Next Article in Journal
Inflammasomes and Natural Ingredients towards New Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Catalytic Performance of a New 1D Cu(II) Coordination Polymer {Cu(NO3)(H2O)}(HTae)(4,4′-Bpy) for Knoevenagel Condensation
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Novel Pleuromutilin Derivatives with Substituted Benzimidazole Moieties
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Molecules 2016, 21(11), 1491; doi:10.3390/molecules21111491

Catalytic Oxidation of NO over MnOx–CeO2 and MnOx–TiO2 Catalysts

School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ramesh Giri
Received: 4 October 2016 / Revised: 27 October 2016 / Accepted: 5 November 2016 / Published: 14 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transition Metal Catalysis 2016)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2310 KB, uploaded 14 November 2016]   |  

Abstract

A series of MnOx–CeO2 and MnOx–TiO2 catalysts were prepared by a homogeneous precipitation method and their catalytic activities for the NO oxidation in the absence or presence of SO2 were evaluated. Results show that the optimal molar ratio of Mn/Ce and Mn/Ti are 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The MnOx–CeO2 catalyst exhibits higher catalytic activity and better resistance to SO2 poisoning than the MnOx–TiO2 catalyst. On the basis of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning transmission electron microscope with mapping (STEM-mapping) analyses, it is seen that the MnOx–CeO2 catalyst possesses higher BET surface area and better dispersion of MnOx over the catalyst than MnOx–TiO2 catalyst. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements reveal that MnOx–CeO2 catalyst provides the abundance of Mn3+ and more surface adsorbed oxygen, and SO2 might be preferentially adsorbed to the surface of CeO2 to form sulfate species, which provides a protection of MnOx active sites from being poisoned. In contrast, MnOx active sites over the MnOx–TiO2 catalyst are easily and quickly sulfated, leading to rapid deactivation of the catalyst for NO oxidation. Furthermore, temperature programmed desorption with NO and O2 (NO + O2-TPD) and in situ diffuse reflectance infrared transform spectroscopy (in situ DRIFTS) characterizations results show that the MnOx–CeO2 catalyst displays much stronger ability to adsorb NOx than the MnOx–TiO2 catalyst, especially after SO2 poisoning. View Full-Text
Keywords: MnOx–CeO2; MnOx–TiO2; catalytic oxidation; NO; SO2 MnOx–CeO2; MnOx–TiO2; catalytic oxidation; NO; SO2
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, X.; Huo, X.; Zhu, T.; Hong, X.; Sun, Y. Catalytic Oxidation of NO over MnOx–CeO2 and MnOx–TiO2 Catalysts. Molecules 2016, 21, 1491.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]

Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top