Next Article in Journal
Prediction of Peak Shape and Characterization of Column Performance in Liquid Chromatography as a Function of Flow Rate
Previous Article in Journal
Particle Based Modeling of Electrical Field Flow Fractionation Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Carbon Nanotubes Functionalized Polydimethylsiloxane Based Coatings for In-Tube Solid Phase Microextraction Coupled to Capillary Liquid Chromatography
Article Menu

Export Article

From the first issue of 2016, Chromatography has changed its name to Separations.

Open AccessArticle
Chromatography 2015, 2(4), 611-624; doi:10.3390/chromatography2040611

Modeling Compound Loss from Polydimethylsiloxane Passive Samplers

1
Geosyntec Consultants, Ewing, NJ 08268, USA
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Mary Boyce
Received: 16 July 2015 / Revised: 16 September 2015 / Accepted: 23 September 2015 / Published: 12 October 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solid Phase Micro-Extraction)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [758 KB, uploaded 12 October 2015]   |  

Abstract

Volatile losses were measured from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) passive samplers during determination of contaminant porewater concentrations in sediments. Volatile losses could occur between the time of retrieval and processing of the passive sampler or in intertidal environments where the passive sampler could potentially be exposed above the water surface at low tide. A model was developed to predict losses of absorbed compounds as a function of sorbent geometry and the Henry’s Law Coefficient and PDMS-water partition coefficient of the compound of interest. The model suggests that thin layers of PDMS typically used to minimize equilibration times in passive sampling (≤30 µm) may not provide quantitative measurement of naphthalenes or other lighter volatile compounds without special efforts to reduce losses. The results suggest that the samplers should be processed rapidly onsite or kept at low temperatures after retrieval to maximize retention of more volatile compounds or designed with thick PDMS layers. The results also suggest that less volatile compounds, including phenanthrene, and higher molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exhibit minimal evaporative losses with typical sample processing times. View Full-Text
Keywords: passive sampling; solid phase microextration; polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); volatile loss passive sampling; solid phase microextration; polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); volatile loss
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Thomas, C.L.; Reible, D.D. Modeling Compound Loss from Polydimethylsiloxane Passive Samplers. Chromatography 2015, 2, 611-624.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Chromatography EISSN 2227-9075 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top