Next Article in Journal
Addressing Desalination’s Carbon Footprint: The Israeli Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Phosphorus Solubilizing and Releasing Bacteria Screening from the Rhizosphere in a Natural Wetland
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainably Managing Reservoir Storage: Ancient Roots of a Modern Challenge
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2018, 10(2), 196; doi:10.3390/w10020196

Resilient Governance of Water Regimes in Variable Climates: Lessons from California’s Hydro-Ecological Zones

Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Gould Center for Conflict Resolution, Stanford Law School, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Water in the West Program, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 September 2017 / Revised: 1 February 2018 / Accepted: 2 February 2018 / Published: 12 February 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [246 KB, uploaded 12 February 2018]


Highly variable water regimes, such as California’s, contain distinctive problems in the pursuit of secure timing, quantities and distributions of highly variable flows. Their formal and informal systems of water control must adapt rapidly to forceful and unpredictable swings on which the survival of diversified ecosystems, expansive settlement patterns and market-driven economies depends. What constitutes resilient water governance in these high-variability regimes? Three bodies of theory—state resource government, resilience and social mediation—inform our pursuit of governance that adapts effectively to these challenges. Using evidence drawn primarily from California research and participation in the policy and practice of water governance, we identify two stark barriers to learning, adaptation and resilience in high-variability conditions: (1) the sharp divide between modes of governance for ecological (protective) and for social (distributive) resilience and (2) the separation between predominant paradigms of water governance in “basins” (shared streamflow) and in “plains” (minimized social risk). These sources of structural segregation block adaptive processes and diminish systemic resilience, creating need for mediating spaces that increase permeability, learning and adaptation across structural barriers. We propose that the magnitude and diversity of need are related directly to the degree of hydro-climatic variability. View Full-Text
Keywords: high-variability climates; resilient water governance; structural segregation; mediating networks high-variability climates; resilient water governance; structural segregation; mediating networks
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Romm, J.; Conrad, E.; Måren, I.E. Resilient Governance of Water Regimes in Variable Climates: Lessons from California’s Hydro-Ecological Zones. Water 2018, 10, 196.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top