Next Article in Journal
Improving Plant Water Use Efficiency through Molecular Genetics
Previous Article in Journal
New Approaches to Irrigation Scheduling of Vegetables
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationship Marketing: A Qualitative Case Study of New-Media Marketing Use by Kansas Garden Centers
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Horticulturae 2017, 3(2), 29; doi:10.3390/horticulturae3020029

Economic Cost-Analysis of the Impact of Container Size on Transplanted Tree Value

Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2133, TX, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marco A. Palma
Received: 26 October 2016 / Revised: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 / Published: 27 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marketing Strategies of Horticultural Production Chain)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1943 KB, uploaded 27 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

The benefits and costs of varying container sizes have yet to be fully evaluated to determine which container size affords the most advantageous opportunity for consumers. To determine value of the tree following transplant, clonal replicates of Vitex agnus-castus L. [Chaste Tree], Acer rubrum L. var. drummondii (Hook. & Arn. ex Nutt.) Sarg. [Drummond Red Maple], and Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. [Baldcypress] were grown under common conditions in each of five container sizes 3.5, 11.7, 23.3, 97.8 or 175.0 L, respectively (#1, 3, 7, 25 or 45). In June 2013, six trees of each container size and species were transplanted to a sandy clay loam field in College Station, Texas. To determine the increase in value over a two-year post-transplant period, height and caliper measurements were taken at the end of nursery production and again at the end of the second growing season in the field, October 2014. Utilizing industry standards, initial costs of materials and labor were then compared with the size of trees after two years. Replacement cost analysis after two growing seasons indicated a greater increase in value for 11.7 and 23.3 L trees compared to losses in value for some 175.0 L trees. In comparison with trees from larger containers, trees from smaller size containers experienced shorter establishment times and increased growth rates, thus creating a quicker return on investment for trees transplanted from the smaller container sizes. View Full-Text
Keywords: Acer rubrum; Taxodium distichum; Vitex agnus-castus; gain; loss; landscape establishment; tree establishment Acer rubrum; Taxodium distichum; Vitex agnus-castus; gain; loss; landscape establishment; tree establishment
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Garcia Chance, L.M.; Arnold, M.A.; Hall, C.R.; Carver, S.T. Economic Cost-Analysis of the Impact of Container Size on Transplanted Tree Value. Horticulturae 2017, 3, 29.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Horticulturae EISSN 2311-7524 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top