Sustainability 2012, 4(10), 2377-2398; doi:10.3390/su4102377
Article

Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 May 2012; in revised form: 24 August 2012 / Accepted: 12 September 2012 / Published: 27 September 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Nuclear Energy)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [2747 KB, uploaded 27 September 2012 15:54 CEST]
Abstract: The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of stages that nuclear fuel materials go through in a cradle to grave framework. The Once Through Cycle (OTC) is the current fuel cycle implemented in the United States; in which an appropriate form of the fuel is irradiated through a nuclear reactor only once before it is disposed of as waste. The discharged fuel contains materials that can be suitable for use as fuel. Thus, different types of fuel recycling technologies may be introduced in order to more fully utilize the energy potential of the fuel, or reduce the environmental impacts and proliferation concerns about the discarded fuel materials. Nuclear fuel cycle systems analysis is applied in this paper to attain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of fuel cycle alternatives. Through the use of the nuclear fuel cycle analysis code CAFCA (Code for Advanced Fuel Cycle Analysis), the impact of a number of recycling technologies and the associated fuel cycle options is explored in the context of the U.S. energy scenario over 100 years. Particular focus is given to the quantification of Uranium utilization, the amount of Transuranic Material (TRU) generated and the economics of the different options compared to the base-line case, the OTC option. It is concluded that LWRs and the OTC are likely to dominate the nuclear energy supply system for the period considered due to limitations on availability of TRU to initiate recycling technologies. While the introduction of U-235 initiated fast reactors can accelerate their penetration of the nuclear energy system, their higher capital cost may lead to continued preference for the LWR-OTC cycle.
Keywords: nuclear fuel cycle; analysis; nuclear reactor technologies

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Passerini, S.; Kazimi, M. Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options. Sustainability 2012, 4, 2377-2398.

AMA Style

Passerini S, Kazimi M. Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options. Sustainability. 2012; 4(10):2377-2398.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Passerini, Stefano; Kazimi, Mujid. 2012. "Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options." Sustainability 4, no. 10: 2377-2398.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert