Next Article in Journal
Initial Characterization and Water Quality Assessment of Stream Landscapes in Northern Mongolia
Next Article in Special Issue
Vapor Flow Resistance of Dry Soil Layer to Soil Water Evaporation in Arid Environment: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Controls on Suspended Sediment Concentrations and Turbidity within a Reforested, Southern Appalachian Headwater Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Extreme Hourly Precipitation Patterns in Hainan Island, South China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2015, 7(6), 3149-3165; doi:10.3390/w7063149

Flow Regime Classification and Hydrological Characterization: A Case Study of Ethiopian Rivers

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology (AAiT), Addis Ababa 385, Ethiopia
Ethiopian Institute of Water Resources (EIWR), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 3001, Ethiopia
Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Athanasios Loukas
Received: 23 March 2015 / Revised: 5 June 2015 / Accepted: 15 June 2015 / Published: 22 June 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2941 KB, uploaded 22 June 2015]   |  


The spatiotemporal variability of a stream flow due to the complex interaction of catchment attributes and rainfall induce complexity in hydrology. Researchers have been trying to address this complexity with a number of approaches; river flow regime is one of them. The flow regime can be quantified by means of hydrological indices characterizing five components: magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of change of flow. Similarly, this study aimed to understand the flow variability of Ethiopian Rivers using the observed daily flow data from 208 gauging stations in the country. With this process, the Hierarchical Ward Clustering method was implemented to group the streams into three flow regimes (1) ephemeral, (2) intermittent, and (3) perennial. Principal component analysis (PCA) is also applied as the second multivariate analysis tool to identify dominant hydrological indices that cause the variability in the streams. The mean flow per unit catchment area (QmAR) and Base flow index (BFI) show an incremental trend with ephemeral, intermittent and perennial streams. Whereas the number of mean zero flow days ratio (ZFI) and coefficient of variation (CV) show a decreasing trend with ephemeral to perennial flow regimes. Finally, the streams in the three flow regimes were characterized with the mean and standard deviation of the hydrological variables and the shape, slope, and scale of the flow duration curve. Results of this study are the basis for further understanding of the ecohydrological processes of the river basins in Ethiopia. View Full-Text
Keywords: Ethiopia; flow regime; ephemeral; intermittent; perennial; hydrological indices; flow duration curve Ethiopia; flow regime; ephemeral; intermittent; perennial; hydrological indices; flow duration curve

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Berhanu, B.; Seleshi, Y.; Demisse, S.S.; Melesse, A.M. Flow Regime Classification and Hydrological Characterization: A Case Study of Ethiopian Rivers. Water 2015, 7, 3149-3165.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top