Next Article in Journal
Cell Docking, Movement and Cell-Cell Interactions of Heterogeneous Cell Suspensions in a Cell Manipulation Microdevice
Previous Article in Journal
Automated Data Quality Assessment of Marine Sensors
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2011, 11(10), 9603-9612; doi:10.3390/s111009603

Intercomparisons of Nine Sky Brightness Detectors

1
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, A. van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2
Lumineux Consult, Landgraafstraat 96, 6845 ED Arnhem, The Netherlands
3
Sotto le Stelle, Merwedeplantsoen 27, 3522 JS Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 September 2011 / Revised: 27 September 2011 / Accepted: 28 September 2011 / Published: 11 October 2011
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [264 KB, 21 June 2014; original version 21 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

Nine Sky Quality Meters (SQMs) have been intercompared during a night time measurement campaign held in the Netherlands in April 2011. Since then the nine SQMs have been distributed across the Netherlands and form the Dutch network for monitoring night sky brightness. The goal of the intercomparison was to infer mutual calibration factors and obtain insight into the variability of the SQMs under different meteorological situations. An ensemble average is built from the individual measurements and used as a reference to infer the mutual calibration factors. Data required additional synchronization prior to the calibration determination, because the effect of moving clouds combined with small misalignments emerges as time jitter in the measurements. Initial scatter of the individual instruments lies between ±14%. Individual night time sums range from −16% to +20%. Intercalibration reduces this to 0.5%, and −7% to +9%, respectively. During the campaign the smallest luminance measured was 0.657 ± 0.003 mcd/m2 on 12 April, and the largest value was 5.94 ± 0.03 mcd/m2 on 2 April. During both occurrences interfering circumstances like snow cover or moonlight were absent. View Full-Text
Keywords: artificial lighting; intercomparison; intercalibration; light pollution; night sky brightness; Sky Quality Meter artificial lighting; intercomparison; intercalibration; light pollution; night sky brightness; Sky Quality Meter
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

den Outer, P.; Lolkema, D.; Haaima, M.; Hoff, R.; Spoelstra, H.; Schmidt, W. Intercomparisons of Nine Sky Brightness Detectors. Sensors 2011, 11, 9603-9612.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top