Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 January 2022) | Viewed by 63600

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sydney School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
Interests: community participation; transition; inclusive research and education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In this Special Issue how far have we come in terms of living up to the principles of inclusive research captured in the disability slogan, “Nothing about us without us”, or more pithily, “No researching about us without us” will be explored. The foundational principles of inclusive research were introduced in 2003 by Walmsley and Johnson with outcomes aimed at people with intellectual disability having ownership over the “what” and the “how “of the research agenda. The purpose of this Special Issue on inclusive research is to capture internationally, “Where have we come to?” and “Where do we need to go?” Such questions are relevant now that it has been 18 years since Johnson and Walmsley (2003) first introduced the inclusive research paradigm in their text, Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: past present and future.

While there has been much growth in people with intellectual disability becoming visible and vocal as researchers across a range of content and methodologies (Jones et al, 2020).

there has also been ongoing debate and development associated with Johnson and Walmsley’s foundational principles. Bigby and Frawley (2014a, 2014b) illustrated a three-component framework of inclusive research which ranged from an advisory role, to that of collaboration between co-researchers with intellectual disability and those without, to that of researchers with intellectual disability leading and controlling the research process. Whereas Nind and Vinha (2014) and Riches et al (2017) identified a less divided landscape placing importance on inclusive research being characterised by shared learning, mutuality, and reciprocity.    Riches et al heightened the value of such characteristics by reporting a sense of belonging that came from being a member of an inclusive research team.

Johnson and Walmsley re-joined the debate in 2017 updating their original definition

to additionally guide a second generation of inclusive researchers to work towards social change, campaigning for others, as well as standing with others on issues important to them (Walmsley, Strnadova & Johnson, 2018). Beyond the characteristics of the second-generation Milner and Frawley (2019) have called for space for a third wave of inclusive research where the focus is placed on research praxis that is self-directed by the researcher with the lived experience of disability. Such methodology aims to circumvent “othering” that can come from the unquestioned expectation that co-researchers with intellectual disability will fit into the mode of traditional research data collection methods.

The Special Issue will promote inclusive research as a paradigm that has continued to promote transfer of power from those that were once the "researched" to being and becoming the "researchers". This issue will draw upon the work of researchers who have adopted this paradigm to redress the exclusion of people with intellectual disability as partners in the research process.  Apart from contributing to the journal in an area of their own interest they will also be asked to reflect as research practitioners on how their involvement in inclusive research has developed over the years.  Also, this issue will provide opportunities for all members of inclusive research teams to co-author articles through use of accessible innovative contributions. Publishing for authors with intellectual disability has proved challenging (Riches et al, 2020) and this Special Issue will support digital contribution such as, video abstracts, video interviews, power point slide sets and photographs.  Technical support and guidelines for use of video extracts will be made available from MDPI.  Such innovation is aimed at bridging the divide between those inclusive research team members that publish and those who do not. Further all articles would be cost neutral to bridge the economic gap between salaried and non-salaried researchers

Articles are welcomed across a range of topics including but not limited to:

  • The changing and evolving principles and practice of inclusive research;
  • The growing global nature of the use of inclusive research;
  • Emerging new models of inclusive research;
  • Advances in the how people with intellectual disability have increased their agency within the inclusive research process;
  • Facilitators and barriers of inclusive research;
  • Equity in publishing inclusively;
  • Accessible methodologies;
  • Inclusive research and advocacy;
  • Story telling;
  • On being and becoming an inclusive researcher. 

References

Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014a). Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1),3–12. doi:10.1111/jar.12083

Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014b). A collaborative group method of inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 54–64. doi:10.1111/jar.12082

Johnson, K., & Walmsley, J. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: Past, present and futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Jones, K. J. Ben-David, S., & Hole, R. (2020). Are individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities included in research? A review of the literature. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 99-119.

Milner, P., & Frawley, P. (2019). From ‘on’ to ‘with’ to ‘by’; people with a learning     disability creating a space for the third wave of Inclusive Research. Qualitative Research, 19(4) 382-398  

Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2014). Doing research inclusively: Bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 102–109.

Riches, T., O'Brien, P., & The CDS Inclusive Research Network (2017). Togetherness, teamwork and challenges: “Reflections on building an inclusive research network”. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12199

Riches T.N., O'Brien P.M.; The CDS Inclusive Research Network. Can we publish inclusive research inclusively? Researchers with intellectual disabilities interview authors of inclusive studies. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2020; 00:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12324

Walmsley, J., Strnadova, I., & Johnson, K.( 2017). The added value of inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(5), 751-759.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12431

Emerita Prof. Patricia O’Brien
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (19 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

6 pages, 206 KiB  
Editorial
Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?
by Patricia O’Brien
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(12), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120582 - 14 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1169
Abstract
The purpose of this Special Issue on inclusive research is to capture international insights into the following questions: “How far have we come [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

19 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
“Digging Deeper” Advocate Researchers’ Views on Advocacy and Inclusive Research
by Robert Hopkins, Gerard Minogue, Joseph McGrath, Lisa Jayne Acheson, Pauline Concepta Skehan, Orla Marie McMahon and Brian Hogan
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(11), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110506 - 4 Nov 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1901
Abstract
We are the Clare Inclusive Research Group (CIRG) a group of advocates with a learning disability, funded by the Irish support agency the Brothers of Charity (B.O.C.), Clare Services. As a long-established inclusive research group we were approached to reflect on our journey [...] Read more.
We are the Clare Inclusive Research Group (CIRG) a group of advocates with a learning disability, funded by the Irish support agency the Brothers of Charity (B.O.C.), Clare Services. As a long-established inclusive research group we were approached to reflect on our journey as advocates and researchers. In this article we talk about our work, challenging and helping repeal discriminating Irish law regarding intimate relationships. We then talk about our understanding of advocacy and inclusive research and make recommendations to make this work more effective. Method: As a group of members of CIRG, with the coordinator of the group, we developed this article using online Zoom discussion calls to identify themes, circulating online explanations of drafts followed by Zoom reflections and finally responding to academic reviews. The direct comments made by us as advocate researchers have been retained as they were expressed. Conclusions, Limitations and recommendations: One of our team remarked “advocacy and inclusive research are twins”. We concluded that they are very close but not identical. Our work together on this article led us to create a discussion paper, Manifesto for Inclusive Research. This was adopted as a touchstone for presentations at the first webinar roundtable of the newly formed Inclusive Research IASSID Special Interest Research Group in March 2022. In it we set out guidelines for creating inclusive research which require accessible information and valuing our input in terms that match our status as experts by experience in inclusive research. We challenge academic inclusive researchers who explore the world of intellectual disability to stand shoulder to shoulder with advocate inclusive researchers. Through our work together, we aim to create more fulfilling lives for us all. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
14 pages, 388 KiB  
Article
Inclusive Research and Intellectual Disabilities: Moving Forward on a Road Less Well-Travelled
by Patricia O’Brien, Edurne Garcia Iriarte, Roy Mc Conkey, Sarah Butler and Bruce O’Brien
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(10), 483; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100483 - 17 Oct 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3017
Abstract
In reflecting on the title of the special issue: Inclusive Research: A road less or more well-travelled, this paper reviews the strengths of inclusive research that have augmented the global knowledge about the lives of people with intellectual disabilities across the lifespan. The [...] Read more.
In reflecting on the title of the special issue: Inclusive Research: A road less or more well-travelled, this paper reviews the strengths of inclusive research that have augmented the global knowledge about the lives of people with intellectual disabilities across the lifespan. The successes of inclusive research are outlined with the respective ongoing individual challenges discussed. Authors will draw upon their own experiences of inclusive research, together with the seminal and current literature, as well as the dialogue between them. The conclusions of the article are in the form of recommendations aimed at increasing the traffic on the road of inclusive research through: 1. expanding its purpose and parameters across all forms of disability research; 2. developing systems for sustaining inclusive research as a funded model; 3. creating capacity to enable people with intellectual disabilities to be employed as researchers directing research projects; and 4. establishing bridges and crossroads with policy and practice through its findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
14 pages, 264 KiB  
Article
Celebrating Thirty Years of Inclusive Research
by Danielle Garratt, Kelley Johnson, Amanda Millear, Shaun Picken, Janice Slattery and Jan Walmsley
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(9), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090385 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1513
Abstract
Inclusive research has been an important way of increasing the understanding of the lives and issues of people with intellectual (learning) disabilities for 30 years. Three authors of this paper, Amanda, J and Kelley, are Australian and have been conducting inclusive research for [...] Read more.
Inclusive research has been an important way of increasing the understanding of the lives and issues of people with intellectual (learning) disabilities for 30 years. Three authors of this paper, Amanda, J and Kelley, are Australian and have been conducting inclusive research for much of this time. The other three, Danielle, Shaun and Jan, are English. Jan has been doing it for a long time, while the others are relatively new to it. In this paper, we explore together what inclusive research has achieved in its original aims of supporting people with intellectual (learning) disabilities to have a heard voice and in working towards changing attitudes, policies and practices in relation to supporting them to lead good lives. Fundamental to achieving these aims was the need for active participation by people with intellectual (learning) disabilities in conducting research relevant to them. We record what we have done, how we did it and why it was important to do this work together. We focus on what inclusive research has meant to us and how it has been used to get positive change for people with intellectual disabilities. We end with a summary of what we think inclusive research can achieve and where we think it needs to go next. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
15 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Sex Education for Students with an Intellectual Disability: Teachers’ Experiences and Perspectives
by Iva Strnadová, Julie Loblinzk and Joanne Danker
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(7), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070302 - 12 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 6037
Abstract
Background: Sex education assists students in the development of a healthy sexual identity and relationships. However, students with an intellectual disability tend to receive less holistic sex education as compared to students without a disability. In this inclusive study, we explored the perspectives [...] Read more.
Background: Sex education assists students in the development of a healthy sexual identity and relationships. However, students with an intellectual disability tend to receive less holistic sex education as compared to students without a disability. In this inclusive study, we explored the perspectives of 10 high school teachers through interviews and focus groups on how students with an intellectual disability are informed about sexual relationships and prepared for their future life living with as much autonomy as possible, including living with a partner and becoming parents. Method: The interviews and focus groups were analysed using the inductive content analysis. Results: Data analysis revealed three themes: (a) sex education; (b) self-determination and self-advocacy skills; and (c) teachers’ concerns. Conclusions: Several recommendations are discussed. These include incorporating sexuality education-related goals in an Individualised Learning Plan (ILP); teachers adopting a rights-based approach and focusing on students’ self-determination, agency, and rights regarding sex education; and providing schools with necessary resources to teach sex education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
13 pages, 2099 KiB  
Article
Inclusive Research in Health, Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology: Beyond the Binary of the ‘Researcher’ and the ‘Researched’
by Natasha Layton, Em Bould, Ricky Buchanan, Jonathon Bredin and Libby Callaway
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(6), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060233 - 25 May 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2899
Abstract
The principle of ‘working with, not on’ people with disabilities is widely espoused within inclusive research, yet historically such opportunities have not been fully realized. This paper speaks from the perspective of users of health, rehabilitation, assistive technology services, and the academics with [...] Read more.
The principle of ‘working with, not on’ people with disabilities is widely espoused within inclusive research, yet historically such opportunities have not been fully realized. This paper speaks from the perspective of users of health, rehabilitation, assistive technology services, and the academics with whom they collaborate. We draw on Australia’s Disability Inclusive Research Principles to reflect on the practice of inclusive research across the areas of assistive technology policy, digital information, and health access, as well as the co-design of allied health resources. We consider and provide examples of how power and knowledge play out in health and rehabilitation, the developing discourse around consumer co-design and co-production, and the challenges of enacting inclusive research. This paper is about shared power in the mechanisms of research production and our journeys towards it. Engaging in inclusive research has enabled us to assume roles beyond the binary of the ‘researcher’ and the ‘researched’. We conclude by proposing an adaptation of the ladder of participation for inclusive research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1596 KiB  
Article
Relationships of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Times of Pandemic: An Inclusive Study
by Carolina Puyaltó, Maialen Beltran, Tània Coll, Gemma Diaz-Garolera, Marta Figueras, Judit Fullana, Cristina González, Maria Pallisera, Joan Pujolar and Ana Rey
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(5), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050198 - 29 Apr 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2576
Abstract
(1) Background: Since 2012, our Inclusive Research Team has developed several studies on various topics that interest the co-researchers with intellectual disabilities. In 2021, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the co-researchers decided to investigate the impact of the pandemic on the relationships of people [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Since 2012, our Inclusive Research Team has developed several studies on various topics that interest the co-researchers with intellectual disabilities. In 2021, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the co-researchers decided to investigate the impact of the pandemic on the relationships of people with intellectual disabilities. The aim of this article is to disseminate how this inclusive study was developed and to explain its results; (2) Methods: Co-researchers and academic researchers met six times to make different decisions: decide on the research topic; discuss the topic; prepare an interview script for people with intellectual disabilities; analyse the data obtained; and decide how to disseminate the results of the research. The co-researchers interviewed 10 people with intellectual disabilities and participated as facilitators in 3 focus groups; (3) Results: During the pandemic, digital devices have enabled people with intellectual disabilities to maintain their social relationships. However, the lack of access or support in using them, as well as the restrictions imposed on people with intellectual disabilities living in institutions, have presented significant barriers to maintaining their social relationships; (4) Conclusions: This article shows the difficulties people with intellectual disabilities face in maintaining successful social relationships in times of pandemic, and how we undertook research in an inclusive, virtual manner. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2460 KiB  
Article
A Closer Look at the Quest for an Inclusive Research Project: ‘I Had No Experience with Scientific Research, and then the Ball of Cooperation Started Rolling’
by Miriam Zaagsma, Mark Koning, Christien van Andel, Karin Volkers, Alice Schippers and Geert van Hove
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(5), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050186 - 22 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2142
Abstract
The original adage of the movement of people with disabilities ‘Nothing about us without us’ is fortunately more and more adopted in the research world. There is, for example, increasing recognition of the importance and value of actively involving people with intellectual disabilities [...] Read more.
The original adage of the movement of people with disabilities ‘Nothing about us without us’ is fortunately more and more adopted in the research world. There is, for example, increasing recognition of the importance and value of actively involving people with intellectual disabilities in research projects on topics that are relevant to them. In a current doctoral research project, a co-researcher with an intellectual disability was recruited to work together with the doctoral researcher. Now that this project is nearing completion, it is time to look at some aspects of their collaboration and see what we can learn from this process. In several (joint) meetings, the researchers reflected on their personal experiences with working and researching together. Our reflections are presented using three overarching themes: preparations for the collaboration, collaborating as a complex process, and conducting research together. The discussion focuses on what can be inferred from these personal experiences with regard to the following three topics: how inclusive research can be organised best, the possible benefits of the collaboration for the researchers involved, and the possible impact of the collaboration on the quality of the research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 564 KiB  
Article
On the Road Together: Issues Observed in the Process of a Research Duo Working Together in a Long-Term and Intense Collaboration in an Inclusive Research Project
by Sofie Sergeant, Henriëtte Sandvoort, Geert Van Hove, Petri Embregts, Kim van den Bogaard, Elsbeth Taminiau and Alice Schippers
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(5), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050185 - 22 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2229
Abstract
Inclusive research practices can lead to progress towards an inclusive society. With this study, we aimed to gain insight into dilemmas and catalysing processes within the long-term collaboration of an inclusive research duo: one non-academic researcher who lives with the label of intellectual [...] Read more.
Inclusive research practices can lead to progress towards an inclusive society. With this study, we aimed to gain insight into dilemmas and catalysing processes within the long-term collaboration of an inclusive research duo: one non-academic researcher who lives with the label of intellectual disabilities and visual impairment, and one academic researcher. Both researchers kept personal diaries about their collaboration process. Inductive thematic analysis, individually and as a group of authors, was employed. Our findings reveal six necessary conditions for diversity-sensitive work in inclusive research: (a) experiencing belonging within the research group, (b) empowering people in a team through growing self-awareness and competence-building, (c) having room for reflection and searching for various ways of communication, (d) sharing power and ownership of research processes, (e) having enough time to foster the above conditions, and (f) joining in a mutual engagement in accommodating vulnerability in dialogue and collaborative work. Awareness of stigma-related issues and the risk of tokenism is also required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 832 KiB  
Article
Reflections on Working Together in an Inclusive Research Team
by Phillippa Carnemolla, Jack Kelly, Catherine Donnelley and Aine Healy
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(5), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050182 - 20 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2775
Abstract
The funding of a research project working with local governments and people with intellectual disabilities led to the establishment of an inclusive research team within a university faculty. The core team consisted of four people, including a design researcher, an architect, a disability [...] Read more.
The funding of a research project working with local governments and people with intellectual disabilities led to the establishment of an inclusive research team within a university faculty. The core team consisted of four people, including a design researcher, an architect, a disability advocate and a community researcher/self-advocate. Though there are ample attention and resources devoted to the front-facing parts of a university being visibly inclusive—mostly from a physical access perspective or focussed on the student experience—less attention has been directed to what it means to develop and support inclusive research and aligned work opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities within a university campus. For this reason, the paper explores what it was like for our team that included non-traditional academics and people with intellectual disabilities to work at a university in a design school (not a disability-related research centre). We employ a process of collaborative autoethnography to reflect on how different team members took the lead across different parts of the study. We conclude with a set of tips for the development of more inclusive research teams within university settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 313 KiB  
Article
Reflecting on the Value of Community Researchers in Criminal Justice Research Projects
by Caroline Doyle, Sophie Yates and Jen Hargrave
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(4), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040166 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2742
Abstract
While the importance of community researchers has long been acknowledged in disability studies, inclusive research practices such as these are less common in research about another marginalised group: people who are in prison or have spent time in prison. Over the past decade [...] Read more.
While the importance of community researchers has long been acknowledged in disability studies, inclusive research practices such as these are less common in research about another marginalised group: people who are in prison or have spent time in prison. Over the past decade in Australia, the number and rate of people imprisoned has risen rapidly, and recidivism rates remain high, indicating a need for improved services. In this article, we draw on methodological reflections from two case studies on research with marginalised communities, one in disability studies and one in post-prison research. We apply insights from disability research to argue the importance of incorporating community researchers in qualitative research projects seeking to explore the experiences of people involved with the criminal justice system, such as people who have been released from prison. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
13 pages, 1801 KiB  
Article
Doing Research Inclusively: Understanding What It Means to Do Research with and Alongside People with Profound Intellectual Disabilities
by Catherine de Haas, Joanna Grace, Joanna Hope and Melanie Nind
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(4), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040159 - 1 Apr 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 10617
Abstract
Positive developments in inclusion in line with ‘Nothing about us without us’ have rarely extended to people with profound intellectual disabilities. Advances in inclusive research are in danger of leaving this group (and their families and allies) on the outside, with researchers relying [...] Read more.
Positive developments in inclusion in line with ‘Nothing about us without us’ have rarely extended to people with profound intellectual disabilities. Advances in inclusive research are in danger of leaving this group (and their families and allies) on the outside, with researchers relying on proxies at best, or more often omitting this group as ‘too difficult’ to include in the research process at all. This paper argues that finding a way for people with profound intellectual disabilities to belong in inclusive research is important. Using examples, small stories and photographs, it explores and illustrates potential ways to research with and alongside those with profound intellectual disabilities that celebrate different kinds of agency and personhood and that support relational autonomy. The paper concludes that rather than starting from how inclusive research is currently conceived, the starting point should be a deep knowledge of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. The way forward is likely to be an inclusive research culture that can accommodate ‘being with’ as core to its research approach. This will enable the voices of people with profound intellectual disabilities to inform the research in creating intersubjective knowledge together. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1617 KiB  
Article
Inclusive Research and the Use of Visual, Creative and Narrative Strategies in Spain
by Susana Rojas-Pernia and Ignacio Haya-Salmón
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(4), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040154 - 1 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2332
Abstract
In recent decades, there have been many works on inclusive research that provide a clear framework on its meaning and the implications it entails. They also highlight the importance of addressing outstanding challenges, among others, to inquire after research strategies that respond to [...] Read more.
In recent decades, there have been many works on inclusive research that provide a clear framework on its meaning and the implications it entails. They also highlight the importance of addressing outstanding challenges, among others, to inquire after research strategies that respond to the diversity of situations in which people with intellectual disabilities find themselves. This article presents a research project carried out in Spain over a period of eighteen months by a team of researchers with and without intellectual disabilities. Specifically, we explore how the construction of enabling relationships, both dialogic and horizontal, requires giving greater emphasis to visual and creative methodological strategies, such as photographs, image-theatre, body-mapping, murals or visual presentations. The findings reported by the researchers and co-researchers have encouraged us to review some methodological premises such as our role as researchers or the type of relationships we establish. They also demonstrate the value of using a variety of collaborative enquiry strategies that recognise the agency of all researchers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1583 KiB  
Article
How Being a Researcher Impacted My Life
by Alix Herer and Ariel E. Schwartz
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(3), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030127 - 15 Mar 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2289
Abstract
Doing research can help people to learn about a lot of different topics. For example, researchers can learn how to work in a group, collect and analyze data, how to make accessible materials, and get to know their own strengths. In this paper, [...] Read more.
Doing research can help people to learn about a lot of different topics. For example, researchers can learn how to work in a group, collect and analyze data, how to make accessible materials, and get to know their own strengths. In this paper, a researcher shares what she learned while working on two research projects about young adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities and co-occurring mental health conditions. The first project was peer mentoring. In this project, we focused on individual needs for someone who may be struggling with mental health. The second project was about workplace disclosure. In this project, we tried to find out if young adults disclose their mental health conditions at work and in job interviews. We explain how we did the projects, how the researcher learned to do research, and what made it easy to learn. We also share about the impact of doing research on the researcher’s personal life. Finally, we share why doing inclusive research is important and how to help researchers with disabilities feel like they are valued members of the research team. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Experiences of Inclusive Action and Social Design Research with Social Workers and People with Intellectual Disabilities
by Jeroen Knevel, Jean Pierre Wilken and Alice Schippers
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(3), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030121 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2926
Abstract
In this study, we report on a two-year experience of inclusive participative action and social design research consisting of intensive collaboration between social workers, people with intellectual disabilities and researchers. Action research and design research are attunable and lend themselves to an inclusive [...] Read more.
In this study, we report on a two-year experience of inclusive participative action and social design research consisting of intensive collaboration between social workers, people with intellectual disabilities and researchers. Action research and design research are attunable and lend themselves to an inclusive approach aimed at knowledge development and change in practice. Social workers and people with intellectual disabilities were involved in a community of development. They became owners of the subject matter and the answers and solutions they designed. We conclude that an inclusive approach lends itself well to combining or even merging action research and social design research. Inclusive participative action and social design research cannot be standardized since it contains a particularly emergent process. Hence, it requires flexibility and creativity in finding ways to create an inclusive process of co-creation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
10 pages, 240 KiB  
Article
Graduating University as a Woman with Down Syndrome: Reflecting on My Education
by Rachel High and Sally Robinson
Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(11), 444; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10110444 - 20 Nov 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5236
Abstract
This paper reflects on the experience of being a woman with Down Syndrome who completed an undergraduate degree at an Australian university. This autoethnography is based on a year-long research project completed as part of my studies. I did a literature review about [...] Read more.
This paper reflects on the experience of being a woman with Down Syndrome who completed an undergraduate degree at an Australian university. This autoethnography is based on a year-long research project completed as part of my studies. I did a literature review about the experiences of other students with an intellectual disability at university. Then, I wrote about my own university experience. I found that the parts of my own educational journey were linked to each other like stepping-stones. Four main things came from my research: the importance of the journey before going to university; the isolation experienced by students in this situation; how stereotypes might affect students; and teaching methods that can be used to support students during their time at university. This experience changed me as a person. I gained skills and confidence whilst being at university, as well as the ability to see where I am going in life. This experience made me feel more part of society. While there were many wonderful parts, it was not an easy journey. People with an intellectual disability have a right to have an education. What makes the biggest difference is the way we are treated by other people. It would be good for students with an intellectual disability to be accepted and treated with respect. People may have a different way of learning, and it would be good if this was recognised. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

7 pages, 200 KiB  
Commentary
Exploring My Life Path by Asking 600 People What They Love about Theirs
by Fionn Crombie Angus and Jonathan Angus
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(12), 551; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120551 - 27 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1602
Abstract
A young man with Down syndrome and an early adopter of self-managed supports wanted to have a great life, but he needed to be sure what a great life was for him. He decided to ask successful people, “What do you love about [...] Read more.
A young man with Down syndrome and an early adopter of self-managed supports wanted to have a great life, but he needed to be sure what a great life was for him. He decided to ask successful people, “What do you love about your life?”, which he felt was a question that gets right to the heart of the matter. In this paper the young man and his father will outline their journey as co-researchers in collecting/filming 600 stories across ten countries, with some interviews prearranged but many occurring spontaneously at music, film, and arts festivals. The initial findings of “what people loved about their lives” fall into the following categories: Family, Work, Home, Travel, Health, Pets, and Life Itself. Positive side effects for the young man covered: self-confidence, ability to connect with people, opportunities, working relationships, and ongoing friendship. The implications of taking a social journalism approach to collecting stories will be discussed in line with the question “What makes for good inclusive research”? The journey of the co-researchers speaks to the outcome that it is worthwhile to research your life path, accessing elders’ wisdom. The tools of inclusive research are powerful when applied to a citizen’s life questions. Each person values their life in unique ways, yet there are many commonalities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
7 pages, 216 KiB  
Perspective
Reflections on the Implementation of an Ongoing Inclusive Research Project
by Isabel Bonello, Sandra Borg, Anne-Marie Callus and Cristina Grech
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(6), 234; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060234 - 26 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1757
Abstract
This reflective piece is co-authored by four members of an inclusive research team, who have been working on a project that aims to create an online resource with a video curriculum vitae of individuals with intellectual disability to showcase their achievements and skills. [...] Read more.
This reflective piece is co-authored by four members of an inclusive research team, who have been working on a project that aims to create an online resource with a video curriculum vitae of individuals with intellectual disability to showcase their achievements and skills. Taking the view that conducting research inclusively is a dynamic and ongoing process, we discuss our experiences in implementing the project and the steps we took to ensure that the process was as inclusive as possible. We first present an overview of the aims of the project and what we have achieved so far. We then provide our individual perspectives on the experience of being involved in the project so far and how inclusive it has been. Together, we then reflect on the main outcomes of the project so far, on the factors that affected how we implemented it, and on how we plan to work towards the last phase of the project. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
10 pages, 236 KiB  
Case Report
Being an Inclusive Researcher in a National Consultation Exercise—A Case Study
by Greta Westermann, Erin Louise Whittle, Susan Adrian, Suzanne Jessep, Melanie Nolan, Bruce O’Brien, Jasamit Pannu, Elizabeth Young and Mary-Ann O’Donovan
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(4), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040164 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2255
Abstract
This paper presents a case study of the Inclusive Research Network (IRN), an inclusive research group founded by the Centre for Disability Studies, contributing to a National Disability Research Agenda (NDRA) setting project. IRN members with ID carried out their own consultations with [...] Read more.
This paper presents a case study of the Inclusive Research Network (IRN), an inclusive research group founded by the Centre for Disability Studies, contributing to a National Disability Research Agenda (NDRA) setting project. IRN members with ID carried out their own consultations with disability stakeholders. This paper sets out the experiences of the IRN members in facilitating focus groups as part of phase 2 of the NDRA project. As this project took place during the COVID-19 pandemic and state lockdowns, this paper also provides a reflection on new ways of carrying out research and provides an insight into the process for other groups seeking to engage in inclusive research of this nature in a challenging and changing environment. IRN members showed great interest in being involved in the project, and their motivations aligned with the project’s objectives. Facilitating the focus groups on Zoom took some preparation and posed accessibility challenges but enabled a more diverse group of people to attend. IRN members with ID improved their online facilitation skills and confidence but concluded that they preferred working face to face. IRN members overcame the challenges presented by online focus groups, and their involvement added value to the NDRA project. Researchers are encouraged to continue practicing inclusive research in times of remote working and virtual interaction and to share their experiences for mutual learning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusive Research: Is the Road More or Less Well Travelled?)
Back to TopTop