Animals 2011, 1(1), 200-204; doi:10.3390/ani1010200
Book Review

The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?

Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, LE12 5RD, UK
Received: 8 March 2011; Accepted: 11 March 2011 / Published: 15 March 2011
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [32 KB, uploaded 15 March 2011 10:04 CET]
Abstract: The simple, but quite unusual plan, promised much: two leading academics (Gary Francione and Robert Garner) prepared to make their respective cases with conviction and candour, followed by a lively debate between them, during which no stone need be left unturned. In prospect, then, was an opportunity for nuances to be clarified, misunderstandings dispelled and some common ground established. But while it proved to be an enthralling engagement, the apparent inability of one author to concede even an inch of ground to the other’s case meant that the divide between the viewpoints was, regrettably, no narrower at the end than at the beginning. [...]

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mepham, B. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? Animals 2011, 1, 200-204.

AMA Style

Mepham B. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? Animals. 2011; 1(1):200-204.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mepham, Ben. 2011. "The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?" Animals 1, no. 1: 200-204.

Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert