Next Article in Journal
Missing the Wood for the Wrong Trees: On the Difficulty of Defining the Complexity of Complex Problem Solving Scenarios
Next Article in Special Issue
Network Models for Cognitive Development and Intelligence
Previous Article in Journal
Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Intell. 2017, 5(2), 14; doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020014

Intelligence and Cognitive Development: Three Sides of the Same Coin

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 Bd du Pont d’Arve, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Andreas Demetriou and George Spanoudis
Received: 24 January 2017 / Revised: 29 March 2017 / Accepted: 5 April 2017 / Published: 13 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognitive Development and Intelligence)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1046 KB, uploaded 13 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

Research on intelligence, mainly based on correlational and factor-analytical work, research on cognitive development, and research in cognitive psychology are not to be opposed as has traditionally been the case, but are pursuing the same goal, that is, understand how the human being adapts to his/her own, complex environment. Each tradition of research has been focusing on one source of variation, namely situational differences for cognitive psychology, individual differences for psychometrics, and age differences for developmental psychology, while usually neglecting the two other sources of variation. The present paper compares those trends of research with respect to the constructs of fluid intelligence, working memory, processing speed, inhibition, and executive schemes. Two studies are very briefly presented to support the suggestion that tasks issued from these three traditions are very similar, if not identical, and that theoretical issues are also similar. We conclude in arguing that a unified vision is possible, provided one is (a) interested in the underlying processes and not only in the experimental variations of conditions; (b) willing to adopt a multidimensional view according to which few general mechanisms are at work, such as working memory or processing capacity, inhibition, and executive schemes; and (c) granting a fundamental role to individual differences. View Full-Text
Keywords: intelligence; cognitive development; individual differences; working memory; processing capacity; attentional control; inhibition intelligence; cognitive development; individual differences; working memory; processing capacity; attentional control; inhibition
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

de Ribaupierre, A.; Lecerf, T. Intelligence and Cognitive Development: Three Sides of the Same Coin. J. Intell. 2017, 5, 14.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top