KeywordsFVCOM; nesting; northern Gulf of Mexico; operational forecast system; coastal modeling; nearshore restoration; tidal circulation; wave dynamics; sea-level rise; Puget Sound; WRF; hurricanes; storm surge; ADCIRC; submarine groundwater discharge; unstructured Cartesian grid hydrodynamic model; LESS3D; spring-fed estuary; Kings Bay; seawater uranium extraction; structure module; coastal ocean model; FVCOM; hydrodynamic impact; Newark Bay; conceptual site model; hydrodynamics; sediment transport; triad; nonlinear; mild slope; shoaling; directional; wave model; energy flux; beached oil tar balls; velocity residuals; field observation; data mapping; numerical modeling; laboratory testing; VDatum; tides; hydrodynamic model; finite element method; hydrographic survey; Alexander Archipelago; Alaska; Bering Sea; modeling; data management; ocean modeling; visualization; data access; Finite-Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM); river; numerical modeling; Discovery Passage; high resolution; Hurricane Sandy; storm surge; inundation; sub-grid modeling; San Francisco Bay; nowcast/forecast systems; FVCOM; CSEVA; MTEVA; multimodal transportation; storm surge; evacuation; 316(b); zone of influence; entrainment; impingement; ichthyoplankton; intakes; ballast water; numerical modeling; sediment transport; erodibility; model nesting; Waipaoa shelf; New Zealand; ice jam release; bed scouring; Great Lakes; hydrodynamic numerical model; dye study; wind; cohesive sediment; critical stress; sediment transport modeling; erodibility; settling velocity; storm; surge; hurricane; Sandy; inundation; tides; high; water; marks; sensors; LNG plant; effluent discharge; mixing zone; near field; far field; diffuser design; numerical modeling; Simulink; water quality; model development; mass balances; hydrology; maintenance; blades; degradation; fracture mechanics; offshore
