Next Article in Journal
Estimating Relative Uncertainty of Radiative Transition Rates
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
On the Application of Stark Broadening Data Determined with a Semiclassical Perturbation Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas

by
Evgeny Stambulchik
1,*,
Annette Calisti
2,
Hyun-Kyung Chung
3 and
Manuel Á. González
4
1
Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
2
Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, PIIM UMR 7345, 13397 Marseille, France
3
International Atomic Energy Agency, Atomic and Molecular Data Unit, Nuclear Data Section, P.O.Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
4
Departamento de Física Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid 47011, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atoms 2014, 2(3), 378-381; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms2030378
Submission received: 16 July 2014 / Accepted: 17 July 2014 / Published: 7 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas)

1. Foreword

Line-shape analysis is one of the most important tools for diagnostics of both laboratory and space plasmas. Its reliable implementation requires sufficiently accurate calculations, which imply the use of analytic methods and computer codes of varying complexity, and, necessarily, varying limits of applicability and accuracy. However, studies comparing different computational and analytic methods are almost non-existent. The Spectral Line Shapes in Plasma (SLSP) code comparison workshop series [1] was established to fill this gap.
Numerous computational cases considered in the two workshops organized to date (in April 2012 and August 2013 in Vienna, Austria) not only serve the purpose of code comparison, but also have applications in research of magnetic fusion, astrophysical, laser-produced plasmas, and so on. Therefore, although the first workshop was briefly reviewed elsewhere [2], and will likely be followed by a review of the second one, it was unanimously decided by the participants that a volume devoted to results of the workshops was desired. It is the main purpose of this special issue.

2. Hydrogen-Like Transitions

Many calculation cases suggested for the first two SLSP workshops are for simple atomic systems: the hydrogen atom or hydrogen-like one-electron ions. Of these, the Ly-α transition is truly the simplest; the atomic model was further reduced by neglecting the fine structure and interactions between states with different principal quantum numbers. Interestingly, this simplest system caused the largest discrepancies between results of various models presented at the first workshop [2] due to, apparently, different treatments of the ion dynamics effect. Now, Ferri et al. [3] discuss this, extending the analysis to more complex transitions with forbidden components. The ion dynamics effect is intimately related to the microfield directionality, as studied in depth by Calisti et al. [4]. Notably, the effects of the directionality of the microfield fluctuations were first researched within the framework of the “standard theory” of the plasma line broadening almost four decades ago, but have largely been forgotten. This approach is recalled and comparisons with computer simulations are made in the paper by Demura and Stambulchik [5].
Results of computer simulations will indeed be found in a majority of studies in this volume. By many scholars, such calculations are considered ab initio and their results regarded as benchmarks—at least for hydrogen-like transitions. However, Rosato et al. [6] argue that caution should be exercised in the case of very weakly coupled plasmas; in the extreme limit of the ideal plasma model, even the largest supercomputers available today might not be able to achieve convergence.

3. Isolated Lines

Isolated lines are often contradistinguished from radiative transitions in hydrogen-like species with degenerate energy levels. Alexiou et al. [7] briefly summarize the theoretical aspects of isolated-line broadening and then delve into a detailed comparison of Stark widths and shifts of Li-like 2s–2p transitions as calculated by various approaches. One of these approaches is the semiclassical perturbation (SCP) method, the work horse behind the Stark-B database. A complete up-to-date description of SCP is presented by Sahal-Bréchot et al. [8]. Another approach, also included in the comparison [7], is based on the relativistic Dirac R-matrix method, and is described by Duan et al. [9] with a focus on the B iii 2s–2p doublet.
Koubiti et al. [10] present a comparison of various line-shape computational methods applied to the case of a plasma-broadened isolated line subjected to magnetic field. Furthermore, this study covers one of the two challenges introduced at the second SLSP workshop, where participants were asked to explain previously unpublished experimental data based on best-fit spectra of their models.

4. Applications

One can hardly overestimate the significance of line-shape calculations for diagnostics of laboratory, space, and industrial plasmas. Dimitrijević and Sahal-Bréchot [11] show and discuss numerous examples of such studies, where the SCP approach [8] was used. In the article of Omar et al. [12], the authors use a few theoretical methods and computer simulations to calculate the shapes of a He i line and compare them to experimental line profiles, allowing inference of the plasma parameters. Lisitsa et al. [13] introduce a new method able to describe penetration of a neutral atomic beam into low-density inhomogeneous fusion plasmas, and provide sample calculations suitable for ITER diagnostics. Spectral line features caused by Langmuir waves and charge-exchange processes are discussed by Dalimier et al. [14], who also suggest several spectral lines for prospective studies of laser-produced plasmas.

5. Conclusions

For the first two SLSP workshops, participants submitted in total over 1,500 line-shape calculations. The studies collected in this Special Issue explore only a part of this immense work. Research is ongoing, and we expect more publications soon.
The next workshop is scheduled for March 2015 in Marseille, France [1].

Acknowledgements

The organizational and financial support from the International Atomic Energy Agency for conducting the SLSP workshops is highly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas workshops. Available online: http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/slsp/ (accessed 16 July 2014).
  2. Stambulchik, E. Review of the 1st Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas code comparison workshop. High Energy Density Phys. 2013, 9, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferri, S.; Calisti, A.; Mossé, C.; Rosato, J.; Talin, B.; Alexiou, S.; Gigosos, M.A.; González, M.Á.; González-Herrero, D.; Lara, N.; Gomez, T.; Iglesias, C.A.; Lorenzen, S.; Mancini, R.C.; Stambulchik, E. Ion dynamics effect on Stark broadened line shapes: A cross comparison of various models. Atoms 2014, 2, 299–318. [Google Scholar]
  4. Calisti, A.; Demura, A.; Gigosos, M.A.; González-Herrero, D.; Iglesias, C.A.; Lisitsa, V.S.; Stambulchik, E. Influence of microfield directionality on line shapes. Atoms 2014, 2, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Demura, A.; Stambulchik, E. Spectral-kinetic coupling and effect of microfield rotation on Stark broadening in plasmas. Atoms 2014, 2, 334–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rosato, J.; Capes, H.; Stamm, R. Ideal Coulomb plasma approximation in line shape models: Problematic issues. Atoms 2014, 2, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Alexiou, S.; Dimitrijević, M.S.; Sahal-Brechot, S.; Stambulchik, E.; Duan, B.; González-Herrero, D.; Gigosos, M.A. The Second Workshop on Lineshape Code Comparison: Isolated lines. Atoms 2014, 2, 157–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sahal-Bréchot, S.; Dimitrijević, M.S.; Nessib, N.B. Widths and shifts of isolated lines of neutral and ionized atoms perturbed by collisions with electrons and ions: An outline of the semiclassical perturbation (SCP) method and of the approximations used for the calculations. Atoms 2014, 2, 225–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duan, B.; Bari, M.A.; Wu, Z.; Yan, J. Electron-impact widths and shifts of B iii 2p–2s lines. Atoms 2014, 2, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koubiti, M.; Goto, M.; Ferri, S.; Hansen, S.; Stambulchik, E. Line-shape code comparison through modeling and fitting of experimental spectra of the C ii 723-nm line emitted by the ablation cloud of a carbon pellet. Atoms 2014, 2, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dimitrijević, M.S.; Sahal-Bréchot, S. On the application of Stark broadening data determined with Semiclassical Perturbation approach. Atoms 2014, 2, 357–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Omar, B.; González, M.Á.; Gigosos, M.A.; Ramazanov, T.S.; Jelbuldina, M.C.; Dzhumagulova, K.N.; Zammit, M.C.; Fursa, D.V.; Bray, I. Spectral line shapes of He I line 3889 Å. Atoms 2014, 2, 277–298. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lisitsa, V.S.; Kadomtsev, M.B.; Kotov, V.; Neverov, V.S.; Shurygin, V.A. Hydrogen spectral line shape formation in the SOL of fusion reactor plasmas. Atoms 2014, 2, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dalimier, E.; Oks, E.; Renner, O. Review of Langmuir-wave-caused dips and charge-exchange-caused dips in spectral lines from plasmas and their applications. Atoms 2014, 2, 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stambulchik, E.; Calisti, A.; Chung, H.-K.; González, M.Á. Special Issue on Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas. Atoms 2014, 2, 378-381. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms2030378

AMA Style

Stambulchik E, Calisti A, Chung H-K, González MÁ. Special Issue on Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas. Atoms. 2014; 2(3):378-381. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms2030378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stambulchik, Evgeny, Annette Calisti, Hyun-Kyung Chung, and Manuel Á. González. 2014. "Special Issue on Spectral Line Shapes in Plasmas" Atoms 2, no. 3: 378-381. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms2030378

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop