Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) Severity and Yield Loss in Canola in Alberta, Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Variations in the Life Cycle of Anemone patens L. (Ranunculaceae) in Wild Populations of Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Canola/Rapeseed Protein: Future Opportunities and Directions—Workshop Proceedings of IRC 2015
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Plants 2016, 5(3), 30; doi:10.3390/plants5030030

Comparison between Canadian Canola Harvest and Export Surveys

Grain Research Laboratory, Canadian Grain Commission, 1404-303 Main St., Winnipeg, MB R3C 3G8, Canada
Academic Editor: Dilantha Fernando
Received: 14 April 2016 / Revised: 13 July 2016 / Accepted: 14 July 2016 / Published: 20 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected/Extended Full Papers of 14th International Rapeseed Congress)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3445 KB, uploaded 20 July 2016]   |  


Parameters, such as oil, protein, glucosinolates, chlorophyll content and fatty acid composition, were determined using reference methods for both harvest survey samples and Canadian Canola exports. Canola harvest survey and export data were assessed to evaluate if canola harvest survey data can be extrapolated to predict the quality of the Canadian canola exports. There were some differences in some measured parameters between harvest and export data, while other parameters showed little difference. Protein content and fatty acid composition showed very similar data for harvest and export averages. Canadian export data showed lower oil content when compared to the oil content of harvest survey was mainly due to a diluting effect of dockage in the export cargoes which remained constant over the years (1.7% to 1.9%). Chlorophyll was the least predictable parameter; dockage quality as well as commingling of the other grades in Canola No. 1 Canada affected the chlorophyll content of the exports. Free fatty acids (FFA) were also different for the export and harvest survey. FFA levels are affected by storage conditions; they increase during the shipping season and, therefore, are difficult to predict from their harvest survey averages. View Full-Text
Keywords: canola; Canadian export quality; harvest survey; oil; protein; chlorophyll; glucosinolates; oleic acid; α-linolenic acid; iodine value; free fatty acid canola; Canadian export quality; harvest survey; oil; protein; chlorophyll; glucosinolates; oleic acid; α-linolenic acid; iodine value; free fatty acid

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barthet, V.J. Comparison between Canadian Canola Harvest and Export Surveys. Plants 2016, 5, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Plants EISSN 2223-7747 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top