**Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation of the Human miR-17-92 Cluster; Evidence for Involvement of Pim-1**

**Maren Thomas 1,†, Kerstin Lange-Grünweller 1,†, Dorothee Hartmann 1 , Lara Golde 1 , Julia Schlereth 1 , Dennis Streng 1 , Achim Aigner 2 , Arnold Grünweller 1,\* and Roland K. Hartmann 1,\***


*Received: 29 March 2013; in revised form: 14 May 2013 / Accepted: 22 May 2013 / Published: 7 June 2013*

**Abstract:** The human polycistronic miRNA cluster miR-17-92 is frequently overexpressed in hematopoietic malignancies and cancers. Its transcription is in part controlled by an E2F-regulated host gene promoter. An intronic A/T-rich region directly upstream of the miRNA coding region also contributes to cluster expression. Our deletion analysis of the A/T-rich region revealed a strong dependence on c-Myc binding to the functional E3 site. Yet, constructs lacking the 5'-proximal ~1.3 kb or 3'-distal ~0.1 kb of the 1.5 kb A/T-rich region still retained residual specific promoter activity, suggesting multiple transcription start sites (TSS) in this region. Furthermore, the protooncogenic kinase, Pim-1, its phosphorylation target HP1γ and c-Myc colocalize to the E3 region, as inferred from chromatin immunoprecipitation. Analysis of pri-miR-17-92 expression levels in K562 and HeLa cells revealed that silencing of E2F3, c-Myc or Pim-1 negatively affects cluster expression, with a synergistic effect caused by c-Myc/Pim-1 double knockdown in HeLa cells. Thus, we show, for the first time, that the protooncogene Pim-1 is part of the network that regulates transcription of the human miR-17-92 cluster.

**Keywords:** miRNA; miR-17-92 cluster; Pim-1; miRNA promoter; c-Myc; HP1γ; RNAi

#### **1. Introduction**

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important post-transcriptional riboregulators of gene expression with high relevance to cancer formation and metastasis [1]. In general, miRNAs are derived from RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) primary transcripts (pri-miRNA) that are further processed to ~70 nt precursors (pre-miRNA) and after nuclear export to mature miRNAs by the activity of the two endonucleases, DROSHA/DGCR8 and DICER [2–5]. MiRNAs are incorporated into the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) and act as repressors of translation by imperfect base-pairing to their target sites in mRNAs [3]. The majority of miRNAs is encoded in intronic regions, either individually or as "polycistronic" miRNA clusters that are cotranscribed [3,6].

Several deregulated miRNAs or miRNA clusters are involved in tumorigenesis, accounting for their designation as tumor-suppressing or as oncogenic miRNAs [7]. Such miRNAs can downregulate targets involved in the regulation of apoptosis or cell cycle progression [1]. One well-characterized polycistronic cluster is the miR-17-92 cluster, also known as OncomiR-1 or C13*orf*25. This cluster encodes six miRNAs belonging to four different seed families: (i) the miR-17 family with miR-17 and miR-20a, (ii) the miR-18 family with miR-18a, (iii) the miR-19 family with miR-19a and miR-19b-1 and (iv) the miR-92 family [8–11]. The human miR-17-92 cluster is encoded in the chromosomal region, 13q31.3, and is amplified in several solid tumors, as well as in some hematopoietic malignancies [8,12]. Because of numerous known targets of its individual miRNAs, the miR-17-92 locus exerts pleiotropic functions during development, proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis in different cell systems [13–15]. In mice, deletion of the cluster prevents normal B-cell development as a consequence of premature cell death [14]. In a mouse B-cell lymphoma model, simultaneous overexpression of c-Myc and the miR-17-92 cluster accelerated lymphomagenesis [9]. This oncogenic effect could later be assigned primarily to miR-19a/b, which dampens expression of the tumor suppressor PTEN, thereby repressing apoptosis [13,15].

Analyses of transcriptional regulation of oncogenic miRNAs and miRNA clusters are of great importance for strategies aiming at cancer prevention. Unfortunately, most miRNA promoters have not been characterized or identified yet [16]. In the case of the miR-17-92 cluster, expression is thought to be promoted from a host gene promoter region upstream of exon 1, with transcription starting at a consensus initiator sequence downstream of a non-consensus TATA box [17,18]. Additionally, this core promoter region contains functional E2F transcription factor binding sites. E2F1-3 were shown to activate C13*orf*25 expression from this promoter and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIP) identified E2F3 to be the main E2F variant associated with the host gene promoter [17,18]. No E2F binding was detected in the region between the host gene promoter and the miR-17-92 cluster [18].

Furthermore, nucleosome mapping combined with chromatin signatures for transcriptionally active promoters [19–21] indicated that transcriptional activity of the miR-17-92 cluster also originates from the intronic A/T-rich region directly upstream of the miRNA coding sequences [16]. This is in line with the finding that cluster expression is activated by c-Myc binding to a conserved E-box element (E3) ~1.5 kb upstream of the miRNA coding sequence [9,10,20]. Indeed, luciferase reporter assays confirmed that both the host gene promoter and the intronic region confer transcriptional activity [16,21].

Here, we subjected the intronic A/T-rich region to deletion analysis using luciferase reporter constructs. Transcription was found to strongly depend on c-Myc binding to the E3 site, but even shorter fragments (<0.3 kb) of sequences directly preceding the miR-17-92 coding sequence still promoted residual, but substantial and specific transcriptional activity. Interestingly, we identified the protooncogene Pim-1 and one of its phosphorylation targets, HP1γ [22], to be associated with the chromatin region containing the E3 site, suggesting that the human C13*orf*25 locus belongs to the set of genes that are regulated by c-Myc and Pim-1 [23,24]. SiRNA-mediated Pim-1 knockdown indeed resulted in reduced pri-miR-17-92 levels, as did a knockdown of c-Myc or E2F3. In Hela cells, a double knockdown of c-Myc/Pim-1 decreased the pri-miR-17-92 levels more than single knockdowns, consistent with a synergism of c-Myc and Pim-1 at the intronic C13*orf*25 promoter.

#### **2. Results and Discussion**

#### *2.1. Results*

#### 2.1.1. c-Myc-Dependent Intronic Transcriptional Activity within the Human miR-17-92 Locus

The 3.4 kb upstream genomic region of the miR-17-92 coding sequence can be subdivided into a G/C-rich and an A/T-rich part. The former is a CpG island (~1.9 kb, 78% GC content; see http://genome.ucsc.edu [25], GRCh37/hg19 assembly) that has its 5'-boundary ~0.4 kb upstream of the TSS of the host gene promoter [20] and its 3'-boundary ~1.4 kb upstream of the miR-17-5p coding sequence, representing the 5'-terminal miRNA of the cluster. The A/T-rich region (~64% A/T content) following the CpG island begins immediately downstream of a functional and highly conserved c-Myc binding site (5'-CATGTG, E-box E3), which is localized ~1.5 kb upstream of the miR-17-5p coding sequence [10] (Figures 1A and S1).

We have analyzed the intronic region of C13*orf*25, including the preceding functional c-Myc box E3 [20] and truncated segments of the A/T-rich region (Figure 1B) for transcriptional activation. For this purpose, luciferase reporter constructs were transfected into K562 (a human myelogenous erythroleukemia cell line from a CML patient) and HeLa cells (an epithelial human cell line from a cervical carcinoma). We selected these two cell lines as a starting point to study transcription of the miR-17-92 cluster in the context of different cellular expression levels (Figure S2).

**Figure 1.** (**A**) Genomic organization of C13*orf*25. The locus consists of four exons and three introns; the six miRNAs of the miR-17-92 cluster are encoded in intron 3. Sequences upstream of the cluster can be subdivided into a G/C-rich CpG island and an A/T-rich downstream part. The host gene promoter thought to be activated by E2F3 is located in the CpG island about 3.4 kb upstream of the miR-17-5p coding sequence. The functional c-Myc site (E3) is located ~1.5 kb upstream of miR-17-5p. Sequence numbering is based on the NCBI reference sequence NG\_032702.1 and the GRCh37/hg19 assembly [25]. Note that previous related studies referred to the numbering system of the previous hg18 assembly [16,17,20,21]. The numbering of the hg18 and hg19 assemblies is correlated as follows: nt 92,002,872 (0 kb in Figure 1A) of hg19 is nt 90,800,873 of hg18; (**B**) Schematic representation of the different C13*orf*25 portions fused to the luciferase structural gene. The functional E3 box for c-Myc binding is indicated in the 1.5 kb construct (white vertical line); (**C**) Promoter activities of the different luciferase reporter constructs in K562 and HeLa cells. Obtained luciferase activities were measured as relative light units (RLU) and normalized to the pGL3 control plasmid carrying the SV40 promoter (Promega). A reporter construct lacking the SV40 promoter, as well as a construct harboring the 339 bp fragment of the A/T-rich intronic region in inverted orientation were used as controls. RLU values of the individual constructs were derived from 5 to 16 experiments (+/− S.E.M.).

The ~1.5 kb reporter construct, comprising c-Myc box E3 (Figures 1A and S1) and the A/T-rich region (lacking the 113 bp preceding the mature miR-17-5p coding sequence for reasons of PCR feasibility), showed substantial transcriptional activity, amounting to 30%–35% in both cell lines relative to the pGL3 control plasmid harboring an SV40 promoter (Figure 1C). This is in line with results of a similar study of the mouse miR-17-92 locus [21]. Furthermore, Ozsolak *et al.* [16] predicted an intronic TSS to be localized ~0.2 kb downstream of the E3 site. Indeed, truncating the 1.5 kb fragment to 625 bp, which deletes the E3 site, strongly reduced reporter activity by ~4.5-fold in K562 and by almost 20-fold in HeLa cells compared to the activity of the ~1.5 kb construct (Figure 1C). To substantiate this finding, we tested the ~1.5 kb construct in K562 cells under conditions of a siRNA-mediated knockdown of c-Myc. This reduced reporter expression to a similar extent as the truncation to 625 bp, supporting the notion that c-Myc binding to the E3 site plays a key role in activating transcription from this intronic region (Figure 1C). SiRNA-mediated c-Myc knockdown in HeLa cells also suggests a ~four-fold decrease in transcription originating from the ~1.5 kb reporter construct (data not shown), again consistent with the crucial role of c-Myc binding to the E3 site. As the 625 bp fragment still conferred basal promoter activity, we further shortened this region to ~340 bp, ~280 bp and ~200 bp. Additionally, we included short fragments with their 3'-boundary ~290 bp upstream of the mature miR-17-5p coding sequence (250, 190 and 108 bp in Figure 1B). We also inversed the orientation of the ~340 bp fragment in front of the luciferase gene (Figure 1C, 339 bp inverse (inv)) to include a control fragment with comparable A/T content. This inversed fragment conferred reporter activity 5.3-fold (K562) or 2.4-fold (HeLa) higher than that of the pGL3 control vector lacking the SV40 promoter (ΔSV40, Figure 1C).

All the fragments ≤ 340 bp conferred residual promoter activities, some clearly to a higher extent than the inverted 339 bp fragment in both cell lines (see the 279 and 197 bp fragments, Figure 1C). This indicates that parts of the intronic A/T-rich region promote specific transcriptional activity, the extent partly differing between the two cell lines (Figure 1C). Notably, despite using a variety of web-based promoter prediction tools (see Suppl. Material), no correlation between fragment activity and promoter elements predicted in this region was identified. In K562 cells, the smaller fragments, including the 625 bp fragment, showed an overall trend towards stronger expression relative to HeLa cells.

### 2.1.2. Pim-1 and HP1γ Are Associated with the Intronic c-Myc Binding Site

We next asked if other factors beyond c-Myc may be involved in human miR-17-92 cluster expression from the A/T-rich region. Transcriptional regulation by c-Myc is associated with Pim-1-dependent H3S10 phosphorylation in about 20% of all genes regulated by c-Myc [24]. Moreover, Pim-1 and c-Myc act synergistically in severe forms of B-cell lymphomas and Pim-1, as well as the miR-17-92 cluster are overexpressed in K562 cells [26]. We performed ChIP assays to test whether Pim-1 localizes to the internal promoter region of the miR-17-92 cluster. For this analysis*,* we amplified a ~90 bp DNA fragment (segment A1 in Figure 2A) 0.1 kb downstream of the functional c-Myc E3 site. The same DNA segment has been analyzed in a previous study on c-Myc [10]. Our ChIP analysis revealed that not only c-Myc, as expected, but also Pim-1 localizes to this genomic region (Figure 2B, left lanes in upper and middle panels). Indeed, this is consistent with the finding that Pim-1-catalyzed H3S10 phosphorylation is required for c-Myc-dependent transcriptional activation [24]. We further analyzed another known phosphorylation target of Pim-1, the heterochromatin protein-1 gamma (HP1γ) [22], for its association with the E3 region. HP1γ localized to this genomic area, as well (Figure 2B, lower panel). Moreover, we were able to identify an association of HP1γ along the miRNA coding region, which is indicative of active transcription (see Figure S3 and Discussion section).

**Figure 2.** (**A**) Schematic representation of the intronic A/T-rich region preceding the miR-17-92 coding sequence. The region A1 (blue box) defines the genomic sequence 0.1 kb downstream of the functional c-Myc binding site (E3; yellow box) that was amplified in ChIP analyses; (**B**) ChIP analysis of the intronic region A1 in K562 cells, using antibodies specific for c-Myc, Pim-1 and HP1γ. +AB: with antibody; −AB: without antibody; Mock: buffer only without cell lysate; Input: supernatant of the −AB -sample after immunoprecipitation and centrifugation (for details, see Supplementary Materials).

2.1.3. Transcriptional Activity of the Human miR-17-92 Cluster Depends on c-Myc and Pim-1

To further substantiate the role of Pim-1 in miR-17-92 cluster expression, we quantified the cellular pri-miR-17-92 levels by qRT-PCR (see Figure 3A for primer positions) after siRNA-mediated Pim-1 knockdown relative to a c-Myc knockdown in K562 and HeLa cells. Since combined ChIP and reporter gene assays suggested that the transcription factor E2F3 is a major activator of transcription initiated at the host gene promoter [17,18], we included E2F3 in our knockdown experiments as a possible measure for the contribution of the host gene promoter to miR-17-92 expression. We also quantified the levels of c-Myc, E2F3 and Pim-1 mRNAs after knockdown by qRT-PCR to evaluate

knockdown efficiencies (Supplementary Table S1). For Pim-1, we have shown good correlation between mRNA and protein levels [26], suggesting that reduced mRNA levels will also entail decreased protein levels. A corresponding parallel analysis of protein levels was inconclusive, owing to a non-interpretable pattern obtained with the used E2F3 antibody [18]. In the study presented here, only experiments with a knockdown efficiency >50% were included (Supplementary Table S1). Single knockdowns of either c-Myc or E2F3 decreased the pri-miR-17-92 levels in HeLa cells to ~35 and 60%, respectively, relative to the control siRNA (Figure 3B). Notably, a 40% reduction of pri-miR-17-92 levels was also observed upon Pim-1 knockdown. Similar results were obtained in K562 cells, with decreases in pri-miR-17-92 levels to ~30%, 30% and 45%, respectively (Figure 3C). However, double knockdowns had additive suppression effects on pri-miR-17-92 levels in the case of c-Myc/E2F3 (HeLa and K562), c-Myc/Pim-1 (Hela) and E2F3/Pim-1 (HeLa). To shed more light on the role of Pim-1, we further analyzed luciferase activity of the 1.5 kb construct harboring the functional c-Myc E3 site in K562 and HeLa cells upon Pim-1 knockdown. We did not observe a substantial decrease in reporter expression after Pim-1 knockdown in K562 cells (data not shown), but a three-fold reduction (Supplementary Figure S4) in HeLa cells (see Discussion).

**Figure 3.** (**A**) Illustration of the primers (red arrows) used for the qRT-PCR quantification of pri-miR-17-92 transcript levels; (**B**,**C**) qRT-PCR-based quantitation of pri-miR-17-92 transcript levels in HeLa (**B**) or K562 cells (**C**) after siRNA-mediated knockdown of c-Myc, E2F3 or Pim-1 or after combined knockdown of c-Myc/E2F3, c-Myc/Pim-1 or E2F3/Pim-1. 2^-ΔΔpri-17-92 values were normalized against 5S rRNA and an internal control siRNA (siVR1), representing mean values from at least three independent experiments (+/− S.E.M.). Statistical analyses were done using the software, R.

#### *2.2. Discussion*

The transcription of the oncogenic miR-17-92 cluster is thought to originate from two different TSSs: one is localized in close proximity to the host gene promoter element [17] (Supplementary Figure S1), and the other TSS was predicted to map to the region ~200 bp downstream of the functional c-Myc site E3 (Figures 1A and S1). The latter prediction was based on nucleosome mapping and chromatin signatures for active promoters. The derived algorithm identified 175 human promoters proximal to miRNA coding sequences and was reported to correctly predict transcription initiation regions to a resolution of 150 bp with high sensitivity and specificity. The majority of predictions were also consistent with known "expressed sequence tag" (EST) TSSs or cDNA 5'-ends [16].

Beyond previous studies [16,20,21], we investigated the intronic A/T-rich region preceding the human miR-17-92 cluster in more detail and compared it to siRNA-mediated knockdown of c-Myc. Similar effects were obtained, substantiating the notion that c-Myc and the c-Myc E3 site play a crucial role in activating transcription from the intronic promoter region. However, the 625 bp and even some of the further truncated fragments (~280 and ~200 bp) of the A/T-rich region conferred residual specific promoter activity in both cell types (Figure 1), indicating that parts of the A/T-rich region, downstream of the c-Myc E3 site, contribute to cluster expression. This E3 box-independent transcriptional activity was more pronounced for K562 relative to HeLa cells, which correlates with the particularly high cluster expression in K562 cells (Supplementary Figure S2). As a possible explanation, transcriptional activity of the ~1.5 kb fragment may be dominated by the recruitment of c-Myc to the E3 site region, while differential activity mediated by the smaller fragments in K562 *vs.* HeLa cells may report that their residual transcriptional activation is mechanistically different from that of the ~1.5 kb fragment. This could mean that regulatory factors of the transcription machinery are differentially expressed in the two cell lines.

ChIP assays revealed that not only c-Myc, but also the protooncogene Pim-1 and its phosphorylation target, HP1γ, associate with the chromatin region harboring the c-Myc E3 site (Figure 2B). Importantly, Pim-1-catalyzed phosphorylation of H3S10 at c-Myc target genes is necessary to regulate key genes required for c-Myc-dependent oncogenic transformation [27].

In mammals, three paralogs of HP1 (α, β and γ) regulate heterochromatin formation, gene silencing or gene activation [28,29]. HP1α and β proteins are mainly recruited to heterochromatin regions harboring H3K9me2,3 modifications, whereas HP1γ is found in association with euchromatin [30] and active genes [29]. Furthermore, HP1c, the *Drosophila* homolog of HP1γ, associates with transcriptionally active chromatin containing H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 histone marks [28]. HP1γ can further be recruited to inducible promoters, where it replaces HP1β, thereby inducing a switch from the repressive to the active transcriptional state. This replacement with HP1γ requires H3 phospho-acetylation [31]. In this context, a transient phosphorylation of H3S10 (via Aurora B kinase) was shown to be necessary for the dissociation of HP1 proteins from chromatin during the M phase of the cell cycle [32]. In the induced state, HP1γ can also be localized within coding regions of protein genes, together with elongating RNA polymerase II [31].

Our data, showing that HP1γ colocalizes with Pim-1 and c-Myc (Figure 2), is in line with the aforementioned activating role of HP1γ during transcription. We extended our ChIP assays to the miRNA coding region of C13*orf*25 to analyze HP1γ association with this part of the cluster. Indeed, ChIP analysis along the miRNA coding sequence identified HP1γ at all four analyzed subregions (A2–A5, Supplementary Figure S3). To our knowledge, this is the first indication that HP1γ is involved in activating the transcription of miRNAs.

The association of Pim-1 with the intronic chromosomal region near the c-Myc E3 site led us to the assumption that Pim-1 plays an important role in the transcriptional activation of the miR-17-92 cluster. This was tested by RNAi also, including E2F3 as an assumed indicator of host gene promoter activity. The strong negative effects of individual knockdowns of c-Myc, Pim-1 and E2F3 on pri-miR-17-92 levels indicate that all three proteins are important for cluster expression by affecting transcription from the host gene promoter (E2F3) or the intronic promoter region (c-Myc, Pim-1). This raises the question about the mechanistic role of Pim-1 in cluster expression from the intronic promoter. In contrast to HeLa cells Supplementary (Figure S4), a Pim-1 knockdown in K562 cells failed to significantly decrease reporter activity from the ~1.5 kb fragment. Among other possibilities, Pim-1 may be recruited to the functional c-Myc E3 site in the context of the cellular chromatin structure in K562 cells, but not in the context of the plasmid-encoded reporter gene. Alternatively, Pim-1 recruitment to the E3 site occurs, as shown by the ChIP assays, but is not a crucial prerequisite for transcriptional activation in K562 cells. On the other hand, the three-fold decrease in ~1.5 kb reporter activity observed in HeLa cells upon Pim-1 depletion adds evidence in support of a crucial role for Pim-1 in miR-17-92 cluster expression, but simultaneously points to cell type-specific differences. For future investigations, other cell lines will be tested, particularly ones that express c-Myc, but not Pim-1. Clearly, decreases in pri-miR-17-92 levels upon c-Myc, E2F3 and/or Pim-1 knockdown (Figure 3) may include indirect effects, e.g., originating from inhibition of cell proliferation (Pim-1), changes in the kinetics of pri-miR-17-92 processing, global changes in transcriptional networks (E2F3, c-Myc) or mutual transactivation (E2F3 and c-Myc) [33–35]. Further complication may arise from the fact that miR-17-5p and miR-20a of the cluster are negative regulators of E2F1-3 mRNAs [10,18].

As c-Myc, HP1γ and histone H3 are known phosphorylation targets of Pim-1, future studies may address the influence of Pim-1 on the phosphorylation status of these proteins at the E3 site, utilizing antibodies that are highly specific for the phosphorylated *versus* unphosphorylated state.

The siRNA-mediated c-Myc knockdown, decreasing c-Myc mRNA levels on average by 65% (HeLa) or 81% (K562; see Supplementary Table S1), resulted in a 60%–70% reduction in pri-miR-17-92 levels in HeLa and K562 cells (Figure 3). This effect may report a rough estimate of the proportion of cluster transcripts normally initiated in the intronic promoter region in these two cell lines, for the following reasons: the C13*orf*25 region contains four c-Myc binding sites (boxes E1-4) and two additional ones with lower c-Myc occupancy (relative to E1) upstream of the host gene promoter [20]. Box E1, immediately downstream of host gene promoter's TSS, was shown by deletion analysis to be inhibitory, which correlates with c-Myc forming heterodimers with MXI or MNT at this site to repress transcription [20]. Thus, host gene promoter activity may even somewhat increase under conditions of a c-Myc knockdown, although such an effect could, in turn, be neutralized by reduced c-Myc-mediated transactivation of E2F [35]. ChIP-Seq data for K562 and HeLa-S3 cells revealed the by far highest c-Myc occupancy at site E3 (little at E2 and E4), where c-Myc forms heterodimers with MAX to activate transcription [20]. A straightforward interpretation of the additive effect of a c-Myc/E2F3 double knockdown in Hela and K562 cells is that this combination negatively affected transcription from the host gene and intronic promoter regions.

A major finding of our study is the recruitment of Pim-1 to the intronic c-Myc E3 site (Figure 2) and the strong negative effect of a Pim-1 knockdown on cluster expression (Figure 3B,C). Interestingly, Pim-1 knockdown efficiencies are comparable in K562 (73%) and HeLa (71%) cells, whereas the effect of the knockdown on cluster expression is stronger in K562 cells (55% reduction compared to 40% in HeLa cells) with the higher Pim-1 expression level. This might be due to cell type-dependent indirect effects of Pim-1 on the regulation of the miR-17-92 cluster. Moreover, double knockdown experiments in HeLa cells revealed a synergistic effect relative to individual c-Myc and Pim-1 knockdowns (Figure 3B), which was not seen for K562 cells. The siRNA-mediated reduction of c-Myc and Pim-1 mRNAs were on average 86% and 77% in HeLa and 86% and 52%, respectively, in K562 cells (Supplementary Table S1). The somewhat weaker suppression of Pim-1 in the c-Myc/Pim-1 double knockdown context (cf. with single knockdowns, Table S1) in K562 *versus* HeLa cells may have contributed to the absence of a clear additive effect upon c-Myc/Pim-1 double knockdown in K562 cells.

#### **3. Experimental Section**

#### *3.1. Oligonucleotides*

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were purchased from Dharmacon (Boulder, CO, USA):

VR1 siRNA [36] was used as an unrelated negative control, with the following sequences of sense and antisense strand.

VR1 siRNA sense 5'-GCG CAU CUU CUA CUU CAA CdTdT and antisense 5'-GUU GAA GUA GAA GAU GCG CdTdT.

The sequences of all other siRNAs used in this study are:

Pim-1 siRNA sense 5'-GAU AUG GUG UGU GGA GAU AdTdT and antisense 5'-UAU CUC CAC ACA CCA UAU CdTdT; Pim-1 siRNA 2 sense→5'-GGA ACA ACA UUU ACA ACU CdTdT and antisense 5'-GAG UUG UAA AUG UUG UUC CdTdT; c-Myc siRNA sense 5'-CAG GAA CUA UGA CCU CGA CUA dTdT and antisense 5'-UAG UCG AGG UCA UAG UUC CUG dTdT; E2F3 siRNA sense 5'-ACA GCA AUC UUC CUU AAU AdTdT and antisense 5'-UAU UAA GGA AGA UUG CUG UdTdT.

### *3.2. Antibodies*

Antibodies against c-Myc (sc-40) and Pim-1 (sc-13513), as well as the secondary antibody (sc-2005: goat anti-mouse IgG HRP conjugated) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany) except for the Phospho HP1γ (Ser83) antibody (2600S), which was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).

### *3.3. Plasmid Construction and Seed Mutagenesis*

For the construction of promoter-luciferase fusions, the SV40 promoter of plasmid "pGL3 control" (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) was removed via digestion with *Bgl*II and *Hind*III (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) and replaced with fragments derived from the intronic A/T-rich region of C13*orf*25 (reference nucleotide sequence NG\_032702.1). Promoter fragments were amplified from genomic DNA of the human cell line K562 using primers specified in the Supplementary Material. PCR products were purified using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and digested with *Bgl*II and *Hind*III for insertion into pGL3. All constructs were cloned in *E. coli* DH5α cells and verified by DNA sequencing. The pGL3 vector lacking the SV40 promoter, as well as the pGL3 construct carrying the C13*orf*25-derived 339 bp fragment in inverse orientation (pGL3 339 bp inv), were used as negative controls.

### *3.4. Transfection Procedures and Luciferase Reporter Assays*

Assays are described in detail in the Supplementary Materials.
