Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Sphere of Prosumerism
Department of Sociology and Business Law, Bologna University, Strada Maggiore, Bologna 45, Italy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 December 2012; in revised form: 21 December 2012 / Accepted: 6 January 2013 / Published: 10 January 2013
Abstract: The term prosumer, first introduced by Toffler in the 1980s, has been developed by sociologists in response to Web 2.0 (the set of technologies that has transformed a predominantly static web into the collaborative medium initially envisaged by Tim Berners-Lee). The phenomena is now understood as a process involving the creation of meanings on the part of the consumer, who re-appropriates spaces that were dominated by institutionalized production, and this extends to the exploitation of consumer creativity on the production side. Recent consumption literature can be re-interpreted through the prosumer lens in order to understand whether prosumers are more creative or alienated in their activities. The peculiar typology of prosumption introduced by Web 2.0 leads us to analyze social capital as a key element in value creation, and to investigate its different online and offline forms. Our analysis then discusses the digital divide and critical consumerism as forms of empowerment impairment.
Keywords: prosumer; consumption; social capital; capitalism; consumerism
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Paltrinieri, R.; Esposti, P.D. Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Sphere of Prosumerism. Future Internet 2013, 5, 21-33.
Paltrinieri R, Esposti PD. Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Sphere of Prosumerism. Future Internet. 2013; 5(1):21-33.
Paltrinieri, Roberta; Esposti, Piergiorgio D. 2013. "Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion in the Sphere of Prosumerism." Future Internet 5, no. 1: 21-33.