Selected Papers from Centring Intersex: Global and Local Dimensions—International Conference

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Gender Studies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 June 2024 | Viewed by 6263

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, Loughborough University London, Lesney Ave, London E20 3BS, UK
Interests: transgender; sexuality and gender identity; intersex equality and diversity; citizenship; global south; intersectionality; lesbian, gay and bisexual; human rights

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Law and Government, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
Interests: human rights law; medical law; law and gender theory and feminist jurisprudence

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Andalusian School of Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
Interests: transgender and transgender research

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Interests: intersex; gender

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent Scholar, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
Interests: intersex; sexuality

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sociology, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Interests: queer theory; medical humanities; intersex

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sociology and Social Policy, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
Interests: disorders of sex development; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; intersex

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are delighted to open a call for abstract submissions for our Special Issue about the global and local dimensions of intersex issues and variations of sex characteristics. 

Intersex people have contributed to remarkable changes over the past 30 years, from near silence on the topic of intersex to the current era of intersex activism, advocacy and scholarship. This global increase in the visibility and recognition of intersex issues enables the current Special Issue. While we look forward to receiving submissions that celebrate the work of intersex people and allies, we also acknowledge the significant challenges faced by intersex people globally. We anticipate that these challenges will also be the focus for some submissions. 

Intersex people can face social erasure and discrimination at any stage of life, from birth to old age. Babies who are born with noticeable intersex characteristics are usually operated on or subjected to other non-consensual medical treatments during infancy, early childhood or adolescence. There has been a limited implementation of the Council of Europe Resolutions and the United Nation recommendations to stop these harmful non-consensual and unnecessary medical interventions on minors. Other key issues for intersex people and their families include a lack of inclusion in anti-discrimination legislation, bullying and erasure in schools (for example an absence of representation in school curricula) and high levels of direct discrimination and harassment in public places. Knowledge about the reasons for the lack of implementation of international human rights directives and a better understanding of intersex people’s needs regarding appropriate healthcare and related policy and practice reform are needed. This Special Issue will provide a forum for knowledge generation and networking in these areas. 

Intersex people are sometimes also trans. When an intersex baby is assigned to a gender they then cannot identify with, they may decide later to live in a different gender. While many intersex people identify as male or female, some identify as non-binary. Key issues may be shared, such as the importance of bodily autonomy and legal rights, but the ways these apply to intersex people and non-intersex trans people vary. The Special Issue will facilitate alliance building and the recognition of diversities amongst intersex people and others. 

Whilst there is a considerable amount of research about intersex issues, much of this is in the Global North. The Special Issue will adopt an international approach, foregrounding voices from the Global South as well as the North. It will bring in dimensions associated with postcoloniality, both in interrogating the historical construction of intersex bodies and their medicalisation in the Global North, and in addressing issues concerning intersex people and people with variations of sex characteristics in the Global South. In this way, it aims to shift the field of intersex studies forwards, whilst also complementing existing activist and scholarly networks that are international and/or based in the Global South. 

The virtual conference ‘Centring Intersex Issues: Global and local dimensions’ occurred on 20‒23 February 2023. 

Link: https://research.hud.ac.uk/institutes-centres/cacs/research-areas/intersex-studies/intersex-studies-conference/

In collaboration with Social Sciences, the presenters of papers at the conference are now invited to submit abstracts for follow-up articles extending the presented research in this dedicated Special Issue. Submissions from other authors are also welcome. 

All abstract submissions will be independently assessed by two members of the Special Issue editorial board and those selected will then be invited to provide a full paper for submission to the journal, after which it will go through standard journal review processes. 

We particularly welcome contributions from regions of the world that are underrepresented in the field, papers using postcolonial analysis, and those whose author/s have lived experience of being intersex, as all these are underrepresented within the field at present. The journal is generously waiving publication fees for papers accepted for the Special Edition. 

Please submit your proposals and any questions to  by 30 April. First drafts are due on 30 November 2023 (). Papers with an acceptance notification will be due on 1 June 2024.

Prof. Dr. Surya Monro
Dr. Tanya Ni Mhuirthile
Dr. Amets Suess Schwend
Dr. Fae Garland
Dr. Daniela Crocetti
Dr. David Andrew Griffiths
Prof. Dr. Katrina Roen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

22 pages, 367 KiB  
Article
From Intersex Activism to Law-Making—The Legal Ban of Intersex Genital Mutilation (IGM) in Greece
by Nikoletta Pikramenou
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040221 - 18 Apr 2024
Viewed by 662
Abstract
In 2022, Greece became the fifth country in the world to legally ban Intersex Genital Mutilation (IGM). The bill was prepared by the Ministry of Health and the intersex-led organisation “Intersex Greece”. Even though the organisation was only established in 2021, it was [...] Read more.
In 2022, Greece became the fifth country in the world to legally ban Intersex Genital Mutilation (IGM). The bill was prepared by the Ministry of Health and the intersex-led organisation “Intersex Greece”. Even though the organisation was only established in 2021, it was actively engaged in the whole law-making process, which resulted in a legal text that became a best practice worldwide. This article tracks the history of the intersex movement in Greece and shows that the movement emerged around 2009. Then, based on online interviews, blogs, videos and articles, all strategies and alliances used by the movement over the years to advocate for intersex rights are explored, especially in the year 2017 when the law on Legal Gender Recognition (LGR) was passed and in 2022 when IGM was banned. Furthermore, online public documents from the Greek Parliament are consulted to provide a comprehensive analysis of how the social, cultural, economic, and political environment in the country affected these legal developments. Based on the above evidence, this article shows that the law-making process on IGM in Greece started 13 years before the law and was the outcome of a long process of multiple and unique intersecting factors. Full article
20 pages, 301 KiB  
Article
Cultural Awareness of Intersex in Malta: Invisibility, Stigma and Epistemic Injustice
by Claudia Bartolo Tabone, Fae Garland and Mitchell Travis
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(3), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030150 - 06 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1172
Abstract
In 2015, Malta introduced ground-breaking legal reform designed to protect the bodily integrity of intersex infants in Malta. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, lawyers, policy-makers and advocates, this article considers the extent to which this reform has improved the cultural visibility [...] Read more.
In 2015, Malta introduced ground-breaking legal reform designed to protect the bodily integrity of intersex infants in Malta. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals, lawyers, policy-makers and advocates, this article considers the extent to which this reform has improved the cultural visibility and recognition of intersex people in Malta. Engaging with literature on epistemic injustice, this article provides new evidence for a cultural silence around intersex bodies that operates not only at a level of public knowledge but also at the individual and institutional levels. Our findings relate to three categories of visibility: political, cultural and medical. While the political visibility of intersex was an important factor in the introduction and shape of law reform in Malta, our respondents felt that the legislation had had very little effect on public understandings and familiarity with intersex issues. Moreover, respondents felt that many intersex people would be unlikely to know that they were intersex due to the limited conceptual and critical resources available to them: issues such as stigma and shame further encourage the epistemic silencing of intersex issues. The lack of cultural and medical visibility has significantly limited both the intended and hoped-for effect of the legislation. The article considers the broader implications of these results beyond Malta for those seeking to use the law to improve the lived experiences of intersex people. Full article
14 pages, 319 KiB  
Article
Boundaries of Parental Consent: The Example of Hypospadias Surgery
by Katrina Roen and Rogena Sterling
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(12), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120677 - 08 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1250
Abstract
Human rights organisations raise concerns about medical interventions on children with intersex variations, particularly when these interventions impinge on the child’s bodily autonomy and are without a sound biomedical basis. Psychosocial literature and legal literature have made very different contributions to thinking about [...] Read more.
Human rights organisations raise concerns about medical interventions on children with intersex variations, particularly when these interventions impinge on the child’s bodily autonomy and are without a sound biomedical basis. Psychosocial literature and legal literature have made very different contributions to thinking about the healthcare of people with intersex variations, but both literatures pay attention to the process of informing patients about elective interventions and the workings of consent. The present paper addresses the absence of dialogue across medical, legal, and psychosocial literatures on the surgical treatment of children with intersex variations. The analysis presented in this paper focusses on the assumptions underpinning the practice of allowing parents to consent on behalf of their children to elective surgery in the instance of hypospadias. In this paper, we (i) introduce consent from a medico-legal perspective, (ii) analyse selected documents (including medical, psychosocial, and human rights documents) in relation to the concept of parental consent on behalf of a child, and (iii) reconsider the current practice of inviting parents to give consent for elective genital surgery on infants. What emerges from our analysis is a picture of long-term relationships and interactions over time within which the consent process is located. The focus is not whether consent is granted, but whether free and informed consent is granted. This picture allows us to expand the understanding of “informed consent,” highlighting the importance of producing ethical interactions between health professionals and patients with the view that these relationships last for years. Understanding consent as a process, considering information as dynamic, partial, and negotiated, and understanding the doctor–patient interaction as relational might enable us to imagine the kind of informed consent process that genuinely works for everyone concerned. Our examination of selected legal, medical, and psychosocial texts raises doubt about whether current hospital practice meets the requirement of informed parental consent on behalf of children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Full article
21 pages, 1296 KiB  
Article
Human Rights-Based Intersex Healthcare: Using Hospital Data to Quantify Genital and Reproductive Surgery on Children in Aotearoa New Zealand
by Katrina Roen, Claire Breen and Ashe Yee
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(12), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120660 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1094
Abstract
Medical intervention in the context of variations in sex characteristics (intersex variations) has been addressed by many academic disciplines, including medical research, human rights law, and psychosocial research, but few studies bring these diverse disciplines into substantive dialogue. Recent years have seen an [...] Read more.
Medical intervention in the context of variations in sex characteristics (intersex variations) has been addressed by many academic disciplines, including medical research, human rights law, and psychosocial research, but few studies bring these diverse disciplines into substantive dialogue. Recent years have seen an increase in human rights statements about the indefensibility of some surgical interventions carried out on children with variations in sex characteristics. This has prompted attempts in some jurisdictions to move towards human rights-based healthcare for people with intersex variations. Such a move will require better dialogue across legal and health-related disciplines, as well as a clearer overview of which and how many surgical interventions are at issue. The present paper initiates the dialogue across disciplines and quantifies surgical interventions carried out on the sexual and reproductive organs of minors in Aotearoa New Zealand, over a five-year period. We suggest that, for the purpose of monitoring any shift towards human rights-based healthcare, national healthcare data will need to more clearly identify diagnoses and interventions relating to minors with variations in sex characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 361 KiB  
Perspective
From Harmful Practices and Instrumentalisation, towards Legislative Protections and Community-Owned Healthcare Services: The Context and Goals of the Intersex Movement in Australia
by Morgan Carpenter
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(4), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040191 - 27 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1346
Abstract
People with innate variations of sex characteristics (also known as intersex traits or disorders or differences of sex development) have any of a wide range of innate physical traits that differ from medical and social norms for female and male bodies. Responses to [...] Read more.
People with innate variations of sex characteristics (also known as intersex traits or disorders or differences of sex development) have any of a wide range of innate physical traits that differ from medical and social norms for female and male bodies. Responses to these physical differences create experiences and risks of stigmatisation, discrimination, violence, and harmful medical practices intended to promote social and familial integration and conformity with gender stereotypes. As is evident globally, the Australian policy response to the existence and needs of people with innate variations of sex characteristics has been largely incoherent, variously framing the population as having disordered sex development in need of “fixing”, and a third sex/gender identity group in need of recognition, with only recent engagement by intersex community-controlled civil society organisations. This paper presents an overview of the context and goals of the intersex human rights movement in Australia. Australian intersex community organisations have sought to apply human rights norms and develop new infrastructure to address key health and human rights issues, and necessitating new ways of resolving policy incoherence. Together with human rights, mental health, and public health institutions, they have called for significant changes to medical models of care and reform to research and classification systems. Intersex community organising and resourcing have made a tangible difference. The Australian Capital Territory is the first jurisdiction in the country to move ahead with reforms to clinical practice, including a legislative prohibition of certain practices without personal informed consent, oversight of clinical decision-making, and investment in psychosocial support. A national community-controlled psychosocial support service has also commenced. Full article
Back to TopTop