Animals 2011, 1(1), 186-199; doi:10.3390/ani1010186

Silence and Denial in Everyday Life—The Case of Animal Suffering

Received: 18 January 2011; Accepted: 17 February 2011 / Published: 21 February 2011
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Simple Summary: This paper analyses issues implicit in the question: How is it that decent and compassionate people co-exist in silence about widespread animal suffering? The paper explores the complex process of denial which operates at both a personal and societal level to allow people to ‘not see’ and ‘not know’ about the realities of the lives of animals in our world. The paper argues that silence allows animal suffering to exist and flourish at a historically unprecedented level at this time. It goes on to examine the conditions under which silence can be punctured and acknowledgement and action for animals becomes possible.
Abstract: How can we make sense of the fact that we live in a world where good people co-exist in silence about widespread animal suffering. How is it that sites of suffering such as laboratories, factory farms, abattoirs and animal transportation are all around us and yet we ‘do not, in a certain sense, know about them’ [1]. This ‘not knowing’ is one of the most difficult barriers for animal activists who must constantly develop new strategies in an attempt to catch public attention and translate it into action. Recent contributions from the ‘sociology of denial’ have elucidated many of the mechanisms involved in ‘not knowing’ in relation to human atrocities and genocide. In this context, ‘denial’ refers to the maintenance of social worlds in which an undesirable situation is unrecognized, ignored or made to seem normal [2]. These include different types of denial: personal, official and cultural, as well as the process of normalization whereby suffering becomes invisible through routinization, tolerance, accommodation, collusion and cover up. Denial and normalization reflect both personal and collective states where suffering is not acknowledged [3]. In this paper, I will examine insights from the sociology of denial and apply them to human denial and normalization of animal suffering. This will include an examination of denial which is both individual and social and the implications of these insights for theory and practice in the human/animal relationship.
Keywords: silence; denial; culture; taboo; passive bystander; emotional management; social censorship; normalization; collective endeavour
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [189 KB, uploaded 21 February 2011 10:30 CET]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Wicks, D. Silence and Denial in Everyday Life—The Case of Animal Suffering. Animals 2011, 1, 186-199.

AMA Style

Wicks D. Silence and Denial in Everyday Life—The Case of Animal Suffering. Animals. 2011; 1(1):186-199.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wicks, Deidre. 2011. "Silence and Denial in Everyday Life—The Case of Animal Suffering." Animals 1, no. 1: 186-199.

Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert