Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties Analysis of an Al-Mg Alloy Connecting Rod with Submicrometric Structure
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Post Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Microhardness of Friction Stir Processed NiAl Bronze (NAB) Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Gas Sensors Based on Electrodeposited Polymers
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Thermal Expansion and Density of CGI and SGI Cast Irons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Material and Process Atmosphere in the Preparation of Al-Ti-B Grain Refiner by SHS

by
Iban Vicario
1,*,
Angeline Poulon-Quintin
2,†,
Miguel Angel Lagos
3,† and
Jean-François Silvain
2,3,†
1
Tecnalia Research & Innovation. Department of Foundry and Steel making, c/Geldo, Edif. 700, E-48160 Derio, Spain
2
CNRS, University of Bordeaux, ICMCB, UPR 9048, F-33600 Pessac cedex, France
3
Tecnalia Research & Innovation. Department of Aerospace, c/Mikeletegi 2, E-20009 Donostia–San Sebastián, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Metals 2015, 5(3), 1387-1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/met5031387
Submission received: 4 June 2015 / Revised: 8 July 2015 / Accepted: 16 July 2015 / Published: 30 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Casting Alloy Design and Modification)

Abstract

:
Al-Ti-B master alloys are widely used in the aluminum industry as grain refiners for the control of the microstructure of the aluminum alloys. The SHS (self-propagating high-temperature synthesis) is an ex situ method that uses exothermic reactions to sustain the chemical reaction in a combustion wave. The advantages of SHS are the low energy requirement, simplicity and product purity. However, the raw material used has to be very pure, with a very small size leading to the necessity of a reactor with a protective gas to produce the reaction. The purpose of this investigation is to fabricate SHS master alloys with commercial standard raw materials, with lower purity and higher grain size without a reactor or protective gas in order to (1) decrease the price and (2) improve the productivity of master alloy manufacturing. The possibility of using cheap borated salts instead of expensive pure boron has been studied. Different compositions of aluminum master alloy have been developed. Bigger TiB2 grain size has been obtained when using bigger commercial raw materials. Larger titanium powder can produce an aluminum master alloy with a maximum of 30% of aluminum without reactor. In comparison, SHS reaction is much more difficult when using finer titanium powder.

1. Introduction

Addition of titanium-boron master alloys to molten aluminum produces fine, equiaxed grains after solidification, which otherwise tends to be coarse and columnar [1,2,3,4,5]. A fine, equiaxed grain structure imparts to casting materials, high toughness, high yield strength, excellent formability, good surface finish and improved machinability [6,7]. Furthermore, a sound grain-refining practice avoids hot tearing, allows a marked increase in casting speed and improves the homogeneity of the cast structure by refining the distribution of secondary phases and micro-porosity [8]. The use of grain refining master alloys in casting of ingots, billets and strip, has become a common practice in aluminum foundries worldwide.
The grain refinement of aluminum alloys, by melt inoculation, is generally achieved by introducing into the melt Al–Ti–B master alloys [9,10,11,12], which typically consist of TiAl3 and TiB2 particles in an aluminum matrix. Although Al3Ti, TiB2, AlB2 and (Ti, Al)B2 can be taken as effective heterogeneous nuclei; Al3Ti was supposed to be the best grain refiner for Al alloys [13]. Recent investigations show that the (0001) faces of TiB2 particles are covered with thin Al3Ti-like phase epitaxial layers on which α-Al is formed with epitaxial orientation. The aluminum nucleates on the basal planes of the coated TiB2 particles led to the ‘free growth’ model. Once the radius of the nucleated solid grows beyond half of the diameter of the TiB2 facet, it can grow freely into the melt. The necessary undercooling to achieve this state is inversely proportional to the facet diameter, the largest TiB2 particles being the most effective [14].
The standard method for the manufacture of Al-Ti-B involves the use of K2TiF6 and KBF4 results in considerable fluoride emissions and formation of potassium aluminum fluoride salts as slag [15]. Trials are currently in progress to minimize these effects and control pollution. Process control is somewhat difficult in flux treatment as the borides may get entrapped with the slag particles leading to less efficient grain refinement and to the introduction of slag inclusions in the solidified aluminum alloy. Other disadvantages of using fluxes include (1) their hygroscopic nature, (2) release of corrosive fumes during melting, (3) possibility of reaction with modifying agents such as Na and Sr (in Al-Si Alloys) and (4) the unpredictable recovery behavior of Ti and B [16].
In order to improve the metallurgical quality of Al-Ti-B master alloys, a method based on SHS (self-propagating high-temperature synthesis) was developed, including the most common, Al-5%Ti-1%B [17]. The SHS process is a powder metallurgical process for producing inorganic compounds by exothermic reactions, with low energy requirements and very high purity of final products due to the high temperatures created during the reaction. The synthesis is initiated by point-heating of a small part of the sample. Once started, a wave of exothermic reaction sweeps through the remaining material. Reactions are conducted in a vacuum and under either inert or reactive gases. The initial melt temperature, powder grade and powder ratio were shown to have a significant effect on the reaction temperature and on the structure of the synthesized grain refiner [18]. The use of fluxes increased the SHS reaction and made it possible to reduce the initial melt temperature [19]. Also the use of two fluxes, Na3AlF6 and K13AlF6, during SHS, induces materials with larger particle size and lower purity [20].
The main reactions involved in the SHS process are [19,20]:
3 Al + Ti → Al3Ti
Ti + 2 B → TiB2
or:
3 Al + 2 Ti + 2 B → Al3Ti + TiB2
The aim of this work is to establish the effect of KBF4 and Na2B4O7 as raw materials and NaCl/KCl salts as flux agents to obtain an Al-Ti-B refining master alloy made by SHS using Ti and B powders with quite large particle size, impurities at different concentrations and with and without a protective atmosphere. The results presented are part of a work aimed at developing low cost refining master alloys presenting a good refining effect. The aim of the work was to validate the production of Al-5Ti-1B master alloys, using SHS, to produce master alloys that could comply with the established quality requirements.

2. Experimental Section

The composition of Al, Ti and B powders, employed as the initial materials for the preparation of master alloys, are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Composition of elemental Ti and B powders.
Table 1. Composition of elemental Ti and B powders.
PowdersPurity (%)Average particle size (≤µm)
Aluminum William Rowland (Fine)99.5025
Titanium Bostlan (Large)99.501000
Boron amorphous Bostlan96.060.6
Figure 1. Schematic self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) Reaction with initial reactive powders and obtained phase products.
Figure 1. Schematic self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) Reaction with initial reactive powders and obtained phase products.
Metals 05 01387 g001
The SHS equipment is composed of a mixer, a briquetting tool, a SHS reactor and generator, and a ball-milling device. The production process can be resumed as follows: (1) elemental powders are mixed in a mixer, for a specific concentration, during 2 h at 69 rpm, (2) elemental powders are cold pressed to 200 bar in order to obtain a 25 mm diameter briquette which is then placed in the reaction chamber, (3) a vacuum is made inside the reactor and then filled with high purity argon, (4) an electric generator gives the necessary electrical discharge in order to start the SHS reaction, (5) a master alloy is obtained for a temperature in a range of 680 to 720 °C and (6) a master alloy is finally milled (for Al-TiB2 master alloy different grain size can be obtained depending on milling conditions) (cf. Figure 1)).
Figure 2 shows a master alloy ingot (1) during the SHS reaction and (2) after SHS reaction, where oxidation of the external ingot surface can be observed.
Figure 2. Reaction process and obtained SHS product without reactor.
Figure 2. Reaction process and obtained SHS product without reactor.
Metals 05 01387 g002
Several trials have been developed in order to obtain the master alloy with optimized structural characteristics and cheaper price. The experimental parameters used are listed below:
(1) Commercial Titanium with a size up to 1.000 µm and commercial Boron with an average particle size of 0.6 μm;
(2) Reaction without reactor in air or with argon supply in order to eliminate the reactor and the high vacuum process;
(3) The use of NaCl/ KCl in order to improve homogeneous dissolution;
(4) The introduction of KBF4 and Na2B4O7 as an economical boron source.
The different master alloys fabricated during this study are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Composition of tested master alloys.
Table 2. Composition of tested master alloys.
Sample numberSize of Ti%Ti%B%Al%NaCl/ KClKBF4Na2B4O7Reactor
1Fine48.221.830No
2Large48.221.830No
3Fine69.0310No
4Large69.0310No
5Fine34.515.550No
6Fine69.0310Yes
7Large48.221.830Yes
8Large47.721.629.71Yes
9Fine47.721.629.71Yes
10Fine18.24.13047.7Yes
11Fine34.515.550Yes
12Fine20.79.370Yes
13Fine22.453042.6Yes
14Fine28.56.438.127Yes
The master alloys were analyzed by Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. The microstructure was examined with and Nikon Eclipse MA-200 x500 optical microscopy (OM, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and Jeol JSM-5910LV scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Chemical analyses were done by energy dispersive spectroscopy with an X-act INCA 300 (SEM-EDS, Oxford instruments, Abingdom, Great Britain). The microstructural characteristics of TiB2 and TiO2 phases were determined using ImageJ as image analysis system (Public domain software). In order to have a statistical consistency, at least 10 different areas where selected to determine the average value of the particle size.

3. Results

Table 3 shows the samples that react during the SHS process and their composition obtained by SEM-EDS analysis. Samples N°5, N°12, N°13 and N°14 did not react during tests and are therefore not listed in the table. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show corresponding SEM micrographs of master alloys produced without and with reactor, respectively.
Table 3. Average TiB2 particle size of the fabricated master alloys.
Table 3. Average TiB2 particle size of the fabricated master alloys.
Sample numberTiB2 size (µm)Composition
11.7Formation by oxidation of Al2TiO5, Gibbsite Al2O3·3H20, Ti5O5 and TiB2. Huge amount of Titanium oxide is also detected. Aluminum is dispersed in the ceramic matrix. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.7 μm.
22.8Formation by oxidation of Rutile (Ti0.992O2), Aluminum Titanium oxide (Al2TiO5) and TiB2. Aluminum is dispersed in the ceramic matrix. TiB2 particle average size is close to 2.8 μm.
31.5Formation of TiB2 matrix with some TiB and Rutile (Ti0.992O2). TiB2 particle average grain size is close to 1.5 μm.
44.6Formation of TiB2 with free Boron and rutile (TiO2). TiB2 particle average size is close to 4.6 μm.
69.5Formation of a TiB2 matrix with bimodal distribution. TiB2 particle average size is close to 9.5 μm.
71.3Formation of TiB2, Al and Al3Ti. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.3 μm.
81.3Formation of TiB2, Al and Al3Ti. Quite big aluminum particles covered with ceramics. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.3 μm.
91.1Formation of TiB2, Al and Al3Ti. Quite big aluminum particles coated with ceramics. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.1 μm.
101.9TiB2, Al, and Al3Ti particles are analyzed. Aluminum particles are coated with TiB2 particles. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.9 μm and same areas present fused salts. Not salt compounds are detected in the RX diffraction analysis.
111.3Aluminum and TiB2 are observed. No Al3Ti is detected. TiB2 particle average size is close to 1.8 μm. Some plates like structures are detected (probably deformed Aluminum grains).
Figure 3. SEM microstructures of master alloys produced without reactor.
Figure 3. SEM microstructures of master alloys produced without reactor.
Metals 05 01387 g003
Figure 4. SEM microstructures of master alloys produced with reactor.
Figure 4. SEM microstructures of master alloys produced with reactor.
Metals 05 01387 g004
From Table 3 and corresponding Figure 3 and Figure 4, the following points can be outlined:
(a) It can be observed that the average equivalent length size for the TiB2 particles increases when the size of the titanium particles increases (Pairs of samples N°1–2; N°3–4 and N°8–9), the average equivalent length size for the TiB2 particles decreases when using a reactor (Pair of sample N°2–7). The shape of TiB2 particles is very similar in all the cases (hexagonal or tetragonal).
(b) Regarding to oxidation behavior of the different samples, in direct reaction (without using a reactor with a protective gas), the total quantity of oxides is greater in the peripheral area compared to the manufacture of the compound in an inert reactor (Samples N°1 to 4). The total amount of oxides is higher when we employ fine Titanium (Pairs of samples N°1–2 and N°3–4) and the oxide layer is smaller when Aluminum is used in the master alloy (Samples N°1–2 in comparison with samples N°3–4).
(c) For the microstructure point of view, it can be observed that the grain size is bigger when aluminum powders are not used in the master alloy (Sample 6), KBF4 increases the grain size, compared with the use of Ti, B and aluminum powders (Sample 10) and finally a small addition of a 1 wt.% of NaCl/KCl do not affect significantly TiB2 grain size (Samples 7 and 8).

4. Discussion

Due to the fact that specific surface area is greater in smaller particles than in larger ones, the use of small particles as precursors induces a decrease in the average final grain size of the TiB2 particles, compared to the use of larger particles as precursors.
The main difference between the two manufacturing processes, with or without reactor, seems to be associated with the oxygen content. Indeed, for the process without reactor, the high oxygen content allows an exothermic reaction and so an increase of the temperature inside the crucible; this oxidation reaction is not observed for the reactor processes due to the absence of oxygen. This difference of temperature with and without reactor is then finally linked with the size of the TiB2 particles: TiB2 particles are smaller for the reactor process (lower temperature) than for the non-reactor one. Whatever the process, final TiB2 particles are formed with a hexagonal (more stable configuration) and/or tetragonal shape.
For the non-reactor process, the oxidation phenomenon of some external areas of the samples have to be associated with the high reactivity of the processing materials with oxygen and also with higher processing temperatures (exothermic reaction) with respect to the reactor process. Similarly, the higher surface area-to-volume ratio of finer Ti powders, in comparison with large one, promotes a larger surface area that can react with oxygen, and therefore a higher processing temperature and a final larger TiB2 particle size.
The decrease of the TiB2 grain size when adding aluminum powders can be associated with two different processes. In the first one, the use of Aluminum in the master alloy can reduce the oxidation process, and therefore the reaction temperature, due to the fact that part of the Ti particles react with Aluminum to form TiAl and Al3Ti. The second one should be more linked with volume restriction. Indeed, the growth of the two TiAl and Al3Ti intermetallics will disable the growth of the TiB2 particles and therefore decrease its grain size.
The increase of the grain size when using KBF4 in the master alloy can be correlated with the decrease of the reaction temperature that is linked with the presence of Boron and Titanium. The use of NaCl/KCl salts reduces reaction temperature, but a small percentage (1% by weight) has no significant influence over the final grain size.

5. Conclusions

Low cost SHS master alloys have been fabricated using commercial standard raw materials, with lower purity and higher grain size without a reactor or protective gas. Different master alloy compositions and morphologies are being developed.
We have shown that a larger titanium powder size can produce an aluminum master alloy with a maximum of 30% of aluminum without reactor. In comparison, the SHS reaction is much more difficult when using fine titanium powders. Chemical decomposition of KBF4 during SHS reaction leads to the formation of large TiB2 particles. TiB2 final particles are bigger when we use a larger Ti particles size and an inert atmosphere during SHS reaction inside a reactor. Ti and Ti-Al oxides are mainly formed in the peripheral area if a reactor is not employed. In the case of fine titanium powders, the total amount of oxides is much smaller than when we employ larger titanium powder. However, in the master alloy, the use of Aluminum reduces oxides concentration in the final products.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by the Basque Government through the research projects INNOTEK IT-2008/00348 and IG-2010/00102 and by the Spanish government through the project IAP-560300-2008-6.
The authors are also much grateful to the personnel of BOSTLAN S.A., company that provided the materials and alloys used for this work and that collaborated in aspects related to the development of the aluminum master alloys.

Author Contributions

I.V. and M.A.L. performed the experiments; I.V., A.P. and J.F.S. analyzed the data; I.V., M.A. L. and A.P. wrote the paper; J.F.S. supervised the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cibula, A. Mechanism of grain refinement of sand castings in aluminium alloys. J. Inst. Metals 1949, 76, 321–346. [Google Scholar]
  2. Murty, B.S.; Kori, S.A.; Chakraborty, M. Grain refinement of aluminium and its alloys by heterogeneous nucleation and alloying. Int. Mater. Rev. 2002, 47, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McCartney, D.G. Grain Refining of Aluminium and its Alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 1989, 34, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prasad, K.V.S.; Murty, B.S.; Pramanik, P.; Chakraborty, M. Reaction of Fluoride Salts with Aluminium. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1996, 12, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mayes, C.D.; McCartney, D.G.; Tatlock, G.J. Influence of Microstructure on Grain Refining Performance of Al-Ti-B master Alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1993, 9, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ohno, A.; Motege, I. Solidification Technology in the Foundry and Cast House; Metals Society: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1983; pp. 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hardman, A.; Hayes, F.H. Al-Ti-B Grain Refining Alloys from Al, B2O3 and TiO2. Mater. Sci. Forum 1996, 217–222, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jones, G.P.; Pearson, J. Factors affecting grain refining of Aluminium using Ti and B adittives. Metall. Trans. 1976, 7, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Venkateswarlu, K.; Murty, B.S.; Chakraborty, M. Effect of hot rolling and heat treatment of Al-5Ti-1B master alloy on the grain refining efficiency of aluminum. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2001, 301, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.-T.; Chen, S.-W. Quantities of grains of aluminium and those of TiB2 and Al3Ti particles added in the grain-refining processes. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2002, 325, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Quested, T.E.; Greer, A.L.; Cooper, P.S. The variable potency of TiB2 nucleates particles in the grain refinement of aluminum by Al-Ti-B additions. Mater. Sci. Forum 2002, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Limmaneevichitr, C.; Eidhed, W. Novel technique for grain refinement in aluminum casting by Al-Ti-B powder injection. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2003, 355, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H. Crystallography and refining mechanism of (Ti, B)-contained salts in pure aluminum. Trans. Nonferreous Metals Soc. China 2008, 18, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Quested, T.E. Understanding the mechanisms of grain refinement by inoculation. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2004, 20, 1357–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Birol, Y. An improved practice to manufacture Al–Ti–B master alloys by reacting halide salts with molten aluminium. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 420, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ramachandran, T.R.; Sharma, P.K.; Balasubramanian, K. Grain Refinement of Light Alloys. In Proceedings of the 68th WFC-World Foundry Congress, Chennai, India, 2008; pp. 189–193.
  17. Nikitin, V.I.; Wanqi, J.I.E.; Kandalova, E.G.; Makarenko, A.G.; Yonk, L. Preparation of Al-Ti-B grain refiner by SHS technology. Scr. Mater. 2000, 42, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kandalova, E.G.; Nikitin, V.I.; Jie, W.; Makarenko, A.G. Effect of Al powder content on SHS Al–Ti grain refiner. Mater. Lett. 2002, 54, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Makarenko, A.G.; Kandalova, E.G.; Nikitin, V.I.; Shugayev, V.A. SHS process for manufacturing aluminum master alloys by use of Flux. In Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on SHS, Moscow, Russia, 1999; p. 47.
  20. Li, P.; Kandalova, E.G.; Nikitin, V.I.; Luts, A.R.; Makarenko, A.G.; Zhang, Y. Effect of fluxes on structure formation of SHS Al–Ti–B grain refiner. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 3694–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vicario, I.; Poulon-Quintin, A.; Lagos, M.A.; Silvain, J.-F. Effect of Material and Process Atmosphere in the Preparation of Al-Ti-B Grain Refiner by SHS. Metals 2015, 5, 1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5031387

AMA Style

Vicario I, Poulon-Quintin A, Lagos MA, Silvain J-F. Effect of Material and Process Atmosphere in the Preparation of Al-Ti-B Grain Refiner by SHS. Metals. 2015; 5(3):1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5031387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vicario, Iban, Angeline Poulon-Quintin, Miguel Angel Lagos, and Jean-François Silvain. 2015. "Effect of Material and Process Atmosphere in the Preparation of Al-Ti-B Grain Refiner by SHS" Metals 5, no. 3: 1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5031387

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop