Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements
AbstractIs mutually beneficial cooperation in trust games more prevalent with private property or common property? Does the strength of property right entitlement affect the answer? Cox, Ostrom, Walker, et al.  report little difference between cooperation in private and common property trust games. We assign stronger property right entitlements by requiring subjects to meet a performance quota in a real effort task to earn their endowments. We report experiment treatments with sequential choice and strategy responses. We find that cooperation is lower in common property trust games than in private property trust games, which is an idiosyncratic prediction of revealed altruism theory . Demonstrable differences and similarities between our strategy response and sequential choice data provide insight into the how these protocols can yield different results from hypothesis tests even when they are eliciting the same behavioral patterns across treatments. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
Experiment Decisions and Materials (ZIP, 373 KB)
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Cox, J.C.; Hall, D.T. Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements. Games 2010, 1, 527-550.
Cox JC, Hall DT. Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements. Games. 2010; 1(4):527-550.Chicago/Turabian Style
Cox, James C.; Hall, Daniel T. 2010. "Trust with Private and Common Property: Effects of Stronger Property Right Entitlements." Games 1, no. 4: 527-550.