Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University of Luebeck, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Klinikum Bielefeld-Mitte, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 August 2009; in revised form: 24 September 2009 / Accepted: 25 September 2009 / Published: 30 September 2009
Abstract: Bridging nerve gaps with suitable grafts is a major clinical problem. The autologous nerve graft is considered to be the gold standard, providing the best functional results; however, donor site morbidity is still a major disadvantage. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems of autologous nerve grafts with artificial nerve tubes, which are “ready-to-use” in almost every situation. A wide range of materials have been used in animal models but only few have been applied to date clinically, where biocompatibility is an inevitable prerequisite. This review gives an idea about artificial nerve tubes with special focus on their biocompatibility in animals and humans.
Keywords: nerve tube; nerve repair; biocompatibility; artificial nerve; peripheral nerve
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Stang, F.; Keilhoff, G.; Fansa, H. Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes. Materials 2009, 2, 1480-1507.
Stang F, Keilhoff G, Fansa H. Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes. Materials. 2009; 2(4):1480-1507.
Stang, Felix; Keilhoff, Gerburg; Fansa, Hisham. 2009. "Biocompatibility of Different Nerve Tubes." Materials 2, no. 4: 1480-1507.