This article is
- freely available
The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?
Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, LE12 5RD, UK
Received: 8 March 2011 / Accepted: 11 March 2011 / Published: 15 March 2011
Abstract: The simple, but quite unusual plan, promised much: two leading academics (Gary Francione and Robert Garner) prepared to make their respective cases with conviction and candour, followed by a lively debate between them, during which no stone need be left unturned. In prospect, then, was an opportunity for nuances to be clarified, misunderstandings dispelled and some common ground established. But while it proved to be an enthralling engagement, the apparent inability of one author to concede even an inch of ground to the other’s case meant that the divide between the viewpoints was, regrettably, no narrower at the end than at the beginning. [...]
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Mepham, B. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? Animals 2011, 1, 200-204.
Mepham B. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? Animals. 2011; 1(1):200-204.
Mepham, Ben. 2011. "The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?" Animals 1, no. 1: 200-204.