Next Article in Journal
Distribution and Excretion of Arsenic Metabolites after Oral Administration of Seafood-Related Organoarsenicals in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
The Evolution of Microstructures and the Properties of Bulk Metallic Glass with Consubstantial Composition Laser Welding
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Welding Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Cast Fe-40Al Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Modeling of Cyclic Deformation in Bulk Metallic Glasses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glass Forming Ability and Corrosion Resistance of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag Bulk Metallic Glass

Shagang School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2016, 6(10), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/met6100230
Submission received: 13 July 2016 / Revised: 20 September 2016 / Accepted: 20 September 2016 / Published: 24 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amorphous Alloys and Related Transitions)

Abstract

:
Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx (x = 0–10) bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) have been prepared by copper mold casting. The glass-forming ability (GFA) and corrosion behavior of Zr-based BMGs have been investigated. It is found that the GFA of Zr-based BMGs first increases and then decreases with the increase of the Ag content, and the best glass former is Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 with the maximum thickness of the glass phase region of 4.3 mm. The corrosion resistance is, however, found to be worsened with the increase of the Ag content. The mechanisms for the enhancement of GFA and the deterioration of corrosion resistance in the alloys are discussed.

1. Introduction

Due to the absence of long-range atomic order, bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) exhibit unique mechanical, physical and chemical properties, and therefore have obtained preliminary applications in fields of sporting goods, precision machinery parts, electronic information, and biomedicine [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, as for a number of BMG-forming alloys, small-size BMGs can be fabricated, which restricts their wide application. Two methods can be used to overcome the drawback: enhancing the cooling rate in preparation and adjusting the alloy composition [7,8]. Considering that the equipment requirement is relatively high for the former method, most researchers used the latter one. Minor alloying has been proved to be a simple and effective way to develop large-size BMGs, such as Pd- [9,10], Fe- [11], Co- [12], Ni- [13], Mg- [14], Cu- [15], and Zr-based [16] BMGs. Among them, Zr-based BMGs have attracted increasing attention due to their high glass-forming ability and wide supercooled liquid region. At present, many Zr-based alloy systems have been developed, such as Zr-Cu-Al [17], Zr-Cu-Ti [18], Zr-Cu-Ag-Al [19], Zr-Cu-Ni-Al [20], and Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ti [21] BMGs. In this study, based on the Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 alloy system, we develop new Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx BMGs with the addition of the element Ag. The glass-forming ability (GFA) and corrosion behavior of Zr-based BMGs have been systematically investigated.

2. Experiment

Master alloy ingots with nominal composition of Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx (x = 1–10) were prepared by arc melting a mixture of pure Zr (99.9%), Cu (99.99%), Ni (99.99%), Al (99.99%), and Ag (99.99%) using a WS-4 vacuum non consumable arc furnace (SKY Technology Development Ltd., Shenyang, China) in a purified argon atmosphere. Before melting, the pure metals were cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaning bath. After six times remelting, the BMGs were produced by suction-casting for wedge-shape plates with an inclined angle of 10° and 60-mm-long rectangular plates of thickness and width 1 mm and 10 mm, respectively. Maximum thickness of fully glass phase in the wedge-shape sample was measured by examining the cross-sectional structure in the central region with an optical microscope (OM, OLYMPUS Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). After OM examination, the wedge-shape samples were cut transversely at the maximum thickness of glass phase region. The microstructure of wedge-shape glass samples was investigated by Thermo ARL X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Smart Lab, Tokyo, Japan) with monochromatic CuKα radiation and JEOL JEM-2100F high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). The TEM foils were prepared by electrochemical twin-jet polishing in a solution of 5% perchloric acid and 95% ethanol at 233 K, followed by ion milling with liquid nitrogen cooling. Thermal analyses were carried out on Perkin-Elmer Pyris Diamond differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, Perkin Elmer Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) at a constant heating rate of 20 K/min under a flow of high purity argon. Melting behaviors were studied by a Netzsch 404F3 differential thermal analysis (DTA, NETZSCH Ltd., Selb, Germany) at a heating rate of 20 K/min. Corrosion behaviors of the plate samples were evaluated by electrochemical polarization measurement, which were conducted in a three-electrode cell, consisting of a test sample, a platinum counter electrode and a standard saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE, CH Instruments Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Before polarization scan, the sample was immersed in the electrolytes of 3.5% NaCl solutions for 20 min so that the open circuit potential became almost steady. The electrochemical polarization measurement was examined at a potential sweep rate of 2 mV/s. At least four electrochemical measurements were conducted for an alloy to obtain reliable results. Surface of the corroded specimens after electrochemical polarization measurement were carefully examined using a SU5000 scanning electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

The maximum thickness of the glass phase region (tc) is a simple and intuitive parameter to characterize the GFA of the alloy. A large tc reflects a high GFA. In this study, tc was used to evaluate the GFA of the alloy. Figure 1 shows the variation of tc with respect to the Ag content in the wedge-shaped sample for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys. As is seen, the value of tc is 2.5 mm for the Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 alloy. After the addition of Ag, the tc first increases with the increase of the Ag content, and reaches its maximum around 4.3 mm, at the composition of Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5. With further increasing the Ag content, the tc gradually decreases. When the Ag content reaches 10%, the tc decreases up to 2.8 mm. These results suggest that the addition of the appropriate amount of Ag is beneficial to glass phase formation for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys, and the best glass former is the Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 alloy.
The XRD patterns of the fully glass phase region for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys consist of two broad diffused peaks without any detectable crystalline diffraction peak, as shown in Figure 2. HRTEM was used to carefully investigate the microstructure of the alloys. Figure 3 presents the bright field image and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the alloys with x = 0 and x = 5. The homogeneous contrast without any distinguishable crystallites in the image and a broad halo in the SAED pattern indicate the formation of a single amorphous phase. In addition, a similar structure has been observed in other alloys.
The formation of the glass phase is determined by two factors: the GFA of the alloy and the preparation condition. In this study, the fabrication process condition is strictly controlled. The preparation condition for each alloy is almost the same. Therefore, the intrinsic property of the alloy is the key factor for glass phase formation. As for the alloy system itself, negative heats of mixing and the large difference in the atomic size among the components are favorable for the formation of the glass phase. In this study, the substitution of Zr with Ag causes an increase in the number of components (4→5), and the interactions among the components become more complicated, which is favorable for glass phase formation to a certain extent [22,23]. The heats of mixing among the components and the atomic radius for the Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag alloy system are displayed in Table 1. The addition of element Ag has positive heats of mixing with Cu and Ni (Ag-Cu: +2 kJ/mol; Ag-Ni: +15 kJ/mol) [24] but negative heats of mixing with Zr and Al, and it especially has a strong attractive interaction with the main constituent element Zr (Ag-Zr: −20 kJ/mol) [24]. The former can weaken the interaction among components, while the latter can enhance their interactions. According to Miedema’s model [25], the chemical mixing enthalpy (ΔHchem) of regular solution in liquid phase for a multi-component alloy can be expressed as:
Δ H chem = i = 1 , i j n Ω i j c i c j
where i and j refer to the two elements, c is the atomic percentage, Ωij is the interaction between the two alloying elements and can be calculated by the mixing enthalpy of the binary alloy in liquid phase: Ωij = 4∆HAB. Figure 4 displays the relationship between the chemical mixing enthalpy (ΔHchem) and Ag concentration. The curve of variation of ΔHchem with the Ag content represents the tendency of increasing in the beginning and decreasing at last with the increase of the Ag content, which is of a parabolic type. The maximum negative value of ΔHchem appears in the alloy with x = 4, which is basically consistent with the change of tc. Moreover, the atomic radius of components in the Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag alloy system decreases sequentially in the order: Zr (1.60 Å), Ag (1.44 Å), Al (1.43 Å), Cu (1.28 Å), Ni (1.24 Å). Ag is the second-largest atom in the alloy system with a large difference in the atomic size ratios of Ag-Zr (25.0%), Ag-Cu (12.5%) and Ag-Ni (16.1%). The large discrepancy in the atomic size among the constituent elements is beneficial to the formation of a highly dense, random-packed structure in melt, leading to the increase of the liquid/solid interfacial energy and the suppression of the long-range diffusion of atoms. Consequently, the alloy system possesses a higher activation energy so as to easily form the glass phase by suppressing the nucleation of the melt. Therefore, the appropriate amount of Ag can effectively enhance the GFA of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Figure 5 shows DSC and DTA curves obtained from wedge-shaped Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys during continuous heating at 20 K/min. An obvious endothermic event associated with glass transition and two or three exothermic crystallization peaks were observed in the DSC curves. As seen in the DTA curves, the melting temperature (Tm) and liquidus temperature (Tl) are marked with arrows. The melting temperature range (∆Tm = TlTm) initially increases and then almost decreases with the Ag content. A quite wide melting peak for each alloy was observed in the melting process, suggesting that the compositions of Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys are at off-eutectic point.
Based on the DSC and DTA curves, variations of the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the crystallization onset temperature (Tx), the supercooled liquid region (∆Tx = TxTg), the reduced glass transition temperature (Trg = Tg/Tl), and the parameter γ = Tx/(Tg + Tl) with respect to Ag content are presented in Figure 6. It is seen that Tg and Tx monotonously increase from 619 and 692 K to 654 and 741 K, respectively, with the increasing Ag content combined with a remarkable increase of the supercooled liquid region ∆Tx from 73 to 87 K. Besides Tx, the parameters Trg and γ increase with the Ag content, which is inconsistent with tc, suggesting that ∆Tx, Trg and γ are not very sensitive to the GFA for Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys. Such a discrepancy between the GFA and these empirical parameters has also been reported in the Cu-Zr [26] and La-Al-Cu-Ni [27] alloy systems with the optimum glass-forming composition located at the off-eutectic point. This phenomenon is related to phase selection during the rapid solidification of the alloys [28]. In addition, the Ag addition can effectively improve the thermal stability. The enhancement of thermal stability for the alloy is due to suppressing the redistribution of components to form the I-phase by partial substitution of Zr with Ag [29].
The corrosion behaviors of Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys were characterized by electrochemical polarization in 3.5% NaCl aqueous solution open to air at 298 K. The polarization curves of the alloys with different Ag contents are shown in Figure 7. The electrochemical polarization parameters are listed in Table 2. It can be seen that the addition of Ag does not notably change the shape of the polarization curve, and the electrode reaction process of each sample is almost the same. Ag-free alloy was spontaneously passivated with a low current density (Icorr) of 1.7 × 10−7 A·cm−2 prior to pitting corrosion (Epit) occurring at 144 mV, showing a relatively positive corrosion potential Ecorr (−454 mV) and a wide passive region EpitEcorr (598 mV). However, the Ecorr and Epit become negative-shifting, while the Icorr slightly decreases as more Ag is added. When the Ag concentration reaches 10%, the Ecorr and Epit decrease up to −599 and −331 mV, respectively, leading to EpitEcorr decreasing up to 267 mV, while Icorr increases up to 1.0 × 106 A·cm−2. In general, the smaller Ecorr and the larger Icorr correspond to a worse corrosion resistance. Therefore, the addition of Ag worsens the corrosion resistance of BMG.
In order to better understand the corrosion behaviors of Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys, the morphologies and elemental distribution of the corroded samples were investigated using SEM combined with electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The typical SEM images are presented in Figure 8. A few small pits with sizes around 5–10 μm were observed on the surface of Ag-free alloy. However, as for the 5 at % Ag alloy, a large number of pits with diameters of 10–20 μm appear on the surface, meaning that the pits formed are a little bigger in size and larger in number than those of the Ag-free alloy. These results suggest that the Ag-bearing alloy exhibits less resistance to pitting corrosion than the Ag-free alloy. The EDS results of chemical composition of the pits, corrosion products, and passive film, marked as A, B, and C in the SEM images, respectively, are listed in Table 3. It is clear that the Cu contents in the pits and the O and Cl contents in the corrosion products are higher than that of the passive film in both alloys. Moreover, Zr is enriched while Cu is depleted in the passive film as compared with that of the pits in both alloys. It can be deduced that pitting corrosion occurs through the selective dissolution of Cu and the formation of oxides and chlorides.
As mentioned above, the BMG displays localized corrosion instead of generalized corrosion after polarization, confirmed by pitting formation. Because of the difference in the atomic radius and the heat of mixing among the components, an inhomogeneous structure rather than a uniform structure is formed [30], such as chemical and topological short-/medium-range orders, composition segregation or phase separation. Once the BMG is immersed in the electrolyte, the galvanic couples can form among these defects and/or between these defects and the glass matrix, and result in the pitting corrosion. As we know, Cu is not corrosion resistant in chloride ions containing solution [31]. With the increase of the potential, the passive film becomes unstable, and pitting corrosion takes place accompanied by Cu-selective dissolution and redeposition in the pits. The component Zr can promote the passivation of the BMG, forming Zr-oxide, which is of a dense and stable structure, and has a highly protective ability against corrosion [32,33]. However, the partial substitution of Zr with Ag decreases the content of the Zr in the alloy, which is involved in passivation, resulting in accelerating the process of chloride penetration, and therefore reduces the corrosion resistance of the BMG.

4. Conclusions

Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx (x = 0–10) BMGs were successfully fabricated by the copper mold suction-casting method. The glass-forming ability (GFA) and corrosion resistance of the BMGs were investigated. It is revealed that the GFA of Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx (x = 0–10) alloys strongly depends on the Ag content. As the Ag content increases, the maximum thickness of the glass phase region initially increases and reaches its maximum around 4.3 mm, at the composition of Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5, and then decreases. The improvement of the GFA is attributed to the enhancement of both the interactions among the constituent elements and the atomic packing density. However, the corrosion resistance of the BMG tends to decrease with the increase of the Ag content, which is originated from the decrease of the Zr content in the surface film.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51401139), the Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20130304 and BK20141193), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2013M541719).

Author Contributions

Wei Zhou conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the paper. Caiwei Zhang contributed to the OM and XRD examinations. Jixin Hou contributed to the DSC, DTA and TEM measurements. Minqi Sheng performed the electrochemical polarization measurement. All authors discussed the results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, W.H.; Dong, D.; Shek, C.H. Bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2004, 44, 45–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schroers, J. Processing of bulk metallic glass. Adv. Mater. 2010, 21, 1566–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, G.; Tang, H.X.; Schroers, J. Nanomoulding with amorphous metals. Nature 2009, 457, 868–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Inoue, A.; Takeuchi, A. Recent development and application products of bulk glassy alloys. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2243–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Inoue, A.; Shen, B.L.; Koshiba, H.; Kato, H.; Yavari, A.R. Ultra-high strength above 5000 MPa and soft magnetic properties of Co-Fe-Ta-B bulk glassy alloys. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 1631–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schuh, C.A.; Hufnagel, T.C.; Ramamurty, U. Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2007, 12, 4067–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mattern, N. Structure formation in liquid and amorphous metallic alloys. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 1723–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lou, H.B.; Wang, X.D.; Xu, F.; Ding, S.Q.; Cao, Q.P.; Hono, K.; Jiang, J.Z. 73 mm-diameter bulk metallic glass rod by copper mould casting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 051910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, N.; Martin, L.; Luzguine-Luzgin, D.V.; Inoue, A. Role of alloying additions in glass formation and properties of bulk metallic glass. Materials 2010, 3, 5320–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Inoue, A.; Nishiyama, N.; Kimura, H. Preparation and thermal stability of bulk amorphous Pd40Cu30Ni10Pd20 alloy cylinder of 72 mm in diameter. Mater. Trans. JIM 1997, 38, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, K.; Ling, H.B.; Li, Q.; Li, J.F.; Yao, K.F.; Guo, S.F. Effects of Co substitution for Fe on the glass forming ability and properties of Fe80P13C7 bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics 2014, 51, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.F.; Wang, L.G.; Guan, S.K.; Zhu, S.Z.; Li, R.; Zhang, T. Effects of boron content on the glass-forming ability and mechanical properties of Co-B-Ta glassy alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 617, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, C.L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.M.; Qiang, J.B.; Dong, C. Ni-based B-Fe-Ni-Si-Ta bulk metallic glasses designed using cluster line, minor alloying, and element substitution. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, Q.; Ma, H.; Ma, E.; Xu, J. Mg-Cu-(Y, Nd) pseudo-ternary bulk metallic glasses: The effects of Nd on glass-forming ability and plasticity. Scr. Mater. 2006, 55, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, W.; Kong, L.T.; Li, J.F.; Zhou, Y.H. Effects of Cr addition on glass-forming ability and mechanical properties of Cu-Zr-Al bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 4996–5001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, Y.J.; Qu, D.D.; Huang, Y.J.; Liss, K.D.; Wei, X.S.; Xing, D.W.; Shen, J. Zr-Cu-Ni-Al bulk metallic glasses with superhigh glass-forming ability. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 1290–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, W.H. Roles of minor additions in formation and properties of bulk metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2007, 52, 540–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, Y.T.; Xing, L.Q.; Kelton, K.F. Formation and crystallization of ZrCuTi metallic glasses. Philos. Mag. 2005, 85, 3673–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, Q.K.; Wang, X.D.; Nie, X.P.; Zhang, G.Q.; Ma, H.; Fecht, H.J.; Bendnarcik, J.; Franz, H.; Liu, Y.G.; Cao, Q.P.; et al. Zr-(Cu, Ag)-Al bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.H.; Wang, G.; Wang, R.J.; Zhao, D.Q.; Pan, M.X.; Wang, W.H. Super plastic bulk metallic glasses at room temperature. Science 2007, 315, 1385–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mattern, N.; Kuhn, U.; Hermann, H.; Ehrenberg, H.; Neuefeind, J. Short-range order of Zr62−xTixAl10Cu20Ni8 bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, D.H.; Duan, G.; Johnson, W.L. Unusual glass-forming ability of bulk amorphous alloys based on ordinary metal copper. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 245504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Greer, A.L. Confusion by design. Nature 1993, 366, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Takeuchi, A.; Inoue, A. Classification of bulk metallic glasses by atomic size difference, heat of mixing and period of constituent elements and its application to characterization of the main alloying element. Mater. Trans. 2005, 46, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miedema, A.R. On the heat of formation of solid alloys II. J. Less Common Met. 1976, 46, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, D.H.; Lohwongwatana, B.; Johnson, W.L.; Garland, C. Bulk metallic glass formation in binary Cu-rich alloy series-Cu100−xZrx (x = 34, 36, 38.2, 40 at %) and mechanical properties of bulk Cu64Zr36 glass. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 2621–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, D.; Feng, Y.P.; Li, Y. Optimum glass formation at off-eutectic composition and its relation to skewed eutectic coupled zone in the La based La-Al-(Cu, Ni) pseudo ternary system. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 4551–4561. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Sun, B.B.; Sui, M.L.; Lu, K.; Ma, E. Bulk metallic glass formation in the binary Cu-Zr system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 4029–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, W.; Hou, J.X.; Zhong, Z.Z.; Li, J.F. Effect of Ag content on thermal stability and crystallization behavior of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag bulk metallic glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2015, 411, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gostin, P.F.; Gebert, A.; Schultz, L. Comparison of the corrosion of bulk amorphous steel with conventional steel. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tam, M.K.; Pang, S.J.; Shek, C.H. Corrosion behavior and glass-forming ability of Cu-Zr-Al-Nb alloys. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 3596–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, A.H.; Xiong, X.; Liu, Y.; An, W.K.; Zhou, G.J.; Luo, Y.; Li, T.L. Corrosion behavior of Cu55Zr35Ti10 metallic glass in the chloride media. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 134, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hua, N.B.; Huang, L.; Wang, J.F.; Cao, Y.; He, W.; Pang, S.J.; Zhang, T. Corrosion behavior and in vitro biocompatibility of Zr-Al-Co-Ag bulk metallic glasses: An experimental case study. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 1599–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dependence of maximum thickness of glass phase region (tc) on the Ag content in the wedge-shaped samples for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Figure 1. Dependence of maximum thickness of glass phase region (tc) on the Ag content in the wedge-shaped samples for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Metals 06 00230 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Metals 06 00230 g002
Figure 3. High resolution TEM images and SAED patterns of Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 (a); and Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 (b) alloys.
Figure 3. High resolution TEM images and SAED patterns of Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 (a); and Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 (b) alloys.
Metals 06 00230 g003
Figure 4. Dependence of chemical mixing enthalpy (ΔHchem) on the Ag content.
Figure 4. Dependence of chemical mixing enthalpy (ΔHchem) on the Ag content.
Metals 06 00230 g004
Figure 5. DSC (a); and DTA (b) curves of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Figure 5. DSC (a); and DTA (b) curves of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Metals 06 00230 g005
Figure 6. Variations of parameters Tg, Tx (a); ∆Tx (b); Trg, and γ (c) with the Ag content.
Figure 6. Variations of parameters Tg, Tx (a); ∆Tx (b); Trg, and γ (c) with the Ag content.
Metals 06 00230 g006aMetals 06 00230 g006b
Figure 7. Potentiodynamic polarization of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys in 3.5% NaCl solution open to air at 298 K.
Figure 7. Potentiodynamic polarization of the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys in 3.5% NaCl solution open to air at 298 K.
Metals 06 00230 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of the corroded surfaces for the Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 (a); and Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 (b) alloys after polarization.
Figure 8. SEM images of the corroded surfaces for the Zr70Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5 (a); and Zr65Cu12.5Ni10Al7.5Ag5 (b) alloys after polarization.
Metals 06 00230 g008
Table 1. Heat of mixing and atomic radius for alloying elements.
Table 1. Heat of mixing and atomic radius for alloying elements.
ElementZrCuNiAlAg
Zr (1.60 Å)-−23−49−44−20
Cu (1.28 Å)--+4−1+2
Ni (1.24 Å)---−22+15
Al (1.43 Å)----−4
Ag (1.44 Å)-----
Table 2. The polarization parameters for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
Table 2. The polarization parameters for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys.
AlloysEcorr (mV)Epit (mV)EpitEcorr (mV)Icorr (A·cm−2)
x = 0−454 ± 5144 ± 4598 ± 51.7 ± 0.4 × 10−7
x = 3−476 ± 4−26 ± 2450 ± 34.1 ± 0.2 × 10−7
x = 5−492 ± 3−62 ± 2430 ± 47.6± 0.3 × 10−7
x = 7−565 ± 6−213 ± 3352 ± 58.2 ± 0.3 × 10−7
x = 10−599 ± 5−331 ± 4267 ± 71.0 ± 0.2 × 10−6
Table 3. Compositions in the pit (A), corrosion product (B) and passive film (C) by EDS for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys after polarization.
Table 3. Compositions in the pit (A), corrosion product (B) and passive film (C) by EDS for the Zr70−xCu12.5Ni10Al7.5Agx alloys after polarization.
AlloysRegionZrCuNiAlAgOCl
x = 0A54.2313.456.722.31-22.271.02
B52.817.565.982.07-28.153.43
C61.127.946.192.78-20.711.26
x = 5A48.8314.626.401.963.1423.701.35
B47.338.246.872.182.6929.423.27
C55.279.217.152.662.9721.731.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, W.; Zhang, C.; Sheng, M.; Hou, J. Glass Forming Ability and Corrosion Resistance of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag Bulk Metallic Glass. Metals 2016, 6, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6100230

AMA Style

Zhou W, Zhang C, Sheng M, Hou J. Glass Forming Ability and Corrosion Resistance of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag Bulk Metallic Glass. Metals. 2016; 6(10):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6100230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Wei, Caiwei Zhang, Minqi Sheng, and Jixin Hou. 2016. "Glass Forming Ability and Corrosion Resistance of Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ag Bulk Metallic Glass" Metals 6, no. 10: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6100230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop