, while preserving good recovery capability. The proposed topology was first introduced by the authors at a conference [15], where preliminary results were shown. This work comprises a detailed explanation of the circuit design and operation as well as an exhaustive experimental characterization of the circuit. The current mode lock-in amplifier, integrated in a 1.8 V–0.18 μm standard CMOS process, arises as a low cost solution, compatible with mixed analog-digital signal systems. To show its functionality, the proposed LIA is used to detect low concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) with a commercial chemiresistive sensor based on tin dioxide [16]. This kind of sensor was selected because chemiresistive metal-oxide (MOX) structures are compatible with integrated CMOS microsystem technologies, since they can be co-integrated with an appropriate intra-CMOS process, facilitating the forthcoming accomplishment of fully integrated low-cost portable smart gas sensing devices [1720].

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the proposed lock-in amplifier and describes its basic building blocks. Section 3 reports the main experimental results. Section 4 demonstrates the circuit capability to improve signal-to-noise ratio by measuring concentrations of carbon monoxide down to 1ppm. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

2. Lock-In Amplifier Architecture

The block diagram of a sensor readout system using a typical analog lock-in amplifier is shown in Figure 1. A sensor is excited by a sinusoidal signal with a known frequency f0 and its response Vs is injected into the lock-in system. The first active block is a low noise amplifier which provides high gain. It may be followed by a band-pass filter to remove or attenuate the noise contribution at all the frequencies except for f0. The next block is a mixer or Phase-Sensitive Detector (PSD), which multiplies the modulated input signal by a square reference signal Vref. By properly synchronizing the sensor and control signals to have the same frequency and phase values, the data signal is full-wave rectified at the output. In this way, the DC component may be easily extracted by means of a low-pass filter (LPF) with a suitable low cut-off frequency, and is given by Vout_dc = 2 VsVref.cosθ/π, where θ is the phase difference between Vs and Vref.

In most integrated LIAs found in literature, the input amplifier is a classic 3-opamp instrumentation amplifier whose gain is controlled through an external resistor Rgain, while the mixer is usually based on an dual supply opamp voltage amplifier stage with a switch-controlled ±1 gain, as shown in Figure 2a. The LIA proposed in this paper totally differs from this approach. In order to accomplish a small and power saving solution compatible with low bias voltage, a current mode approach is adopted [2124]. Hence, the rectification of the signal is carried out in the current domain and gain adjustment is achieved through a 3-bit digitally programmable current divider. As shown in Figure 2b, our proposal consists of a voltage-to-current converter that translates the voltage signal into a current signal. It is followed by a resistorless current mixer, which performs the phase-sensitive detection. A MOS current divider provides gain programmability to the system. Finally, a transimpedance amplifier converts the signal back into a voltage mode for further processing. By using this architecture, not only is the number of active blocks reduced but also the number of resistors, which consume otherwise most of the area and add noise to the circuit. Note that the proposed LIA must be powered by a single supply, which implies that the common mode is related to Vdd/2. Each building block of the proposed LIA is briefly described below at transistor level.

2.1. Transconductor

The input stage is a voltage to current converter to handle the signal of interest in the current domain. The chosen transconductor is a differential pair with source degeneration, which is one of the most popular transconductors. The requirement that the input pair transconductance gm is much higher than the inverse of the degeneration resistance Rdeg to attain a linear transfer characteristic inversely proportional to Rdeg is usually satisfied by employing large transistors and/or bias currents. However, this is not desirable in terms of area and power consumption. As a solution to improve the power efficiency while obtaining high linearity, a simple technique has been adopted based on the boost of the input pair transconductance by means of negative feedback [25], as shown in Figure 3.

Input transistors M1 act as improved voltage followers, buffering the differential input voltage V s = V s + V s to the terminals of the degeneration resistor Rdeg. The linearized differential current signal Iac = Vs/Rdeg can be easily copied out by loading nodes 1 and 2 with transistors M5. Active cascodes (M2-M4, M5-M10 and M9) are used in order to maximize the output impedance and enhance the gm-boosting action, thus increasing the accuracy of the total transconductance Gm=1/Rdeg of the system. Two linear poly-silicon resistors Rdeg/2 =1 kΩ were used to give more symmetry to the layout of the circuit. Finally, through a high swing cascode current mirror (M9), the differential current is converted into a single-output current given by Io1=2Vs/Rdeg.

For this stage, note that the dominant pole is located at nodes 1 and 2, so external capacitors Cext can be added as shown in Figure 3 to adjust the input stage bandwidth and thus reduce the noise contribution.

2.2. Mixer

The mixer function is to carry out the phase sensitive detection over the signal Io1 according to the reference signal Vref. For this purpose, a current mode circuit where Vref determines the direction of the current flow is used to provide a fully rectified output current with a DC component proportional to the signal of interest and (almost) independent of noise.

The topology employed, as depicted in Figure 4 [26], operates as follows: when the square reference signal Vref is low (Vref = 0, V ref ¯ = 1), the input current Io1 is copied through the high swing cascode current mirrors M7-M9 and M8-M10 so that I o 1 = I o 1, acting as a current follower; when Vref is high (Vref = 1, V ref ¯ = 0), the input current is copied and inverted through the paths M7-M11-M12-M14 and M8-M12-M11-M13, so that I o 1 = I o 1, this time acting as a current inverter. With the reference signal in phase with the input signal, the result is a full rectification of the input current signal, and the operation of the mixer can be represented by I o 1 = ( 1 ) V ref I o 1.

2.3. Current Divider

Gain programmability is achieved through a 3-bit MOSFET R-2R current divider (M-2M divider) as shown in Figure 5 [27], where each PMOS transistor is equivalent to a resistance R.

The rectified current I o 1 is driven to the M-2M ladder, where it is divided into two output currents, I out = Δ I o 1 and I out 2 = ( 1 Δ ) I o 1 . The division factor Δ, controlled by a 3-bit digital word A(3)={a2, a1, a0}, is given by:

Δ = 1 2 n [ 1 + j = 0 n 1 ( 2 j a j 2 j ) ] with n = 3

The output current Iout is connected to the virtual ground (Vdd/2) input of the next block, the transimpedance amplifier, while the complementary output, Iout2, is grounded to Vdd/2 for proper current division. The advantage of using parallel transistors to generate R/2 and one transistor to generate R is that the voltage drop between the input node and the current output nodes is smaller than it would be with two transistors in series to generate 2R and one transistor to generate R [28].

2.4. Transimpedance Amplifier

The signal of interest is converted back to the voltage domain by using a transimpedance amplifier (TIA). The topology is shown in Figure 6. It consists of a single-stage differential amplifier and a linear poly-silicon feedback resistor Rf = 100 kΩ value and a compensation capacitor Cc = 500 fF. If Iout is the current delivered by the current ladder, the output voltage is given by Vout =−IoutRf.

Considering the cascade connection of the blocks presented so far, the total gain of the system as a function of the 3-bit digital word is given by the following expression:

V out V s = R f R deg ( 1 2 n [ 1 + j = 0 n 1 ( 2 j a j 2 j ) ] ) ( 1 ) V ref with n = 3

That is, for a given Vref the system is equivalent to a programmable gain amplifier whose gain depends on the Rf to Rdeg ratio and on the current ladder digital word. Note that both Rf to Rdeg are implemented with the same material, a high resistivity poly-silicon (HRP) layer, so both will suffer the same variations with process and temperature, thus ensuring good accuracy and robustness. Furthermore, current division is highly linear [27], and so is the whole system.

2.5. Low Pass Filter

The low-pass filter (LPF) is an RC passive implementation with 5 Hz cut-off frequency. Since this circuit is responsible for removing the harmonic components of the noise and interference signals, its cutoff frequency should be as low as possible. As usually found in literature, the LPF was externally connected to the circuit.

2.6. Simulation Results

Some post-layout simulation results are shown in Figure 7 to illustrate the basic operation principle of the proposed LIA. A sinusoidal signal Vs is introduced to the input of the transconductor and converted into the Io1 output. The current mode mixer multiplies the signal Io1 and the reference square signal Vref. If Io1 and Vref are in phase, as shown in Figure 7a, the result is a fully rectified current signal I o 1 , which is converted into a voltage signal Vout, whose DC component is extracted by the LPF. As the input signal is fully rectified, the DC component Vout_dc is proportional to its amplitude. In contrast, if Io1 and Vref are 90° out of phase, as shown in Figure 7b, the result is a voltage signal Vout whose DC component is equal to the common-mode voltage Vdd/2, independently of the input signal amplitude. Therefore, no information can be extracted in this case.

3. Lock-In Amplifier Experimental Performance

The proposed LIA was designed and integrated in standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology with 1.8 V supply voltage. The photograph of the integrated circuit is shown in Figure 8. The required area is only 0.013 mm2 which, together with the low power consumption, 417 μW, makes the circuit suitable for portable applications.

The gain programmability provided by the 3-bit M-2M ladder is reported in Table 1, which shows the ideal gain (Aid) according to Equation (2) and the experimentally measured gain (Aexp).

Figure 9a shows the frequency response of the programmable LIA at different gain settings (A = {000,010,100,101,111}). As previously mentioned, the bandwidth of the system can be adjusted by means of Cext in order to limit the noise. This feature can be seen in Figure 9b, which shows the transfer function at maximum gain for different Cext values: 7.5 pF, 470 pF, 2.2 nF and 4.7 nF to set a bandwidth of 100 kHz, 6 kHz, 1.3 kHz and 0.6 kHz, respectively. Since no on-chip calibration circuit was included in the design, experimental bandwidths were smaller than the simulated ones due to parasitic capacitances, mainly from chip packaging. In brief, programmability can be used to adjust the gain in accordance with the input amplitude, while bandwidth can be adjusted according to the input frequency through the adequate selection of Cext.

Figure 10 shows the experimental setup block diagram utilized to evaluate the dynamic performance of the integrated LIA. The input (Vin), reference (Vref) and noise (Vno) signals were generated by a Function Generator, so the phase between the noisy input signal Vs = Vin+ Vno and the reference signal Vref was externally regulated. The rectified signal Vout was monitored with an oscilloscope and the DC output level Vout_dc after the low-pass filter with (cut-off frequency of 5.16 Hz) was measured with a 6½ digit digital multimeter.

First, proper operation of the LIA was checked by measuring the output when processing a 1 kHz noise-free sinusoidal signal. It was found that the full-scale input and output ranges are 5 mVpp and 630 mVpp, respectively, with a resolution of 50 μVpp and a sensitivity of 40 mV/mVpp for maximum gain; for the minimum gain the full-scale input and output ranges are 17.5 mVpp and 300 mVpp with a resolution of 120 μVpp and a sensitivity of 8 mV/mVpp. Figure 11 shows the measured output DC voltage vs. the peak-to-peak input voltage for the maximum and minimum LIA gain.

Figure 12 shows, for a noise-free sinusoidal input signal of 5 mVpp at 1 kHz in phase with the square reference signal, and maximum amplifier gain (Aexp = 42 dB), an oscilloscope screenshot of the rectified signal Vout =346.2 mVp. The voltage after the LPF was measured with the multimeter, obtaining Vout_dc =1.0852 V vs. the ideal Vout_dc_id =1.1003 V, which means a 1.9% relative error for the maximum input voltage that can be handled at maximum gain. This relative error remains lower than 0.8% for input voltages equal to or lower than 4.5 mVpp.

Next, the capability of the circuit to recover information from signals buried in noise was evaluated. Two noise cases were studied: a single-frequency interference and white noise. For the first case the signal Vs was a sinusoidal voltage of 50 μVpp at 1 kHz frequency with an interfering sinusoidal signal at different frequencies ranging 1.002 to 2 kHz and an amplitude Vno = 3.2 mV. For the second case the signal Vs was a sinusoidal voltage of 50 μVpp at 1 kHz frequency buried in Gaussian white noise, characterized by a root mean square value Vno_rms = 2.3 mV. The noise bandwidth was set to 10 MHz, so that it fully covers the signal frequency range used in this study. The noise levels were provided by the Function Generator and added to the input signal by means of a wide bandwidth operational amplifier in an adder configuration.

The output voltage for a noise-free signal of Vs =50 μVpp, Vout_dc_exp, and the output Vout_dc_noisy for a noisy signal are reported in Table 2 for both types of noise and two different Cext, that is, two different bandwidths. The relative error when recovering signal amplitudes for SNR levels down to −42.13 dB is below 5.0% with BWLIA = 125 kHz and below 4.1% with BWLIA = 13 kHz. Measurements confirm the capability of the proposed topology to recover signals highly buried in noise.

As can be seen from Case 1 in Table 2, the relative error in the measurement increases when the frequency of the interfering signal gets closer to the frequency of Vs; the dead band, i.e., the frequency range in which the recovery error increases significantly (over 2.9%), is about 2 Hz. When the frequency of the interfering signals is very close to the reference signal frequency, the undesired signals manage to pass the acceptance band of the output filter and are detected by the LIA with a phase difference, thus contributing to the DC voltage. For Case 2, since white noise contains signals within all the frequency range, some signals will match the frequency of the reference signal but with a phase difference and, again, get to contribute to the output DC voltage. The relative error can be reduced down to 4.1% by reducing the bandwidth to 13 kHz with the external capacitors.

Figure 13 displays some examples of the LIA waveforms for some of the noise tests. Figure 13a,b shows the rectified output and DC output for the interfering signal of Case 1a, with BWLIA = 125 kHz and BWLIA = 13 kHz, respectively. Figure 13c,d shows the rectified output and DC output obtained by measuring the amplitude of the input signal submerged in white noise of Case 2 with BWLIA = 125 kHz and BWLIA = 13 kHz, respectively. In the first case, despite the bandwidth reduction of the LIA, because the interference signal is operating very close to the signal of interest it is not possible to filter it so as to attenuate it significantly. In the second case, even when the signal of interest is immersed in white noise, the LIA is able to detect it, being the attenuation of the noise through filtering more evident, lessening the error from 5% to 4.1%. In both cases, even when the signal of interest is deeply submerged in noise, the LIA manages to extract the DC contribution of the signal of interest with a small margin of error, besides being able to reduce the relative error of the measured data by increasing the value of the external capacitors.

Finally, in Table 3 the main characteristics of the LIA are summarized and compared with recent integrated implementations found in the literature. It can be noticed that the proposed topology, operating under single supply voltage, exhibits a significant reduction in power consumption and area of integration. Since our proposal does not include phase control, to perform a fairer comparison note that a dual-phase LIA configuration to eliminate phase dependency would have an estimated power consumption of about 0.84 mW and area around 0.026 mm2, still resulting in a very competitive solution when compared to previous implementations. It is worth noting that the circuit is not subject to a specific operating frequency, so it can be used to operate at the frequency that the user requires as long as it lies within the bandwidth of the amplifier. In summary, compared to its voltage-mode counterparts, the proposed current-mode LIA shows wider bandwidth, good capability to recover signals submerged in noise (SNR = −42.13 dB) and a reduction of one to two orders of magnitude in power consumption and integration area, which validates the design strategy.

4. Detection of Small Gas Concentrations

4.1. Gas Sensor

Metal oxide semiconductor sensors are extensively used in gas detection applications [29,30]. The sensing layer, a metal oxide-based thick film on a Si-micromachined substrate, is sensitive to a specific set of gases when heated at high temperature, usually 200–400 °C. Its electrical resistance changes as a consequence of gas adsorption, being the sensitivity and selectivity determined by the operating temperature. Therefore, a micro-heater is needed to set a constant and uniform temperature and thus ensure good performance of the sensor [31]. The circuit representation of a metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor is shown in Figure 14.

To show the functionality of the proposed LIA, a CO gas detection system was implemented in the laboratory. The commercial Carbon Monoxide Sensor AS-MLC, based on a tin dioxide sensitive layer, was used [16]. Heater and interdigital electrode structures are positioned on a 1 μm-thin membrane on top of which the tin dioxide is deposited, thus creating a gas concentration dependent resistance (RS). Some of the benefits of this sensor are its high sensitivity to CO (0.5 to 500 ppm), low power consumption, long lifetime, low cross-sensitivity and long-term stability.

The typical operation temperature of the sensor is 270 °C with approximately 2.2 V heater voltage and 35 mW power consumption. However, in a practical implementation, pulse width modulation (PWM) can be applied to the heater to significantly reduce energy consumption [32]. The conditioning circuit, in turn, should consume negligible power when compared to the heater in order not to contribute to the power consumption of the whole system and thus extend its life time.

4.2. Experimental Characterization

The proposed lock-in system was tested within an experimental setup to detect small concentrations of carbon monoxide with the above described AS-MLC gas sensor. The setup, shown in Figure 15, ensures well defined gas concentration levels through the Mass Flow Controllers (MFCs). A mixture of CO plus N2 is prepared at the mixing stage and the CO concentration in the gas chamber is measured without and with the proposed LIA. The detection of CO was carried out in a controlled N2 environment to detect only the changes in sensor resistance due to the small variations of CO and avoid cross-sensitivity due to the presence of other gases.

The measurement system is shown in Figure 16. The sensor resistance Rs is placed into a voltage divider stimulated with a sinusoidal voltage Vin =15 mVpp at 1 kHz frequency and with a reference resistor of 51kΩ. A decoupling capacitor Cdec followed by an analog adder was used to set the required DC level (Vdd/2) at the LIA's input. The LIA was set to its minimum gain (24.7 dB) and BW = 13 kHz. The physical implementation of the experiment can be seen in Figure 17.

Three different concentrations of carbon monoxide with nitrogen (CO + N2), namely 1, 2 and 3 ppm, were introduced to the sensor measurement chamber, alternating it with a nitrogen flux to provide some recovery time to the sensor. Although the sensor would usually be operated in atmospheres containing oxygen, experimental tests with nitrogen provide information about the intrinsic noise of the sensor and validate the functionality of the lock-in amplifier. The temperature in the chamber was 22.7 °C and relative humidity was 12.3%. Both the temperature and the humidity were monitored by a temperature and humidity sensor [33] during the measurements because they have an impact on sensor sensitivity but, as this is a commercial sensor, it is out of the scope of this work to characterize that dependence. However, it should be noted that the presence of oxygen and humidity in the measurement process are a source of noise, so that for future measurements they should be taken into account. In Figure 18, the output signal of the voltage divider (Figure 18a) and at the output of the LIA (Figure 18b) for different concentrations of gas is shown. The sensitivity of the system without LIA was 0.15–0.18 mV/ppm while the sensitivity when the LIA was used increased to 3–4.5 mV/ppm. It is observed from Figure 18a that when no LIA is used it is difficult to distinguish whether CO is present for low concentrations, as noise levels are in the same order as the signal to be measured. In contrast, the use of the lock-in amplifier makes it possible to directly discriminate and determine the presence of low gas concentrations. Although this kind of microsensor is used mainly for specific applications, such as safety, where small concentrations of CO, which is highly toxic, must be detected, the system we set up could detect up to 40 ppm. This measurement process was completed with two different LIA prototypes showing similar results, which validates the reliability of the proposed solution.

The response in % to CO, defined as R =[Vout_DC_COVout_DC_air/Vout_DC_air] × 100, with and without lock-in amplifier is shown in Figure 19. The response is increased in more than one order of magnitude with the LIA, as it not only amplifies the amplitude of the signal but also reduces noise contribution.

Based on the LIA output voltage, the sensor resistance (Rs) can be determined from the following expression:

R s = R ref ( 2 A V i n π · Vout D C _ LIA cos θ 1 )

The equivalent resistance of the sensor estimated from (3) is shown in Table 4.

5. Conclusions

A novel integrated 1.8 V–0.18 μm CMOS lock-in amplifier with reduced area and power consumption was presented in this paper. It is based on synchronous rectification of the signal in the current domain. The architecture programmability allows for gain adjustment according to the amplitude of the incoming signal, thus providing versatility and flexibility to the circuit for its use in several applications. Moreover, its bandwidth can also be adjusted to further attenuate unwanted signals and noise, improving accuracy in measurements.

Experimental results show that the proposed LIA is able to recover a signal of interest noisy environments with a relative error below 4.1% for a SNR = −42.13 dB. Power consumption is 417 μW and integration area is 0.013 mm2, which means a reduction of one order of magnitude in power consumption and two orders of magnitude in the integration area compared to other implementations found in the literature. All these features make it a preferable choice in portable sensing applications.

Finally, the proposed LIA was used for the detection of small concentrations of carbon monoxide with a commercial CO sensor. The response to CO was increased in more than one order of magnitude when compared to a single voltage divider interface circuit. The functionality of the LIA was thus demonstrated.

Future work includes the integration of a phase control, to ensure the in-phase condition for proper operation of the LIA, as well as integration of the LPF output stage, in order to achieve a fully integrated solution.

Although the digitalization and actuation system depends on the final application, in a complete sensor system, the proposed analog lock-in can be the core of a general purpose microcontrolled-based portable low-power electronic interface, so that the μC controls all the measurement process and, if possible, the ADCs in the μC perform the final digitalization, with the measured data transmitted via RF. Alternatively, instead of classical ADCs, voltage-to-frequency converters (VFCs) can be used as a more suitable solution for μC-based applications.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CONACYT 235415 and 212441 Doctorate Grants, by CONACYT CB-SEP-2008-01-99901 Research Project, MICINN-FEDER (RYC-2008-03185) and Universidad de Zaragoza (JIUZ-2013-TEC06).

Author Contributions

All authors equally contributed to the content of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Contreras, J.; Costa, D.; Pereira, S.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Wierzbicki, R.; Heerlein, H.; Ferreira, I. Micro Cantilever Movement Detection with an Amorphous Silicon Array of Position Sensitive Detectors. Sensors 2010, 10, 8173–8184. [Google Scholar]
  2. Germano, J.; Martins, V.C.; Cardoso, F.A.; Almeida, T.M.; Sousa, L.; Freitas, P.P.; Piedade, M.S. A Portable and Autonomous Magnetic Detection Platform for Biosensing. Sensors 2009, 9, 4119–4137. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gibson, D.; MacGregor, C. A Novel Solid State Non-Dispersive Infrared CO2 Gas Sensor Compatible with Wireless and Portable Deployment. Sensors 2013, 13, 7079–7103. [Google Scholar]
  4. Twomey, K.; Truemper, A.; Murphy, K. A portable Sensing System for Electronic Tongue Operations. Sensors 2006, 6, 1679–1696. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilmshurst, T.H. Signal Recovery from Noise in Electronic Instrumentation, 2nd ed; Taylor&Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. About Lock-in amplifiers. Available online: http://www.thinksrs.com/downloads/PDFs/ApplicationNotes/AboutLIAs.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2014).
  7. D'Amico, A.; De Marcellis, A.; Di Carlo, C.; Di Natale, C.; Ferri, G.; Martinelli, E.; Paolesse, R.; Stornelli, V. Low-voltage low-power integrated analog lock-in amplifier for gas sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 144, 400–406. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gnudi, A.; Colalongo, L.; Baccarani, G. Integrated lock-in amplifier for sensor applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Solid-State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC), Duisburg, Germany, 21–23 September 1999; pp. 58–61.
  9. Ferri, G.; De Laurentiis, P.; D'Amico, A.; Di Natale, C. A low-voltage integrated CMOS analog lock-in amplifier prototype for LAPS applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2001, 92, 263–272. [Google Scholar]
  10. Azzolini, C.; Magnanini, A.; Tonelli, M.; Chiorboli, G.; Morandi, C. Integrated Lock-In Amplifier for Contactless Interface to Magnetically Stimulated Mechanical Resonators. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, Tozeur, Tunisia, 25–27 March 2008; pp. 1–6.
  11. Xu, J.; Meynants, G.; Merken, P. Low-Power Lock-In Amplifier for Complex Impedance Measurement. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI), Trani, Italy, 25–26 June 2009; pp. 110–114.
  12. Hu, A.; Chodavarapu, V.P. CMOS Optoelectronic Lock-In Amplifier with Integrated Phototransistor Array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2010, 4, 274–280. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, G.N.; Pittet, P.; Sou, G.; Carrillo, G.; El Mourabit, A. A Novel Approach to Implementing On-Chip Synchronous Detection for CMOS Optical Detector Systems. J. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2003, 37, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  14. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P.; D'Amico, A. A new single-chip analog lock-in amplifier with automatic phase and frequency tuning for physical/chemical noisy phenomena detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI), Bari, Italy, 13–14 June 2013; pp. 121–124.
  15. Maya-Hernández, P.M.; Sanz-Pascual, M.T.; Calvo, B. A 1.8 V-0.18 μm CMOS lock-in amplifier for portable applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Seoul, Korea, 20–23 May 2012; pp. 668–671.
  16. Applied Sensor AS-MLC Datasheet. Available online: http://www.gassensor.ru/data/files/carbon_monoxide/CO_AK01.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2014).
  17. Malcovati, P.; Grassi, M.; Baschirotto, A. Towards high-dynamic range CMOS integrated interface circuits for gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 179, 301–312. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dai, L.; Chen, Y.C.; Wu, C.C.; Kuo, C.F. Cobalt Oxide Nanosheet and CNT Micro Carbon Monoxide Sensor Integrated with Readout Circuit on Chip. Sensors 2010, 10, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Y.; Vancura, C.; Barrettino, D.; Graf, M.; Hagleitner, C.; Kummer, A.; Kirstein, K.U.; Hierlemann, A. Advanced Chemical Microsensors Systems in CMOS Technology [gas sensors]. IEEE Sens. 2004, 1, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Saha, H.; Chaudhuri, R. Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductors-Microelectromechanical Systems Integration. Def. Sci. J. 2009, 59, 557–567. [Google Scholar]
  21. Roberts, G.W.; Sedra, A.S. All current-mode frequency selective circuits. Electron. Lett. 1989, 25, 759–761. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson, B. Recent developments in current conveyors and current-mode circuits. IEEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 1990, 137, 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  23. Min, M.; Parve, T. Current mode signal processing as a challenge for improvement of lock-in measuring instruments. Proceedings of the XIV IMEKO World Congress, Tampere, Finland, 2–6 June 1997; pp. 186–191.
  24. Toumazou, C.; Lidgey, F.J.; Haigh, D.G. Analogue IC Design: The Current-Mode Approach; IEE Circuits and Systems Series 2; Peter Peregrinus Ltd: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kwan, T.; Martin, K. An Adaptative Analog Continuous-Time CMOS Biquadratic Filter. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 1991, 26, 859–867. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zatorre, G.; Medrano, N.; Sanz, M.T.; Aldea, C.; Calvo, B.; Celma, S. Digitally Programmable Analogue Circuits for Sensors Conditioning Systems. Sensors 2009, 9, 3652–3665. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bult, K.; Geelen, G. An Inherently Linear and Compact MOST-Only Current Division Technique. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 1992, 27, 1730–1735. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pastre, M.; Kayal, M. Methodology for the Digital Calibration of Analog Circuits and Systems with Case Studies; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht: The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fine, G.F.; Cavanagh, L.M.; Afonja, A.; Binions, R. Metal Oxide Semi-Conductor Gas Sensors in Environmental Monitoring. Sensors 2010, 10, 5469–5502. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, C.; Yin, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, D.; Gao, R. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: Sensitivity and Influencing Factors. Sensors 2010, 10, 2088–2106. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hwang, W.J.; Shin, K.S.; Roh, J.H.; Lee, D.S.; Choa, S.H. Development of Micro-Heaters with Optimized Temperature Compensation Design for Gas Sensors. Sensors 2011, 11, 2580–2591. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jelicic, V.; Magno, M.; Paci, G.; Brunelli, D.; Benini, L. Design, Characterization and Management of a Wireless Sensor Network for Smart Gas Monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI), Savelletri di Fasano, Italy, 28–29 June 2011; pp. 115–120.
  33. Adafruit DHT22 Datasheet. Available online: https://www.adafruit.com/datasheets/DHT22.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2014).
Figure 1. Block diagram of a typical lock-in amplifier.
Figure 1. Block diagram of a typical lock-in amplifier.
Sensors 14 15880f1 1024
Figure 2. Lock-in amplifier schemes: (a) conventional voltage-mode approach and (b) proposed topology.
Figure 2. Lock-in amplifier schemes: (a) conventional voltage-mode approach and (b) proposed topology.
Sensors 14 15880f2 1024
Figure 3. Input stage: gm-boosting source degenerated transconductor.
Figure 3. Input stage: gm-boosting source degenerated transconductor.
Sensors 14 15880f3 1024
Figure 4. Resistorless current mixer.
Figure 4. Resistorless current mixer.
Sensors 14 15880f4 1024
Figure 5. 3-bit MOS current divider.
Figure 5. 3-bit MOS current divider.
Sensors 14 15880f5 1024
Figure 6. Transimpedance amplifier.
Figure 6. Transimpedance amplifier.
Sensors 14 15880f6 1024
Figure 7. Performance of LIA: (a) Vs and Vref in phase; (b) Vs and Vref with a phase shift of 90°.
Figure 7. Performance of LIA: (a) Vs and Vref in phase; (b) Vs and Vref with a phase shift of 90°.
Sensors 14 15880f7 1024
Figure 8. Photograph of the fabricated lock-in amplifier.
Figure 8. Photograph of the fabricated lock-in amplifier.
Sensors 14 15880f8 1024
Figure 9. (a) Gain programmability and (b) BW variation with Cext.
Figure 9. (a) Gain programmability and (b) BW variation with Cext.
Sensors 14 15880f9 1024
Figure 10. Experimental setup block diagram.
Figure 10. Experimental setup block diagram.
Sensors 14 15880f10 1024
Figure 11. Output DC voltage vs. input signal at maximum and minimum gain.
Figure 11. Output DC voltage vs. input signal at maximum and minimum gain.
Sensors 14 15880f11 1024
Figure 12. Rectified output (x-axis: 250 μs/div, y-axis: 500 mV/div).
Figure 12. Rectified output (x-axis: 250 μs/div, y-axis: 500 mV/div).
Sensors 14 15880f12 1024
Figure 13. Rectified output and DC extraction (x-axis: 250 μs/div, y-axis: 500 mV/div): (a) Vs signal with sinusoidal interfering signal, Case 1a with BWLIA = 125 kHz; (b) Vs signal with sinusoidal interfering signal, Case 1a with BWLIA = 13 kHz; (c) Vs signal with Gaussian white noise, Case 2 with BWLIA = 125 kHz; (d) Vs signal with Gaussian white noise, Case 2 with BWLIA = 13 kHz.
Figure 13. Rectified output and DC extraction (x-axis: 250 μs/div, y-axis: 500 mV/div): (a) Vs signal with sinusoidal interfering signal, Case 1a with BWLIA = 125 kHz; (b) Vs signal with sinusoidal interfering signal, Case 1a with BWLIA = 13 kHz; (c) Vs signal with Gaussian white noise, Case 2 with BWLIA = 125 kHz; (d) Vs signal with Gaussian white noise, Case 2 with BWLIA = 13 kHz.
Sensors 14 15880f13 1024
Figure 14. Circuit representation of a metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor.
Figure 14. Circuit representation of a metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor.
Sensors 14 15880f14 1024
Figure 15. Experimental setup scheme.
Figure 15. Experimental setup scheme.
Sensors 14 15880f15 1024
Figure 16. Measurement system with lock-in amplifier.
Figure 16. Measurement system with lock-in amplifier.
Sensors 14 15880f16 1024
Figure 17. Physical implementation of the experimental setup.
Figure 17. Physical implementation of the experimental setup.
Sensors 14 15880f17 1024
Figure 18. Output Voltage for different CO concentrations: (a) Voltage divider; (b) Lock-in amplifier.
Figure 18. Output Voltage for different CO concentrations: (a) Voltage divider; (b) Lock-in amplifier.
Sensors 14 15880f18 1024
Figure 19. Response to CO with and without LIA.
Figure 19. Response to CO with and without LIA.
Sensors 14 15880f19 1024
Table 1. Gain of the LIA for each digital control word.
Table 1. Gain of the LIA for each digital control word.
a0a1a2Aid(dB)Aexp(dB)BWexp(kHz)
00040.042.0125
00138.841.0128
01037.538.0122
01136.036.9123
10034.033.0126
10131.532.2126
11028.027.1125
11122.024.7125
Table 2. Signal Recovery Test Results.
Table 2. Signal Recovery Test Results.
Type of NoiseCasesVout_dc_exp(V)Cext = 34 pF BWLIA = 125 kHzCext = 254 pF BWLIA = 13 kHz


Vout_dc_noisy (V)Relative ErrorVout_dc_noisy (V)Relative Error
InterferenceCase 1(a)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @2 kHz
0.89640.90170.6%0.90100.5%

Case 1(b)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @1.025 kHz
0.89640.90280.7%0.90210.6%

Case 1(c)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @1.005 kHz
0.89640.90831.3%0.90741.2%

Case 1(d)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @1.002 kHz
0.89640.92232.9%0.92172.8%

Case 1(e)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @0.998 kHz
0.89640.92222.9%0.92172.8%

Case 1(f)
νs=50 μVpp @1 kHz
νno=6.4 mVpp @0.995 kHz
0.89640.90831.3%0.90751.2%

Gaussian White NoiseCase 2
νs=17.7 μVrms @1 kHz
νno=2.3 mVrms
0.89640.94115.0%0.93324.1%
Table 3. LIA Electrical Characterization.
Table 3. LIA Electrical Characterization.
ParameterProposed LIAReference [7], 2010Reference [11], 2009Reference [12], 2010
CMOS Technology (μm)0.180.350.180.35
Supply Voltage (V)1.8±11.83.3
Gain (dB)24.7–4210–110--
BW (kHz)0.6–125-10013–25
SNR {ε <4.1 %} (dB)−42.13 a--−1.31
Resolution (μVpp)501--
Power Consumption (mW)0.4173212.79
Integrated Area (mm2)0.013521.5

awith Cext = 254 pF.

Table 4. Gas sensor resistance estimation.
Table 4. Gas sensor resistance estimation.
Sensor CharacterizationLIA Output
CO + N2 (ppm)tsens(min)period(s)VoutDC_LIA (mV)RsLIA (kΩ)
03.00–180959.1419.820
128.0181–1860962.9315.557
046.01861–4620958.3320.802
229.04621–6360964.4014.040
083.06361–11,340957.7721.499
316.011,341–12,300969.029.683
035.512,301–14,430955.1924.890

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maya-Hernández, P.M.; Álvarez-Simón, L.C.; Sanz-Pascual, M.T.; Calvo-López, B. An Integrated Low-Power Lock-In Amplifier and Its Application to Gas Detection. Sensors 2014, 14, 15880-15899. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140915880

AMA Style

Maya-Hernández PM, Álvarez-Simón LC, Sanz-Pascual MT, Calvo-López B. An Integrated Low-Power Lock-In Amplifier and Its Application to Gas Detection. Sensors. 2014; 14(9):15880-15899. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140915880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maya-Hernández, Paulina M., Luis C. Álvarez-Simón, María Teresa Sanz-Pascual, and Belén Calvo-López. 2014. "An Integrated Low-Power Lock-In Amplifier and Its Application to Gas Detection" Sensors 14, no. 9: 15880-15899. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140915880

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop