Next Article in Journal
Intelligence and Cognitive Development: Three Sides of the Same Coin
Previous Article in Journal
Paper-Based Assessment of the Effects of Aging on Response Time: A Diffusion Model Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Socio-Demographic Indicators, Intelligence, and Locus of Control as Predictors of Adult Financial Well-Being
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
J. Intell. 2017, 5(2), 13; doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020013

Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?

1
Academic to Career Research Center, Research & Development, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ 08541, USA
2
Department of Personnel Management, Work, and Organizational Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Julie Aitken Schermer and Paul De Boeck
Received: 30 November 2016 / Revised: 30 March 2017 / Accepted: 4 April 2017 / Published: 12 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence in the Workplace)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1604 KB, uploaded 12 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

A frequently reported finding is that general mental ability (GMA) is the best single psychological predictor of job performance. Furthermore, specific abilities often add little incremental validity beyond GMA, suggesting that they are not useful for predicting job performance criteria once general intelligence is accounted for. We review these findings and their historical background, along with different approaches to studying the relative influence of g and narrower abilities. Then, we discuss several recent studies that used relative importance analysis to study this relative influence and that found that specific abilities are equally good, and sometimes better, predictors of work performance than GMA. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings and sketching future areas for research. View Full-Text
Keywords: intelligence; specific abilities; job performance; relative importance analysis; nested-factors model; specific aptitude theory; general mental ability; bi-factor model; hierarchical factor model; higher-order factor model intelligence; specific abilities; job performance; relative importance analysis; nested-factors model; specific aptitude theory; general mental ability; bi-factor model; hierarchical factor model; higher-order factor model
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kell, H.J.; Lang, J.W. Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g? J. Intell. 2017, 5, 13.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top