Next Article in Journal
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Animals 2011, 1(4), 414-432; doi:10.3390/ani1040414
Article

Bridging the Gap Between Validation and Implementation of Non-Animal Veterinary Vaccine Potency Testing Methods

1
, 1,*  and 2
Received: 29 October 2011; in revised form: 19 November 2011 / Accepted: 22 November 2011 / Published: 29 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Veterinary Vaccines)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [503 KB, uploaded 30 November 2011]
Simple Summary: Many vaccines are tested for quality in experiments that require the use of large numbers of animals in procedures that often cause significant pain and distress. Newer technologies have fostered the development of vaccine quality control tests that reduce or eliminate the use of animals, but the availability of these newer methods has not guaranteed their acceptance by regulators or use by manufacturers. We discuss a strategic approach that has been used to assess and ultimately increase the use of non-animal vaccine quality tests in the U.S. and U.K.
Abstract: In recent years, technologically advanced high-throughput techniques have been developed that replace, reduce or refine animal use in vaccine quality control tests. Following validation, these tests are slowly being accepted for use by international regulatory authorities. Because regulatory acceptance itself has not guaranteed that approved humane methods are adopted by manufacturers, various organizations have sought to foster the preferential use of validated non-animal methods by interfacing with industry and regulatory authorities. After noticing this gap between regulation and uptake by industry, we began developing a paradigm that seeks to narrow the gap and quicken implementation of new replacement, refinement or reduction guidance. A systematic analysis of our experience in promoting the transparent implementation of validated non-animal vaccine potency assays has led to the refinement of our paradigmatic process, presented here, by which interested parties can assess the local regulatory acceptance of methods that reduce animal use and integrate them into quality control testing protocols, or ensure the elimination of peripheral barriers to their use, particularly for potency and other tests carried out on production batches.
Keywords: non-animal; vaccine; safety; potency; regulatory testing; laboratory animals; implementation non-animal; vaccine; safety; potency; regulatory testing; laboratory animals; implementation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Dozier, S.; Brown, J.; Currie, A. Bridging the Gap Between Validation and Implementation of Non-Animal Veterinary Vaccine Potency Testing Methods. Animals 2011, 1, 414-432.

AMA Style

Dozier S, Brown J, Currie A. Bridging the Gap Between Validation and Implementation of Non-Animal Veterinary Vaccine Potency Testing Methods. Animals. 2011; 1(4):414-432.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dozier, Samantha; Brown, Jeffrey; Currie, Alistair. 2011. "Bridging the Gap Between Validation and Implementation of Non-Animal Veterinary Vaccine Potency Testing Methods." Animals 1, no. 4: 414-432.

Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert