Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
A Multilevel Model for Comorbid Outcomes: Obesity and Diabetes in the US
Department of Geography and Centre for Statistics, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, UK
Received: 16 November 2009; Accepted: 21 January 2010 / Published: 27 January 2010
Abstract: Multilevel models are overwhelmingly applied to single health outcomes, but when two or more health conditions are closely related, it is important that contextual variation in their joint prevalence (e.g., variations over different geographic settings) is considered. A multinomial multilevel logit regression approach for analysing joint prevalence is proposed here that includes subject level risk factors (e.g., age, race, education) while also taking account of geographic context. Data from a US population health survey (the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System or BRFSS) are used to illustrate the method, with a six category multinomial outcome defined by diabetic status and weight category (obese, overweight, normal). The influence of geographic context is partly represented by known geographic variables (e.g., county poverty), and partly by a model for latent area influences. In particular, a shared latent variable (common factor) approach is proposed to measure the impact of unobserved area influences on joint weight and diabetes status, with the latent variable being spatially structured to reflect geographic clustering in risk.
Keywords: diabetes; obesity; multilevel; multinomial; latent variable; spatial; poverty
Citations to this Article
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Congdon, P. A Multilevel Model for Comorbid Outcomes: Obesity and Diabetes in the US. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 333-352.
Congdon P. A Multilevel Model for Comorbid Outcomes: Obesity and Diabetes in the US. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010; 7(2):333-352.
Congdon, Peter. 2010. "A Multilevel Model for Comorbid Outcomes: Obesity and Diabetes in the US." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7, no. 2: 333-352.