Next Article in Journal
The Potential Use of Electrochemotherapy in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma: In Vitro Results in 3D Tumor Cultures and In Vivo Results in a Chick Embryo Model
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21cip1/waf1 in Targeting Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutics
Previous Article in Journal
Significance of BRAF Kinase Inhibitors for Melanoma Treatment: From Bench to Bedside
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Multifaceted p21 (Cip1/Waf1/CDKN1A) in Cell Differentiation, Migration and Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/cancers11091343
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epigenetic Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 in Human Cancer

by
Matthias Ocker
1,2,
Samar Al Bitar
3,
Ana Carolina Monteiro
4,
Hala Gali-Muhtasib
3,5 and
Regine Schneider-Stock
4,6,*
1
Bayer AG, Translational Medicine Oncology, 13353 Berlin, Germany
2
Department of Gastroenterology, CBF, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
3
Department of Biology, American University of Beirut, Beirut 110236, Lebanon
4
Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
5
Center for Drug Discovery, American University of Beirut, Beirut 110236, Lebanon
6
Experimental Tumor Pathology, FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitaetsstrasse 22, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2019, 11(9), 1343; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091343
Submission received: 3 July 2019 / Revised: 30 August 2019 / Accepted: 3 September 2019 / Published: 11 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue p21 – An Underestimated Driver for Cancers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
p21cip1/waf1 is a central regulator of cell cycle control and survival. While mutations are rare, it is commonly dysregulated in several human cancers due to epigenetic mechanisms influencing its transcriptional control. These mechanisms include promoter hypermethylation as well as additional pathways such as histone acetylation or methylation. The epigenetic regulators include writers, such as DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs); histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone lysine methyltransferases; erasers, such as histone deacetylases (HDACs); histone lysine demethylases [e.g., the Lysine Demethylase (KDM) family]; DNA hydroxylases; readers, such as the methyl-CpG-binding proteins (MBPs); and bromodomain-containing proteins, including the bromo- and extraterminal domain (BET) family. We further discuss the roles that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) play in the epigenetic control of p21cip1/waf1 expression and its function in human cancers.

1. Introduction

Regulation of gene function is essential to the coordination of cellular processes and tissue homeostasis. In cancer, dysregulation of genes is commonly mediated by genetic events such as activating mutations (e.g., k-RAS, PI3K, EGFR), gene fusions (e.g., BCR-ABL, NTREK), or amplifications (e.g., FGFR). Besides these mechanisms, additional features “on top” of the genetic information, i.e., epigenetic modifications, are heavily involved in the orchestration of gene functions. The term ‘epigenetics’ was first used by Conrad Hal Waddington in 1942 and is now defined as inherited changes in gene expression without alterations in the DNA [1,2]. While Hanahan and Weinberg defined the hallmarks of cancer based largely on genetic alterations, an increasing body of evidence now supports the view that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to the development of the malignant phenotype and can even drive cancer formation on their own [3,4].
An epigenetic signature is mediated by enzymes that alter DNA methylation or modifications of histones via methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and various other mechanisms [5]. Besides these so-called epigenetic writers and erasers, enzymes that “read” the chromatin state form part of the epigenetic machinery [6]. Furthermore, various noncoding RNAs have recently been identified as playing a major role in epigenetic regulation [7].
p21cip1/waf1 is a low-molecular-weight molecule (21 kDa) that inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases. It is a key downstream target of p53 upon DNA damage and has multiple functions during cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, gene transcription, and apoptosis [8]. We have previously discussed the link between histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) and p21cip1/waf1 signaling [9]. Here, we will extend this discussion to epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA or histone methylation, and their effects on p21caip1/waf1 in cancer cells.

2. Epigenetic Mechanisms

2.1. Epigenetic Writers

The epigenetic landscape of tumor cells is created by various chemical modifications at DNA or histone tails.
DNA methylation occurs in somatic cells at the so-called CpG (cytosine–phosphate–guanine) islands, mostly CG-rich DNA sequences in the gene promoter regions and usually leads to silencing of the respective gene. This modification is mediated by the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) family [10]. In cancer, about 5–10% of promoter regions become abnormally methylated [11]. DNMT1 is considered to be a maintenance DNA methyltransferase that copies methylation patterns during DNA replication and is thus important to the inheritance of DNA methylation, while DNMT3a and DNMT3b act as de novo DNA methyltransferases during embryogenesis and in somatic tissues [12,13]. Although the promoter region of CDKN1A, the gene encoding p21cip1/waf1, is usually not methylated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), decitabine is capable of inducing its re-expression via induction of DNA damage and activation of the ATM/p53 pathway [14].
Histone modifications make a major contribution to the transcriptional outcome of a specific gene sequence. Interestingly, a histone lysine residue can be modified differentially; i.e., it can be acetylated or (tri-)methylated, and each modification will contribute to cancer development in a different way and extends the language of the DNA sequence [15,16]. Lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) catalyze the transfer of an acetyl group from acetyl–CoA to the ε-amino group of a lysine. Histone acetylation is a modification that can be recognized by epigenetic readers, but it also leads to a more relaxed chromatin structure and, consequently, an enhanced binding of transcription factors. Acetylation can occur at different histone tail lysines (K9, K14, K18, K5, K8, and K12) and in non-histone proteins. TIP60 and GCN5 are further acetyltransferases that link epigenetic modifications to p21cip1/waf1, e.g., by acetylation of p53 and MYC, respectively [17,18,19].
H3K4 methylation in general marks a transcriptionally active gene. There are six methyltransferases (MLL1/KMT2A, MLL2/KMT2B, MLL3/KMT2C, MLL4/KMT2D, SETD1A/KMT2F, and SETD1B/KMT2G) that lead in different complexes to this active histone modification. Mutations and rearrangements of the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (MLL) family proteins play a major role in the initiation and maintenance of various cancer types [20]; p53 might be involved in the correct recruitment of the Set1 complex to DNA-damage-responsive genes and thus links this phenotype to p21cip1/waf1 [21]. The association of methyltransferases in diseases has recently been summarized in Hyun et al. [22].
The H3K27me3 mark is associated with gene silencing. The responsible Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is composed of four core subunits: EZH2, SUZ12, EED, and RbAp46/48. The catalytic subunit EZH2 is responsible for the mono-, di-, and trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 [23]. EZH2 is upregulated in many cancers, and the inhibition of PRC2 catalytic activity has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in cancer [24,25].
There are at least eight different H3K36 methyltransferases; the most important are NSD1/KMT3B, NSD2/KMT3G, NSD3/KMT3F, and SETD2/KMT3A [26].
Dot1L is responsible for the active mark at H3K79 that is localized at the globular domain of histone 3. The relationship of the abovementioned epigenetic writers to p21cip1/waf1 is summarized in Table 1 and discussed in further detail below.

2.2. Epigenetic Erasers

Modifications to DNA and histones need to be reversible to be functional regulators of gene activity and are performed by distinct enzymes that are classified as epigenetic erasers. Generally, the removal of methylation marks facilitates transcription and enhances gene expression, while deacetylation has suppressive effects.
DNA methylation can be reversed by the ten-eleven translocation (TET1-3) family of proteins [27]. TET proteins are DNA hydroxylases that convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and, if the oxidization process is repeated, to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine [28,29,30]. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is commonly found in sites of active chromatin, such as promoters and transcriptional start sites, and it has been identified as a recognition signal for epigenetic readers [31,32]. Mutations in TET2 (leading to decreased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels) have been associated with various hematologic malignancies [33], although the exact mechanism of how TET2 contributes to the development of such cancers remains unclear [34]. Epigenetic inactivation or reduced expression of TET3 has been demonstrated in solid tumors such as head and neck, cervical, or colon cancer [35,36,37].
Histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) consist of more than 30 enzymes that have a distinct substrate specificity and belong to two different enzyme families: the Flavin-Adenin-Dinukleotid (FAD)-dependent amine oxidase family with KDM1A and KDM1B (LSD1, LSD2) as the only two members and the Jumonji C-domain-containing family of dioxygenases with more than 30 members in several subfamilies (KDM2–8). KDM1A/B can remove mono- and dimethyl groups from histone H3K4, while the Jumonji-family enzymes can also remove trimethyl groups [38,39]. So far, no clear evidence for specific histone arginine demethylases exists. Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) and JMJD6 have been shown to mediate arginine demethylation, but both enzymes also possess additional properties beyond demethylation [40,41].
Histone deacetylation is removed by zinc-dependent Class I, II, and IV histone deacetylases (HDAC) or Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide + (NAD+)-dependent sirtuins that are also referred to as Class III HDACs. HDACs remove ε-amino acetyl groups from lysine residues in histones and in non-histone proteins (especially mediated by Class II HDACs, which are also found in the cytoplasm), which explains the pleiotropic effects and rather narrow therapeutic window of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) in humans [42,43]. HDACs are part of larger multi-enzyme complexes, including Sin3, NuRD, and Co-REST, that determine their target recognition and substrate specificity, but also have demethylase properties [44,45]. Mechanistically, removal of acetylation from histones restores a condensed and transcriptionally repressive status. While mutations in HDACs are uncommon, altered expression levels of HDACs have been described in various human cancers and proposed as prognostic markers, e.g., in colorectal, ovarian, breast, and liver cancer [46,47,48,49].

2.3. Epigenetic Readers

Epigenetic modifications are recognized by a group of proteins that are referred to as epigenetic readers. Most reader proteins specifically recognize and interact with specific epigenetic marks; however, some readers also bind to unmodified histones whose functional relevance is not well understood yet [50,51,52,53].
Methylated CpG islands in DNA are recognized by methyl-CpG-binding proteins (MBPs), and these proteins in general support the gene silencing properties of methylated loci. Three families of MBPs have been described: MBD proteins (MBD1-6, SETDB1/2, BAZ2A/B, and MeCP2), Zinc Finger (ZnF) domain proteins (ZBTB4, ZBTB33/Kaiso, ZBTB38, and ZFP57), and the SET and RING finger-associated (SRA) domain proteins (UHRF1) [6,54].
Histone lysine methylation marks are recognized by a plethora of different protein families that specifically interact with distinct lysine residues and their methylation pattern [55,56]. Interestingly, a cross-talk between DNA and histone methylation exists by, e.g., interaction of the ATRX, DNMT3, DNMT3L (ADD) domain of DNMT3 with the histone H3 or the binding of the DNA methylation reader UHRF1 with unmethylated H3R2 [57,58,59].
Acetylation of histones leads to an open chromatin structure that is recognized by proteins containing bromodomains or tandem plant homeodomain (PHD) domains [60,61]. In humans, more than 60 bromodomains have been identified [62]. Among them, the bromo- and extraterminal domain (BET) family proteins (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT) are the best studied and have been shown to regulate transcriptional elongation processes as well as cell cycle progression. Interestingly, inhibition of BET proteins leads to downregulation of MYC, which is a key regulator of cellular survival and proliferation (e.g., via p21cip1/waf1) in hematologic and solid tumors [63,64,65]. Other acetylation readers, such as EP300 and CREBBP, possess only a single bromodomain and are also known to regulate gene transcription processes [66].

3. Epigenetic Regulation of p21cip1/waf1

3.1. Promoter Methylation of CDKN1A

Expression of p21cip1/waf1 is regulated by several epigenetic and other additional post-transcriptional mechanisms that are also interconnected with each other (Tables 1 and 2).
The proximal promoter of CDKN1A contains several CpG dinucleotides that can be subject to DNA methylation [67,68]. Methylation affects Sp1 and Sp3 binding activity and was shown to suppress p21cip1/waf1 transcription independently of p53 [69,70]. Some anticancer compounds, such as curcumin, induce apoptosis by promoter demethylation of CDKN1A [68]. In prolactinoma, low p21cip1/waf1 levels caused by CDKN1A promoter hypermethylation were shown to contribute to enhanced proliferation in invasive specimens [71].
Hypermethylation of the Sp1 and Sp3 genomic region and concomitant transcriptional repression were found in different hematologic and solid cancers, including breast cancer, and were associated with a poorer prognosis due to more aggressive phenotypes [72,73,74]. DNMTs, as mediators of DNA methylation, have thus also been shown to have elevated levels in cancer, and pharmacological inhibition of these enzymes is already a clinical standard in hematologic diseases [75]. Furthermore, DNMTs compete with p21cip1/waf1 for PCNA binding and overexpression of DNMTs could thus release p21cip1/waf1 from PCNA and render it more susceptible to proteasomal degradation [76,77].
Nevertheless, low p21cip1/waf1 levels in tissues are not always associated with CDKN1A promoter hypermethylation as previously shown in osteoarthritic chondrocytes [78].
Analyzing in silico the MethHC database that integrates DNA methylation and mRNA expression data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we observed that there is no uniform pattern when comparing tumor with nontumor DNA for CDKN1A gene expression. Bladder cancer, colon cancer, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma show a lower CDKN1A expression in tumors, whereas cervical squamous cell carcinoma, lung squamous carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, skin cutaneous carcinoma, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma show a higher p21cip1/waf1 encoding mRNA expression in tumors compared to their normal counterparts (Figure 1). Head and neck carcinoma did not even show different gene expression levels. Except for prostate and skin carcinoma, there were no impressive differences visible to the naked eye in the graphs. As expected, when analyzing DNA promoter methylation and CDKN1A gene expression, there was a negative correlation between both parameters except for uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma; however, the correlation coefficients were not remarkably high (Figure 2). These results point to the fact that CDKN1A silencing is not epigenetically regulated by DNA methylation only. We summarize the major mechanisms in the following paragraphs.

3.2. Writers and p21cip1/waf1

Several histone acetyl transferases (HATs), e.g., p300, CREB-binding protein, PCAF, Tip60, and GCN5, have been shown to be crucial for p53-dependent and independent activation of p21cip1/waf1 [79,80] (Table 1). Interestingly, the histone acetyltransferase PCAF can induce the acetylation of H3K9 and H3K14 at the distal p53-responsive element in the CDKN1A promoter to induce its expression under stress conditions. This action is independent of PCAF-mediated acetylation at K320 in p53’s regulatory domain [79,80]. The TIP60 protein is a lysine acetyltransferase that can directly acetylate histones or non-histone proteins to alter their activity. TIP60 was shown to act as a tumor suppressor in vivo. In human papilloma virus (HPV)-mediated cervical cancer, TIP60 is destabilized by the HPV-mediated complex with the E3 ubiquitin ligase EDD1 [81]. High TIP60 expression was associated with 5-Fluoruracil (5-FU)-induced apoptosis and growth arrest and is not restricted to p53-dependent promoters [18]. The reason for this is that acetylation at the two TIP60-mediated acetylation sites Lys161 and Lys163 at the p21cip1/waf1 C-terminus leads to stabilization of p21cip1/waf1 and this acetylation is a pre-requisite for p21cip1/waf1-dependent DNA damage response and cell cycle progression.
SETD1A a histone methyltransferase that ensures that the active H3K4 methylation triggers cell proliferation by suppressing p21cip1/waf1 in a p53-independent manner. On the other hand, SETD1A knockdown leads to a p21cip1/waf1-dependent senescence phenotype [93]. The fact that SETD1A is often amplified in invasive breast carcinomas might reflect the better tolerance of these aggressive tumor cells to mitotic stress. Cell cycle arrest in SETD1A knockdown senescent cells is independent of mutations in p53, Rb, and p16, which are known senescence mediators; instead, it is sustained through transcriptional suppression of SKP2, which degrades p27 and p21cip1/waf1. The histone methyltransferase SETD2, which is responsible for the trimethylation of H3K36, is necessary for the proper mismatch repair in vivo [35]. In this regard, it has been shown that the hMutSα subunit of the mismatch repair protein hMSH6 contains a Pro–Trp–Trp–Pro (PWWP) domain that reads the H3K36me3 histone mark [94]. SETD2 can interact with p53 to regulate the transcription of its target genes encoding for e.g. p21cip1/waf1, Fas, and Puma [95]. SETD2 loss could also promote tumor growth in a p53-independent manner, leading to aberrant mitosis and multinucleated giant cells in tumors.
In lymphoma, the growth factor independent 1 (Gfi1) oncoprotein mediates the recruitment of the histone lysine methyltransferase G9a in complex with the histone deacetylase HDAC1 to the CDKN1A promoter. The subsequent increase in H3K9 dimethylation leads to diminished CDKN1A transcription [36]. Recently, the COUP-TF-interacting protein 2 (CTIP2) and the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 were shown to be recruited to the proximal SP1 site of the CDKN1A promoter, and trimethylation of H3K9 was found to lead to transcriptional repression of CDKN1A in microglial cells. In parallel, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection of macrophages activates CDKN1A gene expression and promotes G2/M cell cycle arrest. Both actions seem to facilitate HIV-1 replication [37].
Overexpressed MYC induces acute erythroleukemia, an uncommon AML subtype that is associated with a worse prognosis. The histone methyltransferase EZH2 has been reported to be a target of the MYC oncoprotein. MYC knockdown results in reduced EZH2 expression and an increase in p21cip1/waf1 expression by removal of the silencing EZH2-specific H3K27me3 mark at the CDKN1A promoter. The subsequently induced p21cip1/waf1-dependent senescence phenotype is p53-independent [38]. In non-small-cell lung cancer, the long noncoding RNA LINCO1133 recruits EZH2 and lysine-specific demethylase 1A (LSD1) to the CDKN1A promoter to repress its transcription, leading to a proliferative stimulus [39]. Whereas EZH2 sets the silencing H3K27me3 mark, LSD1 removes the active H3K4me1/2 code to shape the chromatin into a repressive conformation. This p21cip1/waf1 suppression has also been associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a process that is important for invasion and metastasis. Downregulation of methylation of H3K79 leads to a p21cip1/waf1-dependent induction of the senescence program in lung cancer, which is believed to represent a barrier to tumorigenesis. When tumor cells are deficient in the responsible methyltransferase DOT1, they show a remarkable chromosomal instability [88]. When investigating a panel of histone methyltransferases in prostate cancer, PRMT6, a Type I arginine methyltransferase that builds the H3R2 dimethylation, was highly upregulated compared to nontumor tissue [89]. PRMT6 counteracts the MLL complex at H3K4 and both marks are mutually exclusive. When the repressive H3R2me2 mark is lost, tumor aggressiveness is significantly reduced by inhibition of the oncogenic AKT pathway and senescence induction via p21cip1/waf1 upregulation. In leukemia, methylation at H4K20 by suppressor of variegation 4-20 homolog 1 (Suv4-20h1) promotes cell cycle G1/S transition and, hence, proliferation by repressing the p21cip1/waf1 encoding gene [90]. A direct binding of Suv4-20h1 with enrichment of histones H3K20me2 and H4K20me3 at the CDKN1A promoter was shown in that study.
The histone variant H2A.Z is enriched at p53 binding sites in the CDKN1A promoter, facilitating p53 binding and p21cip1/waf1 expression [91]. Interestingly, H2A.Z is lost from the CDKN1A promoter in response to DNA damage followed by recruitment of TIP60 histone acetyltransferase to trigger CDKN1A gene expression [92]. Thus, H2A.Z seems to be a negative regulator of p21cip1/waf1. The authors show that p53 plays an active role in positioning H2A.Z to gene promoters and contributes to p21cip1/waf1 induction in an H2A.Z-depleted setting. In contrast, MYC represses CDKN1A transcription by preferentially recruiting H2A.Z at MYC binding sites in the TATA initiator region of the CDKN1A promoter to protect the malignant cells from senescence [91,92].
These findings indicate a tight and complex crosstalk between different epigenetic mechanisms in regulating p21cip1/waf1 expression in different human cancer cells.

3.3. Erasers and p21cip1/waf1

Besides DNA methylation, histone H3 lysine methylation/demethylation was demonstrated to regulate p21cip1/waf1 expression (Table 2). Lysine-specific demethylase (LSD1/KDM1A) is a key regulator of histone H3K4 and H3K9 mono- and dimethylation [96]. It is commonly overexpressed and correlated with a poor prognosis in different human cancers [97,98,99]. LSD1 regulates p21cip1/waf1 [100] via demethylation of histone and non-histone targets, including p53 and DNMT1 [101], and controls the cell cycle via demethylation of Rb, interaction with long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) (including HOTAIR), and demethylation of AGO2, a key element of the RNA-induced silencing complex [96,102]. In glioma and renal tumor cells, LSD1 knockdown enhanced CDKN1A transcription. This was correlated with increased levels of H3K4me2 at the CDKN1A promotor [100,101] (Table 2). Surprisingly, in prostate cancer, LSD1 knockdown resulted in increased H3K4me2 in the CDKN1A promotor, but repressed CDKN1A transcription. However, LSD1 knockdown increased DNMT1 binding to the promotor; thus, methylation might be responsible for the reduced levels of p21cip1/waf1 [103].
Mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) lead to the generation of 2-hydroxoglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite, instead of the physiologic metabolite α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which is a co-substrate for TET and Jumonji enzymes. 2-HG acts as a competitive inhibitor to these epigenetic modifiers and, thus, increases histone lysine methylation and decreases 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels [107], which can lead to enhanced expression of p21cip1/waf1 [104]. Interestingly, IDH mutations are frequently observed in glioblastoma, intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia, where epigenetic alterations are commonly found, and are already part of established diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms [108,109,110].
It is known that vitamin C can increase the levels of TET enzymes [111,112]. In skin cancer cells, this treatment induced a global DNA demethylation, which was associated with elevated 5hmC levels in the CDKN1A promotor and increased p21cip1/waf1 expression. Knockout of the enzymes TET1/TET2 inhibited p21cip1/waf1 upregulation, suggesting that TET regulates p21cip1/waf1 expression in skin cancer cells treated with vitamin C [113].
In agreement with our previous report [9], recent studies have continued to demonstrate the regulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression by HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) in tumors. In non-small-cell lung carcinoma, treatment with HDACi alone or in combination with the natural flavonolignan silibinin caused increased H3 and H4 acetylation in the Sp1/Sp3 binding site at the CDKN1A promoter, activating CDKN1A transcription [105]. In colorectal cancer cells, individual treatment with different HDACi, such as Trichostatin A, SAHA, and sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPB), strongly increased p21cip1/waf1 mRNA and protein levels. Specifically, the effect of NaPB, an inhibitor of predominantly nuclear HDACs, on p21cip1/waf1 regulation was evaluated. Treatment increased H3K27ac occupancy at the CDKN1A promotor and the enhancer region, demonstrating that p21cip1/waf1 expression is regulated by histone acetylation [114]. In pancreatic cancer cells, SAHA induced increased expression of p21cip1/waf1 levels as well as increased acetylation of histone H3 globally and specifically at the CDKN1A promotor [115]. The same was observed in multiple myeloma cells treated with the novel HDAC inhibitor Scriptaid [106]. Moreover, other studies have reported the modulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression after HDAC inhibition in lymphoma [116], leukemia [117], hepatocellular carcinoma [118], and breast cancer [119]; however, histone marks were not investigated.

4. The Role of lncRNAs and miRNAs in the Deregulation of p21cip1/waf1 in Cancer

Interestingly, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) have been shown to be involved in the regulation of p21cip1/waf1 (Figure 3, Table 3). Overexpression of the long noncoding RNA HOXA cluster antisense RNA2 (HOXA–AS2) is associated with tumor size, TNM stage, and a poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Interestingly, this lncRNA promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation by downregulating mRNA levels of CDKN1A in vitro and in vivo via binding with enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) [102]. The long noncoding RNA plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) is upregulated in pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tissues and has been shown to promote pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), by downregulating p21cip1/waf1 [120]. The HOX Antisense Intergenic RNA (HOTAIR), which is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers, including cervical cancer, is able to silence p21cip1/waf1 and promote cancer radio-resistance in vitro and in vivo [121]. Other long noncoding RNAs that have been shown to silence p21cip1/waf1 during human malignancies include the antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL), which is upregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer tissues. Through silencing p21cip1/waf1 expression, ANRIL promotes cancer cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis. The mechanism of silencing includes binding to EZH2, in addition to a direct binding to the p21cip1/waf1 promotor that mediates H3K27me3 modification [122]. Recently, the lncRNA MIR31HG was found to promote cell cycle progression and proliferation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by targeting p21cip1/waf1 [123]. The BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR) interacts with p21cip1/waf1 and increases its expression to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in colorectal cancer [124].
MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that are 18–25 nucleotides long [125]. They play an important role in gene regulation at the post-transcriptional level by targeting mRNAs and inducing their degradation and/or inhibiting their translation [125,126]. Notably, miRNAs can activate the expression of specific genes by targeting their promotors [127,128]. miRNAs have been strongly implicated in tumorigenesis and their deregulation is correlated with the hallmarks of cancer [129,130,131]. miR-125a and miR-125b have been shown to downregulate p53, thereby resulting in decreased expression of p21 [131,132]. Several other miRNAs have been reported to directly downregulate p21cip1/Waf1 by binding to its 3’-UTR, and these include miR-17, miR-20a, miR-20b, miR-93, miR-106a, and miR-106b (reviewed by Jung et al. [133]). Subsequently, upregulation of these miRNAs promotes cellular proliferation [133]. Conversely, let-7a targets Np95 ICBP90 ring finger (NIRF) and, therefore, upregulates p21 expression; however, the mechanism by which NIRF regulates p21 remains elusive [129]. Recent studies show a complicated role of miRNAs in regulating p21cip1/waf1 in cancer cells (Figure 1, Table 3). Plasma and tissue samples obtained from lung cancer patients showed an overexpression of miR-93-5p and a reduced expression of p21cip1/waf1 and Bcl-w, indicating a potential role of this miRNA in suppressing senescence through p21cip1/waf1 [130]. miR-208a has also been shown to be overexpressed in the serum of lung cancer patients who were subjected to radiation therapy. A further analysis indicated that this miRNA directly targets p21cip1/waf1 and affects the AKT/mTOR pathway to promote cell proliferation and radio-resistance. miR-208a is predicted to bind to a putative binding site at positions 86–92 in the 3’UTR of CDKN1A mRNA. Interestingly, this miRNA is secreted by lung cancer cells in response to radiation. Moreover, it was shown that serum miR-208a can be taken up by these cells via exosomes in a time-dependent manner [134]. A recent in vivo analysis of human cervical cancer tissue showed an upregulation of miR-92a, which is associated with cervical cancer progression. A complementary in vitro analysis revealed that p21cip1/waf1 is a direct target of miR-92a, which promotes cell cycle progression through inhibiting p21cip1/waf1 expression in cervical cancer [135]. miR-17 5p has been reported to be upregulated in multi-drug resistant human gastric cancer cell lines and its upregulation resulted in decreased expression of p21cip1/waf1 and drug resistance [136]. Evidence from a recent study has revealed a role of miR-95-3p in cell growth of osteosarcoma through targeting of p21cip1/waf1. This miRNA has been also reported to be significantly upregulated in the serum of osteosarcoma patients. The downregulation of this miRNA inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis by enhancing the activities of caspase-3 and caspase-9 and increasing the expression of Bax/Bcl-2 proteins in osteosarcoma cells. On the other hand, the overexpression of miR-95-3p promoted cell growth, while inhibiting apoptosis, by modulating TGF-β, cyclin D1, and p21cip1/waf1 expression levels in these cells [137]. Similarly, miR-95-3p upregulation in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line, HCC tissues, and HCC xenograft mouse models was found to promote tumor proliferation and growth by directly targeting p21cip1/waf1. An in vitro analysis showed that the 15-bp region between 1500 bp and 1515 bp from the stop codon TAA at the 3′-UTR of CDKN1A contains the 3’UTR region that is targeted by this miRNA [138]. An in vitro analysis has shown that miR-503-3p induces apoptosis of lung cancer cells by downregulating p21cip1/waf1 and CDK4 expression [139]. miR-224 promotes chemoresistance of in vitro and in vivo models of human lung adenocarcinoma through targeting p21cip1/waf1 and thereby modulating G1/S transition and apoptosis [140].
On the other hand, miR-3619-5p has been shown to activate p21cip1/waf1 expression by targeting a putative site in its promotor. The same study showed that reduced expression of this miRNA and p21cip1/waf1 is associated with cancer progression and poor survival of patients with bladder carcinoma [141]. Another study showed that miR-370, miR-1180, and miR-1236 are downregulated in bladder carcinoma tissues, and their overexpression led to p21cip1/waf1 activation and inhibition of cancer. These miRNAs have been shown to induce the nuclear and not the cytoplasmic expression of p21 by interacting directly with its promotor. As a result, CDK4/6 and cyclin D1, which are downstream gene targets of p21cip1/waf1, were repressed following overexpression of the three miRNAs [142]. miR-6734 upregulates p21cip1/waf1 expression through modifying histones in the CDKN1A promoter and induces cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cells. A detailed mechanistic analysis showed that this miRNA directly interacts with the CDKN1A promotor by binding to a target site located at −360 to −260 relative to the transcriptional start site [143]. Results from a recent study revealed that miR-200c mediates sub-G1 and G2/M phase arrest and, consequently, enhances the radio-resistance of esophageal squamous cancer cells through modulating the expression levels of several cell cycle regulators, including p21cip1/waf1 [144]. The expression level of the lncRNA growth arrest specific transcript 5 (GAS5) has been observed to be downregulated in stomach cancer and resulted in decreased p21cip1/waf1 expression and impaired cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Importantly, the downregulation of GAS5 results in the downregulation of YBX1, a transactivator of p21cip1/waf1 in prostate cancer, thereby decreasing p21cip1/waf1 expression [145].
All in all, these findings show a biological significance for the role of lncRNAs and miRNAs in the deregulation of p21cip1/waf1 in cancer. However, the exact mechanism by which they affect the expression levels of p21cip1/waf1 remains unclear and requires further investigation. Nevertheless, the use of these noncoding RNAs as molecular biomarkers offers potential diagnostic and prognostic value for the better management and treatment of cancer diseases associated with deregulated p21cip1/waf1 expression.
Table
Table 3. miRNAs and lncRNAs involved in the deregulation of p21 in cancer.
Table 3. miRNAs and lncRNAs involved in the deregulation of p21 in cancer.
miRNA/LncRNACancer TypeExpression LevelsBiological FunctionsRef.
HOXA cluster antisense RNA2 (HOXA-AS2)GC+Epigenetically silences p21 transcription and promotes cancer cell growth[102]
Plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1)PDAC+Promotes cancer cell proliferation and migration, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), by downregulating p21[120]
HOX Antisense Intergenic RNA (HOTAIR)Cervix+Promotes radio-resistance by silencing p21 expression[121]
antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL)NSCLC+Promotes cancer cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis by silencing p21 expression[122]
LnCRNA MIR31HGHNSCC+Promotes cell cycle progression and proliferation by targeting p21[123]
BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR)CRC+Interacts with p21 and increases its expression to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis[124]
miR-93-5pLung+ in plasma and tissue samples obtained from lung cancer patientsSuppression of senescence through reducing the expression of p21[130]
miR-208aLung+ in serum of lung cancer patients who were subjected to radiation therapyReduces the expression of p21 to promote cell proliferation and radio-resistance [134]
miR-92aCervix+ in human cervical tissues and Hela cellsPromotes cell cycle progression and cell proliferation via inhibiting p21 expression[135]
miR-17-5pMulti-drug resistant human GC+Promotes drug resistance partially through downregulating p21[136]
miR-95-3pOS, HCC + in the serum of OS patients and in an HCC cell linePromotes cell proliferation and growth by targeting p21[137,138]
miR-503-3pLung cancer+Induces apoptosis of lung cancer cells by downregulating p21 and CDK4 expression[139]
miR-224Human lung adenocarcinoma + in cisplatin (DDP; cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II)-resistant A549 cellsPromotes chemo-resistance through targeting p21 and modulating G1/S transition and apoptosis[140]
miR-3619-5pBC−Activates p21 expression by targeting its putative promotor. Reduced expression of this miRNA and p21 is associated with cancer progression and poor survival of patients with BC[141]
miR-370, miR-1180, and miR-1236BC– in BC tissuesActivates p21 and inhibits cancer[142]
miR-6734CC−Modifies histones in the p21 promoter and induces cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cells[143]
miR-200cESCC−Mediates sub-G1 and G2/M phase arrest and, consequently, enhances radio-resistance of esophageal squamous cancer cells through modulating the expression levels of several cell cycle regulators, including p21[144]
lncRNA growth arrest specific transcript 5 (GAS5)GC−Increases p21 expression and enhances cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase[145]
Note: Upregulation—(+); Downregulation—(–); GC—Gastric cancer; PDAC—pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma; NSCLC—non-small-cell lung cancer; HNSCC—head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; CRC—colorectal cancer; OS—osteosarcoma; HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma; BC—bladder cancer; CC—colon cancer; ESCC—esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

5. Conclusions

In addition to the accumulation of multiple genetic alterations during the progression of cancer, it is now widely established that global epigenetic changes also drive carcinogenesis as sequential events. Aberrant epigenetic modifications lead to the expression or silencing of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, respectively. The universal cyclin-dependent kinase CDK inhibitor p21, which does not act as a transcription factor per se, is deregulated in many types of cancer. By showing dual antagonism, it is involved in many hallmarks of cancer. The expression of p21 is largely mediated by epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone H3 methylation, and histone deacetylation. Importantly, the deregulation of miRNAs and lncRNAs contributes to p21 repression or activation, resulting in enhanced proliferation or growth arrest, drug response or resistance, and apoptosis or survival, respectively. Given that epigenetic modifications are reversible, it is conceivable that the epigenetic machinery, including noncoding RNAs, might be an important regulatory mechanism for p21 in different stages of cancer or during various therapies. The use of epigenetic drugs, in combination with conventional therapy, may lead to a novel approach for chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-resistant cancers, and alterations in p21 should not be underestimated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O. and R.S.-S.; methodology, H.G.-M., S.A.B., and A.C.M.; formal analysis, A.C.M. and R.S.-S.; data curation, H.G.-M., S.A.B. and A.C.M; writing—original draft preparation, M.O., R.S.-S. and H.G.-M.; writing—review and editing, M.O., R.S.-S. and H.G.-M.; visualization, A.C.M. and R.S.-S.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

R.S.S. was supported by the Emerging Fields Initiative “Cell Cycle in Disease and Regeneration” (CYDER) of Friedrich Alexander University (Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany). This article is partly based upon work from COST Action CA17118, which was supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Waddington, C.H. The epigenotype. 1942. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 41, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nebbioso, A.; Tambaro, F.P.; Dell’Aversana, C.; Altucci, L. Cancer epigenetics: Moving forward. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Flavahan, W.A.; Gaskell, E.; Bernstein, B.E. Epigenetic plasticity and the hallmarks of cancer. Science 2017, 357, eaal2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dawson, M.A.; Kouzarides, T. Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell 2012, 150, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Biswas, S.; Rao, C.M. Epigenetic tools (The Writers, The Readers and The Erasers) and their implications in cancer therapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 837, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saliminejad, K.; Khorram Khorshid, H.R.; Soleymani Fard, S.; Ghaffari, S.H. An overview of microRNAs: Biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 5451–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karimian, A.; Ahmadi, Y.; Yousefi, B. Multiple functions of p21 in cell cycle, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation after DNA damage. DNA Repair 2016, 42, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ocker, M.; Schneider-Stock, R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Signalling towards p21cip1/waf1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 1367–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lyko, F. The DNA methyltransferase family: A versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baylin, S.B.; Jones, P.A. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome—Biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Okano, M.; Bell, D.W.; Haber, D.A.; Li, E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999, 99, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gujar, H.; Weisenberger, D.J.; Liang, G. The Roles of Human DNA Methyltransferases and Their Isoforms in Shaping the Epigenome. Genes 2019, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liao, H.F.; Tai, K.Y.; Chen, W.S.; Cheng, L.C.; Ho, H.N.; Lin, S.P. Functions of DNA methyltransferase 3-like in germ cells and beyond. Biol. Cell 2012, 104, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kaiser, S.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Kellner, S.; Schneider, D.; Jeltsch, A.; Helm, M. The RNA methyltransferase Dnmt2 methylates DNA in the structural context of a tRNA. RNA Biol. 2017, 14, 1241–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jiemjit, A.; Fandy, T.E.; Carraway, H.; Bailey, K.A.; Baylin, S.; Herman, J.G.; Gore, S.D. p21(WAF1/CIP1) induction by 5-azacytosine nucleosides requires DNA damage. Oncogene 2008, 27, 3615–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, B.; Carey, M.; Workman, J.L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 2007, 128, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Subbaiah, V.K.; Zhang, Y.; Rajagopalan, D.; Abdullah, L.N.; Yeo-Teh, N.S.; Tomaic, V.; Banks, L.; Myers, M.P.; Chow, E.K.; Jha, S. E3 ligase EDD1/UBR5 is utilized by the HPV E6 oncogene to destabilize tumor suppressor TIP60. Oncogene 2016, 35, 2062–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mattera, L.; Escaffit, F.; Pillaire, M.J.; Selves, J.; Tyteca, S.; Hoffmann, J.S.; Gourraud, P.A.; Chevillard-Briet, M.; Cazaux, C.; Trouche, D. The p400/Tip60 ratio is critical for colorectal cancer cell proliferation through DNA damage response pathways. Oncogene 2009, 28, 1506–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lu, Q.; Kamps, M.P. Heterodimerization of Hox proteins with Pbx1 and oncoprotein E2a-Pbx1 generates unique DNA-binding specifities at nucleotides predicted to contact the N-terminal arm of the Hox homeodomain—Demonstration of Hox-dependent targeting of E2a-Pbx1 in vivo. Oncogene 1997, 14, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, W.; Ernst, P. Distinct functions of histone H3, lysine 4 methyltransferases in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2017, 24, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vedadi, M.; Blazer, L.; Eram, M.S.; Barsyte-Lovejoy, D.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; Hajian, T. Targeting human SET1/MLL family of proteins. Protein Sci. 2017, 26, 662–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ng, H.H.; Robert, F.; Young, R.A.; Struhl, K. Targeted recruitment of Set1 histone methylase by elongating Pol II provides a localized mark and memory of recent transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hyun, K.; Jeon, J.; Park, K.; Kim, J. Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017, 49, e324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barski, A.; Cuddapah, S.; Cui, K.; Roh, T.Y.; Schones, D.E.; Wang, Z.; Wei, G.; Chepelev, I.; Zhao, K. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 2007, 129, 823–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, J.; Dai, X.; Laurent, B.; Zheng, N.; Gan, W.; Zhang, J.; Guo, A.; Yuan, M.; Liu, P.; Asara, J.M.; et al. AKT methylation by SETDB1 promotes AKT kinase activity and oncogenic functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Laugesen, A.; Hojfeldt, J.W.; Helin, K. Molecular Mechanisms Directing PRC2 Recruitment and H3K27 Methylation. Mol. Cell 2019, 74, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hansen, K.H.; Bracken, A.P.; Pasini, D.; Dietrich, N.; Gehani, S.S.; Monrad, A.; Rappsilber, J.; Lerdrup, M.; Helin, K. A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 1291–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, B.; Konze, K.D.; Jin, J.; Wang, G.G. Targeting EZH2 and PRC2 dependence as novel anticancer therapy. Exp. Hematol. 2015, 43, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Emran, A.A.; Chatterjee, A.; Rodger, E.J.; Tiffen, J.C.; Gallagher, S.J.; Eccles, M.R.; Hersey, P. Targeting DNA Methylation and EZH2 Activity to Overcome Melanoma Resistance to Immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bannister, A.J.; Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, F.; Mao, G.; Tong, D.; Huang, J.; Gu, L.; Yang, W.; Li, G.M. The histone mark H3K36me3 regulates human DNA mismatch repair through its interaction with MutSalpha. Cell 2013, 153, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lorsbach, R.B.; Moore, J.; Mathew, S.; Raimondi, S.C.; Mukatira, S.T.; Downing, J.R. TET1, a member of a novel protein family, is fused to MLL in acute myeloid leukemia containing the t(10;11)(q22;q23). Leukemia 2003, 17, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Tahiliani, M.; Koh, K.P.; Shen, Y.; Pastor, W.A.; Bandukwala, H.; Brudno, Y.; Agarwal, S.; Iyer, L.M.; Liu, D.R.; Aravind, L.; et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 2009, 324, 930–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. He, Y.F.; Li, B.Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Q.; Ding, J.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011, 333, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ito, S.; Shen, L.; Dai, Q.; Wu, S.C.; Collins, L.B.; Swenberg, J.A.; He, C.; Zhang, Y. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011, 333, 1300–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Shen, L.; Zhang, Y. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: Generation, fate, and genomic distribution. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, H.; Zhang, Y. Mechanisms and functions of Tet protein-mediated 5-methylcytosine oxidation. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 2436–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Abdel-Wahab, O.; Mullally, A.; Hedvat, C.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Patel, J.; Wadleigh, M.; Malinge, S.; Yao, J.; Kilpivaara, O.; Bhat, R.; et al. Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies. Blood 2009, 114, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, W.; Xu, L. Epigenetic Function of TET Family, 5-Methylcytosine, and 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in Hematologic Malignancies. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2019, 42, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Misawa, K.; Imai, A.; Mochizuki, D.; Mima, M.; Endo, S.; Misawa, Y.; Kanazawa, T.; Mineta, H. Association of TET3 epigenetic inactivation with head and neck cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 24480–24493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Bronowicka-Klys, D.E.; Roszak, A.; Pawlik, P.; Sajdak, S.; Sowinska, A.; Jagodzinski, P.P. Transcript levels of ten-eleven translocation type 1-3 in cervical cancer and non-cancerous cervical tissues. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 3921–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Seshagiri, S.; Stawiski, E.W.; Durinck, S.; Modrusan, Z.; Storm, E.E.; Conboy, C.B.; Chaudhuri, S.; Guan, Y.; Janakiraman, V.; Jaiswal, B.S.; et al. Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer. Nature 2012, 488, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Black, J.C.; Van Rechem, C.; Whetstine, J.R. Histone lysine methylation dynamics: Establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nicholson, T.B.; Veland, N.; Chen, T. Writers, Readers, and Erasers of Epigenetic Marks. In Epigenetic Cancer Therapy; Gray, S.G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 31–66. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, Y.; Wysocka, J.; Sayegh, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Perlin, J.R.; Leonelli, L.; Sonbuchner, L.S.; McDonald, C.H.; Cook, R.G.; Dou, Y.; et al. Human PAD4 regulates histone arginine methylation levels via demethylimination. Science 2004, 306, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kwok, J.; O’Shea, M.; Hume, D.A.; Lengeling, A. Jmjd6, a JmjC Dioxygenase with Many Interaction Partners and Pleiotropic Functions. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, X.J.; Gregoire, S. Class II histone deacetylases: From sequence to function, regulation, and clinical implication. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 2873–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ocker, M. Deacetylase inhibitors—Focus on non-histone targets and effects. World J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 1, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bantscheff, M.; Hopf, C.; Savitski, M.M.; Dittmann, A.; Grandi, P.; Michon, A.M.; Schlegl, J.; Abraham, Y.; Becher, I.; Bergamini, G.; et al. Chemoproteomics profiling of HDAC inhibitors reveals selective targeting of HDAC complexes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hayakawa, T.; Nakayama, J. Physiological roles of class I HDAC complex and histone demethylase. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 129383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nemati, M.; Ajami, N.; Estiar, M.A.; Rezapour, S.; Gavgani, R.R.; Hashemzadeh, S.; Kafil, H.S.; Sakhinia, E. Deregulated expression of HDAC3 in colorectal cancer and its clinical significance. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 27, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yano, M.; Yasuda, M.; Sakaki, M.; Nagata, K.; Fujino, T.; Arai, E.; Hasebe, T.; Miyazawa, M.; Ogane, N.; Hasegawa, K.; et al. Association of histone deacetylase expression with histology and prognosis of ovarian cancer. Oncol. Lett 2018, 15, 3524–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Seo, J.; Min, S.K.; Park, H.R.; Kim, D.H.; Kwon, M.J.; Kim, L.S.; Ju, Y.S. Expression of Histone Deacetylases HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC6 in Invasive Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast. J. Breast Cancer 2014, 17, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Quint, K.; Agaimy, A.; Di Fazio, P.; Montalbano, R.; Steindorf, C.; Jung, R.; Hellerbrand, C.; Hartmann, A.; Sitter, H.; Neureiter, D.; et al. Clinical significance of histone deacetylases 1, 2, 3, and 7: HDAC2 is an independent predictor of survival in HCC. Virchows Arch. 2011, 459, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tallant, C.; Valentini, E.; Fedorov, O.; Overvoorde, L.; Ferguson, F.M.; Filippakopoulos, P.; Svergun, D.I.; Knapp, S.; Ciulli, A. Molecular basis of histone tail recognition by human TIP5 PHD finger and bromodomain of the chromatin remodeling complex NoRC. Structure 2015, 23, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Guo, X.; Rong, N.; Song, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lan, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Cao, C. The PHD1 finger of KDM5B recognizes unmodified H3K4 during the demethylation of histone H3K4me2/3 by KDM5B. Protein Cell 2014, 5, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Couture, J.F.; Collazo, E.; Trievel, R.C. Molecular recognition of histone H3 by the WD40 protein WDR5. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, Y.; Jurkowska, R.; Soeroes, S.; Rajavelu, A.; Dhayalan, A.; Bock, I.; Rathert, P.; Brandt, O.; Reinhardt, R.; Fischle, W.; et al. Chromatin methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3a/3L is guided by interaction of the ADD domain with the histone H3 tail. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4246–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Moore, L.D.; Le, T.; Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Berkyurek, A.C.; Suetake, I.; Arita, K.; Takeshita, K.; Nakagawa, A.; Shirakawa, M.; Tajima, S. The DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 directly interacts with the SET and RING finger-associated (SRA) domain of the multifunctional protein Uhrf1 to facilitate accession of the catalytic center to hemi-methylated DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Iurlaro, M.; Ficz, G.; Oxley, D.; Raiber, E.A.; Bachman, M.; Booth, M.J.; Andrews, S.; Balasubramanian, S.; Reik, W. A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Spruijt, C.G.; Gnerlich, F.; Smits, A.H.; Pfaffeneder, T.; Jansen, P.W.; Bauer, C.; Munzel, M.; Wagner, M.; Muller, M.; Khan, F.; et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 2013, 152, 1146–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Musselman, C.A.; Lalonde, M.E.; Cote, J.; Kutateladze, T.G. Perceiving the epigenetic landscape through histone readers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Taverna, S.D.; Li, H.; Ruthenburg, A.J.; Allis, C.D.; Patel, D.J. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: Lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 1025–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ooi, S.K.; Qiu, C.; Bernstein, E.; Li, K.; Jia, D.; Yang, Z.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Lin, S.P.; Allis, C.D.; et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 2007, 448, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Otani, J.; Nankumo, T.; Arita, K.; Inamoto, S.; Ariyoshi, M.; Shirakawa, M. Structural basis for recognition of H3K4 methylation status by the DNA methyltransferase 3A ATRX-DNMT3-DNMT3L domain. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rajakumara, E.; Wang, Z.; Ma, H.; Hu, L.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Guo, R.; Wu, F.; Li, H.; Lan, F.; et al. PHD finger recognition of unmodified histone H3R2 links UHRF1 to regulation of euchromatic gene expression. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dialynas, G.K.; Vitalini, M.W.; Wallrath, L.L. Linking Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) to cancer progression. Mutat. Res. 2008, 647, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Coles, A.H.; Jones, S.N. The ING gene family in the regulation of cell growth and tumorigenesis. J. Cell Physiol. 2009, 218, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yun, M.; Wu, J.; Workman, J.L.; Li, B. Readers of histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Jain, A.K.; Barton, M.C. Bromodomain Histone Readers and Cancer. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Filippakopoulos, P.; Knapp, S. Targeting bromodomains: Epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 337–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. French, C.A. NUT Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic features, pathogenesis, and treatment. Pathol. Int. 2018, 68, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Postel-Vinay, S.; Herbschleb, K.; Massard, C.; Woodcock, V.; Soria, J.C.; Walter, A.O.; Ewerton, F.; Poelman, M.; Benson, N.; Ocker, M.; et al. First-in-human phase I study of the bromodomain and extraterminal motif inhibitor BAY 1238097: Emerging pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship and early termination due to unexpected toxicity. Eur. J. Cancer 2019, 109, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jung, M.; Gelato, K.A.; Fernandez-Montalvan, A.; Siegel, S.; Haendler, B. Targeting BET bromodomains for cancer treatment. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Delmore, J.E.; Issa, G.C.; Lemieux, M.E.; Rahl, P.B.; Shi, J.; Jacobs, H.M.; Kastritis, E.; Gilpatrick, T.; Paranal, R.M.; Qi, J.; et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 2011, 146, 904–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Attar, N.; Kurdistani, S.K. Exploitation of EP300 and CREBBP Lysine Acetyltransferases by Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017, 7, a026534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fang, J.Y.; Lu, Y.Y. Effects of histone acetylation and DNA methylation on p21( WAF1) regulation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 8, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chatterjee, B.; Ghosh, K.; Kanade, S.R. Curcumin-mediated demethylation of the proximal promoter CpG island enhances the KLF4 recruitment that leads to increased expression of p21Cip1 in vitro. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, W.G.; Srinivasan, K.; Dai, Z.; Duan, W.; Druhan, L.J.; Ding, H.; Yee, L.; Villalona-Calero, M.A.; Plass, C.; Otterson, G.A. Methylation of adjacent CpG sites affects Sp1/Sp3 binding and activity in the p21(Cip1) promoter. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 4056–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Koutsodontis, G.; Moustakas, A.; Kardassis, D. The role of Sp1 family members, the proximal GC-rich motifs, and the upstream enhancer region in the regulation of the human cell cycle inhibitor p21WAF-1/Cip1 gene promoter. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 12771–12784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dong, W.; Li, J.; Liu, Q.; Liu, C.; Li, C.; Song, G.; Zhu, H.; Gao, H.; Zhang, Y. P21(Waf1/Cip1) and p27(Kip1) are correlated with the development and invasion of prolactinoma. J. Neurooncol. 2018, 136, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Askari, M.; Sobti, R.C.; Nikbakht, M.; Sharma, S.C. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of p21 (WAF1/CIP1) gene and its impact on expression and role of polymorphism in the risk of breast cancer. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2013, 382, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Roman-Gomez, J.; Castillejo, J.A.; Jimenez, A.; Gonzalez, M.G.; Moreno, F.; Rodriguez Mdel, C.; Barrios, M.; Maldonado, J.; Torres, A. 5′ CpG island hypermethylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the p21(CIP1/WAF1/SDI1) gene and confers poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2002, 99, 2291–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pinyol, M.; Hernandez, L.; Cazorla, M.; Balbin, M.; Jares, P.; Fernandez, P.L.; Montserrat, E.; Cardesa, A.; Lopez-Otin, C.; Campo, E. Deletions and loss of expression of p16INK4a and p21Waf1 genes are associated with aggressive variants of mantle cell lymphomas. Blood 1997, 89, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Pan, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhou, F.; Su, B.; Li, Y. DNA methylation profiles in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hayashi, A.; Suenaga, N.; Shiomi, Y.; Nishitani, H. PCNA-dependent ubiquitination of Cdt1 and p21 in mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1170, 367–382. [Google Scholar]
  90. Bloom, J.; Amador, V.; Bartolini, F.; DeMartino, G.; Pagano, M. Proteasome-mediated degradation of p21 via N-terminal ubiquitinylation. Cell 2003, 115, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sesselmann, S.; Soder, S.; Voigt, R.; Haag, J.; Grogan, S.P.; Aigner, T. DNA methylation is not responsible for p21WAF1/CIP1 down-regulation in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2009, 17, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Love, I.M.; Sekaric, P.; Shi, D.; Grossman, S.R.; Androphy, E.J. The histone acetyltransferase PCAF regulates p21 transcription through stress-induced acetylation of histone H3. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 2458–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Davies, C.; Hogarth, L.A.; Dietrich, P.A.; Bachmann, P.S.; Mackenzie, K.L.; Hall, A.G.; Lock, R.B. p53-independent epigenetic repression of the p21(WAF1) gene in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 37639–37650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lee, M.S.; Seo, J.; Choi, D.Y.; Lee, E.W.; Ko, A.; Ha, N.C.; Yoon, J.B.; Lee, H.W.; Kim, K.P.; Song, J. Stabilization of p21 (Cip1/WAF1) following Tip60-dependent acetylation is required for p21-mediated DNA damage response. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Liu, L.; Xu, F.; Chang, C.K.; He, Q.; Wu, L.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X. MYCN contributes to the malignant characteristics of erythroleukemia through EZH2-mediated epigenetic repression of p21. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zang, C.; Nie, F.Q.; Wang, Q.; Sun, M.; Li, W.; He, J.; Zhang, M.; Lu, K.H. Long non-coding RNA LINC01133 represses KLF2, P21 and E-cadherin transcription through binding with EZH2, LSD1 in non small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 11696–11707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Kim, W.; Kim, R.; Park, G.; Park, J.W.; Kim, J.E. Deficiency of H3K79 histone methyltransferase Dot1-like protein (DOT1L) inhibits cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 5588–5599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Almeida-Rios, D.; Graca, I.; Vieira, F.Q.; Ramalho-Carvalho, J.; Pereira-Silva, E.; Martins, A.T.; Oliveira, J.; Goncalves, C.S.; Costa, B.M.; Henrique, R.; et al. Histone methyltransferase PRMT6 plays an oncogenic role of in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 53018–53028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Nie, M.; Deng, Y.; Yao, B.; Gui, T.; Li, X.; Ma, L.; Guo, C.; et al. Suv4-20h1 promotes G1 to S phase transition by downregulating p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression in chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 6123–6130. [Google Scholar]
  100. Bellucci, L.; Dalvai, M.; Kocanova, S.; Moutahir, F.; Bystricky, K. Activation of p21 by HDAC inhibitors requires acetylation of H2A.Z. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gevry, N.; Chan, H.M.; Laflamme, L.; Livingston, D.M.; Gaudreau, L. p21 transcription is regulated by differential localization of histone H2A.Z. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1869–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tajima, K.; Matsuda, S.; Yae, T.; Drapkin, B.J.; Morris, R.; Boukhali, M.; Niederhoffer, K.; Comaills, V.; Dubash, T.; Nieman, L.; et al. SETD1A protects from senescence through regulation of the mitotic gene expression program. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dhayalan, A.; Rajavelu, A.; Rathert, P.; Tamas, R.; Jurkowska, R.Z.; Ragozin, S.; Jeltsch, A. The Dnmt3a PWWP domain reads histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation and guides DNA methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 26114–26120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Xie, P.; Tian, C.; An, L.; Nie, J.; Lu, K.; Xing, G.; Zhang, L.; He, F. Histone methyltransferase protein SETD2 interacts with p53 and selectively regulates its downstream genes. Cell Signal. 2008, 20, 1671–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Majello, B.; Gorini, F.; Sacca, C.D.; Amente, S. Expanding the Role of the Histone Lysine-Specific Demethylase LSD1 in Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Schulte, J.H.; Lim, S.; Schramm, A.; Friedrichs, N.; Koster, J.; Versteeg, R.; Ora, I.; Pajtler, K.; Klein-Hitpass, L.; Kuhfittig-Kulle, S.; et al. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 is strongly expressed in poorly differentiated neuroblastoma: Implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Amente, S.; Bertoni, A.; Morano, A.; Lania, L.; Avvedimento, E.V.; Majello, B. LSD1-mediated demethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 triggers Myc-induced transcription. Oncogene 2010, 29, 3691–3702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Metzger, E.; Wissmann, M.; Yin, N.; Muller, J.M.; Schneider, R.; Peters, A.H.; Gunther, T.; Buettner, R.; Schule, R. LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature 2005, 437, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Kong, W.; Huang, J.; Dong, B.; Huang, Y.; Xue, W.; Zhang, J. LSD1 inhibition suppresses the growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via upregulating P21 signaling. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nicholson, T.B.; Chen, T. LSD1 demethylates histone and non-histone proteins. Epigenetics 2009, 4, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Xie, M.; Sun, M.; Zhu, Y.N.; Xia, R.; Liu, Y.W.; Ding, J.; Ma, H.W.; He, X.Z.; Zhang, Z.H.; Liu, Z.J.; et al. Long noncoding RNA HOXA-AS2 promotes gastric cancer proliferation by epigenetically silencing P21/PLK3/DDIT3 expression. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 33587–33601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Battaglia, S.; Karasik, E.; Gillard, B.; Williams, J.; Winchester, T.; Moser, M.T.; Smiraglia, D.J.; Foster, B.A. LSD1 dual function in mediating epigenetic corruption of the vitamin D signaling in prostate cancer. Clin. Epigenet. 2017, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Miyata, S.; Urabe, M.; Gomi, A.; Nagai, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Tsukahara, T.; Mizukami, H.; Kume, A.; Ozawa, K.; Watanabe, E. An R132H mutation in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 enhances p21 expression and inhibits phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein in glioma cells. Neurol. Med. Chir. 2013, 53, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mateen, S.; Raina, K.; Jain, A.K.; Agarwal, C.; Chan, D.; Agarwal, R. Epigenetic modifications and p21-cyclin B1 nexus in anticancer effect of histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with silibinin on non-small cell lung cancer cells. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Yao, R.; Han, D.; Sun, X.; Xie, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fu, C.; Yao, Y.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; Xu, K. Scriptaid inhibits cell survival, cell cycle, and promotes apoptosis in multiple myeloma via epigenetic regulation of p21. Exp. Hematol. 2018, 60, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xu, W.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Kim, S.H.; Ito, S.; Yang, C.; Xiao, M.T.; Liu, L.X.; et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Goldman, S.L.; Hassan, C.; Khunte, M.; Soldatenko, A.; Jong, Y.; Afshinnekoo, E.; Mason, C.E. Epigenetic Modifications in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Prognosis, Treatment, and Heterogeneity. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Dong, Z.; Cui, H. Epigenetic modulation of metabolism in glioblastoma. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. O’Rourke, C.J.; Munoz-Garrido, P.; Aguayo, E.L.; Andersen, J.B. Epigenome dysregulation in cholangiocarcinoma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis. Dis. 2018, 1864, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Blaschke, K.; Ebata, K.T.; Karimi, M.M.; Zepeda-Martinez, J.A.; Goyal, P.; Mahapatra, S.; Tam, A.; Laird, D.J.; Hirst, M.; Rao, A.; et al. Vitamin C induces Tet-dependent DNA demethylation and a blastocyst-like state in ES cells. Nature 2013, 500, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shenoy, N.; Bhagat, T.; Nieves, E.; Stenson, M.; Lawson, J.; Choudhary, G.S.; Habermann, T.; Nowakowski, G.; Singh, R.; Wu, X.; et al. Upregulation of TET activity with ascorbic acid induces epigenetic modulation of lymphoma cells. Blood Cancer J. 2017, 7, e587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lin, J.R.; Qin, H.H.; Wu, W.Y.; He, S.J.; Xu, J.H. Vitamin C protects against UV irradiation-induced apoptosis through reactivating silenced tumor suppressor genes p21 and p16 in a Tet-dependent DNA demethylation manner in human skin cancer cells. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2014, 29, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Halaburkova, A.; Jendzelovsky, R.; Koval, J.; Herceg, Z.; Fedorocko, P.; Ghantous, A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors potentiate photodynamic therapy in colon cancer cells marked by chromatin-mediated epigenetic regulation of CDKN1A. Clin. Epigenet. 2017, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Kumagai, T.; Wakimoto, N.; Yin, D.; Gery, S.; Kawamata, N.; Takai, N.; Komatsu, N.; Chumakov, A.; Imai, Y.; Koeffler, H.P. Histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (Vorinostat, SAHA) profoundly inhibits the growth of human pancreatic cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 121, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhou, J.; Zhang, C.; Sui, X.; Cao, S.; Tang, F.; Sun, S.; Wang, S.; Chen, B. Histone deacetylase inhibitor chidamide induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in NK/T lymphoma cells through ATM-Chk2-p53-p21 signalling pathway. Invest. New Drugs 2018, 36, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kwa, F.A.A.; Cole-Sinclair, M.F.; Kapuscinski, M.K. Combination Treatment of p53-Null HL-60 cells with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors and Chlorambucil Augments Apoptosis and Increases BCL6 and p21 Gene Expression. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2019, 12, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. He, B.; Dai, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Wu, J.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, S. The HDAC Inhibitor Quisinostat (JNJ-26481585) Supresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma alone and Synergistically in Combination with Sorafenib by G0/G1 phase arrest and Apoptosis induction. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1845–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Natarajan, U.; Venkatesan, T.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Samuel, S.; Rathinavelu, A. Differential Mechanisms of Cell Death Induced by HDAC Inhibitor SAHA and MDM2 Inhibitor RG7388 in MCF-7 Cells. Cells 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wu, B.Q.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, F.; Sun, D.L.; He, X.Z. Long Noncoding RNA PVT1 Promotes EMT and Cell Proliferation and Migration Through Downregulating p21 in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2017, 1533034617700559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jing, L.; Yuan, W.; Ruofan, D.; Jinjin, Y.; Haifeng, Q. HOTAIR enhanced aggressive biological behaviors and induced radio-resistance via inhibiting p21 in cervical cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 3611–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nie, F.Q.; Sun, M.; Yang, J.S.; Xie, M.; Xu, T.P.; Xia, R.; Liu, Y.W.; Liu, X.H.; Zhang, E.B.; Lu, K.H.; et al. Long noncoding RNA ANRIL promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis by silencing KLF2 and P21 expression. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, R.; Ma, Z.; Feng, L.; Yang, Y.; Tan, C.; Shi, Q.; Lian, M.; He, S.; Ma, H.; Fang, J. LncRNA MIR31HG targets HIF1A and P21 to facilitate head and neck cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by promoting cell-cycle progression. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Shi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Jie, D.; Yun, T.; Li, W.; Yan, L.; Wang, K.; Feng, J. Downregulated Long Noncoding RNA BANCR Promotes the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells via Downregualtion of p21 Expression. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Carthew, R.W. Gene regulation by microRNAs. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Guo, H.; Ingolia, N.T.; Weissman, J.S.; Bartel, D.P. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 2010, 466, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Place, R.F.; Li, L.C.; Pookot, D.; Noonan, E.J.; Dahiya, R. MicroRNA-373 induces expression of genes with complementary promoter sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Huang, V.; Place, R.F.; Portnoy, V.; Wang, J.; Qi, Z.; Jia, Z.; Yu, A.; Shuman, M.; Yu, J.; Li, L.C. Upregulation of Cyclin B1 by miRNA and its implications in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1695–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wang, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, N.; You, Y. Regulation of let-7 and its target oncogenes (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2012, 3, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Choi, J.Y.; Shin, H.J.; Bae, I.H. miR-93-5p suppresses cellular senescence by directly targeting Bcl-w and p21. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 505, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Zhang, Y.; Gao, J.S.; Tang, X.; Tucker, L.D.; Quesenberry, P.; Rigoutsos, I.; Ramratnam, B. MicroRNA 125a and its regulation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3725–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Le, M.T.; Teh, C.; Shyh-Chang, N.; Xie, H.; Zhou, B.; Korzh, V.; Lodish, H.F.; Lim, B. MicroRNA-125b is a novel negative regulator of p53. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 862–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Jung, Y.S.; Qian, Y.; Chen, X. Examination of the expanding pathways for the regulation of p21 expression and activity. Cell Signal. 2010, 22, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Tang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Li, Z.; Jiao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, W.; Zhou, X.; et al. Radiation-induced miR-208a increases the proliferation and radioresistance by targeting p21 in human lung cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Su, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y.; Deng, G.; Chen, R. MicroRNA-92a Promotes Cell Proliferation in Cervical Cancer via Inhibiting p21 Expression and Promoting Cell Cycle Progression. Oncol. Res. 2017, 25, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Wang, Z.; Ji, F. Downregulation of microRNA-17-5p inhibits drug resistance of gastric cancer cells partially through targeting p21. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 4585–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 11 01343 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of average CDKN1A gene expression in a tumor sample (Tu) and matched normal samples (NT) in a panel of different tumor types. Data were taken from the MethHC database (http://methhc.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) for p21cip1/waf1 (NM-000389). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005.
Figure 1. Comparison of average CDKN1A gene expression in a tumor sample (Tu) and matched normal samples (NT) in a panel of different tumor types. Data were taken from the MethHC database (http://methhc.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) for p21cip1/waf1 (NM-000389). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005.
Cancers 11 01343 g001
Cancers 11 01343 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of promoter DNA methylation level and mRNA expression in tumor samples in a panel of different tumor types. ß values for methylation are between 0 and 1: 0—unmethylated and 1—fully methylated. Data were taken from the MethHC database (http://methhc.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) for p21cip1/waf1(Nm-000389). r, correlation coefficient.
Figure 2. Comparison of promoter DNA methylation level and mRNA expression in tumor samples in a panel of different tumor types. ß values for methylation are between 0 and 1: 0—unmethylated and 1—fully methylated. Data were taken from the MethHC database (http://methhc.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) for p21cip1/waf1(Nm-000389). r, correlation coefficient.
Cancers 11 01343 g002
Cancers 11 01343 g003 550
Figure 3. Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression by noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). (left figure)—Mechanistic p21cip1/waf1 repression. Several microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were shown to inhibit CDKN1A transcription by directly interacting with its promotor. The expression of these ncRNAs in tumor cells led to p21cip1/waf1 repression. (right figure)—Mechanistic p21cip1/waf1 activation. On the other hand, some miRNAs were shown to enhance CDKN1A transcription by remodeling histones or targeting putative sites in its promotor. The expression of these miRNAs in cancer cells led to increased levels of p21cip1/waf1. Moreover, the BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR) interacts with p21cip1/waf1 to increase its expression.
Figure 3. Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 expression by noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). (left figure)—Mechanistic p21cip1/waf1 repression. Several microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were shown to inhibit CDKN1A transcription by directly interacting with its promotor. The expression of these ncRNAs in tumor cells led to p21cip1/waf1 repression. (right figure)—Mechanistic p21cip1/waf1 activation. On the other hand, some miRNAs were shown to enhance CDKN1A transcription by remodeling histones or targeting putative sites in its promotor. The expression of these miRNAs in cancer cells led to increased levels of p21cip1/waf1. Moreover, the BRAF-activated noncoding RNA (BANCR) interacts with p21cip1/waf1 to increase its expression.
Cancers 11 01343 g003
Table
Table 1. Overview of p21cip1/waf1 regulation by epigenetic writers.
Table 1. Overview of p21cip1/waf1 regulation by epigenetic writers.
WritersEpigenetic MarkExperimental Conditionsp21cip1/waf1 RegulationRef.
DNMTs5mCLung cancer cells5mC affects Sp1 and Sp3 binding activity[82]
TIP60H2/H4acDecreased in colon and breast cancerAcetylates the damage sensor ATM or the gate keeper p53 [17,18]
PCAFH3K9/H3K14Osteosarcoma and NSCLC cellsExpression ↓[83]
G9a-GLPH3K9meCervical cancer and acute promyelocytic leukemia cellsRecruited by Gfi1, transcription ↓ [84]
CTIP2H3K9me3Microglial cellsInduces transcriptional repression of p21[85]
EZH2H3K27me3Erythroleukemia and NSCLC cellsInduces transcriptional repression of p21[86,87]
DOT1LH3K79NSCLCDOT1L inhibition reduces H3K79me and increases p21 expression[88]
PRMT6H3R2me2Prostate cancerPRMT6 silencing leads to increased p21 expression[89]
Suv4-20h1H4K20meMyeloid leukemia cellsInduces transcriptional repression of p21[90]
H2A.ZOsteosarcoma cellsReduces binding of TIP60 to p21 promotor and activates p21 transcription[91,92]
DNMTs—DNA methyltransferases; EZH2—enhancer of zeste homolog 2; G9a-GLP—G9a and G9a-like protein; CTIP2—chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor-interacting protein 2; DOT1L—disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like; PRMT6—protein arginine-N-methyltransferase; Suv4-20h1—suppressor of variegation 4-20 homolog 1; H2—histone H2; H4ac—histone H4 acetylation; H3K9/H3K14—histone H3 lysine 9/histone H3 lysine 14; H3K9me—histone H3 lysine 9 methylation; H3K9me3—histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation; H3K79—histone H3 lysine 79; H3R2me2—histone H3 arginine 2 dimethylation; H4K20me—histone H4 lysine 20 methylation; H2A.Z—histone H2 A variant Z; NSCLC—non-small cell lung cancer; ATM—ataxia telangiectasia mutated.
Table
Table 2. Overview of p21cip1/waf1 regulation by epigenetic erasers.
Table 2. Overview of p21cip1/waf1 regulation by epigenetic erasers.
ErasersEpigenetic MarkExperimental Conditionsp21cip1/waf1 RegulationRef.
TET5hmCGlioma cellsExpression ↑[104]
KDM1A/LSD1H3K4/H3K9meRenal cells carcinoma and gliomaRegulates p21cip1/waf1 via demethylation of histone and non-histone targets[100,101]
HDACHistone deacetylationMultiple myeloma and NSCLCExpression ↑[105,106]
TET—ten-eleven translocation; KDM1A/LSD1—lysine-specific (histone) demethylase 1; HDAC—histone deacetylases; 5hmC—5-hydroxymethylcytosine; H3K4/H3K9me—histone H3 lysine 4/histone H3 lysine 9 methylation; NSCLC—non-small cell lung cancer.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ocker, M.; Al Bitar, S.; Monteiro, A.C.; Gali-Muhtasib, H.; Schneider-Stock, R. Epigenetic Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 in Human Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091343

AMA Style

Ocker M, Al Bitar S, Monteiro AC, Gali-Muhtasib H, Schneider-Stock R. Epigenetic Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 in Human Cancer. Cancers. 2019; 11(9):1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ocker, Matthias, Samar Al Bitar, Ana Carolina Monteiro, Hala Gali-Muhtasib, and Regine Schneider-Stock. 2019. "Epigenetic Regulation of p21cip1/waf1 in Human Cancer" Cancers 11, no. 9: 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop