Learning of Power Technologies in China: Staged Dynamic Two-Factor Modeling and Empirical Evidence
AbstractCost evolution has an important influence on the commercialization and large-scale application of power technology. Many researchers have analyzed the quantitative relationship between the cost of power technology and its influencing factors while establishing various forms of technical learning curve models. In this paper, we focus on the positive effects of the policy on research and development (R&D) learning by summarizing and comparing four energy technology cost models based on learning curves. We explore the influencing factors and dynamic change paths of power technology costs. The paper establishes a multi-stage dynamic two-factor learning curve model based on cumulative R&D investment and the installed capacity. This work presents the structural changes of the influencing factors at various stages. Causality analysis and econometric estimation of learning curves are performed on wind power and other power technologies. The conclusion demonstrates that a “learn by researching” approach had led to cost reduction of wind power to date, but, in the long term, the effect of “learn by doing” is greater than that of “learn by researching” when R&D learning is saturated. Finally, the paper forecasts the learning rates and the cost trends of the main power technologies in China. The work presented in this study has implications on power technology development and energy policy in China. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Xu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wang, J. Learning of Power Technologies in China: Staged Dynamic Two-Factor Modeling and Empirical Evidence. Sustainability 2017, 9, 861.
Xu Y, Yuan J, Wang J. Learning of Power Technologies in China: Staged Dynamic Two-Factor Modeling and Empirical Evidence. Sustainability. 2017; 9(5):861.Chicago/Turabian Style
Xu, Yan; Yuan, Jiahai; Wang, Jianxiu. 2017. "Learning of Power Technologies in China: Staged Dynamic Two-Factor Modeling and Empirical Evidence." Sustainability 9, no. 5: 861.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.