Brain Sci. 2013, 3(1), 262-293; doi:10.3390/brainsci3010262

Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia I: H.M.’s Spared Retrieval Categories

1 Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 2 PsycholoPsychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 November 2012; in revised form: 28 February 2013 / Accepted: 5 March 2013 / Published: 14 March 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain and Language)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [432 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 15 March 2013 15:03 CET]
The original version is still available [432 KB, uploaded 14 March 2013 15:35 CET]
Abstract: Three studies examined amnesic H.M.’s use of words, phrases, and propositions on the Test of Language Competence (TLC). In Study 1, H.M. used 19 lexical categories (e.g., common nouns, verbs) and one syntactic category (noun phrases) with the same relative frequency as memory-normal controls, he used no lexical or syntactic category with less-than-normal frequency, and he used proper names (e.g., Melanie) and coordinative conjunctions (e.g., and) with reliably greater-than-normal frequency. In Study 2, H.M. overused proper names relative to controls when answering episodic memory questions about childhood experiences in speech and writing, replicating and extending Study 1 results for proper names. Based on detailed analyses of the use (and misuse) of coordinating conjunctions on the TLC, Study 3 developed a syntax-level “compensation hypothesis” for explaining why H.M. overused coordinating conjunctions relative to controls in Study 1. Present results suggested that (a) frontal mechanisms for retrieving word-, phrase-, and propositional-categories are intact in H.M., unlike in category-specific aphasia, (b) using his intact retrieval mechanisms, H.M. has developed a never-previously-observed proposition-level free association strategy to compensate for the hippocampal region damage that has impaired his mechanisms for encoding novel linguistic structures, and (c) H.M.’s overuse of proper names warrants further research.
Keywords: amnesic H.M.; category-specific lexical retrieval; sentence production; propositional conjunction; compensation strategies in amnesia; syntax-based free association; hippocampus; medial temporal lobe

Supplementary Files

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

MacKay, D.G.; Johnson, L.W.; Fazel, V.; James, L.E. Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia I: H.M.’s Spared Retrieval Categories. Brain Sci. 2013, 3, 262-293.

AMA Style

MacKay DG, Johnson LW, Fazel V, James LE. Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia I: H.M.’s Spared Retrieval Categories. Brain Sciences. 2013; 3(1):262-293.

Chicago/Turabian Style

MacKay, Donald G.; Johnson, Laura W.; Fazel, Vedad; James, Lori E. 2013. "Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia I: H.M.’s Spared Retrieval Categories." Brain Sci. 3, no. 1: 262-293.

Brain Sci. EISSN 2076-3425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert