Next Article in Journal
Use of a Terrestrial LIDAR Sensor for Drift Detection in Vineyard Spraying
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of the Dual Stone Locating System on an Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptor
Previous Article in Journal
Disposable Fluorescence Optical pH Sensor for Near Neutral Solutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detectability of Absorption and Reduced Scattering Coefficients in Frequency-Domain Measurements Using a Realistic Head Phantom
Sensors 2013, 13(1), 500-515; doi:10.3390/s130100500
Article

Repeatability, Reproducibility and Standardisation of a Laser Doppler Imaging Technique for the Evaluation of Normal Mouse Hindlimb Perfusion

1,2,* , 3
, 4
, 4
, 4
, 4
, 1,2
, 4
, 1
 and 1,2
Received: 3 November 2012; in revised form: 11 December 2012 / Accepted: 20 December 2012 / Published: 28 December 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical & Biological Imaging)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [565 KB, updated 21 June 2014; original version uploaded 21 June 2014]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Background. Preclinical perfusion studies are useful for the improvement of diagnosis and therapy in dermatologic, cardiovascular and rheumatic human diseases. The Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging (LDPI) technique has been used to evaluate superficial alterations of the skin microcirculation in surgically induced murine hindlimb ischemia. We assessed the reproducibility and the accuracy of LDPI acquisitions and identified several critical factors that could affect LDPI measurements in mice. Methods. Twenty mice were analysed. Statistical standardisation and a repeatability and reproducibility analysis were performed on mouse perfusion signals with respect to differences in body temperature, the presence or absence of hair, the type of anaesthesia used for LDPI measurements and the position of the mouse body. Results. We found excellent correlations among measurements made by the same operator (i.e., repeatability) under the same experimental conditions and by two different operators (i.e., reproducibility). A Bland-Altman analysis showed the absence of bias in repeatability (p = 0.29) or reproducibility (p = 0.89). The limits of agreement for repeatability were –0.357 and –0.033, and for reproducibility, they were –0.270 and 0.238. Significant differences in perfusion values were observed in different experimental groups. Conclusions. Different experimental conditions must be considered as a starting point for the evaluation of new drugs and strategic therapies.
Keywords: Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging; hindlimb perfusion; mice; microcirculation; standardisation Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging; hindlimb perfusion; mice; microcirculation; standardisation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Greco, A.; Ragucci, M.; Liuzzi, R.; Gargiulo, S.; Gramanzini, M.; Coda, A.R.D.; Albanese, S.; Mancini, M.; Salvatore, M.; Brunetti, A. Repeatability, Reproducibility and Standardisation of a Laser Doppler Imaging Technique for the Evaluation of Normal Mouse Hindlimb Perfusion. Sensors 2013, 13, 500-515.

AMA Style

Greco A, Ragucci M, Liuzzi R, Gargiulo S, Gramanzini M, Coda ARD, Albanese S, Mancini M, Salvatore M, Brunetti A. Repeatability, Reproducibility and Standardisation of a Laser Doppler Imaging Technique for the Evaluation of Normal Mouse Hindlimb Perfusion. Sensors. 2013; 13(1):500-515.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Greco, Adelaide; Ragucci, Monica; Liuzzi, Raffaele; Gargiulo, Sara; Gramanzini, Matteo; Coda, Anna R.D.; Albanese, Sandra; Mancini, Marcello; Salvatore, Marco; Brunetti, Arturo. 2013. "Repeatability, Reproducibility and Standardisation of a Laser Doppler Imaging Technique for the Evaluation of Normal Mouse Hindlimb Perfusion." Sensors 13, no. 1: 500-515.


Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert