Next Article in Journal
Growing and Etching MoS2 on Carbon Nanotube Film for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Neurodegenerative Diseases: Might Citrus Flavonoids Play a Protective Role?
Previous Article in Journal
Increasing the Level of IRS-1 and Insulin Pathway Sensitivity by Natural Product Carainterol A
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Anticonvulsant Activity of a Flavonoid-Rich Extract from Orange Juice Involves both NMDA and GABA-Benzodiazepine Receptor Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 21
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules21101311
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chlorella sorokiniana Extract Improves Short-Term Memory in Rats

by
Maria Grazia Morgese
1,
Emanuela Mhillaj
2,
Matteo Francavilla
3,4,
Maria Bove
2,
Lucia Morgano
1,
Paolo Tucci
1,
Luigia Trabace
1,*,† and
Stefania Schiavone
1,†
1
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia 71121, Italy
2
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
3
STAR Agroenergy Research Group, University of Foggia, Via Gramsci, 89-91, Foggia 71121, Italy
4
Institute of Marine Science, National Research Council, via Pola 4, Lesina 71010, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(10), 1311; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101311
Submission received: 1 August 2016 / Revised: 21 September 2016 / Accepted: 23 September 2016 / Published: 29 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Potential Neuromodulatory Profile of Phytocompounds in Brain Disorders)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Increasing evidence shows that eukaryotic microalgae and, in particular, the green microalga Chlorella, can be used as natural sources to obtain a whole variety of compounds, such as omega (ω)-3 and ω-6 polyunsatured fatty acids (PUFAs). Although either beneficial or toxic effects of Chlorella sorokiniana have been mainly attributed to its specific ω-3 and ω-6 PUFAs content, the underlying molecular pathways remain to be elucidated yet. Here, we investigate the effects of an acute oral administration of a lipid extract of Chlorella sorokiniana, containing mainly ω-3 and ω-6 PUFAs, on cognitive, emotional and social behaviour in rats, analysing possible underlying neurochemical alterations. Our results showed improved short-term memory in Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats compared to controls, without any differences in exploratory performance, locomotor activity, anxiety profile and depressive-like behaviour. On the other hand, while the social behaviour of Chlorella sorokiniana-treated animals was significantly decreased, no effects on aggressivity were observed. Neurochemical investigations showed region-specific effects, consisting in an elevation of noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) content in hippocampus, but not in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. In conclusion, our results point towards a beneficial effect of Chlorella sorokiniana extract on short-term memory, but also highlight the need of caution in the use of this natural supplement due to its possible masked toxic effects.

1. Introduction

Increasing evidence shows that algae, and in particular eukaryotic microalgae, can be used as natural sources to obtain a number of food and non-food products [1,2]. Moreover, because of the high cost of microalgae production technology, academia and industry are looking for new applications of algae extracts/products that could contribute to increase the economic value of biomass with a “biorefinery” approach [3]. Within the food science and nutrition field, the identification and characterization of new bioactive compounds, which are able to confer additional health benefits beyond the basic nutritional and energetic requirements in order to maintain and promote consumers’ health and prevent chronic diseases is, at present, a hot-topic [2]. Considering the tremendous market value of the functional food industry, valued in 168 billion dollars just in the US in 2010 [4], it is easy to understand the enormous interest in the identification of new compounds, extracts and products that, once their efficacy has been proved with scientific evidence, can be produced at a larger scale. Among them, there is a whole variety of compounds, such as polyunsatured fatty acids (PUFAs), which are widely known to exert pharmacological or nutraceutical effects [5]. In particular, the PUFA composition in many species of the green microalga Chlorella, belonging to the phylum Chlorophyta, has been well characterized and the correlations between cultivation, conditions and percentages of fatty acids have been the focus of many studies [6]. Among all the Chlorella strains, the Chlorella sorokiniana has been shown to be the most suitable one to extract omega (ω)-3 and ω-6 PUFAs, mainly by biorefinery-based production methods [7,8,9]. Together with their beneficial effects against cardiovascular system disorders and their protective actions on uncontrolled cellular proliferation, ω-3 PUFAs have been demonstrated to be important physiological components of total brain lipid amount and to play a crucial role in several neurological functions, such as neurogenesis, neurotransmission and protection against oxidative stress-induced cerebral damage [10,11]. Further on, they are precursors of molecules involved in the modulation of cerebral immune and inflammatory processes [12,13]. Reduced dietary ω-3 PUFAs content has been shown to be associated with impaired cognitive and behavioural performance [14] and correlated to the development of depressive and anxiety-like symptoms [15]. In this context, we have recently demonstrated that lifelong nutritional ω-3 PUFAs deficiency evokes depressive-like state through soluble β amyloid (βA) involvement in rats [16]. Accordingly, ω-3 PUFAs have been also demonstrated to have important neuroprotective effects in both rodent models of neurodegenerative diseases [17,18] and human clinical investigations [19,20]. On the other hand, the role of ω-6 PUFA in brain maturation and development is much less studied. It is known that the main ω-6 derivative, arachidonic acid (AA), crucially contributes to several physiological functions, acting both as an important precursor of bioactive mediators and as an activator of protein kinases and ion channels involved in the processes of synaptic transmission [21]. Recently, the involvement of a ω-6 PUFA-enriched diet in enhancing plasma levels of βA has been reported in rodents [16]. In addition, a high ω-6/ω-3 ratio appears to be particularly unfavorable for proper central nervous system functioning [22]. Importantly, Chlorella sorokiniana is marketed in the US as a dietary supplement for weight control and protection against cancer, oxidative-stress and age-dependent cognitive impairment, as well as metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [23]. On the other hand, some recent reports have shown side toxic effects following dietary supplementation with Chlorella sorokiniana, such as gastrointestinal disorders, allergic reactions and increased skin sensitivity to the sun, elevation in plasma levels of uric acid and, more rarely, tubulointerstitial nephritis and psychotic symptoms development [24,25,26]. Although both the beneficial or toxic effects of Chlorella sorokiniana have been attributed to its specific ω-3 and ω-6 PUFAs content [23], the underlying molecular pathways remain to be elucidated yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of an acute oral administration of a lipid extract, containing mainly ω-3 and ω-6 PUFAs, obtained from monoxenic strain of Chlorella sorokiniana on the cognitive, emotional and social behaviour in rats and to identify the possible underlying neurochemical alterations. By using a double experimental approach (extraction and chemical characterization of the total lipid component on one hand and analysis of its activity on behaviour and neurochemistry on the other hand), we demonstrated specific behavioural effects of Chlorella sorokiniana lipid extract in rats, together with a specific brain region neuromodulatory activity.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Characterization of Chlorella Sorokiniana Extract

The algal biomass showed a total lipids (TL) content of 21% dry weight (d.w.), which was composed mainly by fatty acids (42% d.w.) and unsaponified fraction (UF) (19% d.w.). The remaining 39% d.w. was composed by water-soluble compounds including short polypeptides, glycerol, monomeric sugars and salts. The bioactivity of the TL fraction was characterized in terms of chemical composition of its two main components: unsaturated fatty acids (UFs, Table 1) and fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs, Table 2).
The most abundant UF compounds were 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol and ergosterol. As shown in Table 2, FAMEs belonging to the C16 and C18 carbon chain groups were the most abundant, and accounted for 92% of the total FAMEs detected, according to previously reported results [27,28]. Among them, PUFAs showed a concentration of 286.7 mg·g−1 TL, while monounsaturated (MUFA) and saturated (SFA) fatty acids were found in lower concentrations. PUFAs were composed by ω-3 (169.5 mg·g−1 TL) and ω-6 (114.6 mg·g−1 TL) fatty acids in a ratio of 1 to 1.5 (ω-3 to ω-6). α-Linolenic acid and (Z,Z,Z)-7,10,13-hexadecatrienoic acid were the predominant ω-3 fatty acids, while linoleic acid and (Z,Z)-7,10-hexadecadienoic acid were the most abundant ω-6 fatty acids.

2.2. Effects of Acute Oral Administration of Chlorella Extract on Cognition and Short-Term Memory

The effects of an acute Chlorella sorokiniana administration on cognition and short-term memory were assessed by performing the Novel Object Recognition (NOR) test. Results showed that the discrimination index was significantly increased in Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats compared to controls (Figure 1a, unpaired t-test; p < 0.05). Moreover, both Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated rats exhibited the same exploratory performances in the NOR test, with a significant difference in total time spent exploring the new object rather than the familiar one (Figure 1b, Two-way ANOVA; F(1,28) = 37.33, p < 0.0001, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test; familiar vs. novel object; p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for Chlorella sorokiniana extract and vehicle, respectively).

2.3. Effects of Acute Oral Administration of Chlorella Sorokiniana Extract on Locomotion

As shown in Figure 2a,b, there were no significant differences in the number of entries into closed and open arms between Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated rats in the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) test (unpaired t-test; n.s.). Moreover, as reported in Figure 2c, no statistical differences were found in total exploration time in the NOR test between Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated rats (unpaired t-test; n.s.). Since this lack of effect on locomotion could have been induced by a muscle damage, and since the appearance of creatine-kinase M-type (CKM) in blood has been generally considered to be a marker of skeletal muscle damage, we measured plasma CKM concentrations in Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated rats. Results showed no difference between experimental groups (unpaired t-test; n.s.; Figure 2d), thus confirming that Chlorella sorokiniana administration did not affect locomotor activity, at least under our experimental conditions.

2.4. Effects of Acute Oral Administration of Chlorella sorokiniana Extract on Emotional Profile

We did not detect changes in anxiety- and depressive-like behaviour between Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated groups in EPM and Forced Swimming Test (FST). Indeed, as shown in Figure 3a–d, no significant differences were found in the time spent into open and closed arms and in the entries frequency into open and closed arms (unpaired t-test; n.s.) between experimental groups in the EPM test. Likewise, no differences in the immobility, swimming and struggling frequency in Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats, compared to controls, were reported in the FST (Figure 3e,g unpaired t-test; n.s.).

2.5. Effects of Acute Oral Administration of Chlorella sorokiniana Extract on Central Monoamine Content

In order to corroborate behavioural results with neurochemical data, we measured serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) content in hippocampus (HIPP), prefrontal cortex (PFC) and striatum (STR) of Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated animals. Hippocampal 5-HT content was significantly increased in Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats compared to controls animals (Figure 4b, unpaired t-test; p < 0.05). Similarly, we found that hippocampal NA concentrations were significantly higher in animals that received Chlorella sorokiniana administration compared to controls (Figure 4a, unpaired t-test; p < 0.05). On the other hand, no differences between Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated animals were found in PFC and STR with respect to NA and 5-HT contents (Figure 4c–e, unpaired t-test; n.s.).

2.6. Effects of Acute Oral Administration of Chlorella sorokiniana Exctract on Social Behaviour

Results showed that social behaviour was significantly decreased in Chlorella sorokiniana-treated animals with respect to controls (Figure 5a, unpaired t-test; p < 0,05), while no differences were found in aggressive behaviour between Chlorella sorokiniana- and vehicle-treated rats (Figure 5b, unpaired t-test; n.s.).

3. Discussion

In the present study we found that an acute oral administration of Chlorella sorokiniana lipid extract was able to significantly improve memory performance in rats. This behavioural outcome was corroborated by neurochemical data indicating a significant increase in NA and 5-HT at the hippocampal level.
In previous studies, Chlorella sorokiniana was reported to be an attractive source of bioactive compounds, foods, feeds and fuels [27,29,30]. Those findings make Chlorella sorokiniana an interesting and challenging biomass that could be used to find new and more valuable bioactive molecules.
Interestingly, we found that the lipidic fraction extracted from Chlorella sorokiniana, rich in PUFA of either ω-3 and ω-6 families, induced in rats an increased interest in exploring a novel object in respect to a previously encountered familiar one. This test represents a simple and reproducible behavioural assay primarily based on innate and spontaneous exploratory behaviour in rodent without the use of any reinforcement paradigm or stressful stimuli. It has been demonstrated that the NOR test allows one to study either short or long term memory, depending on the behavioural paradigm chosen [31]. In our experimental conditions, by using an intertrial interval of 1 minute, we tested the effect of treatment on short-term memory. We found for the first time that the lipidic fraction of Chlorella sorokiniana, particularly rich in linoleic and α linolenic acids (ALA), can improve memory function after a single oral administration. In searching of putative targets, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) can be suitable candidates. Indeed, linoleic acid and linolenic acids have been reported to directly bind PPARα and γ receptors [23]. Activation of these intracellular receptors has been shown to improve memory and cognition in several animal models, either after global cerebral ischemia [32], or in diabetes-induced cognitive dysfunction [33], or in transgenic mice model of mental retardation [34].
In particular, activation of PPARγ receptors at a hippocampal level was shown to improve brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression [33], and to rescue the long-term potentiation (LTP) induction by restoring α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor expression and extracellular signal–regulated kinases-cAMP response element-binding protein (ERK-CREB) activities [34]. In further agreement, transient transfection of constitutively active PPARγ plasmid in hippocampal neuronal cells was reported to be able to increase BDNF, AMPA, and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors expression and spine formation [34]. On the other hand, ALA, the most concentrated fatty acids in Chlorella sorokiniana extract, was hypothesized to modulate NMDA functioning and BDNF release by influencing membrane fluidity [35]. Indeed, ALA can markedly increase membrane fluidity that correspond to a better efficiency in formation of lipid rafts in neuronal membranes [36]. Lipid raft composition, and thus lipid micro-environments on the cell surface, by favouring specific protein-protein interactions can influence the activation of signaling cascades [37]. Such an enhanced efficiency of transmembrane signaling would result in increased activated NMDA receptors, which are part of lipid raft [38]. This event would lead to higher calcium influx and initiation of signal transduction pathways ending up to activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) via the canonical pathway which then translocates to the nucleus, ultimately leading to increased BDNF mRNA and protein levels [39,40,41]. Enhanced intracellular BDNF would result in its higher secretion, thereby binding to its receptors Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), and thus controlling synaptic function [42]. Our results are in line with the findings of other studies reporting that short term supplementation with ω-3 PUFA can improve brain cognitive function by altering α-synuclein, calmodulin and transthyretin genes expression in the HIPP [43]. It has been shown that α-synuclein can regulate the homeostasis of monoamines in synapses, through modulatory interactions of the protein with monoaminergic transporters, particularly for NA [44,45]. The NA transporter (NET) is the primary mechanism of NA reuptake and termination of noradrenergic transmission [46,47]. Thus, it can be speculated that PUFA present in our Chlorella sorokiniana fraction, by altering α-synuclein, may modulate NET efficiency leading to increased NA levels. Indeed, in our experimental conditions, we found a significant increase in NA content only at hippocampal level. Otherwise, modulation of plasmalemma fluidity and lipid raft composition could explain such neurochemical alteration. Indeed, as previously hypothesized, increased NMDA receptor signaling may explain the increased NA release, considering that in rat hippocampal synaptosome preparations, NMDA agonists were shown to enhance NA release [48]. On the other hand, it should be taken into account that increased neurotransmitter contents can also reflect a reduction in their release or an increase in their storage. In this regard, very few data are available concerning the effects of PUFA rich extract on 5-HT and NA increased storage. Reduction in dopamine vesicle density in the rat frontal cortex has been reported after ω-3 PUFA deficiency [49], although a mechanism involving an alteration in vesicle density would appear hardly applicable in our experimental conditions considering the short overlap between drug exposure and time of measurement. In any case, we cannot completely rule out such hypothesis and further studies are necessary to elucidate this possible mechanism.
Our neurochemical result endorses the behavioural outcome on short-term memory. Indeed, we found increased NA and 5-HT content only in the HIPP, a brain area important for both spatial memory and non-spatial objects or items experienced, as a form of event memory [50,51,52]. It was reported that NA controls multiple brain functions, such as attention, perception, arousal, sleep, learning, and memory. The HIPP is innervated by noradrenergic projections and hippocampal neurons express β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR). These receptors modulate long-lasting forms of synaptic potentiation, such as LTP, a neuronal process crucially involved in long-term storage of spatial and contextual memories [53]. Furthermore NA, by acting on hippocampal β-AR, was shown to regulate spatial memories and in particular the content and persistence of synaptic information storage in the hippocampal subfields. In addition, activation of these receptors is graded according to the novelty or saliency of the experience [54]. Likewise, it has been shown that stimulation of adenylate cyclase following β-AR activation is the putative mechanism through which NA produces LTP in the dentate gyrus of the HIPP [55].
On the other hand, 5-HT was also increased after Chlorella sorokiniana administration. Serotonergic neurotransmission is responsible for regulating hippocampal plasticity and electrical activity, as well as hippocampal-dependent behaviours and cognitive performance [56]. In particular, it has been shown that by acting at 5-HT1A receptors at hippocampal level, increased 5-HT levels can improve memory performance [57]. Thus, we can hypothesize that the increase in 5-HT content in the HIPP of treated rats could neurochemically underline the improvement of short-term memory induced by Chlorella sorokiniana lipidic fraction.
On the other hand, considering the short duration of the exposure to algal fraction we cannot exclude that any central neurochemical alterations found actually reflect peripheral activation. In this regard, PPAR are highly expressed in epithelial cells of colon and, to a lesser degree, in macrophages and lymphocytes [58]. Furthermore, peripheral release of hormones after food intake has been associated to beneficial effect on memory formation [59].
Ultimately, it has been demonstrated that gut microbiota is actually able to metabolize PUFA and derived metabolites can accumulate in plasma of treated mice [60]. In this light, alteration in cognitive function have been found after gut microbial perturbation while memory enhancement was described after probiotic treatment (see [61] for a review). Therefore, further studies aimed at elucidating possible peripheral effects at the gut level are warranted.
On the other hand, we evaluated the emotional profile in rats after Chlorella sorokiniana administration and no alterations in depressive-like or anxiety-like behaviours were retrieved, as revealed by FST and EPM, respectively, although a different strain of Chlorella, Chlorella vulgaris, has been proposed as adjuvant therapy in depressed and anxious medicated patients [62]. However, discrepancies can be justified on the basis of the different algal strains, algal harvesting and culture biorefinery processes and thus different fatty acid compositions. It is well known that impaired serotonergic neurotransmission in the PFC area is central to depressive disorders [63] and increases in cortical 5-HT and NA have been related to higher swimming and struggling frequencies, respectively, in the FST [64,65]. Thus, the absence of neurochemical alterations in PFC are in line with the absence of alterations found in the FST outcomes. In addition, our behavioural outcomes were validated by the fact that no locomotion alterations were found after Chlorella sorokiniana extract administration, as revealed by total exploration time in NOR test, CKM plasma levels and full entries in EPM.
Finally, we found that Chlorella sorokiniana administration, while it did not affect aggressive behaviour as indicated by a lack of alteration in noradrenergic content in PFC [66], it reduced the social behaviour. This behavioural paradigm can be used to study sociability [67]. Previous studies have negatively correlated fronto-cortical 5-HT metabolism with this behavioural trait [67], although conflicting results have been reported [68,69]. On the other hand, increase in 5-HT release at a hippocampal level has been linked to decreased social behaviour in rats, but according to the authors, such neurochemical modifications cannot be considered the only explanation [70]. Accordingly, in our conditions, while no alterations in PFC were noted, a significant increase was found in serotonergic hippocampal content, possibly explaining the behavioural outcome. However, it should be noted that differences in methodological procedures, such as sample collection and processing, timing after last behavioural testing, and rat strains could account for some of the variance observed across the literature, thus future studies in this direction are surely warranted in order to evaluate the safety profile of our algal extract.
In conclusion, we have described for the first time the beneficial effect of lipidic fraction of Chlorella sorokiniana on short-term memory after acute administration. Chlorella sorokiniana is marketed in the US as a dietary supplement for age-dependent cognitive impairment [23] and is generally considered safe. Although our study supports this evidence, our data also indicate that attention should be paid to the use of this natural supplement for its possible masked toxic effects.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Microalgae Cultivation

Monoxenic strain of Chlorella sorokiniana (UTEX 2805) was phototrophically cultivated in an outdoor closed vertical tubular photobioreactor (PBR) (400 L volume) at the STAR*Facility Centre of the University of Foggia (Foggia, Italy), and grown in Bold Basal medium during the period from April 2015 and June 2015, under a solar radiation (PAR) that ranged between 700 and 930 W·m−2. Flow rate of air was 10 L·W·min−1, while CO2 was injected on pH demand (pHset point = 8.00). The temperature in the PBR ranged between 18 and 25 °C. All the parameters were monitored online by SCADA Software (Version 2.0.1, Aqualgae SL, Vigo, Spain). The algal growth rate was monitored each day by measuring the optical absorbance at 550 nm. The PBR operated in a semi-continuous way with a dilution rate of 0.25 day−1 and a mean productivity of 25.12 g m−2·day−1. The harvested culture was daily centrifuged using a semi-continuous centrifuge (Westfalia, GEA Westfalia Separator Group GmbH, Oelde, Germany). The dewatered algal biomass was then freeze-dried and stored at −20 °C.

4.2. Extract and PUFA Characterization

Lipids from freeze-dried algal biomass were extracted as previously reported by Francavilla et al. [71]. TL were saponified and the saponified mixture was then transferred into a separatory funnel, and the Teflon tube was washed with 40 mL of Milli-Q (Millipore, Milan, Italy) water. The unsaponified matter in the combined solution was then extracted four times with 20 mL of n-hexane. The hexane phases were combined, dried overnight with sodium sulphate, filtered and evaporated. The UF was analysed by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, IT-240, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), as previously described by Francavilla et al. [72]. Hydroalcoholic residue of extraction process of UF was acidified until pH 1 by adding HCl 2 M and extracted three times with 25 mL of n-hexane. The hexane phases were combined, dried with sodium sulphate anhydrous, filtered and evaporated. The yellowish viscous liquid obtained (fatty acids) was treated with 10 mL of freshly prepared 5% methanolic HCl in a Teflon tube for microwave. This mixture was carefully mixed and the tube was closed under nitrogen and then heated for 20 min in a microwave oven (MARS 6, CEM Corporation, Buckingham, UK) at 80 °C. After cooling to room temperature, 5 mL of 6% aqueous K2CO3 were added and the mixture was extracted four times with 20 mL of n-hexane. The hexane phases were then combined, dried with sodium sulphate anhydrous, filtered and evaporated. The process yielded a yellowish viscous liquid (FAMEs) that was weighed and stored at −20 °C until GC-MS analysis. FAMEs were analysed by GC-MS/MS equipment at 110 °C for 5 min, followed by a 2 °C·min−1 ramp up to 260 °C, followed by 5 min at 260 °C. The injector temperature was 250 °C and the injected volume was 1 µL. FAME peaks were identified by comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of a standard mixture (PUFA C4-C24, Supelco, Bellafonte, PA, USA), whereas they were quantified by using calibration curves made with PUFA C4-C24 standard (Supelco) and using C15:0 FAME (Supelco) as internal standard.

4.3. Animals and Treatment

Adult male Wistar rats (Harlan, S. Pietro al Natisone, Udine, Italy) weighing 250–300 g were used in this study. They were housed at constant room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) and relative humidity (55% ± 5%) under a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Procedures involving animals and their care were conducted in conformity with the institutional guidelines of the Italian Ministry of Health (D.L. 26/2014), the Guide for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioural Research (National Research Council 2004), the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and to ARRIVE guidelines. “3Rs” were pursuit in every experimental procedure. Animal welfare was daily monitored through the entire period of experimental procedures. No signs of distress were evidenced and all efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
Two experimental groups were considered: control animals treated with sunflower oil as vehicle and rats administered the Chlorella sorokiniana extract by gavage at the dose of 30 mg/kg diluted in 1 mL of sunflower oil. Behavioral and neurochemical experiments were performed 40 min after oral administration of Chlorella sorokiniana extract. Behavioral and neurochemical protocols were carried out in separate subset of animals in order to avoid confounding factors derived by carry over effects.

4.4. NOR Test

The NOR test was performed according to Giustino at al. [73]. Briefly, rats were submitted to two habituation sessions where they were allowed for 5 min to explore the apparatus (circular arena, 75 cm diameter). 24 h after the last habituation, a session of two 3-min trials, separated by a 1-min intertrial interval (retention interval), was carried out. The discrimination index was calculated using the following formula: (N − F) / (N + F) (N = times spent in exploration of the novel object during the choice trial; F = times spent in exploration of the familiar object in the choice trial) [74].

4.5. FST

The FST was performed according to Porsolt et al. [75]. On the first test day, animals were placed individually in inescapable Perspex cylinders (diameter 23 cm; height 70 cm), filled with a constant maintained 25 ± 1 °C temperature water at a height of 30 cm [65]. During the pre-conditioning period, animals were observed for 15 min. Then, rats were removed and dried before to be returned to their home cages. Twenty-four hours later, each rat was positioned on the water-filled cylinder for 5 min. This session was video-recorded and subsequently scored by an observer blind to the treatment groups. During the test sessions, the time spent in performing the following behaviours was measured: struggling (time spent in tentative of escaping), swimming (time spent moving around the cylinder) and immobility (time spent remaining afloat making only the necessary movements to keep its head above the water).

4.6. Social Interaction Test

The social interaction procedure was adapted from File et al. [76], as previously described [77]. The test was performed in a circular open arena (made of dark plastic; diameter 60 cm; height 31 cm), unfamiliar to the animals and placed in a deemed lit room. On the day of testing, all rats were weighed, and pairs were assigned on the basis of weight and treatment. More specifically, Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats were tested with vehicle-treated partners on the basis of weight, ensuring that they did not differ by more than 10 g. The animals were marked on their back and placed head to head simultaneously in the arena, and their behaviour was recorded for 10 min by a camera mounted vertically above the test arena. During quantification, the observer, who was blinded to the experimental conditions, scored the total time that each rat spent performing the following behaviours: sniffing (sniffing several body parts of the other rat, including the anogenital region), following (moving towards and following behind the other rat around the arena), climbing (climbing over and under the conspecific’s back), kicking and boxing. The defined social interactions included the following: sniffing, following and climbing the partner as social behaviour and boxing and kicking as aggressive behaviour parameters.

4.7. EPM Test

The EPM test was performed according to Pellow et al. [77]. The apparatus consisted of two opposite Plexiglas open arms (50 cm × 10 cm) without side walls and two closed arms (50 cm × 10 cm × 40 cm) extending horizontally at right angles from a central area (10 cm × 10 cm). The maze was situated in a separate brightly lit room illuminated with four, 32-W fluorescent overhead lights that produced consistent illumination within the room. The apparatus had similar levels of illumination on both the open and closed arms. The maze was elevated to a height of 50 cm in the lit room. At the beginning of the experiment, the rat was placed in the central platform facing an open arm and allowed to explore the maze for 5 min. The following parameters were analyzed: number and frequency of entries into open and closed arms and the time spent in open and closed arms. An arm entry was counted when the hind paws were placed on the open arm.

4.8. Post-Mortem Tissue Analysis

Rats were euthanized and brains were immediately removed and cooled on ice for dissection of HIPP, PFC and STR regions, according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson [78]. Tissues were frozen and stored at −80 °C until analysis was performed.

4.8.1. Monoamine Quantification

5-HT and NA concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with an electrochemical detector (Ultimate ECD, Dionex Scientific, Milan, Italy), as previously described [16]. Separation was performed by using a LC18 reverse phase column (Kinetex, 150 mm × 3 mm, ODS 5 μm; Phenomenex, Castel Maggiore, Bologna, Italy). The detection was accomplished by a thin-layer amperometric cell (Dionex, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) with a 5 mm diameter glassy carbon electrode at a working potential of 0.400 V vs. Pd. The mobile phase used was 75 mM NaH2PO4, 1.7 mM octane sulfonic acid, 0.3 mM EDTA, acetonitrile 10%, in distilled water, buffered at pH 3.0. The flow rate was maintained by an isocratic pump (LC-10 AD, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at 0.6 mL/min. Data were acquired and integrated using Chromeleon software (version 6.80, Dionex, San Donato Milanese, Italy).

4.8.2. Measurement of Plasma Levels of Creatine-Kinase M-Type

Measurement of plasma levels of CKM was performed by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit provided by Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample analysis was performed in duplicate to avoid inter-assay variations.

4.9. Blindness of the Study

All analyses were performed blind with respect to the treatment delivery. The blinding of the data was maintained until the analysis and the collection of data was terminated.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis were performed using Graph Pad 5.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). All data were tested for normality by performing the Bartlett Test. Data were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Differences were considered significant only when p-values were less than 0.05.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Ali. Fun to L.T. and F.I.R. form Apulia Region to M.G.M., M.F. and S.S.

Author Contributions

Study design: L.T., M.G.M. and S.S. Study conduct: E.M., M.F., M.B. and P.T. Data collection: M.G.M., M.F., E.M., M.B. and P.T. Data analysis: S.S., M.G.M., E.M., M.B. and P.T. Data interpretation: S.S., M.G.M., E.M., P.T., L.T. Drafting manuscript: S.S., M.G.M., E.M. and L.T. Revising manuscript content: S.S., M.G.M., E.M., M.B., P.T., L.M., M.F. and L.T. All Authors approve the final version of the manuscript. L.T. takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Draaisma, R.B.; Wijffels, R.H.; Slegers, P.M.; Brentner, L.B.; Roy, A.; Barbosa, M.J. Food commodities from microalgae. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sanchez-Camargo Adel, P.; Montero, L.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V.; Tanniou, A.; Cifuentes, A.; Herrero, M.; Ibanez, E. Considerations on the use of enzyme-assisted extraction in combination with pressurized liquids to recover bioactive compounds from algae. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Francavilla, M.; Manara, P.; Kamaterou, P.; Monteleone, M.; Zabaniotou, A. Cascade approach of red macroalgae gracilaria gracilis sustainable valorization by extraction of phycobiliproteins and pyrolysis of residue. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khan, M.I.; Anjum, F.M.; Sohaib, M.; Sameen, A. Tackling metabolic syndrome by functional foods. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2013, 14, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, Y.; Wang, M.; Lindstrom, M.E.; Li, J. Fatty acid and lipid profiles with emphasis on n-3 fatty acids and phospholipids from ciona intestinalis. Lipids 2015, 50, 1009–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zou, S.; Fei, C.; Song, J.; Bao, Y.; He, M.; Wang, C. Combining and comparing coalescent, distance and character-based approaches for barcoding microalgaes: A test with Chlorella-like species (chlorophyta). PLoS ONE 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dong, T.; Wang, J.; Miao, C.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, S. Two-step in situ biodiesel production from microalgae with high free fatty acid content. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Doughman, S.D.; Krupanidhi, S.; Sanjeevi, C.B. ω-3 Fatty acids for nutrition and medicine: Considering microalgae oil as a vegetarian source of epa and dha. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2007, 3, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gouveia, L.; Oliveira, A.C. Microalgae as a raw material for biofuels production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tapiero, H.; Ba, G.N.; Couvreur, P.; Tew, K.D. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and eicosanoids in human health and pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Innis, S.M.; Jacobson, K. Dietary lipids in early development and intestinal inflammatory disease. Nutr. Rev. 2007, 65, S188–S193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Orr, S.K.; Bazinet, R.P. The emerging role of docosahexaenoic acid in neuroinflammation. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2008, 9, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Labrousse, V.F.; Nadjar, A.; Joffre, C.; Costes, L.; Aubert, A.; Gregoire, S.; Bretillon, L.; Laye, S. Short-term long chain omega3 diet protects from neuroinflammatory processes and memory impairment in aged mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Singh, M. Essential fatty acids, dha and human brain. Indian J. Pediatr. 2005, 72, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lang, U.E.; Beglinger, C.; Schweinfurth, N.; Walter, M.; Borgwardt, S. Nutritional aspects of depression. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 37, 1029–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Morgese, M.G.; Tucci, P.; Mhillaj, E.; Bove, M.; Schiavone, S.; Trabace, L.; Cuomo, V. Lifelong nutritional ω-3 deficiency evokes depressive-like state through soluble β amyloid. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stavrovskaya, I.G.; Bird, S.S.; Marur, V.R.; Baranov, S.V.; Greenberg, H.K.; Porter, C.L.; Kristal, B.S. Dietary ω-3 fatty acids do not change resistance of rat brain or liver mitochondria to Ca2+ and/or prooxidants. J. Lipids 2012, 2012, 797105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kawashima, A.; Harada, T.; Kami, H.; Yano, T.; Imada, K.; Mizuguchi, K. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on synaptic plasticity, fatty acid profile and phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling in rat hippocampus and differentiated PC12 cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2010, 21, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Eriksdotter, M.; Vedin, I.; Falahati, F.; Freund-Levi, Y.; Hjorth, E.; Faxen-Irving, G.; Wahlund, L.O.; Schultzberg, M.; Basun, H.; Cederholm, T.; et al. Plasma fatty acid profiles in relation to cognition and gender in Alzheimer’s disease patients during oral ω-3 fatty acid supplementation: The omegad study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2015, 48, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Freund-Levi, Y.; Vedin, I.; Hjorth, E.; Basun, H.; Faxen Irving, G.; Schultzberg, M.; Eriksdotter, M.; Palmblad, J.; Vessby, B.; Wahlund, L.O.; et al. Effects of supplementation with ω-3 fatty acids on oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with alzheimer's disease: The omegad study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014, 42, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Sullivan, E.L.; Riper, K.M.; Lockard, R.; Valleau, J.C. Maternal high-fat diet programming of the neuroendocrine system and behavior. Horm Behav. 2015, 76, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Farahani, S.; Motasaddi Zarandy, M.; Hassanzadeh, G.; Shidfar, F.; Jalaie, S.; Rahimi, V. The effect of low ω-3/ω-6 ratio on auditory nerve conduction in rat pups. Acta Med. Iran. 2015, 53, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Chou, Y.C.; Prakash, E.; Huang, C.F.; Lien, T.W.; Chen, X.; Su, I.J.; Chao, Y.S.; Hsieh, H.P.; Hsu, J.T. Bioassay-guided purification and identification of PPARα/γ agonists from Chlorella sorokiniana. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yim, H.E.; Yoo, K.H.; Seo, W.H.; Won, N.H.; Hong, Y.S.; Lee, J.W. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis following ingestion of chlorella tablets. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2007, 22, 887–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mizoguchi, T.; Takehara, I.; Masuzawa, T.; Saito, T.; Naoki, Y. Nutrigenomic studies of effects of chlorella on subjects with high-risk factors for lifestyle-related disease. J. Med. Food 2008, 11, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Selvaraj, V.; Singh, H.; Ramaswamy, S. Chlorella-induced psychosis. Psychosomatics 2013, 54, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Parsaeimehr, A.; Sun, Z.; Dou, X.; Chen, Y.F. Simultaneous improvement in production of microalgal biodiesel and high-value α-linolenic acid by a single regulator acetylcholine. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ngangkham, M.; Ratha, S.K.; Prasanna, R.; Saxena, A.K.; Dhar, D.W.; Sarika, C.; Prasad, R.B. Biochemical modulation of growth, lipid quality and productivity in mixotrophic cultures of Chlorella sorokiniana. Springerplus 2012, 1, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cordero, B.F.; Obraztsova, I.; Couso, I.; Leon, R.; Vargas, M.A.; Rodriguez, H. Enhancement of lutein production in Chlorella sorokiniana (Chorophyta) by improvement of culture conditions and random mutagenesis. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1607–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, C.Y.; Chang, H.Y. Lipid production of microalga Chlorella sorokiniana cy1 is improved by light source arrangement, bioreactor operation mode and deep-sea water supplements. Biotechnol. J. 2016, 11, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tucci, P.; Mhillaj, E.; Morgese, M.G.; Colaianna, M.; Zotti, M.; Schiavone, S.; Cicerale, M.; Trezza, V.; Campolongo, P.; Cuomo, V.; et al. Memantine prevents memory consolidation failure induced by soluble α amyloid in rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xuan, A.G.; Chen, Y.; Long, D.H.; Zhang, M.; Ji, W.D.; Zhang, W.J.; Liu, J.H.; Hong, L.P.; He, X.S.; Chen, W.L. PPARα agonist fenofibrate ameliorates learning and memory deficits in rats following global cerebral ischemia. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kariharan, T.; Nanayakkara, G.; Parameshwaran, K.; Bagasrawala, I.; Ahuja, M.; Abdel-Rahman, E.; Amin, A.T.; Dhanasekaran, M.; Suppiramaniam, V.; Amin, R.H. Central activation of PPAR-γ ameliorates diabetes induced cognitive dysfunction and improves bdnf expression. Neurobiol. Aging 2015, 36, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, L.; Chen, T.; Li, G.; Wu, C.; Wang, C.; Li, L.; Sha, S.; Chen, L.; Liu, G.; Chen, L. Activation of PPARγ ameliorates spatial cognitive deficits through restoring expression of ampa receptors in seipin knock-out mice. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 1242–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blondeau, N.; Lipsky, R.H.; Bourourou, M.; Duncan, M.W.; Gorelick, P.B.; Marini, A.M. α-Linolenic acid: An ω-3 fatty acid with neuroprotective properties-ready for use in the stroke clinic? Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 519830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Basiouni, S.; Stockel, K.; Fuhrmann, H.; Schumann, J. Polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements modulate mast cell membrane microdomain composition. Cell. Immunol. 2012, 275, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Simons, K.; Toomre, D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 1, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Besshoh, S.; Chen, S.; Brown, I.R.; Gurd, J.W. Developmental changes in the association of nmda receptors with lipid rafts. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Marini, A.M.; Rabin, S.J.; Lipsky, R.H.; Mocchetti, I. Activity-dependent release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor underlies the neuroprotective effect of N-methyl-d-aspartate. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 29394–29399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Blondeau, N.; Widmann, C.; Lazdunski, M.; Heurteaux, C. Activation of the nuclear factor-kappab is a key event in brain tolerance. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 4668–4677. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Lipsky, R.H.; Xu, K.; Zhu, D.; Kelly, C.; Terhakopian, A.; Novelli, A.; Marini, A.M. Nuclear factor kappab is a critical determinant in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated neuroprotection. J. Neurochem. 2001, 78, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jiang, X.; Tian, F.; Mearow, K.; Okagaki, P.; Lipsky, R.H.; Marini, A.M. The excitoprotective effect of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors is mediated by a brain-derived neurotrophic factor autocrine loop in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurochem. 2005, 94, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sopian, N.F.; Ajat, M.; Shafie, N.I.; Noor, M.H.; Ebrahimi, M.; Rajion, M.A.; Meng, G.Y.; Ahmad, H. Does short-term dietary ω-3 fatty acid supplementation influence brain hippocampus gene expression of zinc transporter-3? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15800–15810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wersinger, C.; Jeannotte, A.; Sidhu, A. Attenuation of the norepinephrine transporter activity and trafficking via interactions with α-synuclein. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 3141–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jeannotte, A.M.; Sidhu, A. Regulation of the norepinephrine transporter by α-synuclein-mediated interactions with microtubules. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nelson, J.C. Synergistic benefits of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition. Depress. Anxiety 1998, 7 (Suppl. 1), 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Smythies, J. Section III. The norepinephrine system. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2005, 64, 173–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Pittaluga, A.; Raiteri, M. N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors regulating hippocampal norepinephrine release. I. Location on axon terminals and pharmacological characterization. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1992, 260, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Zimmer, L.; Delpal, S.; Guilloteau, D.; Aioun, J.; Durand, G.; Chalon, S. Chronic n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid deficiency alters dopamine vesicle density in the rat frontal cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 284, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Broadbent, N.J.; Squire, L.R.; Clark, R.E. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14515–14520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cohen, S.J.; Munchow, A.H.; Rios, L.M.; Zhang, G.; Asgeirsdottir, H.N.; Stackman, R.W., Jr. The rodent hippocampus is essential for nonspatial object memory. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Takano, M. Vasculitis of the retina. It’s treatment and light-coagulation for the hemorrhage of retinal vein obstruction. Nihon Ganka Kiyo 1971, 22, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. O’Dell, T.J.; Connor, S.A.; Guglietta, R.; Nguyen, P.V. β-adrenergic receptor signaling and modulation of long-term potentiation in the mammalian hippocampus. Learn. Mem. 2015, 22, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hagena, H.; Hansen, N.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. β-adrenergic control of hippocampal function: Subserving the choreography of synaptic information storage and memory. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 1349–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Stanton, P.K.; Sarvey, J.M. Depletion of norepinephrine, but not serotonin, reduces long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus of rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurosci. 1985, 5, 2169–2176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Nichols, D.E.; Nichols, C.D. Serotonin receptors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1614–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Glikmann-Johnston, Y.; Saling, M.M.; Reutens, D.C.; Stout, J.C. Hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor and spatial learning and memory. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dubuquoy, L.; Rousseaux, C.; Thuru, X.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Romano, O.; Chavatte, P.; Chamaillard, M.; Desreumaux, P. PPARγ as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 2006, 55, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gomez-Pinilla, F. Brain foods: The effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Druart, C.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Vlaeminck, B.; Fievez, V.; Cani, P.D.; Delzenne, N.M. Role of the lower and upper intestine in the production and absorption of gut microbiota-derived PUFA metabolites. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Cryan, J.F.; O’Mahony, S.M. The microbiome-gut-brain axis: From bowel to behavior. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2011, 23, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Panahi, Y.; Badeli, R.; Karami, G.R.; Badeli, Z.; Sahebkar, A. A randomized controlled trial of 6-week chlorella vulgaris supplementation in patients with major depressive disorder. Complement. Ther. Med. 2015, 23, 598–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krishnan, V.; Nestler, E.J. The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature 2008, 455, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Detke, M.J.; Rickels, M.; Lucki, I. Active behaviors in the rat forced swimming test differentially produced by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 1995, 121, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cryan, J.F.; Holmes, A. The ascent of mouse: Advances in modelling human depression and anxiety. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cambon, K.; Dos-Santos Coura, R.; Groc, L.; Carbon, A.; Weissmann, D.; Changeux, J.P.; Pujol, J.F.; Granon, S. Aggressive behavior during social interaction in mice is controlled by the modulation of tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 2010, 171, 840–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tonissaar, M.; Philips, M.A.; Eller, M.; Harro, J. Sociability trait and serotonin metabolism in the rat social interaction test. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 367, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Duxon, M.S.; Starr, K.R.; Upton, N. Latency to paroxetine-induced anxiolysis in the rat is reduced by co-administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist way100635. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 130, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kenny, P.J.; Cheeta, S.; File, S.E. Anxiogenic effects of nicotine in the dorsal hippocampus are mediated by 5-HT1A and not by muscarinic m1 receptors. Neuropharmacology 2000, 39, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. File, S.E.; Zangrossi, H., Jr.; Andrews, N. Social interaction and elevated plus-maze tests: Changes in release and uptake of 5-HT and GABA. Neuropharmacology 1993, 32, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Francavilla, M.; Trotta, P.; Luque, R. Phytosterols from dunaliella tertiolecta and dunaliella salina: A potentially novel industrial application. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4144–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Francavilla, M.; Colaianna, M.; Zotti, M.; Morgese, M.G.; Trotta, P.; Tucci, P.; Schiavone, S.; Cuomo, V.; Trabace, L. Extraction, characterization and in vivo neuromodulatory activity of phytosterols from microalga dunaliella tertiolecta. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 3058–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Giustino, A.; Beckett, S.; Ballard, T.; Cuomo, V.; Marsden, C.A. Perinatal cocaine reduces responsiveness to cocaine and causes alterations in exploratory behavior and visual discrimination in young-adult rats. Brain Res. 1996, 728, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Giovannini, M.G.; Bartolini, L.; Kopf, S.R.; Pepeu, G. Acetylcholine release from the frontal cortex during exploratory activity. Brain Res. 1998, 784, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Porsolt, R.D.; Bertin, A.; Jalfre, M. Behavioral despair in mice: A primary screening test for antidepressants. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1977, 229, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. File, S.E. The use of social interaction as a method for detecting anxiolytic activity of chlordiazepoxide-like drugs. J. Neurosci. Methods 1980, 2, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tucci, P.; Morgese, M.G.; Colaianna, M.; Zotti, M.; Schiavone, S.; Cuomo, V.; Trabace, L. Neurochemical consequence of steroid abuse: Stanozolol-induced monoaminergic changes. Steroids 2012, 77, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Paxinos, G.; Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules 21 01311 g001 550
Figure 1. The NOR test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) discrimination index and (b) time spent in the NOR test of male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats; (b) Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. ** p < 0.01 vs. familiar object and *** p < 0.001 vs. familiar object for vehicle- and for Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats, respectively.
Figure 1. The NOR test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) discrimination index and (b) time spent in the NOR test of male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats; (b) Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. ** p < 0.01 vs. familiar object and *** p < 0.001 vs. familiar object for vehicle- and for Chlorella sorokiniana-treated rats, respectively.
Molecules 21 01311 g001
Molecules 21 01311 g002 550
Figure 2. Evaluation of locomotion parameters in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Number of closed arms entries and (b) number of open arms entries in the elevated plus-maze test; (c) total exploratory activity in the novel object recognition test; (d) plasma CKM concentrations Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group).
Figure 2. Evaluation of locomotion parameters in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Number of closed arms entries and (b) number of open arms entries in the elevated plus-maze test; (c) total exploratory activity in the novel object recognition test; (d) plasma CKM concentrations Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group).
Molecules 21 01311 g002
Molecules 21 01311 g003 550
Figure 3. The forced swimming test and elevated plus maze test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Amount of time spent in open and (b) closed arms, (c) the entries frequency into open and (d) closed arms in the EPM test; (e) Immobility; (f) swimming and (g) struggling frequency in the FST. Male Wistar rats were treated with Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group).
Figure 3. The forced swimming test and elevated plus maze test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Amount of time spent in open and (b) closed arms, (c) the entries frequency into open and (d) closed arms in the EPM test; (e) Immobility; (f) swimming and (g) struggling frequency in the FST. Male Wistar rats were treated with Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group).
Molecules 21 01311 g003
Molecules 21 01311 g004 550
Figure 4. Monoamine quantification in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. NA and 5-HT levels in HIPP (a and b); PFC (c and d); STR (e and f) of male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats and (b) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats.
Figure 4. Monoamine quantification in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. NA and 5-HT levels in HIPP (a and b); PFC (c and d); STR (e and f) of male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats and (b) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats.
Molecules 21 01311 g004
Molecules 21 01311 g005 550
Figure 5. The social interaction test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Time spent performing social and (b) time spent performing aggressive behaviour. Male Wistar rats were treated with Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats.
Figure 5. The social interaction test in male Wistar rats after Chlorella sorokiniana extract or vehicle administration. (a) Time spent performing social and (b) time spent performing aggressive behaviour. Male Wistar rats were treated with Chlorella sorokiniana extract (Chlorella extract, 30 mg/kg/mL dark bar) or vehicle (sunflower oil 1 mL/kg, empty bar) administration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group); (a) t-test * p < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated rats.
Molecules 21 01311 g005
Table
Table 1. UFs of the TL fraction extracted from Chlorella sorokiniana.
Table 1. UFs of the TL fraction extracted from Chlorella sorokiniana.
CompoundUF (mg·g−1 TL)
10-Heneicosene (c,t)
2-Dexyl-1-decanol 3.24
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol acetate (isomer)0.43
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol acetate (isomer)0.22
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol acetate (isomer)0.32
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol64.26
Squalene1.23
Not Identified8.55
α-Tocopherol2.72
(22E)-Ergosta-5,7,9(11),22-tetraen-3-ol6.23
(3β,22E)-Ergosta-5,8,22-trien-3-ol 9.16
Ergosterol43.36
(3β)-Ergosta-5,8-dien-3-ol 7.12
(3β,5α)-Ergost-7-en-3-ol21.56
Table
Table 2. FAMEs of the TL fraction extracted from Chlorella sorokiniana.
Table 2. FAMEs of the TL fraction extracted from Chlorella sorokiniana.
CompoundFAMEs (mg·g−1 TL)
Omega 3169.53
(Z,Z,Z)-7,10,13-Hexadecatrienoic acid methyl ester 69.24
α-Linolenic acid methyl ester100.29
Omega 6116.66
(Z,Z)-7,10-Hexadecadienoic acid methyl ester 35.56
(Z,Z)-9,12-Heptadecadienoic acid methyl ester 2.06
Linoleic acid methyl ester79.04
Saturated58.60
Dodecanoic acid methyl ester0.02
Tridecanoic acid methyl ester0.02
Tetradecanoic acid methyl ester1.27
Methyl 13-methyltetradecanoate0.35
Pentadecanoic acid methyl ester0.60
Hexadecanoic acid methyl ester43.88
15-Methylhexadecanoic acid methyl ester1.68
Heptadecanoic acid methyl ester1.84
Methyl stearate6.17
Eicosanoic acid methyl ester1.53
Heneicosanoic acid methyl ester0.16
Docosanoic acid methyl ester0.36
Tricosanoic acid methyl ester0.07
Tetracosanoic acid methyl ester0.15
Pentacosanoic acid methyl ester0.12
Hexacosanoic acid methyl ester0.38
Monounsaturated54.29
Methyl myristoleate0.25
cis-7-Tetradecenoic acid methyl ester0.72
(Z-13-Methyltetradec-9-enoic acid methyl ester0.37
Methyl palmitoleate20.50
(Z)-7-Hexadecenoic acid methyl ester2.03
(E)-9-Hexadecenoic acid methyl ester2.88
(Z)-9-Heptadecenoic acid methyl ester2.95
Oleic acid methyl ester24.47
Methyl 9-eicosenoate0.13

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morgese, M.G.; Mhillaj, E.; Francavilla, M.; Bove, M.; Morgano, L.; Tucci, P.; Trabace, L.; Schiavone, S. Chlorella sorokiniana Extract Improves Short-Term Memory in Rats. Molecules 2016, 21, 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101311

AMA Style

Morgese MG, Mhillaj E, Francavilla M, Bove M, Morgano L, Tucci P, Trabace L, Schiavone S. Chlorella sorokiniana Extract Improves Short-Term Memory in Rats. Molecules. 2016; 21(10):1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morgese, Maria Grazia, Emanuela Mhillaj, Matteo Francavilla, Maria Bove, Lucia Morgano, Paolo Tucci, Luigia Trabace, and Stefania Schiavone. 2016. "Chlorella sorokiniana Extract Improves Short-Term Memory in Rats" Molecules 21, no. 10: 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101311

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop