Metabolites 2013, 3(3), 623-636; doi:10.3390/metabo3030623

Tackling CASMI 2012: Solutions from MetFrag and MetFusion

†,* email, †,* email and email
Received: 24 April 2013; in revised form: 29 July 2013 / Accepted: 30 July 2013 / Published: 5 August 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [572 KB, uploaded 5 August 2013]
Abstract: The task in the critical assessment of small molecule identification (CASMI) contest category 2 was to determine the identification of (initially) unknown compounds for which high-resolution tandem mass spectra were published. We focused on computer-assisted methods that tried to correctly identify the compound automatically and entered the contest with MetFrag and MetFusion to score candidate structures retrieved from the PubChem structure database. MetFrag was combined with the metabolite-likeness score, which helped to improve the performance for the natural product challenges. We present the results, discuss the performance, and give details of how to interpret the MetFrag and MetFusion output.
Keywords: mass spectrometry; metabolite identification; MetFrag; MetFusion; metabolite likeness; molecular formula
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruttkies, C.; Gerlich, M.; Neumann, S. Tackling CASMI 2012: Solutions from MetFrag and MetFusion. Metabolites 2013, 3, 623-636.

AMA Style

Ruttkies C, Gerlich M, Neumann S. Tackling CASMI 2012: Solutions from MetFrag and MetFusion. Metabolites. 2013; 3(3):623-636.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruttkies, Christoph; Gerlich, Michael; Neumann, Steffen. 2013. "Tackling CASMI 2012: Solutions from MetFrag and MetFusion." Metabolites 3, no. 3: 623-636.

Metabolites EISSN 2218-1989 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert