Next Article in Journal
Micromachined Tools Using Acoustic Wave Triggering for the Interaction with the Growth of Plant Biological Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Voltage-Driven SnO2-Based H2S Microsensor with Optimized Micro-Heater for Portable Gas Sensor Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Asymmetric Jetting during the Impact of Liquid Drops on Superhydrophobic Concave Surfaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Functional Ophthalmic Materials Using Natural Materials and Gold Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Investigation of the Effect of the Work-Function Variation of a Monolithic 3D Inverter Stacked with MOSFETs

ICT & Robotics Engineering, Semiconductor Convergence Engineering, AISPC Laboratory, and IITC, Hankyong National University, 327 Jungang-ro, Anseong-si 17579, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(9), 1524; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091524
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 11 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NANO KOREA 2022)

Abstract

:
The effect of the work-function variation (WFV) of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) gates on a monolithic 3D inverter (M3DINV) structure is investigated in the current paper. The M3DINV has a structure in which MOSFETs are sequentially stacked. The WFV effect of the top- and bottom-tier gates on the M3DINV is investigated using technology computer-aided design (TCAD) and a Monte-Carlo sampling simulation of TCAD. When the interlayer dielectric thickness (TILD) changes from 5 to 100 nm, electrical parameters, such as the threshold voltage, subthreshold swing, on-current, and off-current of the top-tier N-MOSFET and the parameter changes by the change in gate voltage of the bottom-tier P-MOSFET, are investigated. As TILD decreases below about 30 nm, the means and standard deviations of the electrical parameters rapidly increase. This means that the coupling and its distribution are relatively large in the regime and thus should be well considered for M3D circuit simulation. In addition, due to the increase in standard deviation, the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates was observed to be greater than those of only the top-tier MOSFET gates and only the bottom-tier MOSFET gates.

1. Introduction

In the semiconductor industry, the research on improving transistor performance and power consumption by increasing integration according to the scaling of the transistor has been conducted [1]. As a future alternative technology for the miniaturization of transistors, a monolithic 3-dimensional (M3D) process technology in which a top-tier transistor is sequentially stacked on a bottom-tier transistor has been proposed [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The sequential fabrication of multi-transistor layers, M3D offers power, performance, and cost advantages over through-silicon-via (TSV)-based 3D integrated circuits (3DICs) [10,11]. The continuous scaling of transistors can cause process variations, such as line-edge roughness (LER) [12], random dopant fluctuation (RDF) [13], and work-function variation (WFV) [14,15,16,17,18]. LER is the roughness of the edge of the print-line width. As the channel length of the device decreases to less than nanometers, the LER forms channels of different lengths in the channel-length direction of the device, resulting in an electrical characteristic mismatch. RDF is a phenomenon in which the position and density of impurities randomly change during the ion-implantation process of the device. Even with the same number of dopants, the position and density of the dopants in the channel may vary due to the RDF, which may change the electrical characteristics of the device. Due to the continued scale of transistors, high-k/metal-gate (HK/MG) technology has been introduced to overcome the disadvantages of polysilicon. The work-function value of the metal gate electrode used, such as TiN or TaN, has a different value depending on the orientation of the metal particle. Since the size and orientation of the metal particles are randomly determined, the distribution of work-function in the metal gate changes. The change in the WF of the gate metal causes a change in the threshold voltage (Vth), resulting in a mismatch in the electrical characteristics of the transistor [19]. Research has been conducted on characteristics’ variations due to process variations, such as RDF, WFV, and LER for a single device, such as MOSFETS, FinFETs, and gate-all-around (GAA) FETs used in the latest memory and logic devices [20,21,22], but process variations of M3D devices have not been reported. Therefore, it is necessary to study the process variation of the M3D integrated circuit device. As the interlayer dielectric (ILD) between stacked transistors becomes thinner, an electrical coupling in which a gate voltage change of a bottom-tier transistor affects the current of a top-tier transistor is investigated [23], but an electrical coupling considering the process variation of the M3D device is not investigated. Accordingly, it is necessary to analyze the effect of the WFV distribution, which is one of the process variations of the M3D device, on the electrical coupling between the stacked devices.
In this paper, when the gate voltage of the bottom-tier MOSFET is changed from 0 to 1 V in an M3D inverter (M3DINV) in which an N-MOSFET (NMOS) and a P-MOSFET (PMOS) are stacked, the electrical coupling and electrical parameters of the top-tier transistor are investigated for the following three cases: 1. WFV of top-tier MOSFET gate only; 2. WFV of the bottom-tier MOSFET gate only; and 3. WFV of both top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates. It is investigated through the technology computer-aided design (TCAD) [24] and the Monte-Carlo (MC) sampling simulation of TCAD [25]. Section 2 introduces the method for WFV simulation and Section 3 describes the simulation results for changes in electrical parameters, such as Vth, subthreshold swing (SS), off-current (Ioff), and on-current (Ion) due to the influence of WFV and electrical coupling of transistors according to ILD thickness (TILD). Finally, the conclusion is presented.

2. Structure and Method for Work-Function Variation (WFV) Simulation

Figure 1 shows the device structure of M3DINV in which NMOS and PMOS are stacked. The process and structure of this M3DINV is described in detail in [26]. Figure 1a is a cross-sectional view of the M3DINV. To investigate the change in electrical parameters due to the influence of WFV, the channel length (L), the gate oxide (Tox), and the channel width (W) were set to 30, 1, and 30 nm, respectively. For NMOS, n-type doped concentration in the source and drain region and the lightly doped drain (LDD) region under the spacer were 1021 and 1018 cm−3, respectively, and the p-type doped concentration in the channel region was 1015 cm−3. In order to investigate the change in the electrical parameters of the M3D device with respect to WFV, the simulation was performed using the device simulator TCAD. The gate work-function of the stacked devices was set by the MC sampling method using the TCAD design of experiments (DOE) tool [25], and the change in electrical characteristics due to the WFV effect was investigated. Figure 1b shows a schematic diagram of the WFV of the metal grains in the gates of the top- and the bottom-tier MOSFETs. The gate region in the transistor was divided into several segments of the same size, and for each segment, the work functions (WFs) along the grain orientation were randomly determined according to the probability shown in Table 1. The metal gates of NMOS and PMOS were TiN and MoN, respectively, and Table 1 shows the orientations, probabilities, WFs, and average grain sizes (GSs) of the gate materials of NMOS and PMOS [27,28,29]. The TiNs used as the NMOS gate were 4.6 and 4.4 eV according to the <100> and <111> orientations, respectively; the probabilities of the grain orientations were 60 and 40%, respectively; and the average GS was about 5 nm. The MoNs used as the PMOS gate were 5.0 and 4.4 eV according to the <100> and <111> orientations, respectively; the probabilities of the grain orientations were 60 and 40%, respectively; and the average GS was about 15 nm. Assuming a square grain, the number of grains (N) in the metal gate area (=L × W) was defined as (L/GS) × (W/GS). With N grains, the variation of WF Φg was easily calculated through a binomial distribution model as follows [28]:
Φ g = X 1 N Φ 1   + X 2 N Φ 2   + X 3 N Φ 3 + ·   ·   · + X n N Φ n ,
where Xn is a random variable that represents the number of grains with the WF value of Φn divided into segment regions in the metal gate, and Φn is a randomly designated WF value according to the divided grain regions.
Figure 2 shows the distribution of WF according to the number of grains [28]. The symbols and dotted lines denote reference [28] and the simulation distributions of WF, respectively, and the two distributions show a reasonable agreement within a 10% error. TiN was applied to the NMOS gate metal and MoN was applied to the PMOS gate metal. The mean and standard deviation of the WF distribution of the NMOS metal gate were applied when the number of grains was 36 (= (30/5) × (30/5)), and the mean and standard deviation of the WF distribution of the PMOS metal gate were applied when the number of grains was 4 (= (30/15) × (30/15)). In Figure 2a, the standard deviation increases as the number of grains decreases. This means that the smaller the number of grains, the more affected they are by WFV.
For the MC WFV simulation, according to the flowchart shown in Figure 3, device structure was first created and then current-voltage characteristics were calculated. The left side presented in Figure 3 shows a flowchart for current-voltage characteristics using the TCAD [24]. The device structure including the separation of metal gates with a segmented area was first designed and then the current-voltage characteristics were investigated through the designed device. The right side presented in Figure 3 shows a flowchart for the overall MC WFV simulation of the designed device. The MC WFV simulation started with a TCAD DOE tool [25]. The DOE Internal tool is a process in which the output value changes according to the setting of specified parameters, the input is the mean and standard deviation of the WF, and the output is the WF distribution over all segmented metal regions. The number of simulation samples was first set. Additionally, WF distribution over all segmented metal regions was randomly set using the mean and standard deviation according to the number of grains investigated in Figure 2. Subsequently, the device structure of Figure 1 containing the WF distribution of all the segmented metal regions was generated according to the flowchart on the left in Figure 3. The current-voltage characteristics of the resulting device structure were simulated. The electrical parameters, such as Vth, SS, Ioff, and Ion, were extracted from the current-voltage characteristics. The simulation was repeated for the number of samples. To investigate the WFV effect of the stacked device, the investigation of changes in electrical parameters was performed in the following three cases: (1) considering the WFV effect of the top-tier MOSFET gate only; (2) considering the WFV effect of the bottom-tier MOSFET gate only; and (3) considering the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates. The effect of changing TILD on the electrical coupling of top-tier MOSFET according to the change in the bottom-tier MOSFET gate voltage was investigated.

3. Simulation Results

Figure 4 shows the drain current-gate voltage (IDS-VGS) characteristics of the top-tier NMOS, considering the WFV of both the top- and bottom-tier gates with the method shown in Figure 3, when the gate voltages of the bottom-tier PMOS (VBG) are 0 and 1 V. The black lines denote the distributions of IDS-VGS characteristics considering the WFV effect with more 400 samples, and the green and red triangles denote IDS-VGS characteristics simulated with the average WF values when VBG are 0 and 1 V, respectively. The left and right sides of the y-axis in Figure 4 show logarithmic and linear scales, respectively, which are indicated by the dotted arrows. Due to the impact of WFV, the distributions of IDS-VGS characteristics are observed, and the threshold voltage shift is observed due to the electrical coupling effect caused by a change of VBG.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the distributions of the electrical parameters of the top-tier NMOS with TILD = 10 nm considering the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier gates when VBG = 0 and 1 V, respectively. Figure 7 shows the distributions of the electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V of the top-tier NMOS with TILD = 10 nm considering the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier gates. The histograms denote the distributions of the electrical parameters and electrical parameter changes obtained by MC sampling simulations of 400 samples. The red lines denote the Gaussian distribution fitted from the MC sampling simulation results, and the extracted means and standard deviations are shown in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.
For the three cases where the WFV effect on the top-tier NMOS gate only, the bottom-tier PMOS gate only, and both the top- and bottom-tier NMOS/PMOS gates were considered, the distribution of IDS-VGS characteristics was investigated. The distribution of the electrical parameter changes, such as ΔVth, ΔSS, ΔIoff, and ΔIon in VBG between 0 and 1 V, extracted from the distribution of IDS-VGS characteristics, was investigated according to TILD of 5 to 100 nm. Figure 8 shows the means and standard deviations of electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V according to TILD when the WFV effect of the top-tier NMOS gate was only considered. Figure 9 shows the means and standard deviations of electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V according to TILD when the WFV effect of the bottom-tier PMOS gate was only considered. Figure 10 shows the means and standard deviations of electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V with respect to TILD when the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates was considered. Figure 8a–c and d (Figure 9a–c and d, and Figure 10a–d) show the means and standard deviations of the electrical parameter changes of ΔVth, ΔSS, ΔIoff, and ΔIon, respectively. The black-filled and red, empty squares denote the means and standard deviations of electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V, respectively. In Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, the means and standard deviations of all electrical parameters increase as TILD decreases, and especially when TILD is over about 30 nm, all the electrical parameter changes are almost constant and relatively very small, and thus the electrical coupling [23,30] and its distribution can be ignored. Although the means of the electrical parameter changes are almost the same in all the three case, their standard deviations for the WFV of both the top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates considered were greater than those for the other two cases. The variations induced by different process fluctuations, such WFVs of the top- and bottom-tier gates, can be calculated from the following equation [31]:
σ Δ P t o t a l σ 2 Δ P t o p _ g a t e + σ 2 Δ P b o t t o m _ g a t e ,
where σPtotal), σPtop_gate), and σPbottom_gate) are the standard deviations of the electrical parameter changes (ΔPs) of VBG between 0 and 1 V, considering the WFV effect of both the top- and bottom-tier gates as shown in Figure 10, the top-tier NMOS gate only as shown in Figure 8, and the bottom-tier PMOS gate only as shown in Figure 9, respectively. In Figure 10, the blue, empty triangles denote the standard deviations of electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V, calculated from Equation (2). The calculated standard deviations of electrical parameter changes (blue, empty triangles) show a reasonable agreement with the simulated ones (red, empty triangles) within a 10% error. The means and the measured and calculated standard deviations, shown in Figure 10, are summarized in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

The WFV effect of MOSFET gates in an M3DINV structure stacked sequentially with an NMOS and a PMOS was investigated using the TCAD and MC sampling simulation of TCAD. The current-voltage characteristics of the top-tier NMOS in the M3DINV with TILD from 5 to 100 nm were simulated when VBG was 0 and 1 V, and then the electrical parameters, such as Vth, SS, Ioff, and Ion, and their changes (ΔVth, ΔSS, ΔIoff, and ΔIon) by VBG between 0 and 1 V were extracted. Electrical parameters and their changes in the top-tier NMOS were also investigated for the three cases where the WFV effect on the top-tier NMOS gate only, the bottom-tier PMOS gate only, and both the top- and bottom-tier NMOS/PMOS gates were considered. In all three cases, as TILD decreased below about 30nm, the means and standard deviations according to the electrical parameter changes rapidly increased. Because the coupling and its distribution were relatively large in the regime, they must be well considered for a circuit simulation and new techniques required. Although the means of the electrical parameter changes at TILD ≥ 30 nm were almost the same in all the three case, the results should be considered for the circuit simulation because their standard deviations for the WFV of both the top- and bottom-tier MOSFET gates considered are greater than those for the other two cases. However, in this paper, only the distribution of the electrical parameter changes due to the WFV effect of the MOSFET gates among process variations in M3DINV were investigated. In addition to WFV, it is necessary to investigate the distribution of the electrical parameter changes in M3D devices due to overall process deviations, such as LER and RDF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.J.L. and Y.S.Y.; methodology, G.J.L. and Y.S.Y.; investigation, G.J.L. and Y.S.Y.; data curation, G.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.J.L. and Y.S.Y.; writing—review and editing, G.J.L. and Y.S.Y.; supervision, Y.S.Y.; project administration, Y.S.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through NRF of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1A2C1085295).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by IDEC (EDA tool).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS) Report. 2022. Available online: https://irds.ieee.org (accessed on 22 August 2022).
  2. Batude, P.; Vinet, M.; Pouydebasque, A.; Le Royer, C.; Previtali, B.; Tabone, C.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Sanchez, L.; Baud, L.; Carron, V.; et al. 3D Monolithic Integration. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 15–18 May 2011; pp. 2233–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tarakji, A.H.; Chaudhary, N. Potential of a Novel Double-Sided Fully-Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator CMOS Architecture for the next-Generation Monolithic 3D CPUs and SOCs. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S), San Jose, CA, USA, 14–17 October 2019; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Or-Bach, Z. Practical Process Flows for Monolithic 3D. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S), Monterey, CA, USA, 7–10 October 2013; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Radu, I.; Nguyen, B.-Y.; Gaudin, G.; Mazure, C. 3D Monolithic Integration: Stacking Technology and Applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on IC Design & Technology (ICICDT), Leuven, Belgium, 1–3 June 2015; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Panth, S.; Samal, S.; Yu, Y.S.; Lim, S.K. Design Challenges and Solutions for Ultra-High-Density Monolithic 3D ICs. In Proceedings of the 2014 SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S), Millbrae, CA, USA, 6–9 October 2014; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fitzgerald, E.A.; Yoon, S.F.; Tan, C.S.; Palacios, T.; Zhou, X.; Peh, L.S.; Boon, C.C.; Kohen, D.A.; Lee, K.H.; Liu, Z.H.; et al. Monolithic 3D Integration in a CMOS Process Flow. In Proceedings of the 2014 SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S), Millbrae, CA, USA, 6–9 October 2014; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santos, C.; Vivet, P.; Thuries, S.; Billoint, O.; Colonna, J.-P.; Coudrain, P.; Wang, L. Thermal Performance of CoolCubeTM Monolithic and TSV-Based 3D Integration Processes. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), Millbrae, CA, USA, 6–9 October 2014; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miketic, I.; Salman, E. Power and Data Integrity in Monolithic 3D Integrated SIMON Core. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Sapporo, Japan, 26–29 May 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nayak, D.K.; Banna, S.; Samal, S.K.; Lim, S.K. Power, Performance, and Cost Comparisons of Monolithic 3D ICs and TSV-Based 3D ICs. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S), Rohnert Park, CA, USA, 5–8 October 2015; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, Z. Impact of Line Edge Roughness and Linewidth Roughness on Critical Dimension Variation. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), Zhangjiajie, China, 25–27 May 2012; pp. 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, G.J.; Ahn, T.J.; Lim, S.K.; Yu, Y.S. Investigation into electrical characteristics of logic circuit consisting of modularized monolithic 3D inverter unit cell. J. Inf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 2022, 20, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ohtou, T.; Sugii, N.; Hiramoto, T. Impact of Parameter Variations and Random Dopant Fluctuations on Short-Channel Fully Depleted SOI MOSFETs With Extremely Thin BOX. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2007, 28, 740–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dubey, A.K.; Pal, P.K.; Varshney, V.; Kumar, A.; Nagaria, R.K. Impact of Channel Doping Fluctuation and Metal Gate Work Function Variation in FD-SOI MOSFET for 5nm BOX Thickness. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology, Allahabad, India, 6–8 December 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dhiman, G.; Pourush, R. Analysis on Variations of Metal Gate Work Function on Junctionless Double Gate MOSFET with High-k Spacers. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Communication, Control and Computing (ICONC3), Lakshmangarh, India, 21–22 February 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kannaujiya, A.; Kannaujiya, S.; Chauhan, R.K. Effect of Gate Metal Work Function on Leakage Current in Single Pocket FDSOI 28 nm Transistor. In Proceedings of the 2021 10th IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), Bhopal, India, 18–19 June 2021; pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, V.P.-H.; Chiu, P.-C.; Lu, Y.-C. Impact of Work Function Variation, Line-Edge Roughness, and Ferroelectric Properties Variation on Negative Capacitance FETs. IEEE J. Electron. Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghosh, S.; Rajan, L. Simulation Based Investigation of Sensing Current with Channel Length and Work Function Variation to Realize Hydrogen Detection. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT), Kottayam, India, 13–14 February 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dadgour, H.F.; Endo, K.; De, V.K.; Banerjee, K. Grain-Orientation Induced Work Function Variation in Nanoscale Metal-Gate Transistors—Part II: Implications for Process, Device, and Circuit Design. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2010, 57, 2515–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nam, H.; Shin, C. Impact of Current Flow Shape in Tapered (Versus Rectangular) FinFET on Threshold Voltage Variation Induced by Work-Function Variation. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2014, 61, 2007–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nam, H.; Lee, Y.; Park, J.-D.; Shin, C. Study of Work-Function Variation in High-κ /Metal-Gate Gate-All-Around Nanowire MOSFET. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2016, 63, 3338–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, Y.; Shin, C. Impact of Equivalent Oxide Thickness on Threshold Voltage Variation Induced by Work-Function Variation in Multigate Devices. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2017, 64, 2452–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, Y.S.; Panth, S.; Lim, S.K. Electrical Coupling of Monolithic 3-D Inverters. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2016, 63, 3346–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Silvaco Int. ATLAS Ver. 5.32.1. R Manual; Silvaco Int.: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Silvaco Int. DeckBuild Ver. 5.2.14.R Manual; Silvaco Int.: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ahn, T.J.; Perumal, R.; Lim, S.K.; Yu, Y.S. Parameter Extraction and Power/Performance Analysis of Monolithic 3-D Inverter (M3INV). IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2019, 66, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rasouli, S.H.; Endo, K.; Banerjee, K. Work-Function Variation Induced Fluctuation in Bias-Temperature-Instability Characteristics of Emerging Metal-Gate Devices and Implications for Digital Design. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), San Jose, CA, USA, 7–11 November 2010; pp. 714–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shin, C. Introduction: Barriers Preventing CMOS Device Technology from Moving Forward. In Variation-Aware Advanced CMOS Devices and SRAM; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohmori, K.; Matsuki, T.; Ishikawa, D.; Morooka, T.; Aminaka, T.; Sugita, Y.; Chikyow, T.; Shiraishi, K.; Nara, Y.; Yamada, K. Impact of Additional Factors in Threshold Voltage Variability of Metal/High-k Gate Stacks and Its Reduction by Controlling Crystalline Structure and Grain Size in the Metal Gates. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–17 December 2008; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahn, T.J.; Yu, Y.S. Electrical Coupling of Monolithic 3D Inverters (M3INVs): MOSFET and Junctionless FET. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Shi, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of Process Fluctuations on Reconfigurable Silicon Nanowire Transistor. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2021, 68, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Cross-section view of monolithic 3D-inverter (M3D-INV) and (b) work-function variation (WFV) of the metal grain on the gate of the top- or bottom-tier metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). Here, monolithic inter-tier via (MIV) is shown. The dielectric material of inter-layer dielectric (ILD) is SiO2.
Figure 1. (a) Cross-section view of monolithic 3D-inverter (M3D-INV) and (b) work-function variation (WFV) of the metal grain on the gate of the top- or bottom-tier metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). Here, monolithic inter-tier via (MIV) is shown. The dielectric material of inter-layer dielectric (ILD) is SiO2.
Micromachines 13 01524 g001
Figure 2. Work-function distributions in metal gates of each tier MOSFET. (a) TiN metal gate with the grain size of 5 nm of the top-tier NMOSFET (NMOS) and (b) MoN metal gate with the grain size of 15 nm of the bottom-tier PMOSFET (PMOS).
Figure 2. Work-function distributions in metal gates of each tier MOSFET. (a) TiN metal gate with the grain size of 5 nm of the top-tier NMOSFET (NMOS) and (b) MoN metal gate with the grain size of 15 nm of the bottom-tier PMOSFET (PMOS).
Micromachines 13 01524 g002
Figure 3. WFV simulation flowchart using technology computer-aided design (TCAD).
Figure 3. WFV simulation flowchart using technology computer-aided design (TCAD).
Micromachines 13 01524 g003
Figure 4. Ids-Vgs characteristics of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV of both the top- and bottom-tier gates.
Figure 4. Ids-Vgs characteristics of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV of both the top- and bottom-tier gates.
Micromachines 13 01524 g004
Figure 5. The distributions of the electrical parameters of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates when VBG = 0 V. (a) Vth, (b) SS, (c) Ioff, and (d) Ion.
Figure 5. The distributions of the electrical parameters of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates when VBG = 0 V. (a) Vth, (b) SS, (c) Ioff, and (d) Ion.
Micromachines 13 01524 g005
Figure 6. The distributions of the electrical parameters of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates when VBG = 1 V. (a) Vth, (b) SS, (c) Ioff, and (d) Ion.
Figure 6. The distributions of the electrical parameters of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates when VBG = 1 V. (a) Vth, (b) SS, (c) Ioff, and (d) Ion.
Micromachines 13 01524 g006
Figure 7. The distributions of the electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Figure 7. The distributions of the electrical parameter changes by VBG between 0 and 1 V of the top-tier NMOS considering the WFV effects of both the top- and bottom-tier gates. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Micromachines 13 01524 g007aMicromachines 13 01524 g007b
Figure 8. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering WFV on the TiN gate of the toptier NMOS only. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Figure 8. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering WFV on the TiN gate of the toptier NMOS only. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Micromachines 13 01524 g008
Figure 9. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering WFV on the MoN gate of the bottom-tier PMOS only. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Figure 9. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering WFV on the MoN gate of the bottom-tier PMOS only. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Micromachines 13 01524 g009aMicromachines 13 01524 g009b
Figure 10. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering both WFVs on the TiN gate of top-tier NMOS and the MoN gate of bottom-tier PMOS. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Figure 10. Means (left axis) and standard deviations (right axis) considering both WFVs on the TiN gate of top-tier NMOS and the MoN gate of bottom-tier PMOS. (a) ΔVth, (b) ΔSS, (c) ΔIoff, and (d) ΔIon.
Micromachines 13 01524 g010
Table 1. Physical properties of gate materials used for NMOSFET and PMOSFET (orientation, probability, work function, and average grain size).
Table 1. Physical properties of gate materials used for NMOSFET and PMOSFET (orientation, probability, work function, and average grain size).
Device TypeMaterialOrientationProbability [%]WF [eV]Average Grain Size [nm]
N-typeTiN<100>604.64.3 [27,29]
<111>404.4
P-typeMoN<110>605.017 [27]
<112>404.4
Table 2. Means and standard deviations considering both WFVs on the TiN gate of top-tier NMOS and the MoN gate of bottom-tier PMOS. Here, σ* and σ** represent the measured and calculated standard deviations, respectively.
Table 2. Means and standard deviations considering both WFVs on the TiN gate of top-tier NMOS and the MoN gate of bottom-tier PMOS. Here, σ* and σ** represent the measured and calculated standard deviations, respectively.
TILD
[nm]
ΔVth [V]ΔSS [mV/dec]ΔIoff [A]ΔIon [A]
Meanσ*σ**Meanσ*σ**Meanσ*σ**Meanσ*σ**
50.231440.001870.00175169.170.027960.029021.56 × 10−63.61 × 10−73.65 × 10−72.65 × 10−52.73 × 10−72.61 × 10−7
70.175230.001580.001581.840.017510.018045.10 × 10−71.55 × 10−71.55 × 10−72.03 × 10−56.99 × 10−89.05 × 10−8
100.128560.001350.0013434.920.007980.008451.25 × 10−74.54 × 10−84.37 × 10−81.49 × 10−53.81 × 10−83.01 × 10−8
200.065254.13 × 10−44.19 × 10−49.979.22 × 10−47.62 × 10−41.64 × 10−83.43 × 10−92.91 × 10−97.61 × 10−62.08 × 10−81.69 × 10−8
300.040912.06 × 10−42.30 × 10−45.913.71 × 10−43.42 × 10−49.73 × 10−91.47 × 10−91.34 × 10−94.84 × 10−61.41 × 10−81.56 × 10−8
500.021051.07 × 10−41.12 × 10−43.491.87 × 10−42.01 × 10−47.01 × 10−98.39 × 10−108.33 × 10−102.60 × 10−69.42 × 10−91.31 × 10−8
800.011296.08 × 10−55.53 x10−52.231.43 × 10−41.21 × 10−45.46 × 10−96.49 × 10−105.43 × 10−101.38 × 10−63.43 × 10−93.30 × 10−9
1000.008284.24 × 10−54.43 × 10−51.771.17 × 10−41.17 × 10−44.71 × 10−95.37 × 10−105.27 × 10−101.01 × 10−62.47 × 10−92.53 × 10−9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, G.J.; Yu, Y.S. An Investigation of the Effect of the Work-Function Variation of a Monolithic 3D Inverter Stacked with MOSFETs. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091524

AMA Style

Lee GJ, Yu YS. An Investigation of the Effect of the Work-Function Variation of a Monolithic 3D Inverter Stacked with MOSFETs. Micromachines. 2022; 13(9):1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Geun Jae, and Yun Seop Yu. 2022. "An Investigation of the Effect of the Work-Function Variation of a Monolithic 3D Inverter Stacked with MOSFETs" Micromachines 13, no. 9: 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13091524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop