Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Physical Activity, Screen Time and Weight Status among Young Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Reflection to Improve Goal-Directed Self-Talk on Endurance Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Validity of External:Internal Training Load Ratios in Rested and Fatigued Soccer Players
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sports 2018, 6(2), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6020056

Next Day Subjective and Objective Recovery Indices Following Acute Low and High Training Loads in Academy Rugby Union Players

1
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
2
Department of Physical Education and Sports Studies, Newman University, Birmingham B32 3NT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 May 2018 / Revised: 6 June 2018 / Accepted: 10 June 2018 / Published: 15 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fatigue and Recovery in Football)
Full-Text   |   PDF [280 KB, uploaded 15 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of selected subjective and objective monitoring assessments in detecting changes in group and individual responses to low and high load bouts of high intensity intermittent exercise. In a counterbalanced crossover design, Thirteen Academy Rugby Union players (mean ± SD: age: 18 ± 1 years) performed a low load (15 min) and a high load (90 min) bout of high intensity intermittent exercise (Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test) one week apart. Monitoring assessments were performed immediately prior to and 20 h following each trial. Subjective self-report Well-being Questionnaire (WQ) items showed small to large deteriorations following the high load compared to low load (d = 0.4–1.5, p = 0.03–0.57). A very large increase in resting HR (HRrest) (d = 2.1, p = 0.02), moderate decrease in heart rate variability (HRV) indices (d = 0.7, p = 0.04 and d = 0.7, p = 0.01 for the natural logarithm of the standard deviation of R-R intervals (ln SDNN) and the root square of the mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals (rMSSD), respectively) and no change in countermovement jump (d = 0.0, p = 0.97) were evident following the high load compared to low load. Individual WQ responses revealed 7/9, 7/9, 6/9, 6/9, 5/9, 3/9 and 1/9 participants reported deteriorations in recovery, sleep quality, motivation, muscle soreness, fatigue, stress and appetite, respectively, following the high load compared to low load. Individual analysis indicated a negative response following the high load compared to low load in HRrest, ln SDNN and ln rMSSD for 4/6, 2/6 and 1/6 participants, respectively. Selected WQ items detected group and individual responses to high load and low load highlighting their potential utility. However, objective assessments lacked the sensitivity to detect small individual changes. View Full-Text
Keywords: athlete monitoring; athlete well-being; self-report questionnaire; performance athlete monitoring; athlete well-being; self-report questionnaire; performance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Noon, M.R.; James, R.S.; Clarke, N.D.; Taylor, R.J.; Thake, C.D. Next Day Subjective and Objective Recovery Indices Following Acute Low and High Training Loads in Academy Rugby Union Players. Sports 2018, 6, 56.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sports EISSN 2075-4663 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top