Next Article in Journal
Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance
Next Article in Special Issue
Voluntary Leadership and Asymmetric Endowments in the Investment Game
Previous Article in Journal
Luxembourg in the Early Days of the EEC: Null Player or Not?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gender Differences in the Response to Decision Power and Responsibility—Framing Effects in a Dictator Game
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Games 2018, 9(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020030

From Windfall Sharing to Property Ownership: Prosocial Personality Traits in Giving and Taking Dictator Games

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 April 2018 / Revised: 17 May 2018 / Accepted: 17 May 2018 / Published: 23 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dictator Games)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1268 KB, uploaded 24 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

The dictator game is a well-known task measuring prosocial preferences, in which one person divides a fixed amount of windfall money with a recipient. A key factor in real-world transfers of wealth is the concept of property ownership and consequently the related acts of giving and taking. Using a variation of the traditional dictator game (N = 256), we examined whether individual differences under different game frames corresponded with prosocial personality traits from the Big Five (politeness, compassion) and HEXACO (Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience) (honesty-humility, agreeableness) models. In the Big Five model, the effects of prosocial personality traits were generally stronger and more consistent for taking than for giving, in line with a “do-no-harm” explanation, whereby prosocial individuals felt less entitled to and less willing to infringe on the endowments of others. In contrast, HEXACO honesty-humility predicted allocations across both frames, consistent with its broad association with fair-mindedness, and providing further evidence of its role in allocations of wealth more generally. These findings highlight the utility of integrating personality psychology with behavioral economics, in which the discriminant validity across prosocial traits can shed light on the distinct motivations underpinning social decisions. View Full-Text
Keywords: dictator game; framing effects; personality; Big Five; agreeableness; honesty-humility dictator game; framing effects; personality; Big Five; agreeableness; honesty-humility
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, K.; Kashima, Y.; Smillie, L.D. From Windfall Sharing to Property Ownership: Prosocial Personality Traits in Giving and Taking Dictator Games. Games 2018, 9, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Games EISSN 2073-4336 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top