Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Data Driven Approach to Bioretention Cell Performance: Prediction and Design
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Innovative Urban Water Management as a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy: Results from the Implementation of the Project “Water Against Climate Change (WATACLIC)”
Water 2013, 5(1), 1-12; doi:10.3390/w5010001
Article

Constructed Wetlands for Combined Sewer Overflow Treatment—Comparison of German, French and Italian Approaches

1,3,* , 1
, 2
, 3
, 4
 and 5
Received: 30 October 2012; in revised form: 17 December 2012 / Accepted: 19 December 2012 / Published: 24 December 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Water Management)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [425 KB, uploaded 24 December 2012]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Combined sewer systems are designed to transport stormwater surface run off in addition to the dry weather flows up to defined limits. In most European countries, hydraulic loads greater than the design flow are discharged directly into receiving water bodies, with minimal treatment (screening, sedimentation), or with no treatment at all. One feasible solution to prevent receiving waters from strong negative impacts seems to be the application of vertical flow constructed wetlands. In Germany, first attempts to use this ecological technology were recognized in early 1990s. Since then, further development continued until a high level of treatment performance was reached. During recent years the national “state-of-the-art” (defined in 2005) was adapted in other European countries, including France and Italy. Against the background of differing national requirements in combined sewer system design, substantial developmental steps were taken. The use of coarser filter media in combination with alternating loadings of separated filter beds allows direct feedings with untreated combined runoff. Permanent water storage in deep layers of the wetland improves the system’s robustness against extended dry periods, but contains operational risks. Besides similar functions (but different designs and layouts), correct dimensioning of all approaches suffers from uncertainties in long-term rainfall predictions as well as inside sewer system simulation tools.
Keywords: combined sewer overflow; constructed wetlands; design; layout; international comparison; simulation combined sewer overflow; constructed wetlands; design; layout; international comparison; simulation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer, D.; Molle, P.; Esser, D.; Troesch, S.; Masi, F.; Dittmer, U. Constructed Wetlands for Combined Sewer Overflow Treatment—Comparison of German, French and Italian Approaches. Water 2013, 5, 1-12.

AMA Style

Meyer D, Molle P, Esser D, Troesch S, Masi F, Dittmer U. Constructed Wetlands for Combined Sewer Overflow Treatment—Comparison of German, French and Italian Approaches. Water. 2013; 5(1):1-12.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meyer, Daniel; Molle, Pascal; Esser, Dirk; Troesch, Stéphane; Masi, Fabio; Dittmer, Ulrich. 2013. "Constructed Wetlands for Combined Sewer Overflow Treatment—Comparison of German, French and Italian Approaches." Water 5, no. 1: 1-12.


Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert