Next Article in Journal
Addendum: Mehta et al. Standing Up for Learning: A Pilot Investigation on the Neurocognitive Benefits of Stand-Biased School Desks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(1), 59; doi:10.3390/ijerph13010059
Next Article in Special Issue
Global Asbestos Disaster
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction and Analysis of CO2 Emission in Chongqing for the Protection of Environment and Public Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Australia’s Ongoing Legacy of Asbestos: Significant Challenges Remain Even after the Complete Banning of Asbestos Almost Fifteen Years Ago
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(3), 531;

Trends and the Economic Effect of Asbestos Bans and Decline in Asbestos Consumption and Production Worldwide

NERA Economic Consulting, 1166 Avenue of Americas, New York, NY 10036, USA
NERA Economic Consulting, 200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 950, Miami, FL 33131, USA
NERA Economic Consulting, 360 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601, USA
Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, University of Sydney, Gate 3 Hospital Road, Concord NSW 2139, Australia
World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for Europe, European Centre for Environment and Health, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 February 2018 / Revised: 6 March 2018 / Accepted: 13 March 2018 / Published: 16 March 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1918 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  


Although some countries have reduced asbestos consumption and instituted bans, other countries continue to produce and consume asbestos even as asbestos-related deaths mount and the associated societal costs are high. Asbestos production and consumption has declined globally; the number of bans has increased; and the speed at which countries have tapered off consumption has increased. Using country-level data, we study the economic impact of historical changes in the production and use of asbestos. We compare changes in gross domestic product (GDP) following the enactment of asbestos bans. We do not find any significant effect on GDP following an asbestos ban. In a regional case study, we compare changes in GDP and employment with changes in asbestos production. Regional-level data revealed a temporary employment decline at the local level that was then reversed. View Full-Text
Keywords: asbestos; bans; gross domestic product; employment; mesothelioma asbestos; bans; gross domestic product; employment; mesothelioma

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Allen, L.P.; Baez, J.; Stern, M.E.C.; Takahashi, K.; George, F. Trends and the Economic Effect of Asbestos Bans and Decline in Asbestos Consumption and Production Worldwide. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 531.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top