Next Article in Journal
Diagnostic Potential of Differentially Expressed Homer1, IL-1β, and TNF-α in Coronary Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Elucidating Pharmacological Mechanisms of Natural Medicines by Biclustering Analysis of the Gene Expression Profile: A Case Study on Curcumin and Si-Wu-Tang
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms16010521
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of SAMe Superfamily to Novelty Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase Copy in Lonicera japonica

by
Yuan Yuan
1,
Linjie Qi
2,
Jun Yu
3,
Xumin Wang
3,* and
Luqi Huang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Dao-di Herbs, National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
2
School of Biology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
3
CAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing 100029, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(1), 521-534; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010521
Submission received: 19 August 2014 / Accepted: 24 November 2014 / Published: 29 December 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase superfamily plays important roles in plant development. The buds of Lonicera japonica are used as Chinese medical material and foods; chinese people began domesticating L. japonica thousands of years ago. Compared to the wild species, L. japonica var. chinensis, L. japonica gives a higher yield of buds, a fact closely related to positive selection over the long cultivation period of the species. Genome duplications, which are always detected in the domestic species, are the source of the multifaceted roles of the functional gene. In this paper, we investigated the evolution of the SAMe genes in L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis and further analyzed the roles of the duplicated genes among special groups. The SAMe protein sequences were subdivided into three clusters and several subgroups. The difference in transcriptional levels of the duplicated genes showed that seven SAMe genes could be related to the differences between the wild and the domesticated varieties. The sequence diversity of seven SAMe genes was also analyzed, and the results showed that different gene expression levels between the varieties could not be related to amino acid variation. The transcriptional level of duplicated PEAMT could be regulated through the SAM–SAH cycle.

1. Introduction

Protein methylation is catalyzed by S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferases (SAMe); this posttranslational modification serves diverse cellular functions in plant growth and development [1], including flower scent and color development [2,3]. SAMe genes belong to a superfamily (SCOP53335) and include nearly 57 protein families of different domains [4]. Phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT) is the key enzyme of the plant Cho-synthesis pathway, which catalyzes all three of the methylations required to convert phosphoethanolamine to phosphocholine [5]. The upstream promoter sequence of ZmPEAMT1 contained four kinds of putative cis-acting regulatory elements, including stress-responsive elements, phytohormone-responsive elements, pollen developmental special activation elements, and light-induced signal transduction elements, as well as several other structural features in common with the promoter of rice and Arabidopsis homologies [6]. The temperature-sensitive male sterility and salt hypersensitivity caused by PEAMT silencing in Arabidopsis [7]. Although studies on SAMe genes have provided great insight into the evolution of plant growth and development, our understanding of the mechanisms that control it is still poor.
The buds of Lonicera japonica are important in Chinese foods and medical materials; their active compounds include phenylpropanoids, terpenoids, and fatty acids. A new medicinal resource, L. japonica var. chinensis, is a variety with a greater content of active phenylpropanoid compounds but with lower bud yields. In transcriptome analysis, the minor differences between the two varieties are shown to be related to thousands of genes, including SAMe [8]. SAMes play important roles in the modification of such natural products as phenylpropanoids [9]. Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.104) is an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids [10]. Six caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferases were cloned from L. japonica and its wild variety, and only three genes had greater transcriptional levels in the buds of L. japonica. The expressed profile showed that the transcript level of only one gene in buds of L. japonica was inferior to its ortholog from the L. japonica variety, and the contents of ferulic acid and quercitrin in L. japonica were also lower than that in its variety. Phylogenic analysis suggested that a functional divergence in paralogs may lead to variation in the gene function that controls the content of the active compound.
The L. japonica domestication process started thousands of years ago in China, and the content of one or more active compounds could not as the marker for plant breeding. Compared with the wild species, L. japonica var. chinensis, L. japonica had higher bud yields, a characteristic that is closely related to the positive selection inherent in the long span cultivation of L. japonica cultivation.
Genome duplications have always been detected in domestic species [11], and they have been responsible for the multifaceted roles of the functional gene [12]. Changes in gene duplicates expression are associated with differences in flowering behavior between wild and domesticated sunflowers [13] and, as well, other species. However, few studies have detailed the mechanisms through which duplications in a protein superfamily produce special characteristics in domesticated species.
In this study, we investigated the evolution of SAMe genes in 21 species, including L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis. We also further analyzed the roles that gene duplicates among special groups played during domestication, and we suggest that differences in the transcript levels of gene duplicates are related to variations in the amino acid or SAM–SAH cycle.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Global Phylogeny of SAMe Proteins

Using Superfamily, Interpro and BlastP, as well as information from public genome databases and our own transcriptome databases of L. japonica, we gathered 2354 non-redundant sequences that encode SAMe proteins from 21 different species (Table S1), representing a diverse taxonomic background. The results show that SAMe proteins are widely distributed among bacteria, fungi, animals, and plants. Among the 2354 sequences, 288 putative SAMe protein sequences are identified in Selaginella moellendorffii, compared to 6 SAMe proteins in Escherichia coli (Table 1).
We classified all SAMe protein sequences into three clusters (Figure S1). Some 48% of them are in cluster I. Those from the gymnospermae species are all found in cluster III; a few sequences from Pinus taeda and Pseudotsuga menziesii appear in cluster I. Pteridophyta, algae, monocotyledoneae, and dicotyledoneae species appear in all three clusters.
Cluster I is divided into 14 subgroups (I-1–14), with fully 52% of the sequences in subgroup I-1; only one copy from Escherichia coli appears in subgroup I-12. Almost all animals and fungi are found in subgroups I-1, 3, and 12, and one copy from Culex quinquefasciatus is in subgroup I-2. The sequences of algae, pteridophyta, dicotyledoneae and monocotyledoneae have a similar distribution among the subgroups of cluster I. Cluster II contains11 subgroups (II-1–11), and a few sequences from L. japonica are found in subgroup II-2.
Table
Table 1. Copy number of S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferases (SAMe) in 19 species.
Table 1. Copy number of S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferases (SAMe) in 19 species.
KingdomGroupClassClusters * SpeciesNumber of Copies
I1234567891011121314II1234567891011IIITotal
Animal Culex quinquefasciatus1571600000000100710001101012224
Bacteria Escherichia coli10000000000010020000000001136
Fungus Penicillium marneffei840300000000100400001101010214
Aspergillus nidulans1040500000000100400001101010216
PlantGlymnospermae Pinus taeda20000000020000000000000000024
Pinus pinaster00000000000000000000000000011
Pseudotsuga menziesii11000000000000000000000000056
Algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii3416645000000420016000033020531363
Pteridophyta Selaginella moellendorffii1548314182030487850285005985182291849288
AngiospermaeDicotyle-doneaeGlycine max14585117103013111540413500141216152115293153225
Populus trichocarpa10365571010449330168006676141201750221
Arabidopsis thaliana6636561020226230140004353110111213119
Arabidopsis lyrata1173482104500002070033000088010888158
Vitis vinifera895745101092422024100344412191341171
Lonicera japonica573054101043215105504423807162021133
Lonicera japonica var. chinensis522754101043213104903423805161721122
Monocotyle-doneaeZea mays1165115610080106514001130097177181352845272
Sorghum bicolor6836661005024250148002366121141344160
Oryza sativa1015745200802325013710036119111211853225
Total 1140593891071445122140494735622247711754549485955141972014432354
* Clusters were showed in Figure S1.

2.2. Copying Genes of SAMe in L. japonica

Copying genes generate redundancy and create opportunity for evolutionary innovation [14]. From the Neighbor-joining trees, we compared the copy numbers of SAMe between sequences taken from L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis in the subgroups. Almost all the subgroups include the same number of SAMe copies of L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis, whereas the copy numbers for L. japonica are greater than those of L. japonica var. chinensis in the subgroups I-1, I-12, II-2, II-8, and II-11 (Table S2). The above results suggest that copying genes in these five subgroups plays an important role in L. japonica.
In subgroup I-1, 27 pairs of orthologs were found in L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis. Three redundant copies from L. japonica belong to a different protein family (PF05185, PF08498 and PF02353). In subgroups I-12, three pairs of orthologs were found and two redundant copies from L. japonica belonging to the same protein family (PF01209) (Figure S2). In subgroup II-2, all three pairs of orthologs belong to a protein family (PF03141) with one redundant copy from L. japonica (Figure S3). Four pairs of orthologs were found in subgroups II-8 (Figure S4), with three and one redundant copy from L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis, belong to a single protein family (PF03141). In subgroup II-11, seventeen pairs of orthologs were found, with three redundant copies from L. japonica belonging to one protein family (PF03141) (Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Gene expression of floral developmental genes in Lonicera japonica and its wild variety.
Table 2. Gene expression of floral developmental genes in Lonicera japonica and its wild variety.
Gene NameFunction in Floral OrganAT NCBI Accession No.FLJrFLJ
Accession No. *RPKMAccession No. *RPKM
FVEVegetative to the flower-producing phasesAT2G195202340205638139.82
FCAAT4G1628017238341.9356329457.57
APETALA 1MorphogenesisAT1G6912014624330.855628950
APETALA 3AT3G543401248526.695653040
PISTILLATAAT5G202401892556.345684570
AGAMOUSAT4G1896019184366.1157615857.57
SEPALLATAAT1G242601950158.095719820
SAHHMaintenance and recycling of S-adenosylmethionine dependent methylationAT3G238101834007.065694110
ADKAT3G09820101959323.33388474294.47
Abbreviations: AT, Arabidopsis thaliana; FLJ, Lonicera japonica; rFLJ, Lonicera japonica. var. chinensis (Watts.); RPKM, gene express RPKM; * identified sequences in database of Lonicera japonica and Lonicera japonica. var. chinensis (Watts.) in our group.

2.3. Expression of SAMe Genes in L. japonica Flowers

In order to further study the functional fate of the duplicated SAMe genes, we analyzed the transcript level of the SAMe genes based on L. japonica transcriptome data and real-time PCR. Besides II-2 subgroups, reads per kilo base per million (RPKM) of SAMe genes in subgroups with redundancy copies (Table S2) was greater in L. japonica than in L. japonica var. chinensis. In subgroup II-11, the total RPKM of the SAMe genes was 7.62-fold greater in L. japonica than that in L. japonica var. chinensis.
After duplication, both copies continue functioning when natural selection favors duplicated protein function or expression, or when mutations make them functionally distinct before one copy is silenced [15]. Approximately 50% of paralogs were differentially expressed and thus had undergone expression sub-functionalization by Soybean RNA-seq [16]. The RPKM of paralogs (FLJSAMT37 and FLJSAMT132 in I-1 subgroup) in the buds of L. japonica were 52.42 and 12.81, respectively. These differentially expressed copying genes in L. japonica could have undergone expression sub-functionalization or neo-functionalization.
We also analyzed the difference in gene expression between buds and flower1 of L. japonica. Buds had white or red petals that had not yet bloomed into a full-sized flower, and flower1 have white petals that had bloomed into a full-sized flower. Because of stable flower yields in buds and flower1, the differences in the transcriptional levels of genes in buds and flower 1 related to the flower yields should not be of any significance. Among the total eight SAMe genes, only seven SAMe genes, including FLJSAMT37, had different transcriptional levels between L. japonica and in L. japonica var. chinensis, but not between buds and flower 1 (Table 3), suggesting these genes could be related to the difference between the yields of flowers from the wild and from the domesticated varieties.
We further validated some above-mentioned SAMe genes as representatives using qRT-PCRs, and the results are consistent with the RNA-seq data (Table S3).
Table
Table 3. Gene expression and amino acid variation of SAMe genes in subgroups.
Table 3. Gene expression and amino acid variation of SAMe genes in subgroups.
Subgroups *Orthologs PfamGeneRPKMAmino Acid Variation
FLJ BudFLJ Flower1rFLJ Bud
II-2PF03141FLJSAMT59120.99106.17 365A/E
rFLJSAM40 248.90
II-8PF03141FLJSAMT53495.65860.77 275H/R, 289N/D, 441D/E, 623A/E
rFLJSAMT30 0
II-11PF03141FLJSAMT5168.7982.94 none
rFLJSAMT28 0
PF03141FLJSAMT73151.06153.34 none
rFLJSAMT87 0
PF03141FLJSAMT77118.24153.34 none
rFLJSAMT97 0
I-1PF01135FLJSAMT12141.97121.13 197V/I
rFLJSAMT2 0
PF02005FLJSAMT3677.7554.43 49E/Q, 299L/S, 599V/A
rFLJSAMT45 0
PF02353FLJSAMT3752.4260.38 none
rFLJSAMT24 5.90
Abbreviations: FLJ, Lonicera japonica; rFLJ, Lonicera japonica. var. chinensis (Watts.); FLJ bud, had white petals and had not yet bloomed into a full-size flower; FLJ flower1, had white petals and had bloomed into a full-size flower; rFLJ bud, had red petals and had not yet bloomed into a full-size flower; * Subgroups were showed in Figure S1; II-2, subgroups 2 in the second cluster; II-8, subgroups 8 in the second cluster; II-11, subgroups 11 in the second cluster; I-1, subgroups 1 in the fiest cluster.

2.4. Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase (PEAMT) in L. japonica Domestication

In plants, SAMe occurs as small superfamilies with defined roles for each of its members in flower development. Arabidopsis histone methyltransferase is crucial for both sporophyte and gametophyte development [17]. The transcript pattern showed that Arabidopsis O-methyltransferase is related to the developmental changes in flowers [9]. Acyltransferase was shown to be specifically expressed in anther tapetum cells in the early stages of flower development [18]. The in vitro substrate specificity and the in vivo RNAi-mediated suppression data of the corresponding gene suggest a role of this cation-dependent CCoAOMT-like protein in the stamen/pollen development of A. thaliana [19].
Because of a higher transcript level and greater number of copies in L. japonica than in L. japonica var. chinensis, a phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT, FLJSAMT37, Table S5) was selected to determine whether or not the duplicated gene in L. japonica domestication affects flower development. PEAMT has a central role in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis via the methylation pathway [7]. Studies have shown that the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine is affected by the plant growth regulator indole-3-acetic acid [20], suggesting that phosphatidylcholine has a fundamental function in plant growth and development.
Phosphatidylcholine is also the immediate precursor of many phospholipids [21] and catalyzes the hydrolysis of phospholipids in the cell membrane into phosphatidic acid and polar free heads [22]. Increased expression of phospholipase D, which hydrolyzes membrane lipids to generate phosphatidic acid and associated lipid changes, promotes root growth, flowering, and stress avoidance [23]. A phospholipase A1 catalyzes the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis [24]. PEAMT could exert a role in cell division and inflorescence meristem. Inhibition of PEAMT biosynthesis led to necrotic lesions in leaves, multiple inflorescences, sterility in the flower, and early flowering in short day conditions [25]. However, an increase in endogenous phosphocholine content during plant development improves the root meristem size, cell division, and cell elongation in Arabidopsis [26]. Two phosphatidylinositol/phosphatidylcholine transfer protein genes are predominantly transcribed in the development of the male gametic cells and/or the fertilization process [27]. Thus, we suggest that duplicated PEAMT in L. japonica domestication could affect the inflorescence development and flower yield.
Flower development has two phases: (1) the steps from the vegetative to the flower-producing phases and (2) flower morphogenesis. We selected sequences of FVE, FCA, APETALA, PISTILLATA, AGAMOUS, and SEPALLATA from Arabidopsis thaliana and obtained sequences of their orthologs from L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis using BlastX, pfam, and interpro analysis. FVE and FCA follow a single-phase transition between the vegetative and the flower-producing phases [28]. APETALA and PISTILLATA control the formation of petals and stamens during Arabidopsis flower development [29]. APETALA and AGAMOUS-like act redundantly to control the identity of the floral meristem [30]. The SEPALLATA subfamily also plays a crucial role in the development of all types of floral organs [31]. The transcript level of FVE and FCA in buds of L. japonica was inferior to that of L. japonica var. chinensis, whereas those of APETALA, PISTILLATA, AGAMOUS, and SEPALLATA were greater, suggesting stronger floral meristem and morphogenesis in L. japonica than their wide variety (Table 2). This is consistent with the results of PEAMT expression.

2.5. Sequence Diversity of SAMe between L. japonica and Its Wild Variety

In order to investigate the reason for the differential expression of SAMe in L. japonica and its wild variety, the sequence diversity in SAMe proteins from subgroups I-1, I-12, II-2, II-8, and II-11 were analyzed. Consensus contigs developed from L. japonica served as the basis for alignment to detect single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The readings of the individual sequences, realigned to the consensus contigs, enabled detection of 57 SNPs and 5 indels in the SAMe of L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis, based on a total uniquely aligned read number > 20 and a contingency test p-value <0.01. Only 13 residues of amino acids are changed in SAMe proteins of L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis, whereas novel PEAMT does not has either SNP or an indel; neither was a change in the residues in amino acids seen (Table 3).

2.6. SAM–SAH Cycle Regulates PEAMT Activity

Phosphocholine is synthesized by three successive S-adenosyl-Met (SAM)-dependent N-methylations of the phospho-base phosphoethanolamine [22]. This pattern is presumably due to the very active re-synthesis of SAM from ATP and Met made possible by recycling adenosine and homo-Cys derived from SAH [32]. Poulton and Butt [33] suggested that the ratio of SAM to SAH could regulate caffeic acid O-methyltransferase activity in the leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). The expression and activities of two enzymes, adenosine kinase (ADK) and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH), are both required for the maintenance and recycling of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methylation in plants [34,35]. Subcellular localization of SAHH and ADK in the cytosol with the phospho-base N-methyltransferase activities in spinach [33]. More transcript levels of SAHH and ADK were also found in buds of L. japonica than were found in those of L. japonica var. chinensis (Table 3). SAHH and ADK were found to accumulate in a similar pattern and were also found at high levels in inflorescence meristems, likely to support their higher rates of cell division [36]. Greater amounts of PEAMT were observed in buds of L. japonica than in its wild variety, a finding consistent with the abundance of ADK and SAHH observed in these samples. These results indicate a positive correlation among transcript levels of PEAMT, ADK, and SAHH, reflecting their respective contributions to methyl metabolism.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Plant Material

Buds and leaves of six each L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis plants were sampled in May 2012. These plants are 5 years old and situated in the field in Linyi planting garden, Yate Co, Shandong, China. Buds samples have similar morphology and have not yet bloomed into a full-size flower.

3.2. SAMe Classification

We searched the adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase sequences of 21 species (Table S1) using the superfamily [4] and InterPro databases. The species include one animal, one bacterium, two fungi, two algae, three gymnospermae, two pteridophyta, seven dicotyledoneae, and three monocotyledoneae. L. japonica database derived from five normalized libraries of transcriptome analysis. Flower samples (corollas or all petals) were randomly collected from five independent 3-year old FLJ and rFLJ in Doudian plantation (Beijing, China) to construct transcriptome libraries.
A total of 16,723 plant adenosyl-l-methionine-dependentmethyltransferases (SAMe) extracted from the NCBI non-redundant protein database, the SCOP SUPERFAMILY database [37] and the Unipro database [38]. We compared all searching sequences against the above plant SAMe sequence with an e-value cut-off below 1e−15 using BlastP [39] to determine the SAMe proteins from the best reciprocal hits. The resultant ESTs were dealt with Perl scripts to remove any repeated sequences.

3.3. SAMe Annotation

Domain and motif analyses were performed by InterPro [40] and Pfam [41]. The protein sequence similarities of SAMe were analyzed by DNAMAN. All the L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis SAMe sequences were submitted to COG [42] to cluster the SAMe orthologous groups with a p-value cut-off below 10−5.

3.4. SAMe Phylogeny

We used the SAMe sequences to construct neighbor-joining trees using Mega 5.0 [43] and ClustalW2 [44], respectively, with a bootstrap value of 1000 replicates. Furthermore, we reconciled preliminary trees by setting the bootstrap value greater than 50% to yield a consensus tree even more credible.

3.5. Orthologs and Paralogs

To identify orthologs, we performed an all-against-all sequence comparison using BLAST with an e-value cut-off below 1e−20. The orthologs were then determined based on the best reciprocal hits [45]. We implemented a more stringent criterion: the alignment length percentage against the longer protein had to be above 80%.

3.6. Gene Expression Analyses and Experimental Validation

The gene expression profiling of L. japonica flowers was performed in a previous study [8]. The expression level was normalized with total mapped reads and the contig length, similar to RPKM method [46]. The RPKM value for each transcript was calculated as the number of reads per kilobase of the transcript sequence per million mapped reads [47].
Individual RNA samples extracted from the buds of six each L. japonica and L. Japonica var. chinensis plants were used to produce cDNAs for qRT-PCR, including reactions without reverse transcriptase. The PrimerScript 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit from Takara (Tokyo, Japan) was used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer 3 [48]. The primers are shown in Table S4. The amplifications were carried out with a 1 min incubation at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 57–60 °C for 30 s and 68 °C for 30 s. The lengths of PCR products ranged from 100 to 250 bp. FLJ18S was chosen as an endogenous control in studying gene expressions in various bud samples of L. japonica and L. Japonica var. chinensis. The specificity of amplification was assessed by melting curve analysis, and the relative abundance of genes was determined using the comparative Ct method as suggested in ABI 7500 Software v2.0.1 (ABI, California, CA, USA).

3.7. SNP Identification, Validation and Sequences Diversity

Reads of L. japonica var. chinensis in the transcriptomes were mapped to FLJSAMes nucleotide sequences by BWA [49] and homozygous FLJSAMes SNPs were prepared by SAMtools [50]. Homozygous rFLJSAMes SNPs were also prepared by mapping the L. japonica reads to the FLJSAMes nucleotide sequences. Nucleotide sequences of FLJSAMes and rFLJSAMes were BLAST each other to find the best hits and matching position show the same variants count to candidate SNPs. SNPs with genotypic variants of the position within more than two reads or frank SNPs within 60 bp were removed. The filters we used to find the variants we could consider true SNPs are as follows: The minimum coverage of the position was eight reads and the minimum average quality of the bases was 20.

4. Conclusions

All SAMe protein sequences were classified into three clusters and several subgroups. Almost all subgroups have the same number of SAMe gene copies of L. japonica and L. japonica var. chinensis, whereas copy numbers of L. japonica are higher than L. japonica var. chinensis in the subgroups I-1, I-12, II-2, II-8, and II-11. The difference in transcriptional levels of the duplicated genes showed that seven SAMe genes could be related to the differences between the wild and the domesticated varieties. The sequence diversity of seven SAMe genes showed that the different expressed levels between varieties could be related to variations in the amino acid sequences. However, in the case of those containing PEAMT that had neither SNP/indel nor changes of amino acid residues, the transcript levels of PEAMT could be related to ADK and SAHH, reflecting their respective contributions to methyl metabolism.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/01/0521/s1.

Acknowledgments

The project was funded by Natural Science Foundation of China (81001605, 81373959).

Author Contributions

Yuan Yuan and Luqi Huang contributed to the study design. Linjie Qi, Jun Yu and Xumin Wang performed the research and conducted the data analysis. Yuan Yuan wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Willnow, S.; Martin, M.; Luscher, B.; Weinhold, E. A selenium-based click AdoMet analogue for versatile substrate labeling with wild-type protein methyltransferases. Chembiochem 2012, 13, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fellenberg, C.; Bottcher, C.; Vogt, T. Phenylpropanoid polyamine conjugate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana flower buds. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kessler, D.; Gase, K.; Baldwin, I.T. Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents. Science 2008, 321, 1200–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gough, J.; Karplus, K.; Hughey, R.; Chothia, C. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313, 903–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McNeil, S.; Nuccio, M.; Ziemak, M.; Hanson, A. Enhanced synthesis of choline and glycine betaine in transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10001–10005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wu, S.; Yu, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, W.; Ye, C.; Li, J.; Tang, J.; Ding, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, B. Cloning, characterization, and transformation of the phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene (ZmPEAMT1) in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol. Biotechnol. 2007, 36, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mou, Z.; Wang, X.; Fu, Z.; Dai, Y.; Han, C.; Jian, O.; Bao, F.; Hu, Y.; Li, J. Silencing of phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase results in temperature-sensitive male sterility and salt hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2031–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yuan, Y.; Song, L.; Li, M.; Liu, G.; Chu, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, W.; Qin, S.; et al. Genetic variation and metabolic pathway intricacy govern the active compound content and quality of the Chinese medicinal plant Lonicera japonica thunb. BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wirsing, L.; Naumann, K.; Vogt, T. Arabidopsis methyltransferase fingerprints by affinity-based protein profiling. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 408, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Phogat, N.; Vindal, V.; Kumar, V.; Inampudi, K.K.; Prasad, N.K. Sequence analysis, in silico modeling and docking studies of caffeoyl CoA-O-methyltransferase of Populus trichopora. J. Mol. Model. 2012, 16, 1461–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Hont, A.; Denoeud, F.; Aury, J.M.; Baurens, F.C.; Carreel, F.; Garsmeur, O.; Noel, B.; Bocs, S.; Droc, G.; Rouard, M.; et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 2012, 488, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pin, P.A.; Nilsson, O. The multifaceted roles of FLOWERING LOCUS T in plant development. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1742–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Blackman, B.K.; Strasburg, J.L.; Raduski, A.R.; Michaels, S.D.; Rieseberg, L.H. The role of recently derived FT paralogs in sunflower domestication. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bomblies, K. Evolution: Redundancy as an opportunity for innovation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 320–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chain, F.J.; Dushoff, J.; Evans, B.J. The odds of duplicate gene persistence after polyploidization. BMC Genomics 2011, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. </b>Roulin, A.; Auer, P.L.; Libault, M.; Schlueter, J.; Farmer, A.; May, G.; Stacey, G.; Doerge, R.W.; Jackson, S.A. The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome. Plant J. 2012, 1, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  17. Berr, A.; McCallum, E.J.; Menard, R.; Meyer, D.; Fuchs, J.; Dong, A.; Shen, W.H. Arabidopsis SET DOMAIN GROUP2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation and is crucial for both sporophyte and gametophyte development. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3232–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grienenberger, E.; Besseau, S.; Geoffroy, P.; Debayle, D.; Heintz, D.; Lapierre, C.; Pollet, B.; Heitz, T.; Legrand, M. A BAHD acyltransferase is expressed in the tapetum of Arabidopsis anthers and is involved in the synthesis of hydroxycinnamoyl spermidines. Plant J. 2009, 58, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fellenberg, C.; Milkowski, C.; Hause, B.; Lange, P.R.; Bottcher, C.; Schmidt, J.; Vogt, T. Tapetum-specific location of a cation-dependent O-methyltransferase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 56, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Price-Jones, M.J.; Harwood, J.L. Hormonal regulation of phosphatidylcholine syntehesis in plants: The inhibition of cytidylyltransferase activity by indol-3-ylacetic acid. Biochem. J. 1983, 216, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Smith, D.D.; Summers, P.S.; Weretilnyk, E.A. Phosphocholine synthesis in spinach: Characterization of phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 108, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, K.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Fang, R.; Sun, Z.; Chen, X. Analysis of rice OsPLD3 and OsPLD4 genes and promoters. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 368–375. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hong, Y.; Pan, X.; Welti, R.; Wang, X. Phospholipase Dalpha3 is involved in the hyperosmotic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ishiguro, S.; Kawai-Oda, A.; Ueda, J.; Nishida, I.; Okada, K. The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCIENCE gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2191–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kwon, Y.; Yu, S.I.; Lee, H.; Yim, J.H.; Zhu, J.K.; Lee, B.H. Arabidopsis serine decarboxylase mutants implicate the roles of ethanolamine in plant growth and development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 3176–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alatorre-Cobos, F.; Cruz-Ramirez, A.; Hayden, C.A.; Perez-Torres, C.A.; Chauvin, A.L.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Alva-Cortes, E.; Jorgensen, R.A.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Translational regulation of Arabidopsis XIPOTL1 is modulated by phosphocholine levels via the phylogenetically conserved upstream open reading frame 30. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5203–5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mo, P.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, A.; Yan, C.; Wang, D. Identification of two phosphatidylinositol/phosphatidylcholine transfer protein genes that are predominately transcribed in the flowers of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Suh, S.S.; Choi, K.R.; Lee, I. Revisiting phase transition during flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wuest, S.E.; O’Maoileidigh, D.S.; Rae, L.; Kwasniewska, K.; Raganelli, A.; Hanczaryk, K.; Lohan, A.J.; Loftus, B.; Graciet, E.; Wellmer, F. Molecular basis for the specification of floral organs by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13452–13457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gregis, V.; Sessa, A.; Dorca-Fornell, C.; Kater, M.M. The Arabidopsis floral meristem identity genes AP1, AGL24 and SVP directly repress class B and C floral homeotic genes. Plant J. 2009, 60, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kaufmann, K.; Muino, J.M.; Jauregui, R.; Airoldi, C.A.; Smaczniak, C.; Krajewski, P.; Angenent, G.C. Target genes of the MADS transcription factor SEPALLATA3: Integration of developmental and hormonal pathways in the Arabidopsis flower. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weretilnyk, E.A.; Alexander, K.J.; Drebenstedt, M.; Snider, J.D.; Summers, P.S.; Moffatt, B.A. Maintaining methylation activities during salt stress. The involvement of adenosine kinase. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Poulton, J.E.; Butt, V.S. Purification and properties of S-adenosyl-l-methionine:caffeic acid O-methyltransferase from leaves of spinach beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 403, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schroder, G.; Eichel, J.; Breinig, S.; Schroder, J. Three differentially expressed S-adenosylmethionine synthetases from Catharanthus roseus: Molecular and functional characterization. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 33, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Poulton, J.E. Transmethylation and demethylation reactions in the metabolism of secondary plant products. In The Biochemistry of Plants; Stumpf, P.K., Conn, E.E., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981; Volume 7, pp. 667–723. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pereira, L.A.; Todorova, M.; Cai, X.; Makaroff, C.A.; Emery, R.J.; Moffatt, B.A. Methyl recycling activities are co-ordinately regulated during plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1083–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Available online: supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  38. Available online: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/ (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  39. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. InterPro. Available online: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  41. Pfam. Available online: http://www.pfam.sanger.ac.uk/ (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  42. COG. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/ (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  43. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jeanmougin, F.; Thompson, J.D.; Gouy, M.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23, 403–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tatusov, R.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Lipman, D.J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997, 278, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Oshlack, A.; Robinson, M.D.; Young, M.D. From RNA-seq reads to differential expression results. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mortazavi, A.; Williams, B.A.; McCue, K.; Schaeffer, L.; Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Primer3. Available online: http://Simgene.com/primer3 (accessed on 9 December 2013).
  49. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin1, R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, Y.; Qi, L.; Yu, J.; Wang, X.; Huang, L. Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of SAMe Superfamily to Novelty Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase Copy in Lonicera japonica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 521-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010521

AMA Style

Yuan Y, Qi L, Yu J, Wang X, Huang L. Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of SAMe Superfamily to Novelty Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase Copy in Lonicera japonica. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(1):521-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Yuan, Linjie Qi, Jun Yu, Xumin Wang, and Luqi Huang. 2015. "Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of SAMe Superfamily to Novelty Phosphoethanolamine N-Methyltransferase Copy in Lonicera japonica" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 1: 521-534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010521

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop