Tobacco Cessation Quitline Spending in 2005 and 2006: What State-Level Factors Matter?
AbstractTobacco cessation telephone quitlines are an effective population-wide strategy for smoking cessation, but funding for this service varies widely. State-level factors may explain this difference. Data from the 2005 and 2006 North American Quitline Consortium surveys and from publicly available sources were analyzed to identify factors that predict higher levels of per capita quitline funding. The best-fitting multivariate model comprised higher per capita tobacco control funding (2005 p = 0.004, 2006 p=0.000), not securitizing Master Settlement Agreement payments (2005 p = 0.008, 2006 p=0.01), and liberal political ideology (2005 p = 0.002, 2006 p=0.002). Select state-level factors appear to have influenced per capita quitline services funding. These findings can help inform advocates and policymakers as they advocate for quitlines and tobacco control funding.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Keller, P.A.; Beyer, E.J.; Baker, T.B.; Bailey, L.A.; Fiore, M.C. Tobacco Cessation Quitline Spending in 2005 and 2006: What State-Level Factors Matter? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 259-266.
Keller PA, Beyer EJ, Baker TB, Bailey LA, Fiore MC. Tobacco Cessation Quitline Spending in 2005 and 2006: What State-Level Factors Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2009; 6(1):259-266.Chicago/Turabian Style
Keller, Paula A.; Beyer, Eric J.; Baker, Timothy B.; Bailey, Linda A.; Fiore, Michael C. 2009. "Tobacco Cessation Quitline Spending in 2005 and 2006: What State-Level Factors Matter?" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 6, no. 1: 259-266.