Next Article in Journal
Verification of Calculation Method Using Monte Carlo Method for Water Supply Demands of Office Building
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Soil Moisture Estimation from Remote Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
The Performance and Potentials of the CryoSat-2 SAR and SARIn Modes for Lake Level Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Downscaling GLDAS Soil Moisture Data in East Asia through Fusion of Multi-Sensors by Optimizing Modified Regression Trees
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(6), 372; doi:10.3390/w9060372

Evaluation and Inter-Comparison of Satellite Soil Moisture Products Using In Situ Observations over Texas, U.S.

1
Cooperative Agricultural Research Center, College of Agriculture and Human Sciences, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
2
EDF Renewal Energy, San Diego, CA 92128, USA
3
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Khalifa University, Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 54224, Abu Dhabi, UAE
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jian Peng
Received: 1 March 2017 / Revised: 10 May 2017 / Accepted: 18 May 2017 / Published: 25 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [9808 KB, uploaded 25 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to evaluate four major remote sensing soil moisture (SM) products over the state of Texas. These remote sensing products are: (i) the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer—Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) (2002–September 2011); (ii) the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity system (SMOS, 2010–present); (iii) AMSR2 (2012–present); and (iv) the Soil Moisture Active Passive system (SMAP, 2015–present). The quality of the generated SM data is influenced by the accuracy and precision of the sensors and the retrieval algorithms used in processing raw data. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the quality of these satellite SM products using in situ measurements and/or by inter-comparing their data during overlapping periods. In this study, these two approaches were used where we compared each satellite SM product to in situ soil moisture measurements and we also conducted an inter-comparison of the four satellite SM products at 15 different locations in Texas over six major land cover types (cropland, shrub, grassland, forest, pasture and developed) and eight climate zones along with in situ SM data from 15 Mesonet, USCRN and USDA-NRCS Scan stations. Results show that SM data from SMAP had the best correlation coefficients range from 0.37 to 0.92 with in situ measurements among the four tested satellite surface SM products. On the other hand, SM data from SMOS, AMSR2 and AMSR-E had moderate to low correlation coefficients ranges with in situ data, respectively, from 0.24–0.78, 0.07–0.62 and 0.05–0.52. During the overlapping periods, average root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the correlations between in situ and each satellite data were 0.13 (AMSR-E) and 0.13 (SMOS) cm3/cm3 (2010–2011), 0.16 (AMSR2) and 0.14 (SMOS) cm3/cm3 (2012–2016) and 0.13, 0.16, 0.14 (SMAP, AMSR2, SMOS) cm3/cm3 (2015–2016), respectively. Despite the coarser spatial resolution of all four satellite products (25–36 km), their SM measurements are considered reasonable and can be effectively used for different applications, e.g., flood forecasting, and drought prediction; however, further evaluation of each satellite product is recommended prior to its use in practical applications. View Full-Text
Keywords: AMSR-E; SMOS; AMSR2; SMAP; soil moisture; agriculture; hydrology; meteorology AMSR-E; SMOS; AMSR2; SMAP; soil moisture; agriculture; hydrology; meteorology
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ray, R.L.; Fares, A.; He, Y.; Temimi, M. Evaluation and Inter-Comparison of Satellite Soil Moisture Products Using In Situ Observations over Texas, U.S.. Water 2017, 9, 372.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top