Next Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Dihydromyricetin against •OH-Induced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Damage and Mechanistic Chemistry
Next Article in Special Issue
Catalysts with Cerium in a Membrane Reactor for the Removal of Formaldehyde Pollutant from Water Effluents
Previous Article in Journal
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector and Electrospray Ionization Ion Trap Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry to Evaluate Ginseng Roots and Rhizomes from Different Regions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Pd-Loaded Hierarchical FAU Membranes and Testing in Acetophenone Hydrogenation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supported Pd-Au Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production: Membrane Preparation, Characterization and Testing

1
Institute on Membrane Technology of the Italian National Research Council (TM-CNR), Cubo 17/C, University of Calabria, Rende 87036, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71345, Iran
3
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford 94305, CA, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(5), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050581
Submission received: 16 March 2016 / Revised: 20 April 2016 / Accepted: 22 April 2016 / Published: 9 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Catalysis)

Abstract

:
A supported Pd-Au (Au 7wt%) membrane was produced by electroless plating deposition. Permeation tests were performed with pure gas (H2, H2, N2, CO2, CH4) for long time operation. After around 400 h under testing, the composite Pd-Au membrane achieved steady state condition, with an H2/N2 ideal selectivity of around 500 at 420 °C and 50 kPa as transmembrane pressure, remaining stable up to 1100 h under operation. Afterwards, the membrane was allocated in a membrane reactor module for methane steam reforming reaction tests. As a preliminary application, at 420 °C, 300 kPa of reaction pressure, space velocity of 4100 h−1, 40% methane conversion and 35% hydrogen recovery were reached using a commercial Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Unfortunately, a severe coke deposition affected irreversibly the composite membrane, determining the loss of the hydrogen permeation characteristics of the supported Pd-Au membrane.

1. Introduction

The current development in energy use is oriented towards reducing carbon consumption due to its environmental pollution. Hydrogen as a clean and sustainable energy carrier has gained more attention during the past decades. When hydrogen reacts with oxygen in fuel cells and internal combustion engines, a large amount of energy is released explosively in heat engines and quietly in fuel, releasing water as the product.
The present source of hydrogen comes mainly from synthesis gas, which is a mixture of H2, CO and CO2, and it is produced by breaking the strong C-H bonds (439 kJ/mol) of hydrocarbons in reforming reactions. Afterwards, hydrogen is purified and separated by different energy intensive steps. A membrane reactor (MR) technology can represent an energetically efficient option to the conventional processes, with the practical advantages of a smaller footprint and capital cost reduction. In this alternative reformer, the hydrogen is produced and continuously removed from the reaction side for permeation through a hydrogen perm-selective membrane, shifting the reaction towards further product formation. As a consequence, the conversion increases and pure hydrogen is produced at the same time.
In the specialized literature, porous carbon, silica and zeolite membranes have been used for hydrogen separation [1,2,3]. Nevertheless, their separation characteristics are still not acceptable although their cost is relatively low. Dense membranes made of palladium (Pd) are able to separate hydrogen from a gas mixture by a solution-diffusion mechanism with a theoretically infinite hydrogen perm-selectivity [4]. As it is well known, the cost of Pd-membranes is relatively high, but it can be reduced by depositing a thin Pd layer on a metallic or ceramic support [5].
Despite of the great permeation characteristics of Pd, its application is restricted by some factors. Hydrogen embrittlement of Pd-membranes occurs when the operating conditions are below 300 °C and 2.0 MPa. In these conditions, hydrogen permeation through the membrane allows for the change of Pd lattice from α to β phase, and vice versa. Several cycles from α to β phase can cause the formation of cracks in the membrane lattice [6].
Furthermore, dense Pd-membranes are affected by surface contamination. Different studies have demonstrated the effects of different contaminants such as CO [7,8,9,10], H2O [11,12,13], Cl [14], NH3 [15], certain hydrocarbons and sulfur compounds like H2S [16] on the membranes. In particular, by exposing H2S to the Pd surface, sulfur is reversibly adsorbed on the palladium surface blocking the adsorption sites for hydrogen with a reduction in the hydrogen permeation. Sulfur can also react with the Pd surface producing Pd4S which acts as a barrier to hydrogen permeation decreasing the permeance [17]. The lattice constants of Pd and Pd4S are highly different, so this can cause cracks in the membrane [18].
In order to overcome these drawbacks, some studies proposed to change the crystal structure into nanostructure [19]. However, most of the researches proposed an enhancement of the membranes stability by alloying them with other elements [20,21,22]. Most efforts in this area are dedicated to Pd-Cu alloys because of their high resistance to sulfur poisoning [23,24,25]. Lately, the Pd-Au membranes have been studied due to their higher hydrogen permeability with respect to Pd-Cu. In the pioneeristic study realized by McKinely et al. [26,27], it was shown that the addition of Au content in the range 0wt% –20wt% to palladium membranes enhances the tolerance to sulfur compounds, minimizing the embrittlement phenomenon and improving the hydrogen permeability more than pure Pd. In the experiments done by Way et al. [28], the Pd-15%wt Au has exhibited a higher hydrogen permeating flux in the presence of H2S than a Pd-6%wt Cu in the absence of H2S. In particular, by using Pd-15%wt Au the hydrogen flux decreased 38% after the exposure to 5 ppm H2S at 400 °C, while, with Pd-6%wt Cu, the hydrogen flux was 71% lower than that measured with Pd-Au in H2S presence. Chen and Ma [29] examined a Pd-8%wt Au on a porous metal support. In the temperature range between 350 and 500 °C, no sulfide was detected in the membrane even at 54.8 ppm H2S exposure.
Some studies have compared hydrogen permeation in Pd-Au alloys with pure Pd. Sonwane et al. [30] predicted that the hydrogen permeability in Pd-Au membrane increased by increasing the Au content, having a maximum value at 12wt% Au and showing a hydrogen permeability 1.8 times greater than pure Pd at 180 °C. In other investigations, Gryaznov [31] found that the hydrogen permeability of Pd-10%wt Au at 500 °C is 2.2 times higher than that of pure Pd. Ma et al. [32] investigated the performance of several Pd-Au membranes with different Au content at (4.2wt%–16.7wt%) from 250 to 450 °C, confirming that the membranes with 4.2wt% and 5.4wt% Au show higher hydrogen permeability than pure Pd.
However, the stability of Pd-Au membranes under long-term operation has been tested only in a few studies, including the experimental efforts of Guazzone et al. and Mardilovich et al., who analyzed the long-term permeation test results of Pd and Pd-Au composite membranes under desulfurized coal-derived syngas at pilot scale [33,34,35].
The objective of the present work is to investigate the long-term stability characteristics of hydrogen permeation of a composite membrane constituted of a Pd-Au (Au 7wt%) dense layer supported on a porous stainless steel (PSS) support, meanwhile evaluating the H2/N2, H2/CO2, H2/CH4 and H2/He ideal selectivities.
Furthermore, at stable value of hydrogen permeance, the composite Pd-Au membrane was allocated in a MR module for carrying out methane steam reforming (MSR) reaction for producing hydrogen and to analyze the effect of coke formation during the course of experiments.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Permeation Tests on the Pd-Au/PSS Membrane

The permeation tests on the supported Pd-Au membrane at the onset of the experimental testing were carried out with pure H2 and N2 at 350 °C and transmembrane pressures of 50 and 100 kPa, with the results resumed in Table 1.
As expected, a higher transmembrane pressure affects positively the hydrogen permeation driving force (in this case, represented by the hydrogen partial pressure difference between retentate and permeate sides), making higher hydrogen permeating flux achievable. Nevertheless, the results do not show high performance of the membrane in terms of H2/N2 ideal selectivity, which can be the consequence of defects, non-homogeneity of Pd-Au layer or Pd-Au alloy not yet formed. Furthermore, it is worth of noting that, at the beginning of the experimental campaign (Figure 1), the composite membrane was probably not at steady state conditions. This should justify why the H2/N2 ideal selectivity trend increases slightly by increasing the transmembrane pressure from Δp = 50 kPa to Δp = 100 kPa.
Then, in order to evaluate the permeation characteristic of the membrane at steady state conditions, further permeation tests with pure N2, He and H2 were successively performed and, after each cycle of pure gas permeation test, the composite membrane was flowed under hydrogen at Δp = 50 kPa also over night. The results of these tests in terms of H2, N2 and He permeating fluxes are also resumed in Figure 1. As shown, in the range 0–100 h, the H2 permeating flux increased from ~2.0 × 10−3 mol/m2·s to 7.5 × 10−3 mol/m2·s, due to the temperature increase from 300 °C to 420 °C. Afterwards, at the set temperature (420 °C) and with the composite membrane exposed to pure hydrogen permeation (a part from the daily realization of pure gas permeation tests), after 400 h, the hydrogen permeating flux reached the steady state condition with an average value of ~2.0 × 10−2 mol/m2·s, remaining constant up to 1100 h. This trend confirms the optimum annealing conditions for the formation of Pd-Au alloy over this time [32]. As shown in Figure 2, H2/N2 and H2/He ideal selectivities increased in the range 0–100 h due to the higher operating temperature, consequently acting towards higher hydrogen permeating flux. After 300 h at 420 °C, they reached average values of around 500 and 220, respectively, remaining constant up to 1100 h under operation.
In the range 400–1000 h, when the membrane showed constant properties in terms of hydrogen permeating flux and ideal selectivities, in order to define the correct value of n, a series of hydrogen permeation tests was performed at different transmembrane pressures to calculate the linear regression factor (R2) at different “n”. As illustrated in Figure 3, the highest value of R2 was reached at n = 1, meaning that the permeation characteristics of the composite membrane are far from the Sieverts–Fick law [4], and, meanwhile, confirming a considerable presence of defects as pin-holes in the Pd-Au layer.
Furthermore, with the lifetime of the membrane around 1100 h under continuous operation, CH4 and CO2 permeation tests were also performed besides H2 and the results are summarized in Table 2. As it was mentioned earlier, hydrogen permeates through the Pd-Au layer by a solution-diffusion mechanism. On the contrary, the other gases permeate through the defects of the Pd-Au surface and the pores of the support with a Knudsen diffusion mechanism [36].
The H2/CO2 ideal selectivity of a bit less than 500 represents an interesting result for the separation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide mixtures. However, only a few results are available in the open literature about Pd-Au composite membranes applied in the field of gas separation and reaction testing, particularly evaluating the membrane aging. Then, a qualitative summary of the long-term characteristics of Pd-Au membranes from literature data are displayed in Table 3. Preparation method, thickness of the Pd-Au layer, operating conditions and H2 permeance as well as αH2/He and reference are reported. As shown, the ideal selectivity αH2/He of this work is the lowest compared to the other reported data, but it was calculated after almost 1000 h under operation, while the other data refer to the onset of the experimental tests or for a shorter range time under continuous operation.

2.2. Methane Steam Reforming Reaction in the MR Housing the Pd-Au/PSS

With the aim of examining the performance of the Pd-Au/PSS membrane in an MR, the MSR reaction was carried out (as reported by the square indicator in Figure 1) at 420 °C and 300 kPa of reaction pressure by using also a sweep-gas in the permeate stream in counter-current mode with respect to the feed.
The endothermic reaction of MSR reaction can be expressed according to Equation (1):
CH4 + H2O = CO + 3H2, ΔH = 206 kJ/mol
In the meanwhile, the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction takes place according to Equation (2):
CO + H2O = CO2 + H2, ΔH = −41.15 kJ/mol
Table 4 resumes the operating conditions of MSR reaction, and Figure 4 sketches the reaction results in terms of methane conversion, hydrogen recovery and yield.
The first reaction test was carried out at 420 °C, GHSV = 4100 h−1 and after 500 h of the membrane under pure gas permeation tests and with a constant hydrogen permeance. At these conditions, methane conversion is equal to 40% and the hydrogen recovery around 35%, while the yield is around 15%. The low conversion of methane is probably due to the low reaction temperature used during the tests.
Furthermore, owing to a low value of hydrogen perm-selectivity the effect of the conversion shifting is not so much effective compared to dense Pd-based membranes, full hydrogen perm-selective. As a consequence, the hydrogen yield is also low as well as the hydrogen recovered in the permeated stream. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 5, the total hydrogen produced during the reaction was 0.84 mL/min, subdivided in the hydrogen in the permeate and retentate streams.
All the results reported in Figure 4 and Figure 5 show a maximum error bar lower than 2%.
Hence, in order to improve the methane conversion, the space velocity was decreased to favor higher residence time of the reactants in the reaction zone with a consequent longer contact time between the gas mixture and the catalyst. Nevertheless, at GHSV = 1100 h−1 and 420 °C, the hydrogen recovery increased up to 65%, but the conversion dropped to around 10%. This reverse phenomena can be a sequence of catalyst deactivation due to coke formation.
As a consequence, the experimental tests at 1100 h−1 were repeated, and, once again, coke formation was verified. Then, after the reaction test, pure hydrogen was flowed into the reaction side (~3.0 × 10−3 mol/min) at 420 °C and for around 2 h.
Figure 6 shows the feed and retentate molar flow rates of hydrogen. The results show that, particularly, in the first hour of operation, a substantial part of hydrogen fed to the MR was consumed in the catalytic bed, forming methane and indirectly confirming the coke deposition during the experimental tests. Indeed, during the hydrogen feeding procedure, methane was detected by analyzing the retentate stream to the GC. Hence, after almost 1 h under operation, the flow rate of methane formed during this procedure decreased gradually till 2.25 h, in which the inlet hydrogen stream was equal to the outlet stream. Successively, the reaction test was repeated, but the conversion remained still low and, then, the reaction tests were stopped. To verify the hydrogen permeation characteristic of the Pd-Au/PSS membrane after the reaction tests, permeation tests with pure H2, N2 and He were further performed. Unfortunately, both αH2/N2 and αH2/He ideal selectivities dropped dramatically and, consequently, the MR was cooled down at ambient temperature, removing the membrane from the MR module. Figure 7 shows the status of the membrane before and after the experimental campaign, highlighting the color difference of the membrane surface, moved from the initial gold to gray.
Gade et al. [37] supposed that the presence of H2S was responsible of the grain boundary attack with consequent loss of gold. However, the aforementioned authors stated that, in their opinion, the H2S attack was not the sole mechanism as a cause of gold depletion as in the case of this work. Therefore, in a next study, we will investigate in details what could be the mechanism for the change in color of the membrane surface from gold to gray during such a reaction as MSR in absence of H2S in the feed.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Membrane Preparation

Different techniques can be adopted for depositing palladium or its alloys onto porous substrates such as magnetron sputtering [38], spray pyrolysis [39], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [40], physical vapor deposition [39,41] and electroless plating deposition (ELP) [42,43]. In this study, a dense Pd-Au layer (~7 μm thick) was deposited onto a PSS tubular support via the ELP method.
The support was supplied by Pall AccuSep (New York, NY, USA) having 1.0 cm O.D. (AISI 316L porous tube) with an active length around 4 cm. The porous support was welded to two stainless steel tubes, and one of them is closed for facilitating the membrane housing in the MR module. Then, the total length of the membrane tube was 20 cm. The support was oxidized for 12 h at 500 °C. It was then graded with preactivated Al2O3 particles and cemented with Pd in order to decrease the surface pore size and narrow the surface pore size distribution and create the intermediate layer for avoiding intermetallic diffusion.
The surface activation was then carried out using the standard SnCl2-PdCl2 activation procedure and a thin layer of pure Pd was deposited by electroless plating technique. Successively, the Au deposition was performed by the method described in detail in Chen and Ma [29]. After each step of membrane preparation, the He permeance at room temperature was also measured (Figure 8a,b).
Hence, the Pd-Au/PSS membrane was allocated in the module and fixed by means of graphite gaskets and 3.0 g of Ni/Al2O3 commercial catalyst was packed in the annulus of the MR. To prevent the movement of catalyst particles, glass spheres were placed at each side of the catalytic bed.
The MR was flowed with pure N2 at ambient temperature to check the presence of leakages. A thermocouple was used to measure the temperature of the MR module, which was heated up by using two electrical tapes up to achieving the required temperatures (300–420 °C). The retentate pressure was adjusted by utilizing a back-pressure regulator placed at the outlet side of this stream, while the permeate pressure was always kept at 100 kPa.
A scheme of the experimental setup used in this work is illustrated in Figure 9. In the case of permeation tests, pure gases (H2, N2, He, CH4 or CO2) were flowed into the MR module and the permeating flow rate was measured by means of bubble flow meters.
During the reaction tests of MSR, methane was mixed with deionized water (steam/methane = 3.5/1), which was pumped by a P680 HPLC pump (Dreieich, Germany), in a preheated chamber and, then, injected to the reaction zone. N2 was also used as an internal standard gas and as a sweep gas with a flow rate of ~25 mL/min, flowed in counter-current mode with respect to the feed. To remove the unreacted water from the retentate and, eventually, from the permeate streams, they were passed through a condenser. Then, the retentate and permeate dry streams were analyzed by means of a temperature programmed HP 6890 gas chromatograph (GC) (Foster City, CA, USA). Each experimental point reported in this work was constituted of, at least, ten reaction cycles at the same operating conditions in order to ensure the reproducibility of the results.

3.2. Permeation Tests

Pure gases such as H2, N2, He, CH4 or CO2 were flowed into the membrane reactor module before reaction tests for studying the permeation characteristics of the supported Pd-Au membrane.
The pure gases were provided by cylinders.
To analyze the hydrogen permeation characteristics of the Pd-Au/PSS membrane, Equation (3) was used as:
JH2 = PH2 (pnH2,retentate − pnH2,permeate)
where JH2 is the hydrogen flux permeating through the membrane, PH2 the hydrogen permeance, pH2,reaction and pH2,permeate the hydrogen partial pressures in the reaction and permeate sides, respectively. n is variable in the range 0.5–1 depending on the rate limiting step of hydrogen diffusion. More details about the deviation of Sieverts–Fick law (n = 0.5) were explained elsewhere [44].
The hydrogen over other pure gas ideal selectivity (αH2/i) was expressed as the ratio of the H2 permeating flux over the permeating flux of another pure gas of interest at the same transmembrane pressure, as reported in Equation (4):
αH2/i = JH2/Ji, i = (He, N2, CO2, CH4)
Methane conversion was described by using Equation (5) during MSR reaction:
Conversion (%) = [(COout + CO2out)/CH4 in] × 100
where COout and CO2out represent the outlet molar flow rates of CO and CO2, while CH4,in represents the molar flow rate of methane in the reaction side.
Hydrogen recovery was defined by Equation (6):
Hydrogen Recovery (%) = [H2-perm/( H2-perm + H2-ret)] × 100
where H2-perm and H2-ret are the molar flow rates of hydrogen in the permeate and retentate streams, respectively.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the performance of a supported Pd-Au membrane in terms of hydrogen permeance and ideal selectivity in pure gas permeation tests under long time continuous operation. The hydrogen permeance increased till achieving steady state conditions after around 400 h. Hence, at 50 kPa of transmembrane pressure and 420 °C, the composite membrane reached H2/N2 ideal selectivity of around 500 with an hydrogen permeance of 2.3 × 10−2 mol/m2·s, remaining stable up to 1100 h under operation.
During MSR reaction tests, 40% of methane conversion and 35% of hydrogen recovery were reached in the MR. However, coke was formed during the reaction tests, and it was probably responsible of the irreversible loss of hydrogen permeation characteristics of the membrane. The MR was cooled at ambient temperature, and we observed that the color of the membrane surface moved from gold to gray. In the future, we will better investigate this effect, making more stable the alloy during the reaction tests, meanwhile, improving the hydrogen permeation selectivity.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Yi Hua Ma and Ivan P. Mardilovich for the Pd-Au/PSS membrane preparation at the Worcester Polytechnique Institute (Worcester, MA, USA).

Author Contributions

A.I. partially wrote the manuscript and made the analysis of the experimental data; M.A. partially wrote the manuscript and participated to the experimental campaign. G.B., S.L. and B.A. participated to the experimental campaign, J.W., M.R.R. and R.E. contributed to the manuscript preparation, and A.B. managed the whole manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

SymbolDefinitionUnit
BPermeabilitymol·m−1·s−1·kPa−n
dpPore Diameterm
DkiKnudsen Diffusivitym2·s−2
JPermeation Fluxmol·m−2·s−1
MMolecular Weightkg/mol
pPartial PressurekPa
PTotal PressurekPa
tTimeh
TTemperature°C

Greek Letters

SymbolDefinitionUnit
αIdeal Selectivity
δMembrane Thicknessm

Subscripts

SymbolDefinitionUnit
iSpecies

Abbreviations

GCGas Chromatograph
GHSVGas Hourly Space Velocityh−1
MRMembrane Reactor
MSRMethane Steam Reforming
PSSPorous Stainless Steel

References

  1. Briceño, K.; Iulianelli, A.; Montané, D.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Basile, A. Carbon molecular sieve membranes supported on non-modified ceramic tubes for hydrogen separation in membrane reactors. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 13536–13544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghasemzadeh, K.; Morrone, P.; Iulianelli, A.; Liguori, S.; Babaluo, A.A.; Basile, A. H2 production in silica membrane reactor via methanol steam reforming: Modeling and HAZOP analysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 10315–10326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Illgen, U.; Schäfer, R.; Noack, M.; Kölsch, P.; Kühnle, A.; Caro, J. Membrane supported catalytic dehydrogenation of iso-butane using an MFI zeolite membrane reactor. Catal. Commun. 2001, 2, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Basile, A.; Iulianelli, A.; Longo, T.; Liguori, S.; de Falco, M. Pd-based selective membrane state-of-the-art. In Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes; Marrelli, L., De Falco, M., Iaquaniello, G., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Chapter 2; pp. 21–55. ISBN 978-0-85729-150-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, A.; Gracem, J.R.; Lim, C.J. Preparation of thin Pd-based composite membrane on planar metallic substrate: Part II. Preparation of membranes by electroless plating and characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 306, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Flanagan, T.B.; Oates, W.A. The Palladium-Hydrogen System. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1991, 21, 269–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, T.H.; Mori, S.; Suzuki, M. Hydrogen permeance and the effect of H2O and CO on the permeability of Pd0.75Ag0.25 membranes under gas-driven permeation and plasma-driven permeation. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amandusson, H.; Ekedahl, L.G.; Dannetun, H. The effect of CO and O2 on hydrogen permeation through a palladium membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 153, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sakamoto, Y.; Chen, F.L.; Kinari, Y.; Sakamoto, F. Effect of carbon monoxide on hydrogen permeation in some palladium-based alloy membranes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1996, 21, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, D.; Flanagan, T.B.; Shanahan, K.L. Permeation of hydrogen through pre-oxidized Pd membranes in the presence and absence of CO. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 372, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Catalano, J.; Giacinti Baschetti, M.; Sarti, G.C. Influence of water vapor on hydrogen permeation through 2.5 μm Pd-Ag membranes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 8658–8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gielens, F.C.; Knibbeler, R.J.J.; Duysinx, P.F.J.; Tong, H.D.; Vorstman, M.A.G.; Keurentjes, J.T.F. Influence of steam and carbon dioxide on the hydrogen flux through thin Pd/Ag and Pd membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Heras, J.M.; Estiú, G.; Viscido, L. The interaction of water with clean palladium films: A thermal desorption and work function study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 108, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ali, J.K.; Newson, E.J.; Rippin, D.W.T. Deactivation and regeneration of Pd-Ag membranes for dehydrogenation reactions. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 89, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sakamoto, F.; Kinari, Y.; Chen, F.L.; Sakamoto, Y. Hydrogen permeation through palladium alloy membranes in mixture gases of 10% nitrogen and ammonia in the hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1997, 22, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Edlund, D.J.; Pledger, W.A. Thermolysis of hydrogen sulfide in a metal-membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 77, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burke, M.L.; Madix, R.J. Hydrogen on Pd(100)-S: The effect of sulfur on precursor mediated adsorption and desorption. Surf. Sci. 1990, 237, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kajiwara, M.; Uemiya, S.; Kojima, T. Stability and hydrogen permeation behavior of supported platinum membranes in presence of hydrogen sulfide. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1999, 24, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bryden, K.J.; Ying, J.Y. Nanostructured palladium–iron membranes for hydrogen separation and membrane hydrogenation reactions. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 203, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lewis, A.E.; Kershner, D.C.; Paglieri, S.N.; Slepicka, M.J.; Way, J.D. Pd-Pt/YSZ composite membranes for hydrogen separation from synthetic water–gas shift streams. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 437, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. She, Y.; Emerson, S.C.; Magdefrau, N.J.; Opalka, S.M.; Thibaud-Erkey, C.; Vanderspurt, T.H. Hydrogen permeability of sulfur tolerant Pd-Cu alloy membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Okazaki, J.; Tanaka, D.A.P.; Tanco, M.A.L.; Wakui, Y.; Mizukami, F.; Suzuki, T.M. Hydrogen permeability study of the thin Pd-Ag alloy membranes in the temperature range across the α–β phase transition. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kamakoti, P.; Morreale, B.D.; Ciocco, M.V.; Howard, B.H.; Killmeyer, R.P.; Cugini, A.V.; Sholl, D.S. Prediction of hydrogen flux through sulfur-tolerant binary alloy membranes. Science 2005, 307, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kamakoti, P.; Sholl, D.S. Ab initio lattice-gas modeling of interstitial hydrogen diffusion in CuPd alloys. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Semidey-Flecha, L.; Sholl, D.S. Combining density functional theory and cluster expansion methods to predict H2 permeance through Pd-based binary alloy membranes. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mckinley, D.L. Metal Alloy for Hydrogen Separation and Purification. U.S. Patent 3,350,845, 7 November 1967. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mckinley, D.L. Method for Hydrogen Separation and Purification. U.S. Patent 3,439,474, 22 April 1969. [Google Scholar]
  28. Way, J.; Lusk, M.; Thoen, P. Sulfur-Resistant composite Metal Membranes. U.S. Patent 2008/0038567 A1, 14 February 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen, C.-H.; Ma, Y.H. The effect of H2S on the performance of Pd and Pd/Au composite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sonwane, C.G.; Wilcox, J.; Ma, Y.H. Achieving optimum hydrogen permeability in PdAg and PdAu alloys. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gryaznov, V. Metal containing membranes for the production of ultrapure hydrogen and the recovery of hydrogen isotopes. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2000, 29, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, Y.H.; Chen, C.-H.; Catalano, J.; Guazzone, F.; Payzant, E.A. Synthesis, annealing, and performances of Pd-Au asymmetric composite membranes for hydrogen purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 8732–8744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guazzone, F.; Catalano, J.; Mardilovich, I.P.; Kniep, J.; Pande, S.; Wu, T.; Lambrecht, R.C.; Datta, S.; Kazantzis, N.K.; Ma, Y.H. Gas permeation field tests of composite Pd and Pd-Au membranes in actual coal derived syngas atmosphere. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 14557–14568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guazzone, F.; Catalano, J.; Mardilovich, I.P.; Wu, T.; Lambrecht, R.C.; Datta, S.; Kniep, J.; Pande, S.; Kazantzis, N.K.; Ma, Y.H. Enhancement of the long-term permeance, selectivity stability, and recoverability of Pd-Au membranes in coal derived syngas atmospheres. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 4150–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mardilovich, I.P.; Castro-Dominguez, B.; Kazantzis, N.K.; Wu, T.; Ma, Y.H. A comprehensive performance assessment study of pilot-scale Pd and Pd/alloy membranes under extended coal-derived syngas atmosphere testing. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 6107–6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abedini, R.; Nezhadmoghadam, A. Application of membrane in gas separation process: Its suitability and mechanisms. Pet. Coal 2010, 52, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gade, S.K.; DeVoss, S.J.; Coulter, K.E.; Paglieri, S.N.; Alptekin, G.O.; Way, J.D. Palladium–gold membranes in mixed gas streams with hydrogen sulfide: Effect of alloy content and fabrication technique. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peters, T.A.; Stange, M.; Bredesen, R. Fabrication of palladium-based membranes by magnetron sputtering. In Palladium Membrane Technology for Hydrogen Production, Carbon Capture and Other Applications: Principles, Energy Production and Other Applications; Doukelis, A., Panopoulos, K., Koumanakos, A., Kakaras, E., Eds.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Chapter 2; pp. 1–383. ISBN 978-178242241-9; 978-178242234-1. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Z.Y.; Maeda, H.; Kusakabe, K.; Morooka, S.; Anzai, H.; Akiyama, S. Preparation of palladium-silver alloy membranes for hydrogen separation by the spray pyrolysis method. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 78, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jun, C.S.; Lee, K.H. Palladium and palladium alloy composite membranes prepared by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition method (cold-wall). J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 176, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Broglia, M.; Pinacci, P.; Radaelli, M.; Bottino, A.; Capannelli, G.; Comite, A.; Vanacore, G.; Zani, M. Synthesis and characterization of Pd membranes on alumina-modified porous stainless steel supports. Desalination 2009, 245, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheng, Y.S.; Yeung, K.L. Effects of electroless plating chemistry on the synthesis of palladium membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 182, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Xiong, G.; Yang, W. A modified electroless plating technique for thin dense palladium composite membranes with enhanced stability. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liguori, S.; Iulianelli, S.; Dalena, F.; Pinacci, P.; Drago, F.; Broglia, M.; Huang, Y.; Basile, A. Performance and long-term stability of Pd/PSS and Pd/Al2O3 for hydrogen separation. Membranes 2014, 4, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Pure H2, N2, He permeating fluxes through the Pd-Au/PSS membrane and operating temperature vs. time.
Figure 1. Pure H2, N2, He permeating fluxes through the Pd-Au/PSS membrane and operating temperature vs. time.
Molecules 21 00581 g001
Figure 2. H2/N2, H2/He ideal selectivities for the Pd-Au/PSS membrane and operating temperature vs. time.
Figure 2. H2/N2, H2/He ideal selectivities for the Pd-Au/PSS membrane and operating temperature vs. time.
Molecules 21 00581 g002
Figure 3. H2 permeating flux vs. the driving force at different “n” and T = 420 °C.
Figure 3. H2 permeating flux vs. the driving force at different “n” and T = 420 °C.
Molecules 21 00581 g003
Figure 4. Methane conversion at 420 °C, 300 kPa and GHSV = 4100 h−1 during MSR reaction in the Pd-Au MR.
Figure 4. Methane conversion at 420 °C, 300 kPa and GHSV = 4100 h−1 during MSR reaction in the Pd-Au MR.
Molecules 21 00581 g004
Figure 5. Hydrogen in the permeate and retentate streams during MSR reaction in the Pd-Au MR at 420 °C, 300 kPa and GHSV = 4100 h−1.
Figure 5. Hydrogen in the permeate and retentate streams during MSR reaction in the Pd-Au MR at 420 °C, 300 kPa and GHSV = 4100 h−1.
Molecules 21 00581 g005
Figure 6. Molar flow rate of H2 in and out of the MR during coke deposition analysis.
Figure 6. Molar flow rate of H2 in and out of the MR during coke deposition analysis.
Molecules 21 00581 g006
Figure 7. Picture of the supported Pd-Au membrane before tests (top) and after (bottom).
Figure 7. Picture of the supported Pd-Au membrane before tests (top) and after (bottom).
Molecules 21 00581 g007
Figure 8. (a) fabrication Steps: [A] Initial support [B] Oxidation at 500 °C [C] Grading [D] Final Pd-Au metallic layer; (b) He permeating flux during membrane progress (Δp = 1 bar, T = 25 °C).
Figure 8. (a) fabrication Steps: [A] Initial support [B] Oxidation at 500 °C [C] Grading [D] Final Pd-Au metallic layer; (b) He permeating flux during membrane progress (Δp = 1 bar, T = 25 °C).
Molecules 21 00581 g008
Figure 9. Schematic view of the experimental setup used for permeation and MSR reaction tests.
Figure 9. Schematic view of the experimental setup used for permeation and MSR reaction tests.
Molecules 21 00581 g009
Table 1. H2 and N2 permeating flux at 350 °C with the Pd-Au/PSS membrane at the onset of the experimental testing.
Table 1. H2 and N2 permeating flux at 350 °C with the Pd-Au/PSS membrane at the onset of the experimental testing.
Pure gas (i)Transmembrane Pressure (kPa)Permeating Flux (mol/m2·s)αH2/i
H2503.83 × 10−31
1008.81 × 10−3
N2504.83 × 10−580
1009.13 × 10−5~100
Table 2. Permeation test results after 1100 h of composite membrane under continuous operation at 420 °C.
Table 2. Permeation test results after 1100 h of composite membrane under continuous operation at 420 °C.
Pure Gas-iMolecular Weight (g/mol)Transmembrane Pressure (kPa)Permeating Flux (mol/m2·s)αH2/i
H22.00502.3 × 10−21
CH416.04508.6 × 10−5270
CO244.01504.7 × 10−5490
Table 3. A comparison between the long term characteristics of different Pd-Au membranes
Table 3. A comparison between the long term characteristics of different Pd-Au membranes
Preparation MethodPd-Au Layer (µm)T (°C)Δp (kPa)H2 Permeance (Nm3 m−2 h−1 bar−0.5)αH2/HeRef.
Electroless PlatingPd:6.1 Au:0.545010014.0 ± 2.4 (after 473 h in syngas atmosphere, 1200 kPa)>160 000(initial)[34]
Electroless DepositionPd:12.6Au:1.235010011.2 (after 150 h in pure H2 atmosphere)900 (after 150 h)[32]
Electroless PlatingPd:14Au:0.94501005.5 (after 250 h in H2/N2 mixtures and syngas atmosphere, 1200 kPa)>2700(Initial)[35]
Electroless DepositionPd:8.2Au:0.164501008.3 ± 2.6 (after 250 h in H2/N2 mixture and syngas atmosphere 1200 kPa)>1563(Initial)[33]
Electroless DepositionPd-Au:7420505.6 * after 1000 h operation220 (after 1000 h under operation)This work
* The unit of this value is (Nm3 m−2 h−1 bar−1).
Table 4. Operating conditions during MSR reaction tests in the Pd-Au MR.
Table 4. Operating conditions during MSR reaction tests in the Pd-Au MR.
T = 420 °C
p (retentate) = 300 kPa
p (permeate) =100 kPa
Steam/Methane = 3.5/1
Sweep flow (N2) = 25 mL/min
GHSV * = 4100 h−1CH4 = 1.9 × 10−3 mol/min
H2O = 6.7 ×10−3 mol/min
* Gas Hourly Space Velocity.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iulianelli, A.; Alavi, M.; Bagnato, G.; Liguori, S.; Wilcox, J.; Rahimpour, M.R.; Eslamlouyan, R.; Anzelmo, B.; Basile, A. Supported Pd-Au Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production: Membrane Preparation, Characterization and Testing. Molecules 2016, 21, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050581

AMA Style

Iulianelli A, Alavi M, Bagnato G, Liguori S, Wilcox J, Rahimpour MR, Eslamlouyan R, Anzelmo B, Basile A. Supported Pd-Au Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production: Membrane Preparation, Characterization and Testing. Molecules. 2016; 21(5):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iulianelli, Adolfo, Marjan Alavi, Giuseppe Bagnato, Simona Liguori, Jennifer Wilcox, Mohammad Reza Rahimpour, Reza Eslamlouyan, Bryce Anzelmo, and Angelo Basile. 2016. "Supported Pd-Au Membrane Reactor for Hydrogen Production: Membrane Preparation, Characterization and Testing" Molecules 21, no. 5: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050581

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop