Next Article in Journal
Impacts of Off-Farm Employment on Irrigation Water Efficiency in North China
Previous Article in Journal
Coupling GIS with Stormwater Modelling for the Location Prioritization and Hydrological Simulation of Permeable Pavements in Urban Catchments
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2016, 8(10), 450; doi:10.3390/w8100450

Evaluation of Radiation Components in a Global Freshwater Model with Station-Based Observations

1
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe-University, Frankfurt D-60438, Germany
2
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt D-60325, Germany
3
Center of Research and Development, German Meteorological Service, Offenbach D-63067, Germany
4
Pyrenean Institute of Ecology, Spanish National Research Council, Zaragoza ES-50059, Spain
5
Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe-University, Frankfurt D-60438, Germany
6
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich CH-8092, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Received: 3 July 2016 / Revised: 29 September 2016 / Accepted: 11 October 2016 / Published: 14 October 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [8005 KB, uploaded 14 October 2016]   |  

Abstract

In many hydrological models, the amount of evapotranspired water is calculated using the potential evapotranspiration (PET) approach. The main driver of several PET approaches is net radiation, whose downward components are usually obtained from meteorological input data, whereas the upward components are calculated by the model itself. Thus, uncertainties can be large due to both the input data and model assumptions. In this study, we compare the radiation components of the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model, driven by two meteorological input datasets and two radiation setups from ERA-Interim reanalysis. We assess the performance with respect to monthly observations provided by the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) and the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA). The assessment is done for the global land area and specifically for energy/water limited regions. The results indicate that there is no optimal radiation input throughout the model variants, but standard meteorological input datasets perform better than those directly obtained by ERA-Interim reanalysis for the key variable net radiation. The low number of observations for some radiation components, as well as the scale mismatch between station observations and 0.5° × 0.5° grid cell size, limits the assessment. View Full-Text
Keywords: global hydrological modeling; radiation; validation with station observations; BSRN; GEBA; uncertainty global hydrological modeling; radiation; validation with station observations; BSRN; GEBA; uncertainty
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Müller Schmied, H.; Müller, R.; Sanchez-Lorenzo, A.; Ahrens, B.; Wild, M. Evaluation of Radiation Components in a Global Freshwater Model with Station-Based Observations. Water 2016, 8, 450.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top