Genes 2014, 5(1), 196-213; doi:10.3390/genes5010196
Review

Association Claims in the Sequencing Era

Received: 26 December 2013; in revised form: 24 February 2014 / Accepted: 24 February 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Grand Celebration: 10th Anniversary of the Human Genome Project)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, the field of human genetics has been in great flux, largely due to technological advances in studying DNA sequence variation. Although community-wide adoption of statistical standards was key to the success of genome-wide association studies, similar standards have not yet been globally applied to the processing and interpretation of sequencing data. It has proven particularly challenging to pinpoint unequivocally disease variants in sequencing studies of polygenic traits. Here, we comment on a number of factors that may contribute to irreproducible claims of association in scientific literature and discuss possible steps that we can take towards cultural change.
Keywords: association; GWAS; next-generation sequencing; significance; bias; complex traits
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [356 KB, uploaded 11 March 2014 09:35 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Pulit, S.L.; Leusink, M.; Menelaou, A.; de Bakker, P.I.W. Association Claims in the Sequencing Era. Genes 2014, 5, 196-213.

AMA Style

Pulit SL, Leusink M, Menelaou A, de Bakker PIW. Association Claims in the Sequencing Era. Genes. 2014; 5(1):196-213.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pulit, Sara L.; Leusink, Maarten; Menelaou, Androniki; de Bakker, Paul I.W. 2014. "Association Claims in the Sequencing Era." Genes 5, no. 1: 196-213.

Genes EISSN 2073-4425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert