Next Article in Journal
Testing of High Thermal Cycling Stability of Low Strength Concrete as a Thermal Energy Storage Material
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis and Evaluation of Performance Gains and Tradeoffs for Massive MIMO Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Sorption of Ammonium in the Soil-Water Environment in Agricultural Areas of Central Poland

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159 St., Warsaw 02-776, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2016, 6(10), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/app6100269
Submission received: 14 July 2016 / Revised: 24 August 2016 / Accepted: 13 September 2016 / Published: 22 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical and Molecular Sciences)

Abstract

:
Sorption characteristics of nitrogen compounds is necessary in ascertaining their fate in the soil-water environment. This paper presents a laboratory “batch” experiment for determining the sorption parameters of ammonium in the soil-water environment. Three agricultural soils (silt loam, loam, and sand) with different contents of the clay fraction, significantly affecting the range of the adsorption of contaminants on the surface of solid particles, were chosen as research material. Considering the composition of ammonium nitrate (a commonly used fertilizer in Poland), ammonium solutions with a concentration of 0–52 mg NH4+/L were used as markers. Pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intra-particle diffusion kinetic models were used to describe the mechanisms of ammonium adsorption. Experimental data obtained from the equilibrium tests have been analysed using two-parameter (Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin) and three-parameter (Redlich-Peterson, Hill, Sips) models. In order to adjust the parameters of the considered isotherms to the experimental data, the method of minimization of the sum of squared errors was used. Additionally, the maximum sorption capacities and reduction ratios of ammonium versus time were assessed. It was observed that the presence of silt loam and loam in the soil profile can increase the possibility of ammonium adsorption up to almost 20%. Taking into consideration the results of the batch tests, it was concluded that ammonium adsorption attains equilibrium within 48 h. Experimental data was best followed by the pseudo-second order equation and the adsorption isotherm conformed to the Redlich-Peterson model for loam and sand.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Agriculture is commonly regarded as the major source of contamination in the soil-water environment worldwide. Excessive use of manure and fertilizers has a negative impact on the groundwater quality and drinking water supplies, which can be detrimental to human health [1,2,3,4]. One of the most problematic issues connected with the nitrogen cycle in agricultural areas (Figure 1) is nitrogen leaching to groundwater and surface water as a result of the abusive use of fertilizers [5,6,7]. The composition of nitrogen fertilizers is dominated by ammonium nitrate, which provides half of the nitrogen in the ammonium form and half in the nitrate form. These forms are easily available for crops but, in high concentrations, may cause hazardous effects to the aquatic system. Excessive concentrations of ammonium may cause a decrease of dissolved oxygen in natural waters and toxicity to aquatic organisms [8]. Ammonium ions can be adsorbed by clay particles, contrary to nitrates, which are easily transported in the soil-water environment and, subsequently, may lead to eutrophication [9,10,11].
Leaching of nitrogen compounds depends on several factors, i.e. fertilization level, type of fertilizer, time and method of application, properties of soils (pH, texture, organic matter content), types of plants, agronomic practices, level of animal production, weather conditions, and watershed land use [12,13,14,15,16]. Due to the leaching of nitrates from the soil profile and the resulting possibility of spreading contaminants in the soil-water environment, it is reasonable to undertake extensive research aiming to recognize the basic processes, especially sorption, responsible for the migration of these contaminants [3,7,9,17,18,19].
Among the processes responsible for the migration of contaminants in the soil-water environment, the most significant are advection, diffusion, dispersion, biodegradation, and sorption. The role of particular processes associated with the migration of contaminants depends mainly on the type, the physical and chemical properties of pollution, and the properties of the medium in which the migration takes place [17,20,21]. Extremely important in solving problems related to risk assessment and groundwater protection in agricultural areas is recognition of the sorption processes occurring in natural soils [10,12]. For ammonium ions, the key reactive processes controlling subsurface migration include sorption as a result of cation exchange and biological degradation [22]. Adsorption of positively-charged ammonium ions occurs on the surface of negatively-charged clay particles. Mackin and Aller [23], Çelik et al. [24], Balci and Dince [25], Mikołajków [26], Abdulgawad et al. [27], Tosun [28], Buragohain [29], and Ismadji et al. [30] reported that montmorillonite has a higher adsorption capacity compared to kaolinite, fine and coarse sand, and for this reason natural clays are one of the most essential sorbents due to their availability and easy application in removal of nitrogen forms from the environment.
Whereas many studies have been conducted in order to characterize the phenomena of sorption processes of various contaminants onto different sorbents [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], only very few reports have been presented on the evaluation of the adsorption of contaminants originating from agricultural sources. This gap in knowledge can result in reduced possibilities in the assessment of risks posed by ammonium contamination arising from many sources [22].
In reference to the issues mentioned above, the main aims of this study were: (1) to assess the sorption capacities of agricultural soils from Central Poland; (2) to determine the kinetics of sorption of ammonium into soils with various contents of the clay fraction (0%–21%); and (3) to estimate the ammonium sorption characteristics using two- and three-parameter models.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area of approximately 40 ha covers two adjacent fields of crop production, located in Imielin (Figure 2), Central Poland (52°4’28.99’’ N, 21°11’3.65’’ E) in the Masovian Voivodeship, Konstancin Jeziorna commune.
According to the geomorphological classification of Poland, the study area is located within the Central Masovian Lowland macroregion, the Warsaw Plain and the Middle Vistula Valley mesoregions. The area lies approximately at 88 m above sea level (a.s.l.). Shallow drillings indicate the presence of silt loams with a thickness of 1 m below the subsoil. Silty sands and medium sands have been identified below the silty clays. The study area lies approximately 1.5 km from the Vistula River and at a distance of c. 300 m from the Gwoździe Lake. To the south, west, and north, the field is surrounded by drainage ditches. There is no housing development in the vicinity of the study area.

2.2. Materials

In this study three soil samples were used as adsorbents. The samples were collected from the field of winter wheat cultivation located in the Imielin experimental site in the central part of Poland (Figure 2). According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture soil survey staff [42], the tested soils were classified as silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively (Figure 3). The physical and chemical properties of the applied soils are presented in Table 1.

2.3. Kinetic Tests

The kinetics of adsorption is one of the important characteristics defining the efficiency of adsorption [43]. The study of sorption kinetics provides valuable insights into the reaction pathways and into the mechanism of sorption reactions [44,45,46]. Before determining the adsorption isotherms, the kinetics of adsorption of ammonium onto natural soils had been studied using three kinetic models (Table 2). Constants of sorption were determined using the pseudo-first order equation of Lagergren [47] based on solid capacity, the pseudo-second order equation based on solid phase sorption, and the intra-particle diffusion model, respectively.
Prior to the laboratory analyses, the soil samples were prepared by drying at room temperature and sieved through a Φ1 mm sieve. For kinetic studies, 5 g of each soil sample were mixed with 50 mL of the ammonium nitrate solution (52 mg NH4+/L, pH = 6.62, electrical conductivity (EC) = 1.706 mS/cm), maintaining a constant solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10. Similarly, blank and control samples were prepared using the treatment solution without the soil sample and a soil sample with distilled water, respectively. The time periods of shaking were chosen according to US EPA [50] and were carried out for 1, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h on a rotary shaker GFL 3040 with the speed of 14 min−1. After the time of a desired period of shaking, the solutions were filtered through paper filters and prepared for chemical analysis. Samples were analysed for their ammonium and nitrate contents by Nessler [51] and cadmium reduction method [52], respectively, using a spectrophotometer UV-VIS DR 6000 (Hach Lange type, Düsseldorf, Germany). Electrical conductivity and pH were measured using a 18.52.01 multimeter (Eijkelkamp type, Giesbeek, the Netherlands). All samples were analysed in duplicate.
The percent contributions of ammonium adsorbed (%R) and ammonium adsorption capacity (q) were calculated using the following expressions:
% R = C 0 C e C 0 100 %
and:
q = ( C 0 C e ) V m
where: C0—initial concentration of ammonium in the solution, [mg/L]; Ce—final ammonium concentration in the solution, [mg/L]; V—volume of the solution, [mL]; m—amount of sorbent on the dry basis, [g].

2.4. Equilibrium Studies

Substantial parameters simulating nitrogen compound leaching include adsorption isotherm coefficients. In this study, the relationship between the amount of the contaminant adsorbed into the soil surface and the equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate in the solvent at an equilibrium in a constant temperature were estimated by various adsorption isotherm models. The isotherms relate the ammonium uptake per unit mass of the adsorbent to the equilibrium adsorbate concentration in the bulk fluid phase [53]. The equilibrium behaviour of natural soils during ammonium adsorption was investigated using the Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin, Redlich-Peterson, Sips, and Hill models at room temperature (22 °C) (Table 3). Batch equilibrium studies were run in duplicate with a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10, using 5 g of air-dried soil samples and 50 mL of ammonium nitrate solution with following concentrations of ammonium: 10, 20, 30, 45, 50, and 52 mg NH4+/L. The bottles containing the soil-ammonium nitrate solution were sealed tightly and placed on a rotary shaker GFL 3040. The shaking process at a speed of 14 min−1 was carried out according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [50] for 48 h. After the desired time of shaking, the working solutions were filtered through paper filters and then pH, electrical conductivity, and ammonium and nitrate concentrations were determined (methods described in the section “Kinetic Tests”). All of the reagents used in the tests were of analytical reagent grade.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Contact Time on the Reduction of Ammonium and Sorption Capacity of Soils

Contact time is one of the most effective factors in batch adsorption process [23,53]. The results showed that ammonium sorption attained an equilibrium within 48 h (Figure 4), which means that no significant sorption and/or desorption of this compound were recorded after this time [8]. It was observed that with increasing contact time, reduction of the ammonium ions increased, reaching the maximum value of 19.4%, 18.5%, and 14.4% for silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively (Table 4).
The sorption capacity of the tested soils determined at equilibrium time (48 h) were found to be as follows (Figure 4): qt = 0.1011 mg/g, qt = 0.0958 mg/g, and qt = 0.0752 mg/g for silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively, which indicates the great impact of the clay and organic matter contents on the sorption capacity of the soils. Similar variations in the sorption capacities, dependent on the soil type, were presented by Abdulgawad et al. [27].

3.2. Kinetic Tests

Table 5 shows the parameters of three kinetic models chosen for this study. Comparison of the values of correlation coefficients (R2) values of the pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intra-particle diffusion models shows that the ammonium sorption data were best described by the pseudo-second order kinetic model.
The results of the studies by Sharifnia et al. [60] have shown that the kinetics of ammonium sorption follows the pseudo-second order kinetic model (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Weber and Morris [49] suggested that the mechanism of sorption is via intra-particle diffusion when the plot of qt versus t1/2 is linear, and if the sorption process is controlled by more than one mechanism, the plot of qt versus t1/2 is multi-linear [61]. Our study shows that certainly more than one process is responsible for the sorption of ammonium onto agricultural soils. Based on the coefficients of determination, R2 = 0.91, R2 = 0.87, R2 = 0.94 for silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively, it can be concluded that this model best describes the sorption of ammonium onto agricultural soils. Taking into consideration the high values of R2 for the pseudo-first and intra-particle diffusion models, we can assume that the sorption of ammonium can be additionally controlled by physical processes and surface and pore-volume diffusion, respectively [47,49].

3.3. Equilibrium Studies

Data obtained from the equilibrium studies have been analysed using two-parameter (Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin) and three-parameter (Redlich-Peterson, Hill, Sips) models.
As pointed out in our research, the classification of all the tested models for the description of adsorption equilibrium isotherms of ammonium onto agricultural soils can be described as follows:
  • for silt loam: Sips (R2 = 0.89) = Hill (R2 = 0.89) > Redlich-Peterson (R2 = 0.88) > Langmuir (R2 = 0.81) > Temkin (R2 = 0.72) > Freundlich (R2 = 0.66),
  • for loam: Redlich-Peterson (R2 = 0.94) >Hill (R2 = 0.83) > Langmuir (R2 = 0.79) > Sips (R2 = 0.72) > Temkin (R2 = 0.63) > Freundlich (R2 = 0.59),
  • for sand: Redlich-Peterson (R2 = 0.88) > Langmuir (R2 = 0.65) > Freundlich (R2 = 0.63) > Hill (R2 = 0.56) > Temkin (R2 = 0.43) > Sips (R2 = 0.39).
The n value of the Freundlich isotherm indicates the degree of nonlinearity between the solution concentration and adsorption [62]. Briefly, if n = 1, then adsorption is linear; if n < 1, then adsorption is a chemical process; and if n > 1, then adsorption is a physical process. Adsorption is considered as satisfactory when the Freundlich constant n attains values within the range 1–10. In this study, the n value was found to be 4.17, 6.41, and 6.59 for silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively (Table 6), which indicates the physical character of ammonium adsorption onto agricultural soil.
Based on the Langmuir isotherm, the efficiency of the adsorption process can be predicted by the dimensionless equilibrium parameter RL, called the separation factor, which is expressed by the following equation [63]:
R L = 1 1 + K L C 0
where: KL—Langmuir constant, [L/mg], C0—initial concentration of ammonium in the solution, [mg/L].
Adsorption is considered as irreversible when RL = 0, favourable when 0 < RL < 1, linear when RL = 1, and unfavourable when RL > 1. In this study, RL values were found to be 0.05–0.21 for silt loam, 0.05–0.20 for loam, and 0.02–0.10 for sand, indicating that the adsorption of ammonium onto agricultural soils is favourable.
The results of the studies of Sharifnia et al. [60] and Karadag et al. [64] have shown that the equilibrium data of ammonium sorption were fitted well by the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Abdulgawad et al. [27] claimed that ammonium adsorption on montmorillonite, kaolinite, coarse and fine sand obeys the Freundlich adsorption isotherm. A nearly similar tendency is presented in the research conducted by Moradzadech et al. [41].
Results of this study indicate that among the six commonly used adsorption models (Figure 8), the Redlich-Peterson model has the best fitting with the experimental data for loam and sand (R2 = 0.94 and R2 = 0.88, respectively). For silt loam, the best fitting between experimental and modelled data was obtained using the Sips and Hill models (R2 = 0.89). Our research has revealed that among the two-parameter models, the Langmuir isotherm best reflects the mechanism of ammonium sorption (R2 = 0.81, R2 = 0.79 and R2 = 0.65 for silt loam, loam, and sand, respectively).
Furthermore, the studies of many other researchers [28,39,65,66,67] demonstrated that models with two parameters always less accurately describe the sorption processes than those with more than two parameters. This was also confirmed by the results obtained in our studies (Table 7).

4. Conclusions

Understanding the adsorption behaviour of ammonium in the soil-water environment is priceless for the knowledge of nitrogen chemistry in soils. An essential issue in agricultural areas is to identify the transport and fate of ammonium in soils in order to improve the efficiency of the application of nitrogen fertilizers. The present investigation has shown that ammonium is adsorbed more in silt loam and loam compared to sand. Therefore, it can be considered that in the environment ammonium will reach the aquifer faster in sandy soils and soils with a low organic matter content than in cohesive soils with higher clay and organic matter contents. On the basis of the values of the regression coefficients, it is concluded that ammonium sorption into agricultural soils can be approximated more appropriately by the pseudo-second order kinetic model rather than by the pseudo-first order and the intra-particle diffusion kinetic model. Sorption parameters obtained from the batch tests reflect the results described in literature for similar materials.
In summary, batch tests can be considered as an efficient method to provide input data for numerical modelling of ammonium transport (with particular focus on sorption processes) in the soil-water system in order to assess contaminant migration in agricultural areas for the purpose of surface and groundwater protection.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially financed by the European Regional Development Fund under the Innovative Economy Operational Programme: BIOPRODUCTS, innovative production technologies of pro-healthy bakery products and pasta with reduced caloric value (POIG.01.03.01-14-041/12).

Author Contributions

Anna Sieczka and Eugeniusz Koda conceived the subject of the paper, prepared and wrote the article. Anna Sieczka was responsible for laboratory tests and data analysis. Eugeniusz Koda provided the expertise on the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schröder, J.J.; Scholefield, D.; Cabral, F.; Hofman, G. The effects of nutrient losses from agriculture on ground and surface water quality: The position of science in developing indicators for regulation. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Camargo, J.A.; Alonso, Á. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 831–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jin, Z.; Pan, Z.; Jin, M.; Li, F.; Wan, Y.; Gu, B. Determination of nitrate contamination sources using isotopic and chemical indicators in an agricultural region in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 155, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wick, K.; Heumesser, C.; Schmid, E. Groundwater nitrate contamination: Factors and indicators. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sanchez-Perez, J.M.; Antiguedad, I.; Arrate, I.; Garcia-Linares, C.; Morell, I. The influence of nitrate leaching through unsaturated soil on ground water pollution in an agricultural area of the Basque country: A case of study. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 317, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Epelde, A.M.; Cerro, I.; Sánchez-Pérez, J.M.; Sauvage, S.; Srinivasan, R.; Antigüedad, I. Application of the SWAT model to assess the impact of changes in agricultural management practices on water quality. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2015, 60, 825–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lawniczak, A.E.; Zbierska, J.; Nowak, B.; Achtenberg, K.; Grześkowiak, A.; Kanas, K. Impact of agriculture and land use on nitrate contamination in groundwater and running waters in central-west Poland. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kučić, D.; Markić, M.; Briški, F. Ammonium Adsorption on the natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite): Adsorption isotherms and kinetics modeling. Holist. Approach Environ. 2012, 2, 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  9. Colombani, N.; Mastrocicco, M.; Di Giuseppe, D.; Faccini, B.; Coltorti, M. Batch and column experiments on nutrient leaching in soils amended with Italian natural zeolites. Catena 2015, 127, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fronczyk, J.; Sieczka, A.; Lech, M.; Radziemska, M.; Lechowicz, Z. Transport of nitrogen compounds through subsoils in agricultural areas: Column tests. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 1505–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mosier, A.R.; Syers, J.K.; Freney, J.R. Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle. Assessing the Impacts of Fertilizer Use on Food Production and the Environment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, F.L.; Alva, A.K. Ammonium Adsorption and Desorption in Sandy Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 64, 1669–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sieling, K.; Kage, H. N balance as an indicator of N leaching in an oilseed rape—Winter wheat—Winter barley rotation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Ruijter, F.J.; Boumans, L.J.M.; Smit, A.L.; van den Berg, M. Nitrate in upper groundwater on farms under tillage as affected by fertilizer use, soil type and groundwater table. Nutri. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2007, 77, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kyllmar, K.; Bechmann, M.; Deelstra, J.; Iital, A.; Blicher-Mathiesen, G.; Jansons, V.; Koskiaho, J.; Povilaitis, A. Long-term monitoring of nutrient losses from agricultural catchments in the Nordic-Baltic region: A discussion of methods, uncertainties and future needs. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 198, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Radziemska, M.; Fronczyk, J.; Lech, M.; Sieczka, A.; Lechowicz, Z. Selected monitoring properties of agricultural soil from the Imielin experimental site. Sci. Rev. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2016, 72, 105–115. [Google Scholar]
  17. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koda, E. Influence of Vertical Barrier Surrounding Old Sanitary Landfill on Eliminating Transport of Pollutants on the Basis of Numerical Modeling and Monitoring Results. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 929–935. [Google Scholar]
  19. Iital, A.; Klõga, M.; Pihlak, M.; Pachel, K.; Zahharov, A.; Loigu, E. Nitrogen content and trends in agricultural catchments in Estonia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 198, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koda, E.; Osiński, P.; Sieczka, A.; Wychowaniak, D. Areal Distribution of Ammonium Nitrogen Contamination of Soil-Water Environment in the Vicinity of Old Municipal Landfill Site with Vertical Barrier. Water 2015, 7, 2656–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wychowaniak, D.; Zawadzki, Ł.; Lech, M. Application of column tests and electrical resistivity methods for leachate transport monitoring. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW Land Reclam. 2015, 47, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Buss, S.R.; Herbert, A.W.; Morgan, P.; Thornton, S.F.; Smith, J.W.N. A review of ammonium attenuation in soil and groundwater. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2004, 37, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mackin, T.E.; Aller, R.C. Ammonium Adsorption in Marine Sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1984, 29, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Çelik, M.S.; Ozdemir, B.; Turan, M.; Koyuncu, I.; Ateok, G.; Sarikaya, H.Z. Removal of ammonia by natural clay materials using fixed and fluidised bed column reactors. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2001, 1, 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  25. Balci, S.; Dince, Y. Ammonium ion adsorption with sepiolite: Use of transient uptake method. Chem. Eng. Process. 2002, 41, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mikołajków, J. Laboratory methods of estimating the retardation factor of migrating mineral nitrogen compounds in shallow groundwater. Geol. Q. 2003, 47, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abdulgawad, F.; Bockelmann-Evans, B.; Sapsford, D.; Williams, K.P.; Falconer, R. Ammonium Ion Adsorption on Clays and Sand Under Freshwater and Seawater Conditions. In Advances in Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Proceedings of 16th IAHR-APD Congress and 3rd Symposium of IAHR-ISHS(II), Nanjing, China, 20–23 October 2008; Zhang, C., Tang, H., Eds.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2009; pp. 656–661. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tosun, İ. Ammonium Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Clinoptilolite: Determination of Isotherm and Thermodynamic Parameters and Comparison of Kinetics by the Double Exponential Model and Conventional Kinetic Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2012, 9, 970–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Buragohain, P.; Sredeep, S.; Saiyouri, N. A study on the adsorption of ammonium in bentonite and kaolinite. Int. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Sci. 2013, 1, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ismadji, S.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Ayucitra, A. Clay Materials for Environmental Remediation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. McKay, G. Solution to the homogeneous surface diffusion model for batch adsorption systems using orthogonal collocation. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 81, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mon, J.; Flury, M.; Harsh, J.B. Sorption of four triarylmethane dyes in a sandy soil determined by batch and column experiments. Geoderma 2006, 133, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, H.; Dong, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Adsorption behavior of ammonium by a bioadsorbent—Boston ivy leaf powder. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yusof, A.M.; Keat, L.K.; Ibrahim, Z.; Majid, Z.A.; Nizam, N.A. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of the removal of ammonium ions from aqueous solution by rice husk ash-synthesized zeolite Y and powdered and granulated forms of mordenite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Michel, M.M.; Kiedryńska, L. Modelling equlibrium data for manganese (II) sorption onto manganese modified chalcedonite using the non-linear regression method. Ann. Wars. Univ. of Life Sci. SGGW Land Reclam. 2011, 43, 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  36. Boopathy, R.; Karthikeyan, S.; Mandal, A.B.; Sekaran, G. Adsorption of ammonium ion by coconut shell-activated carbon from aqueous solution: Kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kiecak, A.; Kret, E.; Malina, G. Ocena opóźnienia migracji TCE w ośrodku porowatym na podstawie testów statycznych (Estimation of ratardation of TCE migration in a porous medium using batch tests). Prz. Geol. 2013, 61, 62–66. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  38. Olgun, A.; Atar, N.; Wang, S. Batch and column studies of phosphate and nitrate adsorption on waste solids containing boron impurity. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 222, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shahbeig, H.; Bagheri, N.; Ghorbanian, S.A.; Hallajisani, A.; Poorkarimi, S. A new adsorption isotherm model of aqueous solutions on granular activated carbon. WJMS 2013, 9, 243–254. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kalenik, M. Sewage Treatment Efficacy of Sandy Soil Bed with Natural Clinoptilolite Assist Layer. Ochr. Środowiska 2014, 36, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moradzadeh, M.; Moazed, H.; Sayyad, G.; Khaledian, M. Transport of nitrate and ammonium ions in a sandy loam soil treated with potassium zeolite—Evaluating equilibrium and non-equilibrium equations. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey Staff. Soil Survey Manual; Agricultural Handbook No. 18; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1951.
  43. Özcan, A.S.; Erdem, B.; Özcan, A. Adsorption of Acid Blue 193 from aqueous solutions onto BTMA-bentonite. Colloids Surf. A 2005, 266, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ho, Y.S. Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 136, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ruíz-Baltazar, A.; Pérez, R. Kinetic Adsorption Study of Silver Nanoparticles on Natural Zeolite: Experimental and Theoretical Models. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 1869–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lagergren, S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetnskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ho, Y.S. Adsorption of Heavy Metals from Waste Streams by Peat. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, January 1995. [Google Scholar]
  49. Weber, W.J.; Morris, J.C. Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1963, 89, 31–59. [Google Scholar]
  50. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Batch—Type Procedures for Estimating Soil Adsorption of Chemicals; US EPA/530/SW-87/006-F; United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  51. Waste and Waste Water. Test For Nitrogen Compounds Contents. Determination of Ammonium Nitrogen in Water by Direct Nesslerization Method; PN-C-04576-4; Polish Committee for Standarization: Warsaw, Poland, 1994. (In Polish)
  52. Water Analysis Handbook, 7th ed.; Nitrate Cadmium Reduction Method 8171; Hach Company: Loveland, CO, USA, 2012.
  53. Kumar, P.; Kirthika, K. Equilibrium and kinetic study of adsorption of nickel from aqueous solution onto bael tree leaf powder. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2009, 4, 351–363. [Google Scholar]
  54. Freundlich, H.M.F. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 1906, 57, 385–471. [Google Scholar]
  55. Langmuir, I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38, 2221–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Temkin, M.I.; Pyzhev, V. Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalyst. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 1940, 12, 327–356. [Google Scholar]
  57. Redlich, O.J.; Peterson, D.L. A useful adsorption isotherm. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 1024–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sips, R. On the structure of a catalyst surface. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hill, T.L. Theory of physical adsorption. Adv. Catal. 1952, 4, 211–258. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sharifnia, S.; Khadivi, M.A.; Shojaeimehr, T.; Shavisi, Y. Characterization, isotherm and kinetic studies for ammonium ion adsorption by light expanded clay aggregate (LECA). J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Olu-Owolabi, B.I.; Diagboya, P.N.; Adebowale, K.O. Evaluation of pyrene sorption-desorption on tropical soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Desta, M.B. Batch Sorption Experiments: Langmuir and Freundlich Isotherm Studies for the Adsorption of Textile Metal Ions onto Teff Straw (Eragrostis tef) Agricultural Waste. J. Thermodyn. 2013, 2013, 375830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Weber, T.W.; Chakkravorti, R.K. Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1974, 20, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Karadag, D.; Koc, Y.; Turan, M.; Ozturk, M. A comparative study of linear and nonlinear regression analysis for ammonium exchange by clinoptilolite zeolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 144, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Padmesh, T.V.N.; Vijayaraghavan, K.; Sekaran, G.; Velan, M. Application of Two-and Three-Parameter Isotherm Models: Biosorption of Acid Red 88 onto Azolla microphylla. Bioremediation J. 2006, 10, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hamdaoui, O.; Naffrechoux, E. Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon. Part II. Models with more than two parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Belhachemi, M.; Addoun, F. Comparative adsorption isotherms and modeling of methylene blue onto activated carbons. Appl. Water Sci. 2011, 3, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of the nitrogen cycle in agricultural areas.
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of the nitrogen cycle in agricultural areas.
Applsci 06 00269 g001
Figure 2. Location of the study fields.
Figure 2. Location of the study fields.
Applsci 06 00269 g002
Figure 3. Classification of soil texture of the studied soils.
Figure 3. Classification of soil texture of the studied soils.
Applsci 06 00269 g003
Figure 4. Ammonium sorption capacity versus time and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Figure 4. Ammonium sorption capacity versus time and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Applsci 06 00269 g004
Figure 5. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the pseudo-first order equation and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Figure 5. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the pseudo-first order equation and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Applsci 06 00269 g005
Figure 6. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the pseudo-second order equation and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Figure 6. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the pseudo-second order equation and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Applsci 06 00269 g006
Figure 7. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the intra-particle diffusion model and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Figure 7. Kinetics of ammonium removal by soils according to the intra-particle diffusion model and standard deviation error bars for the experimental data.
Applsci 06 00269 g007
Figure 8. Freundlich (a), Langmuir (b), Temkin (c), Redlich-Peterson (d), Sips (e), and Hill (f) isotherm models and standard deviation error bars for ammonium adsorption onto loam, silt loam, and sand, respectively.
Figure 8. Freundlich (a), Langmuir (b), Temkin (c), Redlich-Peterson (d), Sips (e), and Hill (f) isotherm models and standard deviation error bars for ammonium adsorption onto loam, silt loam, and sand, respectively.
Applsci 06 00269 g008aApplsci 06 00269 g008b
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of the tested soils.
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of the tested soils.
AdsorbentBulk DensityPorositypHElectrical ConductivityOrganic MatterHydraulic Conductivity
[Mg/m3][-][-][μS/cm][%][m/s]
Silt loam1.630.407.43633.11.9 × 10−8
Loam1.600.407.51602.33.6 × 10−6
Sand1.700.347.21550.13.0 × 10−5
Table 2. Kinetic models of ammonium sorption into agricultural soils.
Table 2. Kinetic models of ammonium sorption into agricultural soils.
Kinetic ModelEquationPlotReference
Pseudo-first order log ( q e q t ) = log ( q e ) k 1 t 2.203 log ( q e q t )   vs .   t [47]
Pseudo-second order t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + t q e
v 0 = k 2 q e 2
t q t   vs .   t [47,48]
Intraparticle diffusion q t = k i t 1 / 2 + C i qt vs. t0.5[49]
where: qe—amount of ions adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent at equilibrium time, [mg/g]; qt—amount of ions adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent at time t [mg/g]; t—contact time, [min]; k1—the pseudo-first order rate constant, [1/min]; k2—the pseudo-second order rate constant, [g/mg min]; ki—intraparticle diffusion rate constant, [mg/g min1/2]; Ci—intercept, directly proportional to the thickness of the boundary layer, [mg/g].
Table 3. Two- and three-parameter isotherm models used in the studies.
Table 3. Two- and three-parameter isotherm models used in the studies.
IsothermEquationModel ParametersReference
Two-parameter models
Freundlich q e = K F C e 1 / n KF, n[54]
Langmuir q e = q max K L C e 1 + K L C e qmax, KL[55]
Temkin q e = B ln ( A C e ) B, A[56]
Three-parameter models
Redlich-Peterson q e = K R C e 1 + b r C e g KR, br, g[57]
Sips q e = q max b C e 1 / m 1 + b C e 1 / m qmax, m, b[58]
Hill q e = q H C e n H K D + C e n H qH, KD, nH[59]
where: KF—Freundlich constant related to the adsorption capacity, [(mg/g)(L/mg)n]; Ce—concentration of the adsorbate in the solution at equilibrium, [mg/L]; n—Freundlich constant related to the adsorption intensity, [-]; qmax—maximum adsorption capacity, [mg/g]; KL—Langmuir constant related to the adsorption energy, [L/mg]; B—Temkin constant related to the heat of adsorption, [L/g]; A—Temkin isotherm constant, [-]; KR—Redlich-Peterson isotherm constant, [L/g]; br—Redlich-Peterson isotherm constant, [L/mg]; g—Redlich-Peterson isotherm exponent, [-]; m—Sips isotherm model exponent, [-]; b—Sips equilibrium constant, [(L/mg)m]; qH—Hill isotherm maximum uptake, [mg/g]; KD—Hill constant related to energy of adsorption, [-]; nH—exponent of Hill isotherm, [-].
Table 4. Effect of contact time on the reduction of ammonium on agricultural soils.
Table 4. Effect of contact time on the reduction of ammonium on agricultural soils.
SoilContact Time [h]
148162448
Reduction of ammonium [%]
Silt loam3.18.19.110.418.719.4
Loam5.06.910.511.318.418.5
Sand3.84.25.55.811.214.4
Table 5. Kinetic parameters for ammonium adsorption onto natural soils.
Table 5. Kinetic parameters for ammonium adsorption onto natural soils.
ParameterSoil
Silt LoamLoamSand
Pseudo-first order kinetic model
qemg/g0.10110.09600.0752
k11/min0.00160.00240.0016
R2-0.890.800.89
Pseudo-second order kinetic model
qemg/g0.11890.11100.0880
k2mg/g min0.01400.01670.0306
v0mg/g min0.00020.00020.0002
R2-0.910.870.94
Intra-particle diffusion
kintmg/g min1/20.00180.00160.0013
Cimg/g0.00800.01610.0029
R2-0.860.770.89
Table 6. Parameters of ammonium adsorption onto agricultural soils according to Freundlich, Langmuir, and Temkin models.
Table 6. Parameters of ammonium adsorption onto agricultural soils according to Freundlich, Langmuir, and Temkin models.
SoilFreundlichLangmuirTemkin
KFnR2qmaxKLR2ABR2
Silt loam0.0714.170.660.180.360.819.500.0290.72
Loam0.0486.410.590.090.400.792.310.0190.63
Sand0.0346.590.630.060.790.650.180.0300.43
Table 7. Parameters of ammonium adsorption onto agricultural soils according to Redlich-Peterson, Sips and Hill models.
Table 7. Parameters of ammonium adsorption onto agricultural soils according to Redlich-Peterson, Sips and Hill models.
SoilRedlich-PetersonSipsHill
KRbRgR2qmaxnbR2qmaxKdmR2
Silt loam0.0350.0621.320.880.160.400.070.890.1615.252.480.89
Loam0.0170.0641.270.940.091.881.270.720.092.591.170.83
Sand0.0060.0061.710.880.505.570.020.390.072.580.890.56

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sieczka, A.; Koda, E. Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Sorption of Ammonium in the Soil-Water Environment in Agricultural Areas of Central Poland. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6100269

AMA Style

Sieczka A, Koda E. Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Sorption of Ammonium in the Soil-Water Environment in Agricultural Areas of Central Poland. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(10):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6100269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sieczka, Anna, and Eugeniusz Koda. 2016. "Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies of Sorption of Ammonium in the Soil-Water Environment in Agricultural Areas of Central Poland" Applied Sciences 6, no. 10: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6100269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop