Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Viruses 2012, 4(11), 2578-2597; doi:10.3390/v4112578
Review

Silencing and Innate Immunity in Plant Defense Against Viral and Non-Viral Pathogens

 and *
Received: 27 September 2012; in revised form: 20 October 2012 / Accepted: 24 October 2012 / Published: 29 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Viruses)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [451 KB, uploaded 29 October 2012]   |   Browse Figure
Abstract: The frontline of plant defense against non-viral pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and oomycetes is provided by transmembrane pattern recognition receptors that detect conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), leading to pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). To counteract this innate defense, pathogens deploy effector proteins with a primary function to suppress PTI. In specific cases, plants have evolved intracellular resistance (R) proteins detecting isolate-specific pathogen effectors, leading to effector-triggered immunity (ETI), an amplified version of PTI, often associated with hypersensitive response (HR) and programmed cell death (PCD). In the case of plant viruses, no conserved PAMP was identified so far and the primary plant defense is thought to be based mainly on RNA silencing, an evolutionary conserved, sequence-specific mechanism that regulates gene expression and chromatin states and represses invasive nucleic acids such as transposons. Endogenous silencing pathways generate 21-24 nt small (s)RNAs, miRNAs and short interfering (si)RNAs, that repress genes post-transcriptionally and/or transcriptionally. Four distinct Dicer-like (DCL) proteins, which normally produce endogenous miRNAs and siRNAs, all contribute to the biogenesis of viral siRNAs in infected plants. Growing evidence indicates that RNA silencing also contributes to plant defense against non-viral pathogens. Conversely, PTI-based innate responses may contribute to antiviral defense. Intracellular R proteins of the same NB-LRR family are able to recognize both non-viral effectors and avirulence (Avr) proteins of RNA viruses, and, as a result, trigger HR and PCD in virus-resistant hosts. In some cases, viral Avr proteins also function as silencing suppressors. We hypothesize that RNA silencing and innate immunity (PTI and ETI) function in concert to fight plant viruses. Viruses counteract this dual defense by effectors that suppress both PTI-/ETI-based innate responses and RNA silencing to establish successful infection.
Keywords: silencing; innate immunity; pattern-triggered immunity; effector-triggered immunity; siRNA; miRNA; plant antiviral defense; Cauliflower mosaic virus; silencing suppressor; avirulence protein silencing; innate immunity; pattern-triggered immunity; effector-triggered immunity; siRNA; miRNA; plant antiviral defense; Cauliflower mosaic virus; silencing suppressor; avirulence protein
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Zvereva, A.S.; Pooggin, M.M. Silencing and Innate Immunity in Plant Defense Against Viral and Non-Viral Pathogens. Viruses 2012, 4, 2578-2597.

AMA Style

Zvereva AS, Pooggin MM. Silencing and Innate Immunity in Plant Defense Against Viral and Non-Viral Pathogens. Viruses. 2012; 4(11):2578-2597.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zvereva, Anna S.; Pooggin, Mikhail M. 2012. "Silencing and Innate Immunity in Plant Defense Against Viral and Non-Viral Pathogens." Viruses 4, no. 11: 2578-2597.



Viruses EISSN 1999-4915 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert