Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Novel Lipophilic N-Substituted Norcantharimide Derivatives and Evaluation of Their Anticancer Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
miR-221/222 Promotes S-Phase Entry and Cellular Migration in Control of Basal-Like Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Stage Prediction of the Effects of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquid Mixtures on Luciferase
Previous Article in Special Issue
The role of Micro-RNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Molecular Biology to Treatment
Article Menu

Export Article

Molecules 2014, 19(5), 6891-6910; doi:10.3390/molecules19056891

Circulating miRNAs as Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Disorders
Margherita Grasso 1, Paola Piscopo 2, Annamaria Confaloni 2 and Michela A. Denti 1,3,*
Laboratory of RNA Biology and Biotechnology, Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, via Sommarive 9, 38123 Trento, Italy
Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council (CNR), Padova 35100, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel.: +39-0461-282-740; Fax: +39-0461-283-937.
Received: 19 April 2014; in revised form: 19 May 2014 / Accepted: 21 May 2014 / Published: 23 May 2014


: Neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and frontotemporal dementias (FTD), are considered distinct entities, however, there is increasing evidence of an overlap from the clinical, pathological and genetic points of view. All neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by neuronal loss and death in specific areas of the brain, for example, hippocampus and cortex for AD, midbrain for PD, frontal and temporal lobes for FTD. Loss of neurons is a relatively late event in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases that is typically preceded by other events such as metabolic changes, synaptic dysfunction and loss, neurite retraction, and the appearance of other abnormalities, such as axonal transport defects. The brain’s ability to compensate for these dysfunctions occurs over a long period of time and results in late clinical manifestation of symptoms, when successful pharmacological intervention is no longer feasible. Currently, diagnosis of AD, PD and different forms of dementia is based primarily on analysis of the patient’s cognitive function. It is therefore important to find non-invasive diagnostic methods useful to detect neurodegenerative diseases during early, preferably asymptomatic stages, when a pharmacological intervention is still possible. Altered expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in many disease states, including neurodegeneration, and increasing relevance of miRNAs in biofluids in different pathologies has prompted the study of their possible application as neurodegenerative diseases biomarkers in order to identify new therapeutic targets. Here, we review what is known about the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and the possibilities and challenges of using these small RNA molecules as a signature for neurodegenerative conditions.
miRNAs; biomarkers; Alzheimer’s disease; Parkinson’s disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

1. Introduction

microRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of short, single-stranded 21-22 nucleotides-long non-coding RNAs, constituting about 1% of all human genes and the most abundant class of small RNAs in animals. A repository of miRNAs from many organisms is available at the miRBase Sequence Database [1], a database of published miRNA sequences and annotation [2]. Today, more than 25,000 miRNAs have been described in organisms as evolutionarily diverse as man, worm, Drosophila, and also in the small plant Arabidopsis thaliana [3]. The discovery of miRNAs abundance in different species raised one question: what are these small non coding RNAs doing? To answer it’s important to observe their regulatory targets. The first miRNA, lin-4, was found in 1981 in C. elegans and then molecularly characterized in 1993 [4,5]. The exceptional discovery was that lin-4 produced a pair of short RNA transcripts regulating the larval development timing by translational repression of lin-14 [6], by sequence complementarity between lin-4 and the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of lin-14 mRNA [6,7].

1.1. miRNA Biogenesis and Functions

miRNAs constitute a class of gene expression modulators acting at the post-transcriptional level and fine-tuning the expression of protein-encoding genes. miRNAs modulate gene expression by cleavage or by translational repression in a sequence-specific manner [8]. Animal miRNAs have been reported to functionally target endogenous mRNAs through sites in the 3'UTR [9], but target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by miRNA-binding sites in the 5'UTR as in the 3'UTR [10]. In 2009, a class of miRNA targets containing simultaneous 5'-UTR and 3'-UTR interaction sites has been identified [11]. Moreover, conserved miRNA target sites were also found in CDS (coding sequence) [12] and analysis of CDS-located miRNA target sites suggests that they can effectively inhibit translation [13].

miRNAs derive from long-primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) with distinctive hairpin structures, and their processing is mediated by two endonucleases, Drosha (in the nucleus) and Dicer (in the cytoplasm). Drosha cleaves at the base of the stem to generate a ~60–100 nt hairpin pre-miRNAs [14,15]. After nuclear processing, pre-miRNA is exported into the cytoplasm by Exportin-5 (Exp5) in complex with Ran-GTP and once in the cytoplasm, it is processed by Dicer, that creates a mature miRNAs duplex of approximately 22 bp length [16,17]. It is then separated into the functional guide strand, which is complementary to the target, and the passenger strand, which is subsequently degraded. A recent study provides evidence that pre-miRNAs can give rise to three distinct endogenous miRNAs: the guide strand, the passenger strand and the loop-miR, which is an active miRNA of moderate abundance derived from the single-stranded loop region of selected pre-miRNA hairpins [18]. Complementary base-pairing of miRNA guides RISC to target mRNAs, directing degradation and translational repression via several mechanisms. miRNAs are involved in the fine regulation of several cellular processes such as development, differentiation, cell proliferation and apoptosis, and their dysregulation causes many human diseases, including cancers and neurodegenerative diseases.

1.2. miRNAs in the Nervous System

miRNAs are found in high abundance within the nervous system where they often display a brain-specific expression pattern and are usually found to be co-expressed with their targets. They act as key regulators of different biological functions including synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis, in which they channelize the cellular physiology toward neuronal differentiation. They can also indirectly influence neurogenesis by regulating the proliferation and self-renewal of neural stem cells.

miRNAs are dysregulated in several neurodegenerative diseases, a spectrum of aetiologies culminating in a final common pathway of neuronal cell death. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration are complex, but the universal risk factor is aging and common themes across the disorders have been uncovered, including protein aggregation, neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction [19]. The dysfunction of miRNAs in neurodegenerative disorders and their emerging role in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington’s disease (HD) pathogenesis is increasing recognized. The study of miRNAs is therefore a novel approach to understanding neurodegenerative diseases.

miRNA expression profiling of human neurological disorders has led to the identification of signatures correlated with the diagnosis, staging, progression, prognosis and response to the treatment (reviewed in [20]). However, a causal link between a specific miRNA and a disease has been established in just a few cases, and most of the mechanistic data originates from invertebrate model systems.

2. Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases include several central nervous system disorders characterized by the progressive loss of neural tissues. These disorders do not have cures because the neurons of the central nervous system cannot regenerate on their own after cell death or damage. Moreover, once a neurodegenerative disease has manifested, significant neuronal loss and CNS damage will already be present, therefore early diagnosis is essential to maximize the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies. Tremendous efforts have been made in recent years to identify the neuropathological, biochemical, and genetic biomarkers of the diseases so that the diagnosis could be established in the earlier stages.

2.1. Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Biomarkers represent essential tools for the development of therapeutic strategies to be applied in the early stages of disease. In this context, the biomarkers should be considered potent instruments for biomedical investigation because they are constituted by biochemical or molecular (genetic, epigenetic) elements expressed from a cell, tissue or fluid in a certain stage of the life or normal and/or pathological condition that can be identified, monitored and, if possible, associated to the several stages of the disease. Moreover, the identification of disease specific biomarkers at early stages could give a chance for patients to get an early treatment, which may delay the disease progression. Furthermore, the biomarkers should not only be used to help in predicting the onset of the diseases, but also to help in overseeing the rate of progression, or in responding to treatment.

For these reasons, there is an increasing effort to develop molecular diagnostic markers that meet requirements like easy accessibility, sufficiently high specificity and sensitivity, low costs and applicability by laboratories with standard equipment. The biomarkers for AD, PD and other neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS and HD, must be reliable and specific, and they should be useful in guiding us to make more accurate diagnosis and better treatment of the diseases.

Several blood, plasma, serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers born for neurodegenerative diseases have been proposed to meet these criteria. For example, for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most well-established measurements for detection and tracking of the preclinical and clinical stages of AD include CSF measures of Aβ42, total tau (t-tau) and phospho-tau (p-tau) [21], while for Parkinson’s disease (PD) probably the most promising is the assay of alpha-synuclein for the diagnosis and evolution of the disease [22].

Besides proteins, microRNAs (miRNAs) have also demonstrated their potential as non-invasive biomarkers from blood and serum for a wide variety of human pathologies [23]. In the last years a role for circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases has been shown. A miRNA profile specific for many neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) syndrome, PD, ALS and HD was found.

2.2. Circulating microRNAs as Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases

miRNAs’ high stability in several tissues raised the possibility of a their preservation and quantification also in biofluids. Lawrie and collegues were the first to highlight the presence of miRNAs in serum to discriminate cancer patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) from healthy individuals [24]. Further studies demonstrated miRNAs preservation also in other biofluids such as urine, saliva, CSF and amniotic fluid [25]. Circulating miRNAs can be released by two different pathways: the first one occurs as the result of cell lysis or apoptosis in pathological conditions (tissue damage, metastasis or inflammation) by passive leakage [26]. The second process, an active transport from cells, is mediated by microvesicles (MVs) [27,28], apoptotic bodies (ABs) [29] or, in some cases, is based on microvesicle-free miRNAs, associated with various multiprotein (such as Ago2 and NPM1) [30] or lipoprotein complexes (HDL) [31].

The use of miRNAs as biomarkers has some advantages: first of all the ease of detection and extreme specificity. Unlike large RNA molecules as mRNAs, miRNAs are well preserved in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues (FFPE) and in fresh snap-frozen specimens [32]. Different methods of total RNA purification (column filtration protocols, “Tri-reagents” composed by acid phenol in combination with guanidinium-thiocyanate and chloroform) and different miRNA profiling techniques (sequencing-, microarray- and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-based methods) are used for the isolation and profiling of miRNAs. Moreover, it’s important to choose a suitable normalization method (such as rRNA, U6 snRNA or a combination of different miRNAs) to remove variations and increase the accuracy of miRNAs quantification, because a reliable data analysis is essential for the study outcome.

The easiness of determining profiles of circulating miRNAs could be important for several applications, both in the research laboratory and in the clinic. Two approaches are frequently used for the selection of promising circulating miRNA as disease biomarkers. The first is based on an unbiased global approach of miRNA profiling with subsequent validation of potential biomarkers by qRT-PCR. This approach allows to profile global miRNA expression levels using relatively small amount of purified RNA in a specific and sensitive manner and gives a good opportunity to study the underlying mechanisms involved, but not previously associated, with the disease. The limitations in sensitivity and variability of this approach depend on platforms used to profile miRNAs. Moreover, this approach is less suitable for the analysis of cell-free circulating miRNA in plasma or serum because the concentrations of many circulating miRNAs are low. The second approach is based on the analysis of miRNAs that have been shown a direct connection with the disease. This approach has also certain limitations due to potential involvement of the same miRNA in diseases regarding various organs and because high expression of miRNAs in an affected organ is not necessarily accompanied by an increase of the same miRNAs in plasma or CSF [33,34].

2.2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease and Circulating miRNAs

AD is the most common form of primary degenerative dementia. Clinico-pathological studies support the notion of a long “preclinical” stage of the disease; in fact it is thought that brain pathology, consisting of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, begins 10–20 years before significant neuronal cell death and the subsequent appearance of any cognitive and behavioral symptoms [35]. Thus, fluid and imaging biomarkers could identify subjects in early symptomatic and even preclinical stages, possibly when potential treatments can best preserve cognitive function [36]. Over the last few years, a growing number of publications reported dysregulation of miRNAs expression linked to Alzheimer Disease. While altered miRNA patterns have been exhaustively investigated in AD patients’ tissue samples or cell cultures [37,38,39,40], less information is available on circulating miRNAs in AD. The first study on miRNAs as possible biomarkers for AD was published on 2007 by Schipper and colleagues who described for the first time an increased microRNA expression in Alzheimer peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained by a Microarray analysis [41]. A more recent work in blood cells described a miRNA analysis by next-generation sequencing finding a 12-miRNA signature that distinguished between AD and controls with an accuracy of 93%, a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 92% [42]. miRNA profiling studies were also carried out on plasma and CSF; Kumar and colleagues reported, by using a Nanostring Technology, the discovery and validation of a unique circulating 7-miRNA signature (hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-142-3p, hsa-miR-191-5p, hsa-miR-301a-3p and hsa-miR-545-3p) in plasma, which could distinguish AD patients from normal controls with 95% accuracy (AUC of 0.953) [43], while in CSF a miRNA profiling obtained by qRT-PCR was performed in a study that described a reduced expression of hsa-miR-27a-3p in patients with Alzheimer’s disease [44]. Also Cogswell et al. performed miRNA analysis on CSF by qRT-PCR, identifying a set of miRNAs, so-called AD-specific miRNAs, with an expression profile in CSF similar to that of AD patients brain [45].

In addition to profiling analysis, numerous studies are based on selecting of specific miRNAs, as possible candidate biomarkers. For example Lukiw and colleagues chose to analyze miRNA associated to inflammatory signaling finding that miR-146a and miR-155 are abundant in Alzheimer’s Disease CSF and in short post-mortem interval brain tissue-derived extracellular fluid [46,47]. Another study on CSF showed elevated levels in Alzheimer’s disease patients for let-7b, a miRNA that activating Toll-like receptor 7, causes neurodegeneration [48]. Other works include miRNA analysis on plasma, finding levels of circulating miR-15a associate with amyloid plaque score, important for pathological diagnosis of AD [49], and miR-29a/b, miR-181c, miR-9 down-regulated in serum [50]. Moreover, it has been observed that serine palmitoyletransferase (SPT) directly regulates amyloid beta (Aβ) levels through the post-transcriptional regulation of miR-137, miR-181c, miR-9 and miR-29a/b, suggesting that SPT and the respective miRNAs are potential therapeutic targets for AD [39].

A recent study is focused on miRNA-34 family, which participates functionally in at least two signaling pathways: Bcl2 for cell survival/apoptosis and SIRT1 deacetylase for p53 or neuroprotection signalling. The study reported an increase in the circulating levels of miR-34c in both PBMC and plasma in AD compared to controls [51].

An intermediate state between normal aging and AD (and other dementias), is called Mild cognitive Impairment (MCI), usually defined as the first stage when clinical symptoms become evident [52]. Plasma miRNA biomarkers were also reported for MCI [53]: an initial pool of miRNAs was selected among known brain- and neuron- enriched miRNAs. The authors identified biomarker pairs that fall into two sets: the “miR‐132 family”, consisting in miR‐128/miR‐491‐5p, miR‐132/miR‐491‐5p and miR‐874/miR‐491‐5p and the “miR‐134 family” consisting in miR‐134/miR‐370, miR‐323‐3p/miR‐370 and miR‐382/miR‐370 with sensitivity and specificity at 79%–100% and 79%–95% respectively. In a separate longitudinal study, the identified miRNA biomarker pairs successfully detected MCI in majority of patients at asymptomatic stage 1–5 years prior to clinical diagnosis [53].

2.2.2. Parkinson’s Disease and Circulating miRNAs

PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and leads to progressive deterioration of motor function due to loss of dopamine-producing brain cells. It is characterized by primary symptoms such as tremor, stiffness, slowness, impaired balance and secondary symptoms including anxiety, depression, and dementia. PD is a complex disease caused by the interaction of genetic inherited and environmental acquired risk factors [54]. Mutations were found in α-synuclein (SNCA) and leucine-rich repeat kinase2 (LRRK2) genes for late-onset disease and Parkin (PARK2), PTEN Induced Putative Kinase1 (PINK1), oncogene DJ1 (DJ1) for early onset [55]. The neuropathology of PD is characterized by cellular inclusions known as Lewy bodies in neurons, the main components of which are α-synuclein, neurofilament and ubiquitin. The use of different protein biomarkers on PD patients present problems deriving from invasiveness and conflicting results among CSF proteins due to assay differences and/or blood contamination [56]. Hence, the development of circulating biomarkers for PD has great potential but surprisingly is still in its infancy. Two studies in blood cells and in total blood were recently published: the first one, using a microarray-based approach, determined the expression profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 19 patients and 13 controls and identified 18 significantly under-expressed miRNAs [57]. The other one, using qRT-PCR, suggested that miR-1, miR-22-5p and miR-29 expression levels in total peripheral blood allow to distinguish non-treated PD from healthy subjects, and that miR-16-2-3p, miR-26a-2-3p and miR30a differentiate treated from untreated patients [58]. miRNA profiles in plasma from PD patients have also been reported: a first study was performed by qRT-PCR in 31 patients at onset of symptoms and 25 controls and found only one significantly up-regulated miRNA, miR-331-5p [59]; a second study identified miR-1826, miR-450b-3p, miR-626, and miR-505 in 32 PD patients and 32 controls [60]. Soreq et al. [61] identified by NGS in blood leukocytes, 16 miRNAs significantly altered in PD patients compared to healthy controls, including miR-16, miR-20a and miR-320. Eleven miRNAs were modified following deep-brain stimulation (DBS) treatment, five of which were changed inversely to the disease-induced changes [61].

2.2.3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Circulating miRNAs

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare, devastating and fatal neurological disorder that causes weakness, atrophy, paralysis and eventually respiratory failure due to the selective degeneration of the neurons responsible for voluntary movements. ALS is a complex pathology, whose causal factors are currently unknown. Emerging evidence suggests a combined involvement of genes and environmental factors.

During the past decade there has been a large increase in the number of ALS biomarker studies using CSF as well as blood [62]. Most of these studies have examined changes of individual proteins in the CSF of ALS versus healthy controls or other neurologic disease subjects, typically using a gel-based system or ELISA [63]. However, most are limited by the number of samples used in the analysis, choice of control subjects, and typically the lack of verification in a separate cohort of patients. At present, CSF candidate biomarkers in ALS can be grouped into those that reflect neuronal loss and those indicative of neuroinflammatory (glial) processes. Regarding miRNAs as possible biomarkers in ALS, we have, so far, little knowledge. One study was in fact performed on miRNA profiling of ALS subjects, by analyzing 911 human miRNAs using microarray technology in leukocytes [64]. The study reported a profile of identified eight miRNAs that were significantly up- or downregulated in sALS patients as compared to healthy controls. In parallel, an analysis on sorted CD14+CD16– monocytes from ALS patients was performed. It is known that inflammatory monocytes were activated and that their progressive recruitment to the spinal cord correlates with neuronal loss. This study had showed a profile constituting an inflammatory signature of 56 miRNAs significantly affected in CD14+CD16– monocytes that could serve as a biomarker for disease stage or progression [65]. Despite the two analyses were performed with the same technical approach, the populations of dysregulated miRNAs found in leucocytes [64] and monocytes [65] are not overlapped and comparable.

Moreover, little or no studies were performed about circulating miRNA in plasma or serum of patients with various other neurodegenerative diseases, such as HD [66], or Frontotemporal dementia. However, it is interesting to note that miR-34b, whose downregulation is coupled to a decrease in the expression of DJ1 and Parkin, two proteins associated to familial forms of PD [67], is also up-regulated in response to Huntingtin (mHTT) mutant in both pluripotent and neuronally differentiated human cells and in human plasma, suggesting a miR-34b role as biomarker for HD [66]. Nevertheless, the study of circulating miRNA in plasma/serum for diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders needs again more detailed investigations.

Overall, there is a lack of overlap (refer to Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3) and little concordance among these miRNA profiles both for the specific disease and when comparing different neurodegenerative disorders, which highlights the difficulties of analyzing different sample types and comparing different methodologies.

Table 1. Alzheimer’s Disease and circulating miRNAs.
Table 1. Alzheimer’s Disease and circulating miRNAs.
miRNASampleExperimental approachPilot studyValidation studyReference
Increased expression of miR-34a and miR-181bPBMCmiRNA profilingMicroarray
AD: 16
NEC: 16
12-miRNA signature: miR-112, miR-161, let-7d-3p, miR-5010-3p, hsa-miR-26a-5p, hsa-miR-1285-5p, and hsa-miR-151a-3p upregulated; miR-103a-3p, miR-107, miR-532-5p, miR-26b-5p, let-7f-5p downregulatedPeripheral bloodmiRNA profilingNext Generation Sequencing
AD: 48
CT: 22
AD: 94
MCI: 18
MS: 16
PD: 9
DEP: 15
BD: 15
Schiz: 14
CT: 21
7-miRNA signature: hsa-let-7d-5p, hsa-let-7g-5p, hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-142-3p, hsamiR-191-5p, hsa-miR-301a-3p and hsa-miR-545-3pPlasmamiRNA profilingNanostring
AD: 11
MCI: 9
CT: 20
AD: 20
CT: 17
Reduced expression of miR-27a-3pCSFmiRNA profilingqRT-PCR
AD: 35
CT: 37
60 miRNAs differentially regulated between the different Braak stages, including Let-7 family membersCSFmiRNA profilingTaqman®
Braak stage V AD: 10
Braak stage I non demented controls: 10
Elevated levels of miR-146a and miR-155CSF and ECFCandidate miRNAsMicroarray
AD: 5
CT: 5
Significant increase in miR-9, miR-125b, miR-146a, miR-155CSF and ECFCandidate miRNAsMicroarray
AD: 6
CT: 6
Elevated levels of let-7bCSFCandidate miRNAsTaqman®
AD: 13
CT: 11
miR-15a associated with amyloid plaque scorePlasmaCandidate miRNAsMicroarrayqRT-PCR[49]
miR-29a/b, miR-181c, and miR-9 down-regulatedSerumCandidate miRNAsSYBR qRT-PCR
AD: 7
AD: 7
CT: 7
Increased levels of miR-34cPBMC or cell-free plasmaCandidate miRNAsTaqman®
AD: 110
CT: 123
Circulating brain-enriched miRNAs: “miR‐132 family” and “miR‐134 family”PlasmaCandidate miRNAsTaqMan®
MCI: 10
CT: 10
MCI: 20
AD: 20
CT: 20
CY: 20

(PBMC: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells; NEC: Normal Elderly Controls; AD: Alzheimer Disease; CT: Control; MCI: Mild Cognitive Impairment; MS: Multiple Sclerosis; PD: Parkinson Disease; DEP: Major Depression; BD: Bipolar Disorder; Schiz: Schizophrenia; CSF: Cerebrospinal Fluid; ECF: brain tissue-derived extracellular fluid; CY: Young Control).

Table 2. Parkinson’s Disease and circulating miRNAs.
Table 2. Parkinson’s Disease and circulating miRNAs.
miRNASampleExperimental approachPilot studyValidation studyReference
18 significantly under-expressed miRNAsPBMCmiRNA profilingMicroarray
PD: 19
CT: 13
miR-1, miR-22-5p and miR-29 distinguish non-treated PD from healthy subjectsTotal peripheral bloodmiRNA profilingqRT-PCR
untreated PD: 8
treated PD: 4
early-onset PD: 7
CT: 8
miR-16-2-3p, miR-26a-2-3p, miR30a differentiate treated from untreated patientsTotal peripheral bloodmiRNA profilingqRT-PCR
untreated PD: 8
treated PD: 4
early-onset PD: 7
CT: 8
miR-331-5p upregulatedPlasmamiRNA profilingTaqman®
PD: 31
CT: 25
miR-1826, miR-450b-3p, miR-626, and miR-505PlasmamiRNA profilingAgilent
PD: 32
CT: 32
treated PD: 20
untreated PD: 10
PSP: 5
MSA: 4
CT: 4
16 miRNAs (including miR-16, miR-20a and miR-320) modified in patients pre-DBSLeukocytesmiRNA profilingNext Generation Sequencing
PD pre-DBS: 3
PD post-DBS: 3
CT: 6

(PD: Parkinson Disease; PSP: Progressive Supranuclear Palsy; MSA: Multiple System Atrophy; DBS: Deep Brain Stimulation).

Table 3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and circulating miRNAs.
Table 3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and circulating miRNAs.
miRNASampleExperimental approachPilot studyValidation studyReference
8 miRNAs (miR-451, miR-1275, miR-328, miR-638, miR-149, miR-665 and miR-338-3) significantly up- or downregulatedLeukocytesmiRNA profilingMicroarray ALS: 8 CT: 12TaqMan®
ALS: 14
CT: 14
Expression of ALS-specific miRNA inflammatory signatureMonocytesmiRNA profilingMicroarray
ALS: 8
MS: 8
CT: 8

ALS: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

3. Neurodegenerative Diseases Meet Cancers in a miRNA World

Although cancer and neurodegenerative diseases are two distinct pathological disorders, one due to an increased proliferation and the other to premature cell death, emerging evidences indicate that these two types of disease share common mechanisms of regulation. Recent studies show an involvement of miRNAs in the pathology of both diseases, indicating a convergence at the post-transcriptional level. It has been demonstrated that individual miRNA can be involved in the development of both diseases by two different mechanisms: common pathways can be regulated by multiple miRNAs or distinct pathways can be controlled by the same miRNA (reviewed in [68]).

In the first group, some miRNAs were identified as regulators of genes involved as in neurodegenerative disorders as well as in cancer (refer to Table 4). let-7 family, miR-17-5p, miR-20a and miR-106b have a role in the regulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP). An association of APP levels with Alzheimer disease (AD) has been demonstrated in several studies [69,70,71,72], with evidences showing that APP is concentrated at neuronal synapses and in AD-associated amyloid plaques following proteolysis. On the other hand, APP is also over-expressed in cancer of oral cavity, esophageal, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, thyroid, and colorectal cancers [73,74,75,76].

Another family of miRNAs involved in AD is miR-29a/b-1 family. Indeed, these miRNAs showed a role in the post-transcriptional regulation of β-secretase 1 (BACE1), an aspartic acid protease potentially important to the pathophysiology of AD [77], with evidences suggesting that high expression of BACE1 can give rise to inappropriate cleavage of APP and as a consequence to an increased load of amyloid β-peptides in patients with sporadic AD [78]. In another study it has been demonstrated that BACE1 could be the secretase responsible for IR-induced cleavage of ST6GalI, and this cleavage could decrease ST6GalI-mediated cancer cell migration [79].

miR-21 and miR-106b were shown to be involved in the regulation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), a protein implicated in the development of Parkinson’s disease (PD) through activation of two genes involved in neural protection from oxidative stress, PTEN-induced putative kinase (PINK1), and parkinson disease 7 (PARK7, also known as DJ-1) [80]. About the role of these miRNA in cancer regulation, what is known is that PTEN is a tumour suppressor, mutated in sporadic and inherited tumours [81] and involved in the inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling, a pathway leading to enhanced cell survival and growth in a number of human cancers [82].

Table 4. Pathways regulated by multiple miRNAs (common to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases).
Table 4. Pathways regulated by multiple miRNAs (common to cancer and neurodegenerative diseases).
miRNATarget genesExpression in cancerExpression in neurodegenerative disordersReference
let-7 family, miR-17-5p, miR-20a miR-106bAPPOncogene, over-expressed in oral cavity, esophageal, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, thyroid, and colorectal cancerConcentrated at neuronal synapses and in AD-associated amyloid plaques[69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]
miR-29a/b-1 familyBACE1Decrease of ST6GalI-mediated cancer cell migrationHigh expression in patients with sporadic AD[78,79]
miR-21 miR-106bPTENTumour suppressor, mutated in sporadic and inherited tumoursImplicated in PD through activation of PINK1 and PARK7[80,81,82]
miR-34b/cPARK2Tumour suppressor, mutated in glioblastoma, lung cancer and colon cancerReduced in PD brain samples displaying strong miR-34b/c downregulation[67,83]

(APP: Amyloid Precursor Protein; BACE1: β-secretase 1; PTEN: Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog; PARK2: Parkin).

Another important gene involved in PD is Parkinson protein 2 E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PARK2). Inactivating somatic mutations and frequent intragenic deletions of PARK2 lead to human malignancies and PARK2 mutations in cancer occur in the same domains as the germline mutations causing familial PD. PARK2 mutations in cancer decrease PARK2’s E3 ligase activity, compromising its function in the ubiquitination of cyclin E and resulting in mitotic instability. On the basis of these data, PARK2 could be a gene causing neuronal defects when altered in the germline, and instead contributing to oncogenesis when mutated in non-neuronal somatic cells [83]. It has been demonstrated that DJ1 and PARK2 are indirect targets of miR-34b/c: DJ1 and PARK2 expression is reduced in PD brain samples displaying strong miR-34b/c downregulation. In brain areas with neuropathological damage at clinical stages of PD, miRNA expression profiles reveal decreased expression of miR-34b and miR-34c [67].

In the second group, there are some miRNAs involved in the pathology of both neurodegeneration and cancer by targeting distinct pathways that are specific for each disease (refer to Table 5). miR-29 family members are demonstrated to be involved in the regulation of neuron navigator 3 (NAV3) in the context of AD [84]. Studies in lung cancer and acute myelogenous leukemia have shown that the same family of miRNA directly target DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B [85,86].

Another miRNA family, the let-7 family, in addition to its involvement in the regulation of APP in AD in C. elegans [87], seems to have a role in many types of cancer through its regulatory effects on a variety of target proteins such as Ras, HMGA2 and Myc [88,89,90,91].

The third family with an involvement in the regulation of AD [92] and PD [93] is miR-106b family promoting also cell-cycle progression and inducing G1-arrest through negative regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21/CDKN1A) [94]; moreover, in breast cancer cells this miRNA family is able to target breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) and RB1 [95].

With respect to PD, miR-124a and miR-133b by suppressing the expression of the PITX3 transcription factor [96] have shown a role in the regulation of this disease. In HeLa cells, over-expression of miR-124a induces a neuron-specific expression profile [97], and some of the identified downregulated genes were also deregulated in dopamine neurons isolated from affected areas of patients brains with idiopathic PD [98]. miR-124a has been also related to tumorigenesis through its modulation of the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) oncogene and the retinoblastoma (RB1) tumor suppressor gene [99]. miR-133b, down-regulated in a number of tumor types, including esophageal, lung, and colon cancers [100,101,102,103], targets myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1, also known as BCL2L3) and BCL2-like 2 (BCL2L2) [101], oncogenic actinbinding factors like fascin homolog 1 (FSCN1) [102], and the met proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) [103].

The ease of detection and quantification of miRNAs in blood and other biofluids paves the way to use miRNAs involved in both neurodegenerative disease and cancer as therapeutic targets or agents in the treatment of both diseases, while miRNAs differentially expressed in these two different diseases as diagnostic markers.

Table 5. Pathways controlled by the same miRNA (distinct in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases).
Table 5. Pathways controlled by the same miRNA (distinct in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases).
miRNADiseaseTarget genesReference
miR-29 familyLung cancer and acute myeloid leukemiaDNMT3A DNMT3B [85,86]
let-7 familyLung cancer (Ras); Benign mesenchymal tumors and lung cancers (HMGA2); Burkitt lymphoma (Myc)Ras HMGA2 Myc[88,89,90,91]
miR-106b familySeveral cancers (p21/CDKN1A); breast cancer (BRMS1, RB)p21/CDKN1A BRMS1 RB[94,95]
AD and PDAPP PTEN[92,93]
miR-124aColon cancerCDK6 RB[99]
miR-133bEsophageal, lung and colon cancersMCL1 BCL2L2 FSCN1 MET[100,101,102,103]

(DNMT3A: DNA Methyltransferase 3A; DNMT3B: DNA Methyltransferase 3B; NAV3: Neuron Navigator 3; HMGA2: High Mobility Group AT-hook Protein 2; p21/CDKN1A: Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1A; BRMS1: Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1; RB: Retinoblastoma; CDK6: Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; MCL1: Myeloid Cell Leukemia 1; BCL2L2: B-Cell CLL/Lymphoma 2 like 2; FSCN1: Fascin Homolog 1).

4. Conclusions

The data reviewed here suggest that the analysis of circulating miRNAs is a highly promising approach for developing minimally invasive screening tests for neurodegenerative disorders. The advances in the analyses of circulating miRNA summarized here could lead to more efforts toward using miRNAs as biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases in order to ease an early diagnosis and identify new therapeutic targets.


This work was supported by a Futuro in Ricerca—Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research Grant RBFR-0895DC “Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in dementias”.

Author Contributions

Margherita Grasso and Paola Piscopo performed bibliographic researches and wrote the article. Michela A. Denti and Annamaria Confaloni conceived, designed and critically reviewed the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. miRBase Sequence Database. Available online: (accessed on 23 May 2014).
  2. Kozomara, A.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: Integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D152–D157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ambros, V.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P.; Burge, C.B.; Carrington, J.C.; Chen, X.; Dreyfuss, G.; Eddy, S.R.; Griffiths-Jones, S.; Marshall, M.; et al. A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA 2003, 9, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chalfie, M.; Horvitz, H.R.; Sulston, J.E. Mutations that lead to reiterations in the cell lineages of C. elegans. Cell 1981, 24, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, R.C.; Feinbaum, R.L.; Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 1993, 75, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olsen, P.H.; Ambros, V. The lin-4 regulatory RNA controls developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans by blocking LIN-14 protein synthesis after the initiation of translation. Dev. Biol. 1999, 216, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wightman, B.; Ha, I.; Ruvkun, G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 1993, 75, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bartel, D.P. microRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lewis, B.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 2005, 120, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lytle, J.R.; Yario, T.A.; Steitz, J.A. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5'UTR as in the 3'UTR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9667–9672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, I.; Ajay, S.S.; Yook, J.I.; Kim, H.S.; Hong, S.H.; Kim, N.H.; Dhanasekaran, S.M.; Chinnaiyan, A.M.; Athey, B.D. New class of microRNA targets containing simultaneous 5'-UTR and 3'-UTR interaction sites. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, X.; Duan, X.; Qian, J.; Li, F. Abundant conserved microRNA target sites in the 5' untranslated region and coding sequence. Genetica 2009, 137, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hausser, J.; Syed, A.P.; Bilen, B.; Zavolan, M. Analysis of CDS-located miRNA target sites suggests that they can effectively inhibit translation. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, Y.; Ahn, C.; Han, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Yim, J.; Lee, J.; Provost, P.; Rådmark, O.; Kim, S.; et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 2003, 425, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Denli, A.M.; Tops, B.B.; Plasterk, R.H.; Ketting, R.F.; Hannon, G.J. Processing of primary microRNAs by the Microprocessor complex. Nature 2004, 432, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Winter, J.; Diederichs, S. microRNA Northern blotting, precursor cloning, and Ago2-improved RNA interference. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 676, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cullen, B.R. Derivation and function of small interfering RNAs and microRNAs. Virus Res. 2004, 102, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Winter, J.; Link, S.; Witzigmann, D.; Hildenbrand, C.; Previti, C.; Diederichs, S. Loop-miRs: Active microRNAs generated from single-stranded loop regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 10, 5503–5512. [Google Scholar]
  19. Goodall, E.F.; Heath, P.R.; Bandmann, O.; Kirby, J.; Shaw, P.J. Neuronal dark matter: The emerging role of microRNAs in neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 178. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shafi, G.; Aliya, N.; Munshi, A. microRNA signatures in neurological disorders. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2010, 37, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
  21. Langbaum, J.B.; Fleisher, A.S.; Chen, K.; Ayutyanont, N.; Lopera, F.; Quiroz, Y.T.; Caselli, R.J.; Tariot, P.N.; Reiman, E.M. Ushering in the study and treatment of preclinical Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013, 9, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schapira, A.H. Recent developments in biomarkers in Parkinson disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Keller, A.; Leidinger, P.; Bauer, A.; Elsharawy, A.; Haas, J.; Backes, C.; Wendschlag, A.; Giese, N.; Tjaden, C.; Ott, K.; et al. Toward the blood-borne miRNome of human diseases. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 841–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lawrie, C.H.; Gal, S.; Dunlop, H.M.; Pushkaran, B.; Liggins, A.P.; Pulford, K.; Banham, A.H.; Pezzella, F.; Boultwood, J.; Wainscoat, J.S.; et al. Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2008, 141, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gilad, S.; Meiri, E.; Yogev, Y.; Benjamin, S.; Lebanony, D.; Yerushalmi, N.; Benjamin, H.; Kushnir, M.; Cholakh, H.; Melamed, N.; et al. Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One 2008, 3, e3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zen, K.; Zhang, C.Y. Circulating microRNAs: A novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers. Med. Res. Rev. 2012, 32, 326–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hunter, M.P.; Ismail, N.; Zhang, X.; Aguda, B.D.; Lee, E.J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, T.; Schafer, J.; Lee, M.T.; Schmittgen, T.D.; et al. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS One 2008, 3, e3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zernecke, A.; Bidzhekov, K.; Noels, H.; Shagdarsuren, E.; Gan, L.; Denecke, B.; Hristov, M.; Köppel, T.; Jahantigh, M.N.; Lutgens, E.; et al. Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL12-dependent vascular protection. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra81. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, K.; Zhang, S.; Weber, J.; Baxter, D.; Galas, D.J. Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cells. Nucleic Acid Res. 2010, 38, 7248–7259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vickers, K.C.; Palmisano, B.T.; Shoucri, B.M.; Shamburek, R.D.; Remaley, A.T. microRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xi, Y.; Nakajima, G.; Gavin, E.; Morris, C.G.; Kudo, K.; Hayashi, K.; Ju, J. Systematic analysis of microRNA expression of RNA extracted from fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. RNA 2007, 13, 1668–1674. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mizuno, H.; Nakamura, A.; Aoki, Y.; Ito, N.; Kishi, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Sekiguchi, M.; Takeda, S.; Hashido, K. Identification of musclespecific microRNAs in serum of muscular dystrophy animal models: Promising novel blood-based markers for muscular dystrophy. PLoS One 2011, 6, e18388. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cuk, K.; Zucknick, M.; Heil, J.; Madhavan, D.; Schott, S.; Turchinovich, A.; Arlt, D.; Rath, M.; Sohn, C.; Benner, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs in plasma as early detection markers for breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 1602–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bateman, R.J.; Xiong, C.; Benzinger, T.L.; Fagan, A.M.; Goate, A.; Fox, N.C.; Marcus, D.S.; Cairns, N.J.; Xie, X.; Blazey, T.M.; et al. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Craig-Schapiro, R.; Fagan, A.M.; Holtzman, D.M. Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 35, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hebert, S.S.; Horre, K.; Nicolai, L.; Papadopoulou, A.S.; Mandemakers, W.; Silahtaroglu, A.N.; Kauppinen, S.; Delacourte, A.; de Strooper, B. Loss of microRNA cluster miR-29a/b-1 in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease correlates with increased BACE1/beta-secretase expression. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6415–6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, W.X.; Rajeev, B.W.; Stromberg, A.J.; Ren, N.; Tang, G.; Huang, Q.; Rigoutsos, I.; Nelson, P.T. The expression of microRNA miR-107 decreases early in Alzheimer’s disease and may accelerate disease progression through regulation of beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geekiyanage, H.; Chan, C. microRNA-137/181c regulates serine palmitoyltransferase and in turn amyloid beta, novel targets in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 14820–14830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Long, J.M.; Lahiri, D.K. microRNA-101 downregulates Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta precursor protein levels in human cell cultures and is differentially expressed. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 404, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schipper, H.M.; Maes, O.C.; Chertkow, H.M.; Wang, E. microRNA expression in Alzheimer blood mononuclear cells. Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. 2007, 1, 263–274. [Google Scholar]
  42. Leidinger, P.; Backes, C.; Deutscher, S.; Schmitt, K.; Mueller, S.C.; Frese, K.; Haas, J.; Ruprecht, K.; Paul, F.; Stähler, C.; et al. A blood based 12-miRNA signature of Alzheimer disease patients. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, P.; Dezso, Z.; MacKenzie, C.; Oestreicher, J.; Agoulnik, S.; Byrne, M.; Bernier, F.; Yanagimachi, M.; Aoshima, K.; Oda, Y. Circulating miRNA biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 2013, 8, e69807. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sala Frigerio, C.; Lau, P.; Salta, E.; Tournoy, J.; Bossers, K.; Vandenberghe, R.; Wallin, A.; Bjerke, M.; Zetterberg, H.; Blennow, K.; et al. Reduced expression of hsa-miR-27a-3p in CSF of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2013, 81, 2103–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cogswell, J.P.; Ward, J.; Taylor, I.A.; Waters, M.; Shi, Y.; Cannon, B.; Kelnar, K.; Kemppainen, J.; Brown, D.; Chen, C.; et al. Identification of miRNA changes in Alzheimer’s disease brain and CSF yields putative biomarkers and insights into disease pathways. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2008, 14, 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alexandrov, P.N.; Dua, P.; Hill, J.M.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. microRNA (miRNA) speciation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and extracellular fluid (ECF). Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012, 3, 365–373. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lukiw, W.J.; Alexandrov, P.N.; Zhao, Y.; Hill, J.M.; Bhattacharjee, S. Spreading of Alzheimer’s disease inflammatory signaling through soluble micro-RNA. Neuroreport 2012, 23, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lehmann, S.M.; Krüger, C.; Park, B.; Derkow, K.; Rosenberger, K.; Baumgart, J.; Trimbuch, T.; Eom, G.; Hinz, M.; Kaul, D.; et al. An unconventional role for miRNA: Let-7 activates Toll-like receptor 7 and causes neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bekris, L.M.; Lutz, F.; Montine, T.J.; Yu, C.E.; Tsuang, D.; Peskind, E.R.; Leverenz, J.B. microRNA in Alzheimer’s disease: An exploratory study in brain, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. Biomarkers 2013, 18, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Geekiyanage, H.; Jicha, G.A.; Nelson, P.T.; Chan, C. Blood serum miRNA: Non-invasive biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 235, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bhatnagar, S.; Chertkow, H.; Schipper, H.M.; Yuan, Z.; Shetty, V.; Jenkins, S.; Jones, T.; Wang, E. Increased microRNA-34c abundance in Alzheimer’s disease circulating blood plasma. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2014, 7, 2. [Google Scholar]
  52. DeCarli, C. Mild cognitive impairment: Prevalence, prognosis, etiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sheinerman, K.S.; Tsivinsky, V.G.; Crawford, F.; Mullan, M.J.; Abdullah, L.; Umansky, S.R. Plasma microRNA biomarkers for detection of mild cognitive impairment. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 2012, 4, 590–605. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nuytemans, K.; Theuns, J.; Cruts, M.; van Broeckhoven, C. Genetic etiology of Parkinson disease associated with mutations in the SNCA, PARK2, PINK1, PARK7, and LRRK2 genes: A mutation update. Hum. Mutat. 2010, 31, 763–780. [Google Scholar]
  55. Coppedè, F. Genetics and epigenetics of Parkinson’s disease. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 489830. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hong, Z.; Shi, M.; Chung, K.A.; Quinn, J.F.; Peskind, E.R.; Galasko, D.; Jankovic, J.; Zabetian, C.P.; Leverenz, J.B.; Baird, G.; et al. DJ-1 and alpha-synuclein in human cerebrospinal fluid as biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2010, 133, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Martins, M.; Rosa, A.; Guedes, L.C.; Fonseca, B.V.; Gotovac, K.; Violante, S.; Mestre, T.; Coelho, M.; Rosa, M.M.; Martin, E.R.; et al. Convergence of miRNA expression profiling, α-synuclein interacton and GWAS in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 2011, 6, e25443. [Google Scholar]
  58. Margis, R.; Rieder, C.R. Identification of blood microRNAs associated to Parkinson’s disease. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 152, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cardo, L.F.; Coto, E.; de Mena, L.; Ribacoba, R.; Moris, G.; Menéndez, M.; Alvarez, V. Profile of microRNAs in the plasma of Parkinson’s disease patients and healthy controls. J. Neurol. 2013, 260, 1420–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khoo, S.K.; Petillo, D.; Kang, U.J.; Resau, J.H.; Berryhill, B.; Linder, J.; Forsgren, L.; Neuman, L.A.; Tan, A.C. Plasma-based circulating microRNA biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2012, 2, 321–331. [Google Scholar]
  61. Soreq, L.; Salomonis, N.; Bronstein, M.; Greenberg, D.S.; Israel, Z.; Bergman, H.; Soreq, H. Small RNA sequencing-microarray analyses in Parkinson leukocytes reveal deep brain stimulation-induced splicing changes that classify brain region transcriptomes. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2013, 6, 10. [Google Scholar]
  62. Turner, M.R.; Kiernan, M.C.; Leigh, P.N.; Talbot, K. Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ryberg, H.; Bowser, R. Protein biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2008, 5, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. De Felice, B.; Guida, M.; Guida, M.; Coppola, C.; de Mieri, G.; Cotrufo, R. A miRNA signature in leukocytes from sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gene 2012, 508, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Butovsky, O.; Siddiqui, S.; Gabriely, G.; Lanser, A.J.; Dake, B.; Murugaiyan, G.; Doykan, C.E.; Wu, P.M.; Gali, R.R.; Iyer, L.K.; et al. Modulating inflammatory monocytes with a unique microRNA gene signature ameliorates murine ALS. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3063–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gaughwin, P.M.; Ciesla, M.; Lahiri, N.; Tabrizi, S.J.; Brundin, P.; Björkqvist, M. Hsa-miR-34b is a plasma-stable microRNA that is elevated in pre-manifest Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 2225–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Minones-Moyano, E.; Porta, S.; Escaramis, G.; Rabionet, R.; Iraola, S.; Kagerbauer, B.; Espinosa-Parrilla, Y.; Ferrer, I.; Estivill, X.; Marti, E. microRNA profiling of Parkinson’s disease brains identifies early downregulation of miR-34b/c which modulate mitochondrial function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 3067–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Du, L.; Pertsemlidis, A. Cancer and neurodegenerative disorders: Pathogenic convergence through microRNA regulation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 3, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Podlisny, M.B.; Lee, G.; Selkoe, D.J. Gene dosage of the amyloid beta precursor protein in Alzheimer’s disease. Science 1987, 238, 669–671. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rovelet-Lecrux, A.; Hannequin, D.; Raux, G.; le Meur, N.; Laquerrière, A.; Vital, A.; Dumanchin, C.; Feuillette, S.; Brice, A.; Vercelletto, M.; et al. APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  71. Theuns, J.; Brouwers, N.; Engelborghs, S.; Sleegers, K.; Bogaerts, V.; Corsmit, E.; de Pooter, T.; van Duijn, C.M.; de Deyn, P.P.; van Broeckhoven, C. Promoter mutations that increase amyloid precursor-protein expression are associated with Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. LaFerla, F.M.; Green, K.N.; Oddo, S. Intracellular amyloid-beta in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hansel, D.E.; Rahman, A.; Wehner, S.; Herzog, V.; Yeo, C.J.; Maitra, A. Increased expression and processing of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein in pancreatic cancer may influence cellular proliferation. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7032–7037. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ko, S.Y.; Lin, S.C.; Chang, K.W.; Wong, Y.K.; Liu, C.J.; Chi, C.W.; Liu, T.Y. Increased expression of amyloid precursor protein in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 111, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Arvidsson, Y.; Andersson, E.; Bergström, A.; Andersson, M.K.; Altiparmak, G.; Illerskog, A.C.; Ahlman, H.; Lamazhapova, D.; Nilsson, O. Amyloid precursor-like protein 1 is differentially upregulated in neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2008, 15, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krause, K.; Karger, S.; Sheu, S.Y.; Aigner, T.; Kursawe, R.; Gimm, O.; Schmid, K.W.; Dralle, H.; Fuhrer, D. Evidence for a role of the amyloid precursor protein in thyroid carcinogenesis. J. Endocrinol. 2008, 198, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cole, S.L.; Vassar, R. The Basic Biology of BACE1: A key therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Genomics 2007, 8, 509–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, R.; Lindholm, K.; Yang, L.B.; Yue, X.; Citron, M.; Yan, R.; Beach, T.; Sue, L.; Sabbagh, M.; Cai, H.; et al. Amyloid beta peptide load is correlated with increased beta-secretase activity in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3632–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, M.; Park, J.J.; Ko, Y.G.; Lee, Y.S. Cleavage of ST6Gal I by radiation-induced BACE1 inhibits golgi-anchored ST6Gal I-mediated sialylation of integrin β1 and migration in colon cancer cells. Radiat. Oncol. 2012, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morris, L.G.; Veeriah, S.; Chan, T.A. Genetic determinants at the interface of cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Oncogene 2010, 29, 3453–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Salmena, L.; Carracedo, A.; Pandolfi, P.P. Tenets of PTEN tumor suppression. Cell 2008, 133, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wong, K.K.; Engelman, J.A.; Cantley, L.C. Targeting the PI3K signaling pathway in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2010, 20, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Veeriah, S.; Taylor, B.S.; Meng, S.; Fang, F.; Yilmaz, E.; Vivanco, I.; Janakiraman, M.; Schultz, N.; Hanrahan, A.J.; Pao, W.; et al. Somatic mutations of the Parkinson’s disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  84. Shioya, M.; Obayashi, S.; Tabunoki, H.; Arima, K.; Saito, Y.; Ishida, T.; Satoh, J. Aberrant microRNA expression in the brains of neurodegenerative diseases: miR-29a decreased in Alzheimer disease brains targets neurone navigator 3. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2010, 36, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fabbri, M.; Garzon, R.; Cimmino, A.; Liu, Z.; Zanesi, N.; Callegari, E.; Liu, S.; Alder, H.; Costinean, S.; Fernandez-Cymering, C.; et al. microRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15805–15810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Garzon, R.; Liu, S.; Fabbri, M.; Liu, Z.; Heaphy, C.E.; Callegari, E.; Schwind, S.; Pang, J.; Yu, J.; Muthusamy, N.; et al. microRNA-29b induces global DNA hypomethylation and tumor suppressor gene reexpression in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting directly DNMT3A and 3B and indirectly DNMT1. Blood 2009, 113, 6411–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Niwa, R.; Zhou, F.; Li, C.; Slack, F.J. The expression of the Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein-like gene is regulated by developmental timing microRNAs and their targets in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 2008, 315, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Johnson, S.M.; Grosshans, H.; Shingara, J.; Byrom, M.; Jarvis, R.; Cheng, A.; Labourier, E.; Reinert, K.L.; Brown, D.; Slack, F.J. RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell 2005, 120, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, Y.S.; Dutta, A. The tumor suppressor microRNA let-7 represses the HMGA2 oncogene. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1025–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sampson, V.B.; Rong, N.H.; Han, J.; Yang, Q.; Aris, V.; Soteropoulos, P.; Petrelli, N.J.; Dunn, S.P.; Krueger, L.J. microRNA let-7a downregulates MYC and reverts MYC-induced growth in Burkitt lymphoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9762–9770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Boyerinas, B.; Park, S.M.; Hau, A.; Murmann, A.E.; Peter, M.E. The role of let-7 in cell differentiation and cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2010, 17, F19–F36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hébert, S.S.; Horré, K.; Nicolaï, L.; Bergmans, B.; Papadopoulou, A.S.; Delacourte, A.; de Strooper, B. microRNA regulation of Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein expression. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 33, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Poliseno, L.; Salmena, L.; Riccardi, L.; Fornari, A.; Song, M.S.; Hobbs, R.M.; Sportoletti, P.; Varmeh, S.; Egia, A.; Fedele, G.; et al. Identification of the miR-106b~25 microRNA cluster as a proto-oncogenic PTEN-targeting intron that cooperates with its host gene MCM7 in transformation. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra29. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ivanovska, I.; Ball, A.S.; Diaz, R.L.; Magnus, J.F.; Kibukawa, M.; Schelter, J.M.; Kobayashi, S.V.; Lim, L.; Burchard, J.; Jackson, A.L.; et al. microRNAs in the miR-106b family regulate p21/CDKN1A and promote cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 2167–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pan, S.; Yu, F.; Gong, C.; Song, E. Tumor Invasion, and metastasis initiated by miR-106b in breast cancer by targeting BRMS1 and RB. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6157. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kim, J.; Inoue, K.; Ishii, J.; Vanti, W.B.; Voronov, S.V.; Murchison, E.; Hannon, G.; Abeliovich, A. A microRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science 2007, 317, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lim, L.P.; Lau, N.C.; Garrett-Engele, P.; Grimson, A.; Schelter, J.M.; Castle, J.; Bartel, D.P.; Linsley, P.S.; Johnson, J.M. Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature 2005, 433, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Simunovic, F.; Yi, M.; Wang, Y.; Macey, L.; Brown, L.T.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Andersen, S.L.; Stephens, R.M.; Benes, F.M.; Sonntag, K.C. Gene expression profiling of substantia nigra dopamine neurons: Further insights into Parkinson’s disease pathology. Brain 2009, 132, 1795–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lujambio, A.; Ropero, S.; Ballestar, E.; Fraga, M.F.; Cerrato, C.; Setién, F.; Casado, S.; Suarez-Gauthier, A.; Sanchez-Cespedes, M.; Git, A.; et al. Genetic unmasking of an epigenetically silenced microRNA in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1424–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bandrés, E.; Cubedo, E.; Agirre, X.; Malumbres, R.; Zárate, R.; Ramirez, N.; Abajo, A.; Navarro, A.; Moreno, I.; Monzó, M.; et al. Identification by real-time PCR of 13 mature microRNAs differentially expressed in colorectal cancer and non-tumoral tissues. Mol. Cancer 2006, 5, 29. [Google Scholar]
  101. Crawford, M.; Batte, K.; Yu, L.; Wu, X.; Nuovo, G.J.; Marsh, C.B.; Otterson, G.A.; Nana-Sinkam, S.P. microRNA 133B targets prosurvival molecules MCL-1 and BCL2L2 in lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 388, 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  102. Kano, M.; Seki, N.; Kikkawa, N.; Fujimura, L.; Hoshino, I.; Akutsu, Y.; Chiyomaru, T.; Enokida, H.; Nakagawa, M.; Matsubara, H. miR-145, miR-133a and miR-133b: Tumor suppressive miRNAs target FSCN1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2804–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hu, G.; Chen, D.; Li, X.; Yang, K.; Wang, H.; Wu, W. miR-133b regulates the MET protooncogene and inhibits the growth of colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top