Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?
AbstractA frequently reported finding is that general mental ability (GMA) is the best single psychological predictor of job performance. Furthermore, specific abilities often add little incremental validity beyond GMA, suggesting that they are not useful for predicting job performance criteria once general intelligence is accounted for. We review these findings and their historical background, along with different approaches to studying the relative influence of g and narrower abilities. Then, we discuss several recent studies that used relative importance analysis to study this relative influence and that found that specific abilities are equally good, and sometimes better, predictors of work performance than GMA. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and sketching future areas for research. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Kell, H.J.; Lang, J.W. Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g? J. Intell. 2017, 5, 13.
Kell HJ, Lang JW. Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g? Journal of Intelligence. 2017; 5(2):13.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kell, Harrison J.; Lang, Jonas W. 2017. "Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?" J. Intell. 5, no. 2: 13.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.